Новости фразы на немецком гитлера

Воззвание Фюрера к Германскому Народу и Нота Министерства Иностранных Дел Германии Советскому Правительству с приложениями.

"Why We Are Antisemites" - Text of Adolf Hitler's 1920 speech at the Hofbräuhaus

Звук с фразой "Гитлер капут" на немецком языке (мужской голос). Главная» Новости» Цитаты гитлера на немецком. Adolf Hitler beeinflusste die Geschichte des 20. Jahrhunderts auf schreckliche Weise. Doch wie wurde er zum Diktator, der die Welt mit einem verheerenden Krieg und dem Holocaust in eine Katastrophe stürzte? Воззвание Фюрера к Германскому Народу и Нота Министерства Иностранных Дел Германии Советскому Правительству с приложениями. Смотреть онлайн или скачать видео Adolf Hitler: Speech at Krupp Factory in Germany (1935) | British Pathé в MP3, 3GP, WebM, MP4 в HD 720, Full HD 1080, Ultra HD 4K и даже Ultra HD 8К качестве со звуком с YouTube бесплатно по прямой ссылке на компьютер, телефон или планшет без.

Adolf Hitler

речь гитлера на немецком скачать mp3 или слушать онлайн бесплатно на Речь рейхсканцлера А. Гитлера в Рейхстаге 1 сентября 1939 Главная» Новости» Цитаты гитлера на немецком. Немецкий является языком оригинала многих из нижеприведенных цитат, потому что среди немцев было много великих людей. Причем слова, фразы и цитаты использовались немецкой пропагандой не лишь для укрепления воинского духа солдат или «рекламы» известной идеологии. Der Fuerer ist gefallen-Сообщение немецкого радио о смерти Адольфа Гитлера 1 мая 1945 года. и другие mp3 песни этого артиста и похожие треки.

"Why We Are Antisemites" - Text of Adolf Hitler's 1920 speech at the Hofbräuhaus

Доклад 27. Речь 20. Прокламация 01. Вырвавшийся на свободу революционный поток должен быть направлен в надежное русло эволюции. Речь 06. Но кардинально изменить само положение вещей может только эволюция! Прокламация 05. Речь 07.

Мы верим в то, что своей борьбой мы лишь исполняем волю Создателя, наделившего каждое живое существо инстинктом самосохранения. Да будет жить наш народ! Важно только одно — чтобы был наш народ! Речь 28. Но, если мы спасем Германию, мы сделаем самое благое дело в мире. Пусть говорят, что мы не всегда справедливы! Но, если мы спасем Германию, мы устраним величайшую несправедливость в мире.

Пусть говорят, что мы не достаточно нравственны! Но, если наш народ будет спасен, мы возродим истинную нравственность! Речь 19. Речь 01. Я всегда добросовестно старался преобразовать авторитет власти в силу доверия. И теперь я с гордостью могу признать, что подобно тому, как наша национальная социалистическая партия всегда была укоренена в нашем народе, так и теперь мы, уже в качестве правительства, всегда думаем как народ, вместе с народом и о народе! Речь 30.

Речь 02. И в будущем мы будем жить так, чтобы в глазах каждого немца мы по-прежнему оставались порядочными и честными людьми. Речь 26. Наша власть — только та, которую мы нашли и укрепили в сердцах нашего народа. Речь 13. Речь 04. Призыв на выборы 31.

Если ты бросаешь на произвол судьбы одно, тебе придется отказаться и от другого. Такой народ превращается в игрушку для чужеродных сил. Речь 27. Ты силен, когда ты един. Чтобы быть сильным, тебе нужно победить в своем сердце дух классовой вражды и раздора. Нашему народу нужны руководители, обладающие решимостью делать все, что они сочтут правильным перед Богом, миром и собственной совестью. Причем, если понадобиться, и вопреки господствующей на данный момент точке зрения внушаемого большинства.

Умело направляемая воля меньшинства всегда будет брать верх над аморфным безвольным большинством. Речь 05. Речь 12. Эта организация будет построена на идее авторитета, идее руководства снизу доверху.

Jeder hat mich belogen, sogar die SS! Армия мне лжет! Все мне лгут, даже СС! Was Sie da sagen, ist ungeheuerlich. Sie ist ohne Ehre!

And here the state of affairs at the present moment is not such that the outside world would be able to place huge orders with us or offer prospects of an increase in the exchange of goods even if we were to fulfil the most extraordinary conditions that they might lay down. Matters should not be made more complicated than they already are. But Germany cannot be blamed for these two things, and especially not National Socialist Germany. When we assumed power the world economic crisis was worse than it is today. I fear however that I must interpret Mr. Therefore I wish it to be clearly understood that our decision to carry out this plan is unalterable. The reasons which led to that decision were inexorable. And since then I have not been able to discover anything whatsoever that might induce us to discontinue the four years plan. I shall take only one practical example: In carrying out the four years plan our synthetic production of rubber and petrol will necessitate an annual increase in our consumption of coal by a margin of something between 20 and 30 million tons. This means that an extra quota of thousands of coal miners are assured of employment for the rest of their active lives. I must really take the liberty of asking this question: Supposing we abondon [sic] the German four years plan, then what statesman can guarantee me some economic equivalent or other, outside of the Reich, for these thirty million tons of coal? I want bread and work for my people. And certainly I do not wish to have it through the operation of credit guarantees, but through solid and permanent lab our, the products of which I can either exchange for foreign goods or for domestic goods in our internal commercial circulation. If by some manipulation or other Germany were to throw these 20 or 30 million tons of coal annually on the international market for the future, the result would be that the coal exports of other countries would have to decrease. I do not know if a British statesman, for example, could face such a contingency without realizing how serious it would be for his own nation. And yet that is the state of affairs. Germany has an enormous number of men who not only want to work but also to eat. And the standard of living among our people is high. I cannot build the future of the German nation on the assurances of a foreign statesman or on any international help, but only on the real basis of a steady production, for which I must find a market at home or abroad. Perhaps my skepticism in these matters leads me to differ from the British Foreign Secretary in regard to the optimistic tone of his statements. I mean here that if Europe does not awaken to the danger of the Bolshevic infection, then I fear that international commerce will not increase but decrease, despite all the good intentions of individual statesmen. For this commerce is based not only on the undisturbed and guaranteed stability of production in one individual nation but also on the production of all the nations together. One of the first things which is clear in this matter is that every Bolshevic disturbance must necessarily lead to a more or less permanent destruction of orderly production. Therefore my opinion about the future of Europe is, I am sorry to say, not so optimistic as Mr. I am the responsible leader of the German people and must safeguard its interests in this world as well as I can. And therefore I am bound to judge things objectively as I see them. I should not be acquitted before the bar of our history if I neglected something—no matter on what grounds—which is necessary to maintain the existence of this people. I am pleased, and we are all pleased, at every increase that takes place in our foreign trade. But in view of the obscure political situation I shall not neglect anything that is necessary to guarantee the existence of the German people, although other nations may become the victims of the Bolshevic infection. And I must also repudiate the suggestion that this view is the outcome of mere fancy. For the following is certainly true: The British Foreign Secretary opens out theoretical prospects of existence to us, whereas in reality what is happening is totally different. The revolutionizing of Spain, for instance, has driven out 15. Should this revolutionizing of Spain spread to other European countries then these damages would not be lessened but increased. I also am a responsible statesman and I must take such possibilities into account. Therefore it is my unalterable determination so to organize German lab our that it will guarantee the maintenance of my people. Eden may rest assured that we shall utilize every possibility offered us of strengthening our economic relations with other nations, but also that we shall avail ourselves of every possibility to improve and enrich the circulation of our own internal trade. I must ask also whether the grounds for assuming that Germany is pursuing a policy of isolation are to be found in the fact that we have left he League of Nations. If such be the grounds, then I would point out that the Geneva League has never been a real League of peoples. A number of great nations do not belong to it or have left it. And nobody has on this account asserted that they were following a policy of isolation. I think therefore that on this point Mr. Eden misunderstands our intentions and views. For nothing is farther from our wishes than to break off or weaken our political or economic relations with other nations. I have already tried to contribute towards bringing about a good understanding in Europe and I have often given, especially to the British people and their Government, assurance of how ardently we wish for a sincere and cordial cooperation with them. I admit that on one point there is a wide difference between the views of the British Foreign Secretary and our views; and here it seems to me that this is a gap which cannot be filled up. Eden declares that under no circumstances does the British Government wish to see Europe torn into two halves. Unfortunately, this desire for unity has not hitherto been declared or listened to. And now the desire is an illusion. For the fact is that the division into two halves, not only of Europe but also of the whole world, is an accomplished fact. It is to be regretted that the British Government did not adopt its present attitude at an earlier date, that under all circumstances a division of Europe must be avoided; for then the Treaty of Versailles would not have been entered into. This Treaty brought in the first division of Europe, namely a division of the nations into victors on the one side and vanquished on the other, the latter nations being outlawed. Through this division of Europe nobody suffered more than the German people. That this division was wiped out, so far as concerns Germany, is essentially due to the National Socialist Revolution and this brings some credit to myself. The second division has been brought about by the proclamation of the Bolshevic doctrine, an integral feature of which is that they do not confine it to one nation but try to impose it on all the nations. Here it is not a question of a special form of national life in Russia but of the Bolshevic demand for a world revolution. If Mr. Eden does not look at Bolshevism as we look at it, that may have something to do with the position of Great Britain and also with some happenings that are unknown to us. But I believe that nobody will question the sincerity of our opinions on this matter, for they are not based merely on abstract theory. For Mr. Eden Bolshevism is perhaps a thing which has its seat in Moscow, but for us in Germany this Bolshevism is a pestilence against which we have had to struggle at the cost of much bloodshed. It is a pestilence which tried to turn our country into the same kind of desert as is now the case in Spain; for the habit of murdering hostages began here, in the form in which we now see it in Spain. National Socialism did not try to come to grips with Bolshevism in Russia, but the Jewish international Bolshevics in Moscow have tried to introduce their system into Germany and are still trying to do so. Against this attempt we have waged a bitter struggle, not only in defence of our own civilization but in defence of European civilization as a whole. In January and February of the year 1933, when the last decisive struggle against this barbarism was being fought out in Germany, had Germany been defeated in that struggle and had the Bolshevic field of destruction and death extended over Central Europe, then perhaps a different opinion would have arisen on the banks of the Thames as to the nature of this terrible menace to humanity. For since it is said that England must be defended on the frontier of the Rhine she would then have found herself in close contact with that harmless democratic world of Moscow, whose innocence they are always trying to impress upon us. Here I should like to state the following once again: — The teaching of Bolshevism is that there must be a world revolution, which would mean world-destruction. If such a doctrine were accepted and given equal rights with other teachings in Europe, this would mean that Europe would be delivered over to it. As far as Germany itself is concerned, let there be no doubts on the following points: — 1 We look on Bolshevism as a world peril for which there must be no toleration. It is in accordance with this attitude of ours that we should avoid close contact with the carriers of these poisonous bacilli. And that is also the reason why we do not want to have any closer relations with them beyond the necessary political and commercial relations; for if we went beyond these we might thereby run the risk of closing the eyes of our people to the danger itself. I consider Bolshevism the most malignant poison that can be given to a people. And therefore I do not want my own people to come into contact with this teaching. As a citizen of this nation I myself shall not do what I should have to condemn my fellow-citizens for doing. I demand from every German workman that he shall not have any relations with these international mischief-makers and he shall never see me clinking glasses or rubbing shoulders with them. Moreover, any further treaty connections with the present Bolshevic Russia would be completely worthless for us. It is out of the question to think that National Socialist Germany should ever be bound to protect Bolshevism or that we, on our side, should ever agree to accept the assistance of a Bolshevic State. For I fear that the moment any nation should agree to accept such assistance, it would thereby seal its own doom. I must also say here that I do not accept the opinion which holds that in the moment of peril the League of nations could come to the rescue of the member States and hold them up by the arms, as it were. Eden stated in his last address that deeds and not speeches are what matters. On that point I should like to call attention to the fact that up to now the outstanding feature of the League of Nations has been talk rather than action. There was one exception and in that case it would probably have been better to have been content with talk. In this one case, as might have been foreseen, action was fruitless. Hence, just as I have been forced by economic circumstances to depend on our own resources principally for the maintenance of my people, so also I have been forced in the political sphere. And we ourselves are not to blame for that. Three times I have made concrete offers for armament restriction or at least armament limitation. These offers were rejected. In this connection I may recall the fact that the greatest offer which I then made was that Germany and France together should reduce their standing armies to 300,000 men; that Germany, Great Britain and France, should bring down their air force to parity and that Germany and Great Britain should conclude a naval agreement. Only the last offer was accepted and it was the only contribution in the world to a real limitation of armaments. The other German proposals were either flatly refused or were answered by the conclusion of those alliances which gave Central Europe to Soviet Russia as the field of play for its gigantic forces. Eden speaks of German armaments and expects a limitation of these armaments. We ourselves proposed this limitation long ago. But it had no effect because, instead of accepting our proposal, treaties were made whereby the greatest military power in the world was, according to the terms of the treaties and in fact, introduced into Central Europe. In speaking of armaments it would be well to mention in the first instance the armaments possessed by that Power which sets the standard for the armaments of all others. Eden believes that in the future all States should possess only the armament which is necessary for their de fence. I do not know whether and how far Mr. Eden has sounded Moscow on the question of carrying that excellent idea into effect, and I do not know what assurances they have given from that quarter. I think however that I ought to put forward one point in this connection. Each nation has the right to judge this for itself, and it alone has the right. If therefore Great Britain today decides for herself on the extent of her armaments everybody in Germany will understand her action; for we can only think of London alone as being competent to decide on what is necessary for the protection of the British Empire. On the other hand I should like to insist that the estimate of our protective needs, and thus of the armament that is necessary for the de fence of our people, is within our own competency and can be decided only in Berlin. I believe that the general recognition of these principles will not render conditions more difficult but will help to release tension. Anyhow Germany is pleased at having found friends in Italy and Japan who hold the same views as ourselves and we should be still more pleased if these convictions were widespread in Europe. Therefore nobody welcomed more cordially than we did the manifest lessening of tension in the Mediterranean, brought about by the Anglo-Italian agreement. We believe that this will first of all lead to an understanding which may put a stop to, or at least limit, the catastrophe from which poor Spain is suffering. Germany has no interests in that country except the care of those commercial relations which Mr. Eden himself declares to be so important and useful. Our sympathies with General Franco and his Government are in the first place of a general nature and, secondly, they arise from a hope that the consolidation of a real National Spain may lead to a strengthening of economic possibilities in Europe. We are ready to do everything which in any way may contribute towards the restoration of order in Spain. But I think that the following considerations should not be left out of account: — During the last hundred years a number of new nations have been created in Europe which formerly, because of their disunion and weakness, were of only small economic importance and of no political importance at all. Through the establishment of these new States new tensions have naturally arisen. True statesmanship however must face realities and not shirk them. The Italian nation and the new Italian State are realities. The German nation and the German Reich are likewise realities. And for my my own fellow citizens I should like to state that the Polish nation and the Polish State have also become realities. Also in the Balkans nations have reawakened and have built their own States. The people who belong to those States want to live and they will live. The unreasonable division of the world into nations that have and nations that have not will not remove or solve that problem, no more than the internal social problems of the nations can be simply solved through more or less clever phrases. For thousands of years the nations asserted their vital claims by the use of power. If in our time some other institution is to take the place of this power for the purpose or regulating relations between the peoples, then it must take account of natural vital claims and decide accordingly. It is the task of the League of Nations only to guarantee the existing state of the world and to safeguard it for all time, then we might just as well entrust it with the task of regulating the ebb and flow of the tides or directing the Gulf Stream into a definite course for the future. But the League of Nations will not be able to do the one or the other. The continuance of its existence will in the long run depend on the extent to which it realize that the necessary reforms which concern international relations must be carefully considered and put into practice. The German people once built up a colonial Empire without robbing anyone and without violating any treaty. And they did so without any war. That colonial Empire was taken away from us. And the grounds on which it was sought to excuse this act are not tenable. First: It was said that the natives did not want to belong to Germany. Who asked them if they wished to belong to some other Power? And when were these natives ever asked if they had been contented with the Power that formerly ruled them? Second: It is stated that the colonies were not administered properly by the Germans. Now, Germany had these colonies only for a few decades. Great sacrifices were made in building them up and they were in a process of development which would have led to quite different results than in 1914. But anyhow the colonies had been so developed by us that other people considered it worth while to engage in a sanguinary struggle for the purpose of taking them from us. Third: It is said that they are of no real value. If that is the case then they can be of no value to other States also. And so it is difficult to see why they keep them.

Among our people there are millions and millions of persons living today for whom this law has become clear and intelligible. What individual seers and the still unspoiled natures of our forefathers saw by direct perception has now become a subject of scientific research in Germany. And I can prophesy here that, just as the knowledge that the earth moves around the sun led to a revolutionary alternation in the general world-picture, so the blood-and-race doctrine of the National Socialist Movement will bring about a revolutionary change in our knowledge and therewith a radical reconstruction of the picture which human history gives us of the past and will also change the course of that history in the future. And this will not lead to an estrangement between the nations; but, on the contrary, it will bring about for the first time a real understanding of one another. At the same time, however, it will prevent the Jewish people from intruding themselves among all the other nations as elements of internal disruption, under the mask of honest world-citizens, and thus gaining power over these nations. We feel convinced that the consequences of this really revolutionizing vision of truth will bring about a radical transformation in German life. For the first time in our history, The German people have found the way to a higher unity than they ever had before; and that is due to the compelling attraction of this inner feeling. Innumerable prejudices have been broken down, many barriers have been overthrown as unreasonable, evil traditions have been wiped out and antiquated symbols shown to be meaningless. From that chaos of disunion which had been caused by tribal, dynastic, philosophical, religious and political strife, the German nation has arisen and has unfurled the banner of a reunion which symbolically announces, not a political triumph, but the triumph of the racial principle. For the past four-and-a-half years German legislation has upheld and enforced this idea. Just as on January 30th, 1933, a state of affairs already in existence was legalized by the fact that I was entrusted with the chancellorship, whereby the party whose supremacy in Germany had then become unquestionable was not authorized to take over the government of the Reich and mould the future destiny of Germany; so this German legislation that has been in force for the past four years was only the legal sanction which gave jurisdiction and binding force to an idea that had already been clearly formulated and promulgated by the party. When the German community, based on the racial blood-bond, became realized in the German State we all felt that this would remain one of the finest moments to be remembered during our lives. Like a blast of springtime it passed over Germany four years ago. The fighting forces of our movement who for many years had defended the banner of the Hooked Cross against the superior forces of the enemy, and had carried it steadily forward for a long fourteen years, now planted it firmly in the soil of the new Reich. Within a few weeks the political debris and the social prejudices which had been accumulating through a thousand years of German history were removed and cleared away. May we not speak of a revolution when the chaotic conditions brought about by parliamentary-democracy disappear in less than three months and a regime of order and discipline takes their place, and a new energy springs forth from a firmly welded unity and a comprehensive authoritative power such as Germany never before had? So great was the Revolution that its intellectual foundations are not even yet understood but are superficially criticized by our contemporaries. They talk of democracies and dictatorships; but they fail to grasp the fact that in this country a radical transformation has taken place and has produced results which are democratic in the highest sense of the word, if democracy has any meaning at all. With infallible certainty we are steering towards an order of things in which a process of selection will become active in the political leadership of the nation, as it exists throughout the whole of life in general. By this process of selection, which will follow the laws of Nature and the dictates of human reason, those among our people who show the greatest natural ability will be appointed to positions in the political leadership of the nation. In making this selection no consideration will be given to birth or ancestry, name or wealth, but only to the question of whether or not the candidate has a natural vocation for those higher positions of leadership. In this country that principle will have its political counterpart. Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid. And that is no theory. In the present National Socialist Germany it is a reality that is considered by us all as a matter of course. I myself, to whom the people have given their trust and who have been called to be their leader, come from the people. All the millions of German workers know that it is not a foreign dilettante or an international revolutionary apostle who is at the head of the Reich, but a German who has come from their own ranks. And numerous people whose families belong to the peasantry and working classes are now filling prominent positions in this National Socialist State. Some of them actually hold the highest offices in the leadership of the nation, as Cabinet Ministers, Reichsstatthalter and Gauleiter. But National Socialism always bears in mind the interests of the people as a whole and not the interests of one class or another. The National Socialist Revolution has not aimed at turning a privileged class into a class which will have no rights in the future. Its aim has been to grant equal rights to those social strata that hitherto were denied such rights. We have not ruined millions of citizens by degrading them to the level of enslaved workers. Our aim has been to educate slaves to be German citizens. One thing will certainly be quite clear to every German; and this is that revolutions as acts of terror can only be of short duration. If revolutions are not able to produce something new they will end up by devouring the whole of the national patrimony which existed before them. From the assumption of power as an act of force the beneficial work of peace must be promptly developed. But those who abolish classes for the purpose of putting new classes in their place sow the seeds of new revolutions. The bourgeois citizen who has the ruling power in his hands today will become a proletarian if he is banished to Siberia tomorrow and condemned to enforced lab our there. He will then yearn for hisday of deliverance, just as did the proletarian of former times, who now thinks that his turn has come to play the despot. Therefore the National Socialist Revolution never aimed at bringing in one class of the German people and turning out another. One the contrary, our objective has been to make it possible for the whole German people to work, not only in the economic but also in the political field, and to guarantee this possibility by organizing the various classes into one national unit. The National Socialist Movement, however, limits its sphere of internal activity to those individuals who belong to one people and it refuses to allow the members of a foreign race to wield an influence over our political, intellectual, or cultural life. And we refuse to accord to the members of a foreign race any predominant position in our national economic system. In this folk-community, which is based on the bond of blood, and in the results which National Socialism has obtained by making the idea of this community understood among the public, lies the most profound reason for the marvelous success of our Revolution. Confronted with this new and vigorous ideal, all idols and relics of the past which had been upheld by dynastic interests, tribal affiliations and even party interests, now began to lose their glamour. That is why the whole party system of former times completely collapsed in a few weeks, without giving rise to the feeling that something had been lost. They were superseded by a better ideal. A new movement took their place. A reorganization of our people into a national unit that includes all those whose lab our is productive simply pushed aside the old organizations of employers and employees. The symbolic emblems of the recent past, which was a period of disintegration and disability, were banished, not—as in 1918 or 1919—through a resolution voted by a committee appointed to invent a new symbol for the Reich, as if the choice were to depend on the results of a prize competition. Since that day it has become the consecrated symbol of his national resurgence on land and sea and in the air. There could be no more eloquent proof of how profoundly the German people have understood the significance of this change and new development than the manner in which the nation sanctioned our regime at the polls on so many occasions during the years that followed. So, of all those who like to point again and again to the democratic form of government as the institution which is based on the universal will of the people, in contrast to dictatorships, nobody has a better right to speak in the name of the people than I have. Among the results of this phase of the German Revolution I may enumerate the following: — 1 Since that time there is only one trustee of supreme power among the German people and that trustee is the whole people itself. Anyone who compares this state of affairs with the condition of Germany before January 1933 will realize what a tremendous transformation is indicated by these few short statements. But this transformation is only a result that has followed from carrying a fundamental axiom of the National Socialist doctrine into practical effect. This axiom is that the only reasonable meaning and purpose of all human thought and conduct cannot be to create or to maintain structures, organizations or functions made by men, but only to preserve and develop the innate character of the people itself; for Providence has given us this character as the groundwork of all our constructive efforts. Through the successful issue of the National Socialist Movement the people as such was placed above any organization, construction or function, as the sole element that is always there and will permanently abide. The meaning and purpose which Providence had in mind when it created the different races cannot be investigated by us, human beings, and no theory about it can be laid down. But the meaning and purpose of human organizations and of all human activities can be measured by asking what value they are for the maintenance of the race or people, which is the one existing element that must abide. The people—the race—is the primary thing. Party, State, Army, the national economic structure, Justice etc, all these are only secondary and accidental. They are only the means to the end and the end is the preservation of this nation. These public institutions are right and useful according to the measure in which their energies are directed towards this task. If they are incapable of fulfilling it, then their existence is harmful and they must either be reformed or removed and replaced by something better. It is absolutely necessary that this principle should be practically recognized; for that is the only way in which men can be saved from becoming the victims of a devitalized set of dogmas in a matter where dogmas are entirely out of place, and from drawing dogmatic conclusions from the consideration of ways and means, when the final purpose itself is the only valid dogma. All of you, gentlemen and members of the German Reichstag, understand the meaning of what I have just said. But on this occasion I am speaking to the whole German people and therefore I should like to bring forward a few examples which show how important these principles were proved to be when they were put into practice. There are many people for whom this is the only way of explaining why we talk of a Nationalist Socialist Revolution, though no blood was shed and no property wrecked. For a long time our ideas of law and justice had been developing in a way that led to a state of general confusion. This was partly due to the fact that we adopted ideas which were foreign to our national character and also partly because the German mind itself did not have any clear notion of what public justice meant. This confusion was evidenced more strikingly by the lack of inner clarity as to the function of law and justice. There are two extreme poles which are characteristic of this mental lack: —- 1 The opinion that the law as such is its own justification and hence cannot be made the subject of any critical analysis as to its utility, either in regard to its general principles or its relation to particular problems. According to this notion, the law would remain even though the world should disappear. Between these two extreme poles the idea of defending the larger interests of the community was introduced very timidly and under the cloak of an appeal to reasons of state. In contradistinction to all this, the National Socialist Revolution has laid down a definite and unambiguous principle on which the whole system of legislation, jurisprudence and administration of justice must be founded. It is the task of justice to collaborate in supporting and protecting the people as a whole against those individuals who, because they lack a social conscience, try to shirk the obligations to which all the members of the community are subject, or directly act against the interests of the community itself. In the new German legal system which will be in force from now onwards the nation is placed above persons and property. The principle expressed in that brief statement and everything it implies has led to the greatest reform ever introduced in our German legal structure. The first decisive action taken in accordance with the fundamental principle I have spoken of was the setting up not only of one legislator but also of one executive. The second measure is not yet ready but will be announced to the nation within a few weeks. In the German penal code, which has been drawn up with this wide general perspective in view, German justice will be placed for the first time on a basis which ensures that for all time to come its duty will be to serve in maintaining the German race. Although the chaos which we found before us in the various branches of public life was very great indeed, the state of dissolution into which German economic life had fallen was still greater. And this was the feature of the German collapse that impressed itself most strikingly on the minds of the broad masses of the people. The conditions that then actually existed have still remained in their memories and in the memory of the German people as a whole. As outstanding examples of this catastrophe we found these two phenomena: — 1 More than six millions of unemployed. The area covered by the German agricultural farms that were on the point of being sold up by forced auction was as large as the whole of Thuringia more than 8. In the natural course of events the falling off in production on the one side and the decrease in purchasing power, on the other, must necessarily bring about the disruption and annihilation of the great mass of the middle class also. How seriously this side of the German distress was then felt might subsequently be measured by the fact that I had to ask for full owners for the period of four years especially for the purpose of reducing unemployment and putting a stop to the dissolution of the German agricultural population. I may further state that in 1933 the National Socialists did not interfere with any activities which were being carried out by others and which at the same time promised success. The Party was called to take over the government of the country at a moment when the possibilities of redeeming the situation in any other way had been exhausted and particularly when repeated attempts to overcome the economic crisis had failed. After four years from that date I now face the German people and you, gentlemen and members of the Reichstag, to give an account of what has been accomplished. On this occasion I do not think you will withhold your sanction from what the National Socialist Government has done and you will agree that I have fulfilled the promises I made four years ago. It was not an easy undertaking. I am not giving away any secrets when I tell you that at that time the so-called economic experts were convinced that the economic crisis could not be overcome. In the face of this staggering situation which, as I have said, appeared hopeless to the minds of the experts, I still believed in the possibility of a German revival and particularly in the possibility of an economic recovery. My belief was grounded on two considerations: — 1 I have always had sympathy for those excited people who invariably talk of the collapse of the nation whenever they find themselves confronted with a difficult situation. What do they mean by a collapse? The German people were already in existence before they made any definite appearance in history as it is known to us. Now, leaving out entirely what their pre-historic experiences may have been, it is certain that during the past two thousand years of history, through which that portion of mankind which we call the German People has passed, unspeakable miseries and catastrophes must have befallen them more than once. Famines, wars and pestilences have overwhelmed our people and wreaked terrible havoc among them. It must give rise to unlimited faith in the vital resources of a nation when we recall the fact that only a few centuries ago our German people, with a population of more than eighteen millions, were reduced by the Thirty Years War to less than four millions. Let us also remember that this once flourishing land was pillaged, dismembered and devastated, that its cities were burned down, its hamlets and villages laid waste, that its fields were left uncultivated and barren. Some ten years afterwards our people began again to increase in number. The cities were rebuilt and began to be filled with a new life. The fields were ploughed once more. Songs were heard along the countryside, in concord with the rhythm of that work which brought new life and livelihood to the people. Let us look back over the development, or at least that part of it known to us, through which our people have passed since those dim historic ages down to the present time. We shall then recognize how puny is all the fuss that these weakling fools make who immediately begin to talk about the collapse of the economic structure—and hence of human existence—the first moment a piece of printed paper loses its face value somewhere in the world. Germany and the German people have mastered many a grave catastrophe. Of course, we must admit that the right men were always needed to formulate the necessary measures and enforce them without paying any attention to those negative persons who always think that they know more than others. A bevy of parliamentarian weaklings are certainly not the kind of men to lead a nation out of the slough of distress and despair. I firmly believed and was solemnly convinced that the economic catastrophe would be mastered in Germany as soon as the people could be got to believe in their own immortality as a people and as soon as they realized that the aim and purpose of all economic effort is to save and maintain the life of the nation. But unfortunately I have observed that the worst theorists are always busy in those quarters where theory has no place at all and where practical life counts for everything. It goes without saying that in the economic sphere and with the passing of time experience has given rise to the employment of certain definite principles and also definite methods of work which have been proved to be productive of good results. But all methods and principles are subject to the time element. To make hard-and-fast dogmas out of practical methods would deprive the human faculties and working power of that elasticity which alone enables them to face changing demands by changing the means of meeting them accordingly and thus mastering them. There were many persons among us who busied themselves, with that perseverance which is characteristic of the Germans, in an effort to formulate dogmas from economic methods and then raise that dogmatic system to a branch of our university curriculum, under the title of national economy. According to the pronouncements issued by these national economists, Germany was irrevocably lost. It is a characteristic of all dogmatists that they vigorously reject any new dogma. In other words, they criticize any new piece of knowledge that may be put forward and reject it as mere theory. For the last eigtheen [sic] years we have been witnessing a rare spectacle. Our economic dogmatists have been proved wrong in almost every branch of practical life and yet they repudiate those who have actually overcome the economic crisis, as propagators of false theories and damn them accordingly. You all know the story of the doctor who told a patient that he could live only for another six months. Ten years afterwards the patient met the physician; but the only surprise which the latter expressed at the recovery of the patient was to state that the treatment which the second doctor gave the patient was entirely wrong. The German economic policy which National Socialism introduced in 1933 is based on some fundamental considerations. In the relations between economics and the people, the people alone is the only unchangeable element. Economic activity in itself is no dogma and never can be such. There is no economic theory or opinion which can claim to be considered as sacrosanct. The will to place the economic system at the service of the people, and capital at the service of economics, is the only thing that is of decisive importance here. We know that National Socialism vigorously combats the opinion which holds that the economic structure exists for the benefit of capital and that the people are to be looked upon as subject to the economic system. We were therefore determined from the very beginning to exterminate the false notion that the economic system could exist and operate entirely freely and entirely outside of any control or supervision on the part of the State. Today there can no longer be such a thing as an independent economic system. That is to say, the economic system can no longer be left to itself exclusively. And this is so, not only because it is unallowable from the political point of view but also because, in the purely economic sphere itself, the consequences would be disastrous.

Цитаты Адольфа Гитлера

On September 12, 1938, Adolf Hitler, Chancellor of the Reich, addressed the German Reichstag. That morning, The German Reich had crossed the German-Czech frontier, thus initiating the Invasion of Czechoslovakia. Delegates, Men of the German Reichstag! For months we have been suffering under. Крылатые фразы Гитлера. Высказывание Гитлера на немецком. По одной из них, данная фраза была в письме Гитлера главе берлинского отделения СС Курту Далюге.

Adolf Hitler Speeches

До этого оно было факультативным, и большинство военных использовало стандартное воинское приветствие , употребляя гитлеровское приветствие только в ответ на такое же обращение со стороны чинов партии или СС. Зиг хайль! Sieg Heil! В качестве официального приветствия не употреблялся. Адольф Гитлер и другие вожди партии чаще всего повторяли эти слова в конце своих речей троекратно: «Зиг… хайль!

Зиг… хайль!

Наступление Штейнера было приказом! Wer sind Sie, dass Sie es wagen, sich meinen Befehlen zu widersetzen? Jeder hat mich belogen, sogar die SS! Армия мне лжет! Все мне лгут, даже СС!

Штейнер не смог собрать достаточно сил для атаки Der Angriff Steiners ist nicht erfolgt. В комнате остаться Кейтелю, Йодлю, Кребсу и Бургдорфу. Das war ein Befehl!

Der Angriff Steiner war ein Befehl! Это был приказ!

There can scarcely be any difference of opinion to-day among the true friends of peace with regard to the value of this agreement. One only needs to ask oneself what might have happened to Europe if this agreement, which brought such relief, had not been entered into five years ago. In signing it, this great Polish marshal and patriot rendered his people just as great a service as the leaders of the National Socialist State rendered the German people. During the troubled months of the past year the friendship between Germany and Poland was one of the reassuring factors in the political life of Europe. The German and Polish statements regarding these negotiations are to be found in the annexed documents. Here, too, the Peace Treaty of Versailles-of course intentionally-inflicted a most severe wound on Germany. The strange way in which the Corridor giving Poland access to the sea was marked out was meant, above all, to prevent for all time the establishment of an understanding between Poland and Germany.

This problem is-as I have already stressed-perhaps the most painful of all problems for Germany. Nevertheless, I have never ceased to uphold the view that the necessity of a free access to the sea for the Polish State cannot be ignored, and that as a general principle, valid for this case, too, nations which Providence has destined or, if you like, condemned to live side by side would be well advised not to make life still harder for each other artificially and unnecessarily. The late Marshal Pilsudski, who was of the same opinion, was therefore prepared to go into the question of clarifying the atmosphere of German-Polish relations, and, finally, to conclude an agreement whereby Germany and Poland expressed their intention of renouncing war altogether as a means of settling the questions which concerned them both. This agreement contained one single exception which was in practice conceded to Poland. It was laid down that the pacts of mutual assistance already entered into by Poland-this applied to the pact with France- should not be affected by the agreement. But it was obvious that this could apply only to the pact of mutual assistance already concluded beforehand, and not to whatever new pacts might be concluded in the future. It is a fact that the German-Polish Agreement resulted in a remarkable lessening of the European tension. Nevertheless, there remained one open question between Germany and Poland, which sooner or later quite naturally had to be solved-the question of the German city of Danzig. Danzig is a German city and wishes to belong to Germany.

On the other hand, this city has contracts with Poland, which were admittedly forced upon it by the dictators of the Peace of Versailles. But since, moreover, the League of Nations, formerly the greatest stirrer-up of trouble, is now represented by a High Commissioner-incidentally a man of extraordinary tact-the problem of Danzig must in any case come up for discussion, at the latest with the gradual extinction of this calamitous institution.

Фразы на немецком Гитлера — история и значения

According to the pronouncements issued by these national economists, Germany was irrevocably lost. It is a characteristic of all dogmatists that they vigorously reject any new dogma. In other words, they criticize any new piece of knowledge that may be put forward and reject it as mere theory. For the last eigtheen [sic] years we have been witnessing a rare spectacle. Our economic dogmatists have been proved wrong in almost every branch of practical life and yet they repudiate those who have actually overcome the economic crisis, as propagators of false theories and damn them accordingly. You all know the story of the doctor who told a patient that he could live only for another six months.

Ten years afterwards the patient met the physician; but the only surprise which the latter expressed at the recovery of the patient was to state that the treatment which the second doctor gave the patient was entirely wrong. The German economic policy which National Socialism introduced in 1933 is based on some fundamental considerations. In the relations between economics and the people, the people alone is the only unchangeable element. Economic activity in itself is no dogma and never can be such. There is no economic theory or opinion which can claim to be considered as sacrosanct.

The will to place the economic system at the service of the people, and capital at the service of economics, is the only thing that is of decisive importance here. We know that National Socialism vigorously combats the opinion which holds that the economic structure exists for the benefit of capital and that the people are to be looked upon as subject to the economic system. We were therefore determined from the very beginning to exterminate the false notion that the economic system could exist and operate entirely freely and entirely outside of any control or supervision on the part of the State. Today there can no longer be such a thing as an independent economic system. That is to say, the economic system can no longer be left to itself exclusively.

And this is so, not only because it is unallowable from the political point of view but also because, in the purely economic sphere itself, the consequences would be disastrous. It is out of the question that millions of individuals should be allowed to work just as they like and merely to meet their own needs; but it is just as impossible to allow the entire system of economics to function according to the notions held exclusively in economic circles and thus made to serve egotistic interests. Then there is the further consideration that these economic circles are not in a position to bear the responsibility for their own failures. In its modern phase of the development, the economic system concentrates enormous masses of workers in certain special branches and in definite local areas. New inventions or a slump in the market may destroy whole branches of industry at one blow.

The industrialist may close his factory gates. He may even try to find a new field for his personal activities. In most cases he will not be ruined so easily. Moreover, the industrialists who have to suffer in such contingencies are only a small number if individuals. But on the other side there are hundreds of thousands of workers, with their wives and children.

Who is to defend their interests and care for them? The whole community of the people? Indeed, it is its duty to do so. Therefore the whole community cannot be made to bear the burden of economic disasters without according it the right of influencing and controlling economic life and thus avoiding catastrophes. It was exclusively a problem of how industrial lab our could best be employed on the one side and, on the other, how our agricultural resources could be utilized.

This is first and foremost a problem of organization. Phrases, such as the freedom of the economic system, for example, are no help. What we have to do is use all available means at hand to make production possible and open up fields of activity for our working energies. If this can be successfully done by the economic leaders themselves, that is to say by the industrialists, then we are content. But if they fail the folk-community, which in this case means the State, is obliged to step in for the purpose of seeing that the working energies of the nation are employed in such a way that what they produce will be of use to the nation, and the State will have to devise the necessary measures to assure this.

In this respect the State may do everything; but one thing it cannot do—-and this was the actual state of affairs we had to face—-is to allow 12. For the folk-community does not exist on the fictitious value of money but on the results of productive labor, which is what gives money its value. This production, and not a bank or gold reserve, is the first cover for a currency. And if I increase production I increase the real income of my fellow-citizens. And if I reduce production I reduce that income, no matter what wages are paid out.

Members of the Reichstag: Within the past four years we have increased German production to an extraordinary degree in all branches. And the whole German nation benefits by this increase. For it there is a demand today for very many million tons of coal more than formerly, this is not for the purpose of superheating the houses of a few millionaires to a couple of thousand degrees, but rather because millions of our German countrymen are thus enabled to purchase more coal for themselves with their increased income. By giving employment to millions of German workers who had hitherto been idle, the National Socialist Revolution has brought about such a gigantic increase in German production. That rise in our total national income guarantees the market value of the goods produced.

And only in such cases where we could not increase this production, owing to certain conditions that were beyond our control, there have been shortages from time to time; but these bear no proportion whatsoever to the general success of the National Socialist struggle. The four-year plan is the most striking manifestation of the systematic way in which our economic life is being conducted. In particular this plan will provide permanent employment in the internal circulation of our economic life for those masses of German lab our that are now being released from the armament industry. One sign of the gigantic economic development which has taken place is that in many industries today it is quite difficult to find sufficient skilled workmen. I am thankful that this is so; because it will help to place the importance of the worker as a man and as a working force in its proper light; and also because in doing so—though there are other motives also—we have a chance of making the activities of the party and its unions better understood and thus securing stronger and more willing support.

Seeing that we insist on the national importance of the function which our economic system fulfils, it naturally follows that the former disunion between employer and employee can no longer exist. But the new State will not and does not wish to assume the role of entrepreneur. It will regulate the working strength of the nation only in so far as such regulation is necessary for the common good. And it will supervise conditions and methods of working only in so far as this is in the interests of all those engaged in work. Under no circumstances will the State attempt to bureaucratize economic life.

The economic effects that follow from every real and practical initiative benefit the people as a whole. At the present moment an inventor or an economic organizer is of inestimable value to the folk community. For the future the first task of National Socialist education will be to make clear to all our fellow-citizens how their reciprocal worth must be appreciated. We must point out to the one side how there can be no substitute for the German worker and we must teach the German worker how indispensable are the inventor and the genuine business leader. It is quite clear that under the aegis of such an outlook on economic life, strikes and lock-outs can no longer be tolerated.

The National Socialists State repudiates the right of economic coercion. Above all contracting parties stand the economic interests of the nation, which are the interests of the people. The practical results of this economic policy of ours are already known to you. Throughout the whole nation there is a tremendous urge towards productive activity. Enormous works are arising everywhere for the expansion of industry and traffic.

While in other countries strikes or lock-outs shatter the stability of national production, our millions of productive workers obey the highest of all laws that we have in this world, namely the law of common sense. Within these four years which have passed we have succeeded in bringing about the economic redemption of our people; but we realize at the same time that the results of this economic work in town and city must be safeguarded. The first danger that threatens us here is in the sphere of cultural creativeness. And that danger comes from those who are themselves active in that sphere. For our fellow-countrymen who are engaged in artistic and cultural productivity today, or are acting as custodians and trustees of cultural works, have not the necessary intuitive faculties to value and appreciate the ideal products of human genius in this sphere.

The National Socialist Movement has laid down the directive lines along which the State must conduct the education of the people. This education does not begin at a certain year and end at another. The development of the human being makes it necessary to take the child from the control of that small cell of social life which is the family and entrust his further training to the community itself. The National Socialist Revolution has clearly outlined the duties which this social education must fulfil and, above all, it has made this education independent of the question of age. In other words, the education of the individual can never end.

Therefore it is the duty of the folk-community to see that this education and higher training must always be along lines that help the community to fulfil its own task, which is the maintenance of the race and nation. For that reason we must insist that all organs of education which may be useful for the instruction and training of the people have to fulfil their duty towards the community. Such organs or organizations are: Education of the Youth, Young Peoples Organization, Hitler Youth, Lab our Front, Party and Army—all these are institutions for the education and higher training of our people. The book press and the newspaper press, lectures and art, the theatre and the cinema, they are all organs of popular education. What the National Socialist Revolution has accomplished in this sphere is astounding.

Think only of the following: — The whole body of our German education, including the press, the theatre, the cinema and literature, is being controlled and shaped today by men and women of our own race. Some time ago one often heard it said that if Jewry were expelled from these institutions they would collapse or become deserted. And now what has happened? In all those branches cultural and artistic activities are flourishing. Our films are better than ever before and our theatrical productions today in our leading theatres stand supreme and alone in comparison with the rest of the world.

Our press has become a powerful instrument to help our people in bringing their innate faculties to self-expression and assertion, and by so doing it strengthens the nation. German science is active and is producing results which will one day bear testimony to the creative and constructive will of this epoch. It is very remarkable how the German people have become immune from those destructive tendencies under which another world is suffering. Many of our organizations which were not understood at all a few years ago are now accepted as a matter of course: the Young people, the Hitler Youth, BDM. This consolidation of the internal life of our German nation also establishes a united front towards the outside world.

I believe that it is here that the National Socialist Revival has produced the most marvelous results. Four years ago, when I was entrusted with the Chancellorship and therewith the leadership of the nation, I took upon myself the bitter duty of restoring the honour of a nation which for fifteen years had been forced to live as a pariah among the other nations of the world. The internal order which we created among the German people offered the conditions necessary to reorganize the army and also made it possible for me to throw off those shackles which we felt to be the deepest disgrace ever branded on a people. It was not the occasion of taking anything from anybody or causing any suffering to anybody. Second: I now state here that, in accordance with the restoration of equality of rights, I shall divest the German Railways and the Reichsbank of the forms under which they have hitherto functioned and shall place them absolutely under the sovereign control of the Government of the German Reich.

Third: I hereby declare that the section of the Versailles Treaty which deprived our nation of the rights that it shared on an equal footing with other nations and degraded it to the level of an inferior people found its natural liquidation in virtue of the restoration of equality of status. Fourth: Above all, I solemnly withdraw the German signature from that declaration which was extracted under duress from a weak government, acting against its better judgment. Members of the German Reichstag: The revindication of the honour of the German people, which was expressed outwardly in the restoration of universal military service, the creation of a new air force, the reconstruction of a German navy and the reoccupation of the Rhineland by our troops, was the boldest task that I ever had to face and the most difficult to accomplish. Today I must humbly thank Providence, whose grace has enabled me, who was once an unknown soldier in the War, to bring to a successful issue the struggle for the restoration of our honor and rights as a nation. I regret to say that it was not possible to carry through all the necessary measures by way of negotiation.

But at the same time it must be remembered that the honor of a people cannot be bartered away; it can only be taken away. And if it cannot be bartered away it cannot be restored through barter; it must simply be taken back. That I carried out the measures which were necessary for this purpose without consulting our former enemies in each case, and even without informing them, was due to my conviction that the way in which I chose to act would make it easier for the other side to accept our decisions, for they would have had to accept them in any case. I should like to add here that, at all this has now been accomplished, the so-called period of surprises has come to an end. As a State which is now on an equal juridical footing with all the other States, Germany is more conscious than ever that she has a European task before here, which is to collaborate loyally in getting rid of those problems that are the cause of anxiety to ourselves and also to the other nations.

If I may state my views on those general questions that are of actual importance today, the most effective way of doing so will be to refer to the statements that were recently made by Mr. Eden in the British House of Commons. At this point I should like to express my sincere thanks for the opportunity which has been given me by the outspoken and noteworthy declarations made by the British Foreign Secretary. I think I have read those statements carefully and have understood them correctly. Of course, I do not want to get lost among the details, and so I should like to single out the leading points in Mr.

In doing this, I shall first try to correct what seems to me to be a most regrettable error. This error lay in assuming that somehow or other Germany wishes to isolate herself and to allow the events which happen in the rest of the world to pass by without participating in them, or that she does not wish to take any account whatsoever of the general necessities of the time. What are the grounds for the assumption that Germany wants to pursue a policy of isolation? If this a such an attitude, then the most than [sic] can be said is that it has been forced to do so under the coercion of a foreign will imposed upon it. Now, in the first place, I should like to assure Mr.

Eden that we Germans do not in the least want to be isolated and that we do not at all feel ourselves isolated. During recent years Germany has entered into quite a number of political agreements with other States. She has resumed former agreements and improved them. And I may say that she has established close friendly relations with a number of States. Our relations with most of the European States are normal from our standpoint and we are on terms of close friendship with quite a number.

Among all those diplomatic connections I would give a special place in the foreground to those excellent relations which we have with those States that were liberated from sufferings similar to those we had to endure and have consequently arrived at similar decisions. Through a number of treaties which we have made, we have relieved many strained relations and thereby made a substantial contribution towards an improvement in European conditions. I need remind you only of our agreement with Poland, which has turned out advantageous for both countries, our agreement with Austria and the excellent and close relations which we have established with Italy. Finally, I may mention our cordial relations with a whole series of nations outside of Europe. The agreement which Germany has made with Japan for combating the movement directed by the Comintern is a vital proof of how little the German Government thinks of isolating itself and how little we feel ourselves actually isolated.

Furthermore, I have on several ocassions [sic] declared that it is our wish and hope to arrive at good cordial relations with all our neighbors. Germany has steadily given its assurance, and I solemnly repeat this assurance here, that between ourselves and France, for example, there are no grounds for quarrel that are humanly thinkable. Furthermore, the German Government has assured Belgium and Holland that it is ready to recognize and guarantee these States as neutral regions in perpetuity. In view of the declarations which we have made in the past and in view of the existing state of affairs, I cannot quite clearly see why Germany should consider herself isolated or why we should pursue a policy of isolation. From the economic standpoint there are no grounds for asserting that Germany is withdrawing from international cooperation.

The contrary is the truth. On looking over the speeches which several statesmen have made within the last few months, I find that they might easily give rise to the impression that the whole world is waiting to shower economic favors on Germany but that we, who are represented as obstinately clinging to a policy of isolation, do not wish to partake of those favors To place this whole matter in its true light, I should like to call attention to the following bare facts: — 1 For many years the German people have been trying to make better commercial treaties with their neighbors. And these efforts have not been in vain; for, as a matter of fact, German foreign trade has increased since 1932, both in volume and in value. This is the clearest refutation of the assertion that Germany is pursuing a policy of economic isolation. Credit manipulation may perhaps have a temporary effect, but in the long run economic international relations will be decisively influenced by the volume of mutual exchange of goods.

Im Jahr darauf bekam er als ihr neuer Vorsitzender umfassende Machtbefugnisse — sein politischer Weg zur Machtergreifung begann. Hitler sah den richtigen Zeitpunkt gekommen, um die Macht zu ergreifen. Am Abend des 8. Schon Ende 1924 wurde er vorzeitig aus der Haft entlassen. Am 13. April erhielt er 36,8 Prozent. Am 30.

Januar 1933 ernannte Hindenburg Hitler zum Reichskanzler.

I think therefore that on this point Mr. Eden misunderstands our intentions and views.

For nothing is farther from our wishes than to break off or weaken our political or economic relations with other nations. I have already tried to contribute towards bringing about a good understanding in Europe and I have often given, especially to the British people and their Government, assurance of how ardently we wish for a sincere and cordial cooperation with them. I admit that on one point there is a wide difference between the views of the British Foreign Secretary and our views; and here it seems to me that this is a gap which cannot be filled up.

Eden declares that under no circumstances does the British Government wish to see Europe torn into two halves. Unfortunately, this desire for unity has not hitherto been declared or listened to. And now the desire is an illusion.

For the fact is that the division into two halves, not only of Europe but also of the whole world, is an accomplished fact. It is to be regretted that the British Government did not adopt its present attitude at an earlier date, that under all circumstances a division of Europe must be avoided; for then the Treaty of Versailles would not have been entered into. This Treaty brought in the first division of Europe, namely a division of the nations into victors on the one side and vanquished on the other, the latter nations being outlawed.

Through this division of Europe nobody suffered more than the German people. That this division was wiped out, so far as concerns Germany, is essentially due to the National Socialist Revolution and this brings some credit to myself. The second division has been brought about by the proclamation of the Bolshevic doctrine, an integral feature of which is that they do not confine it to one nation but try to impose it on all the nations.

Here it is not a question of a special form of national life in Russia but of the Bolshevic demand for a world revolution. If Mr. Eden does not look at Bolshevism as we look at it, that may have something to do with the position of Great Britain and also with some happenings that are unknown to us.

But I believe that nobody will question the sincerity of our opinions on this matter, for they are not based merely on abstract theory. For Mr. Eden Bolshevism is perhaps a thing which has its seat in Moscow, but for us in Germany this Bolshevism is a pestilence against which we have had to struggle at the cost of much bloodshed.

It is a pestilence which tried to turn our country into the same kind of desert as is now the case in Spain; for the habit of murdering hostages began here, in the form in which we now see it in Spain. National Socialism did not try to come to grips with Bolshevism in Russia, but the Jewish international Bolshevics in Moscow have tried to introduce their system into Germany and are still trying to do so. Against this attempt we have waged a bitter struggle, not only in defence of our own civilization but in defence of European civilization as a whole.

In January and February of the year 1933, when the last decisive struggle against this barbarism was being fought out in Germany, had Germany been defeated in that struggle and had the Bolshevic field of destruction and death extended over Central Europe, then perhaps a different opinion would have arisen on the banks of the Thames as to the nature of this terrible menace to humanity. For since it is said that England must be defended on the frontier of the Rhine she would then have found herself in close contact with that harmless democratic world of Moscow, whose innocence they are always trying to impress upon us. Here I should like to state the following once again: — The teaching of Bolshevism is that there must be a world revolution, which would mean world-destruction.

If such a doctrine were accepted and given equal rights with other teachings in Europe, this would mean that Europe would be delivered over to it. As far as Germany itself is concerned, let there be no doubts on the following points: — 1 We look on Bolshevism as a world peril for which there must be no toleration. It is in accordance with this attitude of ours that we should avoid close contact with the carriers of these poisonous bacilli.

And that is also the reason why we do not want to have any closer relations with them beyond the necessary political and commercial relations; for if we went beyond these we might thereby run the risk of closing the eyes of our people to the danger itself. I consider Bolshevism the most malignant poison that can be given to a people. And therefore I do not want my own people to come into contact with this teaching.

As a citizen of this nation I myself shall not do what I should have to condemn my fellow-citizens for doing. I demand from every German workman that he shall not have any relations with these international mischief-makers and he shall never see me clinking glasses or rubbing shoulders with them. Moreover, any further treaty connections with the present Bolshevic Russia would be completely worthless for us.

It is out of the question to think that National Socialist Germany should ever be bound to protect Bolshevism or that we, on our side, should ever agree to accept the assistance of a Bolshevic State. For I fear that the moment any nation should agree to accept such assistance, it would thereby seal its own doom. I must also say here that I do not accept the opinion which holds that in the moment of peril the League of nations could come to the rescue of the member States and hold them up by the arms, as it were.

Eden stated in his last address that deeds and not speeches are what matters. On that point I should like to call attention to the fact that up to now the outstanding feature of the League of Nations has been talk rather than action. There was one exception and in that case it would probably have been better to have been content with talk.

In this one case, as might have been foreseen, action was fruitless. Hence, just as I have been forced by economic circumstances to depend on our own resources principally for the maintenance of my people, so also I have been forced in the political sphere. And we ourselves are not to blame for that.

Three times I have made concrete offers for armament restriction or at least armament limitation. These offers were rejected. In this connection I may recall the fact that the greatest offer which I then made was that Germany and France together should reduce their standing armies to 300,000 men; that Germany, Great Britain and France, should bring down their air force to parity and that Germany and Great Britain should conclude a naval agreement.

Only the last offer was accepted and it was the only contribution in the world to a real limitation of armaments. The other German proposals were either flatly refused or were answered by the conclusion of those alliances which gave Central Europe to Soviet Russia as the field of play for its gigantic forces. Eden speaks of German armaments and expects a limitation of these armaments.

We ourselves proposed this limitation long ago. But it had no effect because, instead of accepting our proposal, treaties were made whereby the greatest military power in the world was, according to the terms of the treaties and in fact, introduced into Central Europe. In speaking of armaments it would be well to mention in the first instance the armaments possessed by that Power which sets the standard for the armaments of all others.

Eden believes that in the future all States should possess only the armament which is necessary for their de fence. I do not know whether and how far Mr. Eden has sounded Moscow on the question of carrying that excellent idea into effect, and I do not know what assurances they have given from that quarter.

I think however that I ought to put forward one point in this connection. Each nation has the right to judge this for itself, and it alone has the right. If therefore Great Britain today decides for herself on the extent of her armaments everybody in Germany will understand her action; for we can only think of London alone as being competent to decide on what is necessary for the protection of the British Empire.

On the other hand I should like to insist that the estimate of our protective needs, and thus of the armament that is necessary for the de fence of our people, is within our own competency and can be decided only in Berlin. I believe that the general recognition of these principles will not render conditions more difficult but will help to release tension. Anyhow Germany is pleased at having found friends in Italy and Japan who hold the same views as ourselves and we should be still more pleased if these convictions were widespread in Europe.

Therefore nobody welcomed more cordially than we did the manifest lessening of tension in the Mediterranean, brought about by the Anglo-Italian agreement. We believe that this will first of all lead to an understanding which may put a stop to, or at least limit, the catastrophe from which poor Spain is suffering. Germany has no interests in that country except the care of those commercial relations which Mr.

Eden himself declares to be so important and useful. Our sympathies with General Franco and his Government are in the first place of a general nature and, secondly, they arise from a hope that the consolidation of a real National Spain may lead to a strengthening of economic possibilities in Europe. We are ready to do everything which in any way may contribute towards the restoration of order in Spain.

But I think that the following considerations should not be left out of account: — During the last hundred years a number of new nations have been created in Europe which formerly, because of their disunion and weakness, were of only small economic importance and of no political importance at all. Through the establishment of these new States new tensions have naturally arisen. True statesmanship however must face realities and not shirk them.

The Italian nation and the new Italian State are realities. The German nation and the German Reich are likewise realities. And for my my own fellow citizens I should like to state that the Polish nation and the Polish State have also become realities.

Also in the Balkans nations have reawakened and have built their own States. The people who belong to those States want to live and they will live. The unreasonable division of the world into nations that have and nations that have not will not remove or solve that problem, no more than the internal social problems of the nations can be simply solved through more or less clever phrases.

For thousands of years the nations asserted their vital claims by the use of power. If in our time some other institution is to take the place of this power for the purpose or regulating relations between the peoples, then it must take account of natural vital claims and decide accordingly. It is the task of the League of Nations only to guarantee the existing state of the world and to safeguard it for all time, then we might just as well entrust it with the task of regulating the ebb and flow of the tides or directing the Gulf Stream into a definite course for the future.

But the League of Nations will not be able to do the one or the other. The continuance of its existence will in the long run depend on the extent to which it realize that the necessary reforms which concern international relations must be carefully considered and put into practice. The German people once built up a colonial Empire without robbing anyone and without violating any treaty.

And they did so without any war. That colonial Empire was taken away from us. And the grounds on which it was sought to excuse this act are not tenable.

First: It was said that the natives did not want to belong to Germany. Who asked them if they wished to belong to some other Power? And when were these natives ever asked if they had been contented with the Power that formerly ruled them?

Second: It is stated that the colonies were not administered properly by the Germans. Now, Germany had these colonies only for a few decades. Great sacrifices were made in building them up and they were in a process of development which would have led to quite different results than in 1914.

But anyhow the colonies had been so developed by us that other people considered it worth while to engage in a sanguinary struggle for the purpose of taking them from us. Third: It is said that they are of no real value. If that is the case then they can be of no value to other States also.

And so it is difficult to see why they keep them. Moreover, Germany has never demanded colonies for military purposes, but exclusively for economic purposes. It is obvious that in times of general prosperity the value of certain territories may decrease, but it is just as evident that in times of distress such value increases.

Today Germany lives in a time of difficult struggle for foodstuffs and raw materials. Sufficient imports are conceivable only if there be a continued and lasting increase in our exports. Therefore, as a matter of course, our demand for colonies for our densely populated country will be put forward again and again.

In concluding my remarks on this subject I should like to note a few points concerning the possible ways which may lead to a general pacification of Europe, which might also be extended outside Europe. They are the most important conditions for lasting and solid economic and political relations between the peoples. A few weeks ago we saw how an organized band of international war mongers spread a mass of lies which almost succeeded in raising mistrust between two nations and might easily have led to worse consequences than actually followed.

I greatly regret that the British Foreign Secretary did not categorically state that there was not one word of truth in those calumnies about Morocco which had been spread by these international war mongers. Thanks to the loyalty of a foreign diplomat and his Government, it was possible to clear up this extraordinary situation immediately. Supposing another case arose in which it turned out impossible to establish the truth so readily, what then would happen?

Germany is hoping to have close and friendly relations with Italy. May we succeed in paving the way for such relations with other European countries. The German Reich will watch over its security and honor with its strong army.

On the other hand, convinced that there can be no greater treasure for Europe than peace, it will always be a reasonable supporter of those European ideals of peace and will be always conscious of its responsibilities. This would lead to a decisive lessening of tension between the nations who are forced to live side by side, and whose State frontiers are not identical with the ethnical frontiers. In concluding these remarks I should like to deal with the document which the British Government addressed to the German Government on the occasion of the occupation of the Rhineland.

I should like first to state that we believe and are convinced that the British Government at that time did everything to avoid an increase of tension in the European crisis, and that the document in question owes its origin entirely to the desire to make a contribution towards disentangling the situation of those days. Nevertheless, it was not possible for the German Government, for reasons which the Government of Great Britain will appreciate, to reply to those questions. We preferred to settle some of those questions in the most natural way by the practical building up of our relations with our neighbors.

I believe that this statement will be understood by all. Moreover, with all my heart I hope that the intelligence and goodwill of responsible European Governments will succeed, despite all opposition, in preserving peace for Europe. Peace is our dearest treasure.

Whatever contributions Germany can make towards preserving it, these she will make. Before concluding my address today I should like to give a short sketch of the tasks that lie ahead of us. In the carrying out of the Four Years Plan lies our first task.

It will call for gigantic efforts but eventually it will turn out a great blessing for our people. Its purpose is to strengthen our national economic system in all its branches. The execution of it is guaranteed.

All those great works which have been started apart from this plan will be continued. Their purpose is to promote the health of the nation and make life more pleasant. Building extensions will be systematically carried out in some of our large cities, as an externalization of the spirit that actuates this great plan.

And that order will be based on such spacious plans as will be worthy of the National Socialist Movement and also of the German metropolis. We have allotted a period of twenty years for the carrying out of this plan. May the Almighty God grant us a time of peace in which to bring this gigantic work to completion.

But this work will only be the counterpart of a general cultural development which we wish to see taking place in Germany, as the crowning achievement to the restoration of our internal and external freedom. And, finally, it will be one of our future tasks to give the German people a Constitution which will be in harmony with the real life of our people, as that life has developed politically. This Constitution will place its seal on this life for all time to come and will be an imperishable and fundamental law for all Germans.

As I look back on the great work that has been done during the past four years you will understand quite well that my first feeling is simply one of thankfulness to our Almighty God for having allowed me to bring this work to success. He has blessed our lab ours and has enabled our people to come through all the obstacles which encompassed them on their way.

Более чем миллион немцев в 1919-20 годах были отрезаны от их родины. Как всегда, я пытался мирным путём добиться пересмотра, изменения этого невыносимого положения. Это — ложь, когда либеральный мир говорит, что мы хотим добиться перемен силой. По свой собственной инициативе я неоднократно предлагал пересмотреть эти невыносимые условия. Все эти предложения, как вы знаете, были отклонены — предложения об ограничении вооружений и, если необходимо, разоружении, предложения об ограничении военного производства, предложения о запрещении некоторых видов современного вооружения. Вы знаете о предложениях, которые я делал для восстановления германского суверенитета над немецкими территориями.

Вы знаете о моих бесконечных попытках, которые я предпринимал для мирного урегулирования вопросов с Австрией, потом с Судетской областью, Богемией и Моравией. Все они оказались напрасны.

Известные цитаты Гитлера (100 цитат)

После Второй мировой войны править После Второй мировой войны в некоторых странах нацистское приветствие и восклицания Heil Hitler! В Австрии действует аналогичный закон. В России в 2012 году рассматривался законопроект о введении штрафов за нацистское приветствие или за приветствие, схожее с ним [16] [17] , который так и не был принят. Слова типа «Хайль, такой-то! В 1996 году в антикоммунистической агитгазете « Не дай Бог! Примерно с 2010-х годов стали появляться слоганы вроде «Хайль Путин!

Воспоминания удивительная штука: согревает изнутри и тут же рвёт на части. Der Appetit kommt beim Essen. Ты главное ешь, а аппетит появится. Только любовь сильнее смерти. Wer fremde Sprache nicht kennt,weiss nichts von seiner eigenen.

Тот, кто не знает иностранных языков, не знает ничего и о своём собственном. Все дороги ведут в Рим. Aller Anfang ist schwer. Первый блин комом. Лиха беда начало. Кто обжегся на молоке теперь на воду дует. Paradies: Der Ort, wo Menschen die Liebe ernster nehmen als sich selbst. Рай: место, где люди принимают любовь более серьезно, чем самих себя Geduld bringt Rosen. Терпение и труд все перетрут. Терпи, казак, атаманом будешь.

Was Du lernen willst zu tun, lernst Du, indem Du es tust. Тому, чему ты хочешь научиться, учишься ты, делая это. Allen Leuten recht getan ist eine Kunst, die niemand kann На вкус и цвет - товарищей нет. Gute Saat, gute Ernte. Что посеешь, то и пожнёшь. Durch Fehler wird man klug. Reden ist Silber, Schweigen ist Gold. Слово - серебро, молчание - золото. Без труда не вытащить и рыбки из пруда. В любви руки и глаза говорят обычно громче, чем рот.

Klein, aber fein. Маленький, да удаленький; Мал золотник, да дорог. Morgen, morgen, nur nicht heute, sagen alle faulen Leute. Не откладывай на завтра то, что можешь сделать сегодня. Кто рано встаёт, тому Бог даёт. Дуракам везёт Eine Schwalbe macht noch keinen Sommer. Одна ласточка весны не делает. Один в поле не воин Hochmut kommt vor dem Fall. Любовь является одним из решений, а не одна из тайн этого мира. Краткость - сестра таланта.

Wenn es etwas Besseres gibt als geliebt zu werden, ist es lieben. Если есть что-нибудь лучше, чем быть любимым, это любить. Kommt Zeit, kommt Rat. Man soll den Tag nicht vor dem Abend loben. Цыплят по осени считают. Маленькие дети не дают спать, а большие жить. Papier ist geduldig. Бумага всё выдержит. Всё тайное становится явным. Шила в мешке не утаишь.

Кто не успел - тот опоздал. Wenn zwei sich streiten, freut sich der Dritte. Где два дурака дерутся, там третий смотрит. Kleider Machen Leute. Wer im Glashaus sitzt, sollte nicht mit Steinen werfen. Не руби сук, на котором сидишь. Wie eine Made im Speck leben. Кататься как сыр в масле. Wer gut futtert, der gut buttert. Каков уход, таков доход.

Кто хорошо кормит, у того хорошо пашется. Wenn ich trinke denke ich und wenn ich denke trinke ich Когда я пью - я думаю, а когда я думаю - я пью. Stille Wasser sind tief. В тихом омуте черти водятся. Wer nicht wagt, der nicht gewinnt. Кто не рискует, тот не пьёт шапманское. Jedem das seine Каждый сверчок знай свой шесток Wer viel gastiert, hat bald quittiert. Хорошо смеется тот, кто смеется последний. Довольному сердцу везде светит солнце. Только мамина любовь длится вечно.

Nur die Liebe der Mutter ist ewig. Спаси и сохрани.

Papierene Erklдrungen, die von Seiten des Kremls oder als Garantieverpflichtungen von Seiten Londons oder Washingtons gegen diese nicht zu bestreitenden Absichten abgegeben werden, imponieren uns nicht. Wir wissen, dass wir es im Osten mit einer infernalischen politischen Teufelei zu tun haben, die die sonst unter Menschen und Staaten ьblichen Beziehungen nicht anerkennt. Wenn beispielsweise der englische Lord Beaverbrook erklдrt, dass Europa dem Sowjetismus zur Fьhrung ьberantwortet werden mьsse, wenn ein maЯgeblicher amerikanisch-jьdischer Journalist Brown diese These durch die zynische Verlautbarung ergдnzt, dass eine Bolschewisierung Europas vielleicht ьberhaupt die Lцsung unseres kontinentalen Problems darstellte, so wissen wir genau, was damit gemeint ist.

Die europдischen Mдchte stehen hier vor ihrer entscheidenden Lebensfrage. Das Abendland ist in Gefahr. Ob ihre Regierungen und ihre Intelligenzschichten das einsehen wollen oder nicht, ist dabei gдnzlich unerheblich. Das deutsche Volk jedenfalls ist nicht gewillt, sich dieser Gefahr auch nur versuchsweise preiszugeben. Hinter den anstьrmenden Sowjetdivisionen sehen wir schon die jьdischen Liquidationskommandos, hinter diesen aber erhebt sich der Terror, das Gespenst des Millionenhungers und einer vollkommenen Anarchie.

Hier erweist sich wiederum das internationale Judentum als das teuflische Ferment der Dekomposition, das eine geradezu zynische Genugtuung dabei empfindet, die Welt in ihre tiefste Unordnung zu stьrzen und damit den Untergang jahrtausendealter Kulturen, an denen es niemals einen inneren Anteil hatte, herbeizufьhren. Wir wissen damit also, vor welcher geschichtlichen Aufgabe wir stehen. Eine zweitausendjдhrige Aufbauarbeit der abendlдndischen Menschheit ist in Gefahr. Man kann diese Gefahr gar nicht ernst genug schildern, aber es ist auch bezeichinend, dass wenn man sie nur beim Namen nennt, das internationale Judentum in allen Lдndern dagegen mit lдrmenden Ausfьhrungen Protest erhebt. So weit also ist es in Europa schon gekommen, dass man eine Gefahr nicht mehr eine Gefahr nennen darf, wenn sie eben vom Judentum ausgeht.

Das aber hindert uns nicht daran, die dazu notwendigen Feststellungen zu treffen. Wir haben das auch frьher in unserem innerpolitischen Kampfe getan, als das kommunistische Judentum sich des demokratischen Judentums im «Berliner Tageblatt» und in der «Vossischen Zeitung» bediente, um eine Gefahr, die von Tag zu Tag drohender wurde, zu verniedlichen und zu bagatellisieren, um damit die von ihr bedrohten Teile unseres Volkes in Sicherheit einzuwiegen und ihre Abwehrkrдfte einzuschlдfern. Wir sдhen, wenn wir dieser Gefahr nicht Herr wьrden, im Geiste schon das Gespenst des Hungers, des Elends und einer Millionenzwangsarbeit fьr das deutsche Volk heraufziehen, sдhen den ehrwьrdigsten Erdteil in seinen Grundfesten wanken und unter seinen Trьmmern das geschichtliche Erbe der abendlдndischen Menschheit begraben. Das ist das Problem, vor dem wir stehen. Die europдischen Staaten einschlieЯlich Englands behaupten, stark genug zu sein, einer Bolschewisierung des europдischen Kontinents, sollte sie einmal praktisch gegeben sein, rechtzeitig und wirksam entgegenzutreten.

Diese Erklдrung ist kindisch und verdient ьberhaupt keine Widerlegung. Sollte die stдrkste Militдrmacht der Welt nicht in der Lage sein, die Drohung des Bolschewismus zu brechen, wer brдchte dann noch die Kraft dazu auf? Hier antworten stьrmische Rufe aus der im Sportpalast versammelten Menge: «Niemand! Sie wьrden im Bedarfsfall von seinen motorisierten Roboterdivisionen in wenigen Tagen ьberfahren werden. In den Hauptstдdten der mittleren und kleinen europдischen Staaten trцstet man sich mit der Absicht, man mьsse sich gegen die bolschewistische Gefahr seelisch rьsten.

Das erinnert verzweifelt an die Erklдrungen der bьrgerlichen Mittelparteien aus dem Jahre 1932, dass der Kampf gegen den Kommunismus nur mit geistigen Waffen ausgefochten und gewonnen werden kцnne. Diese Behauptung war uns auch damals zu albern, als dass wir uns damit auseinandergesetzt hдtten. Der цstliche Bolschewismus ist nicht nur eine terroristische Lehre, sondern auch eine terroristische Praxis. Er verfolgt seine Ziele und Zwecke mit einer infernalischen Grьndlichkeit, unter restloser Ausschцpfung seines inneren Potentials und ohne jede Rьcksichtnahme auf Glьck, Wohlstand und Frieden der von ihm unterjochten Vцlkerschaften. Was wollten England und Amerika tun, wenn der europдische Kontinent im grцbsten Unglьcksfall dem Bolschewismus in die Arme fiele?

Will man Europa von London aus vielleicht einreden, dass eine solche Entwicklung an der Kanalgrenze Halt machen wьrde? Ich habe schon einmal darauf hingewiesen, dass der Bolschewismus seine Fremdenlegionen auf dem Boden aller demokratischen Staaten bereits in den kommunistischen Parteien stehen hat. Keiner dieser Staaten kann von sich behaupten, gegen eine innere Bolschewisierung immun zu sein. Eine jьngst vorgenommene Nachwahl zum englischen Unterhaus ergab, dass der unabhдngige, d. Alle territorialen Verpflichtungen, die die Sowjetunion auf sich nimmt, besitzen in unseren Augen keinen effektiven Wert.

Der Bolschewismus pflegt seine Grenzen auch ideologisch und nicht nur militдrisch zu ziehen, und darin ist eben seine ьber die Grenzen der Vцlker hinwegspringende Gefahr gegeben. Die Welt hat also nicht die Wahl zwischen einem in seine alte Zersplitterung zurьckfallenden und einem unter der Achsenfьhrung sich neu ordnenden Europa, sondern nur die zwischen einem unter dem militдrischen Schutz der Achse stehenden und einem bolschewistischen Europa. Darьber hinaus bin ich der festen Ьberzeugung, dass die lamentierenden Lords und Erzbischцfe in London ьberhaupt nicht einmal die Absicht haben, der bolschewistischen Gefahr, die bei einem weiteren Vordringen der Sowjetarmeen fьr die europдischen Staaten gegeben wдre, praktisch entgegenzutreten. Das Judentum hat die angelsдchsischen Staaten geistig und politisch schon so tief durchdrungen, dass sie diese Gefahr ьberhaupt nicht mehr sehen und wahr haben wollen. Wie es sich in der Sowjetunion bolschewistisch tarnt, so tarnt es sicii in den angelsдchsischen Staaten plutokratisch-kapitalistisch.

Die Methoden der Mimikry sind bei der jьdischen Rasse bekannt. Sie geht seit jeher darauf aus, ihre Gastvцlker einzuschlдfern und damit ihre Abwehrkrдfte gegen von ihr stammende akute und lebensgefдhrdende Bedrohungen zu lдhmen. Zurufe aus der Menge: «Wir haben sie erlebt! Ьber unser Land hinweg reichen sich bereits das westeuropдische scheinzivilisierte Judentum und das Judentum des цstlichen Ghettos die Hдnde. Damit ist Europa in Todesgefahr.

Ich schmeichle mir nicht, mit diesen Ausfьhrungen die цffentliche Meinung in den neutralen oder gar in den feindlichen Staaten alarmieren zu kцnnen. Das ist auch nicht ihr Zweck und ihre Absicht. Ich weiЯ, dass die englische Presse morgen mit einem wьtenden Geklдff ьber mich herfallen wird, ich hдtte angesichts unserer Belastung an der Ostfront die ersten Friedensfьhler ausgestreckt. Stьrmisches Gelдchter. Davon kann ьberhaupt keine Rede sein.

In Deutschland denkt heute kein Mensch an einen faulen Kompromiss, das ganze Volk denkt nur an einen harten Krieg. Ich beanspruche aber als ein verantwortlicher Sprecher des fьhrenden Landes dieses Kontinents fьr mich das souverдne Recht, eine Gefahr eine Gefahr zu nennen, wenn sie nicht nur unser eigenes Land, sondern unseren ganzen Erdteil bedroht. Als Nationalsozialisten haben wir die Pflicht, Alarm zu schlagen gegen die versuchte Chaotisierung des europдischen Kontinents durch das internationale Judentum, das sich im Bolschewismus eine terroristische Militдrmacht aufgebaut hat, deren Bedrohlichkeit ьberhaupt nicht ьberschдtzt werden kann. Die dritte These, die ich hier nдher erlдutern will, ist die, dass Gefahr unmittelbar im Verzuge ist. Die Lдhmungserscheinungen der westeuropдischen Demokratien gegen ihre tцdlichste Bedrohung sind herzbeklemmend.

Das internationale Judentum fцrdert sie mit allen Krдften. Genau so, wie der Widerstand gegen den Kommunismus in unserem Kampf um die Macht in unserem eigenen Lande von den jьdischen Zeitungen kьnstlich eingeschlдfert und nur durch den Nationalsozialismus wieder erweckt wurde, genau so ist das heute bei den anderen Vцlkern der Fall. Das Judentum erweist sich hier wieder einmal als die Inkarnation des Bцsen, als plastischer Dдmon des Verfalls und als Trдger eines internationalen kulturzerstцrerischen Chaos. Man wird, um das hier nur zu erwдhnen, in diesem Zusammenhang auch unsere konsequente Judenpolitik verstehen kцnnen. Wir sehen im Judentum fьr jedes Land eine unmittelbare Gefahr gegeben.

Wie andere Vцlker sich gegen diese Gefahr zur Wehr setzen, ist uns gleichgьltig. Wie wir uns aber dagegen zur Wehr setzen, das ist unsere eigene Sache, in die wir keinerlei Einsprьche dulden. Das Judentum stellt eine infektiцse Erscheinung dar, die ansteckend wirkt. Wenn das feindliche Ausland gegen unsere antijьdische Politik scheinheilig Protest einlegt und ьber unsere MaЯnahmen gegen das Judentum heuchlerische Krokodilstrдnen vergieЯt, so kann uns das nicht daran hindern, das Notwendige zu tun. Deutschland jedenfalls hat nicht die Absicht, sich dieser Bedrohung zu beugen, sondern vielmehr die, ihr rechtzeitig und wenn nцtig mit den radikalsten GegenmaЯnahmen entgegenzutreten.

Minutenlang hindern nach diesen Sдtzen zustimmende Sprechchцre den Ministeram Weiterreden. Der Krieg der mechanisierten Roboter gegen Deutschland und gegen Europa ist auf seinen Hцhepunkt gestiegen. Das deutsche Volk erfьllt mit seinen Achsenpartnern im wahrsten Sinne des Wortes eine europдische Mission, wenn es dieser unmittelbaren und ernsten Lebensbedrohung mit den Waffen entgegentritt. Wir lassen uns nicht durch das Geschrei des internationalen Judentums in aller Welt in der mutigen und aufrechten Fortfьhrung des gigantischen Kampfes gegen diese Weltpest beirren. Er kann und darf nur mit Sieg enden.

Hier ertцnen laute Zwischenrufe: «Deutsche Mдnner, ans Gewehr! Deutsche Frauen, an die Arbeit! Es hatte deshalb nicht nur eine militдrische, sondern auch eine geistige und seelische Bedeutung fьr das deutsche Volk von tiefstgreifender Wirkung. Erst hier sind uns unsere Augen fьr die aus diesem Kriege erwachsende Problematik vollkommen geцffnet worden. Wir wollen jetzt gar nichts mehr von falschen Hoffnungen und Illusionen hцren.

Wir wollen den Tatsachen, und wenn sie noch so hart und grausam sind, mutig in die Augen schauen. Denn jedes Mal noch hat es sich in der Geschichte unserer Partei und unseres Staates erwiesen, dass eine erkannte Gefahr bald schon auch eine gebannte Gefahr ist. Im Zeichen dieses heroischen Widerstandes stehen unsere weiteren schwersten Abwehrkдmpfe im Osten. Sie beanspruchen unsere Soldaten und ihre Waffen in einem Umfange, der uns bei allen bisherigen Feldzьgen vollkommen unbekannt gewesen ist. Im Osten tobt ein Krieg ohne Gnade.

Der Fьhrer hat ihn richtig charakterisiert, als er erklдrte, es werden aus ihm nicht Sieger und Besiegte, sondern nur noch Ьberlebende und Vernichtete hervorgehen. Das deutsche Volk hat das ganz klar erkannt. Mit seinem gesunden Instinkt hat es sich auf eigene Weise einen Weg durch das Gestrьpp der tagesaktuell bedingten geistigen und seelischen Schwierigkeiten dieses Krieges gebahnt. Wir wissen heute genau, dass der Blitzkrieg des Polen- und Wesfeldzuges fьr den Osten nur noch eine bedingte Gьltigkeit hat. Hier kдmpft die deutsche Nation um ihr alles.

Wir sind in diesem Kampf zu der Erkenntnis gekommen, dass das deutsche Volk hier seine heiligsten Gьter, seine Familien, seine Frauen und seine Kinder, die Schцnheit und Unberьhrtheit seiner Landschaft, seine Stдdte und Dцrfer, das zweitausendjдhrige Erbe seiner Kultur und alles, was uns das Leben lebenswert macht, zu verteidigen hat. Fьr diese Schдtze unseres reichen Volkstums hat der Bolschewismus natьrlich nicht das geringste Verstдndnis, und er wьrde auch im Bedarfsfalle darauf nicht die geringste Rьcksicht nehmen. Er tut das ja nicht einmal seinem eigenen Volke gegenьber. Die Sowjetunion hat das bolschewistische Kriegspotential seit 25 Jahren in einem Umfange ausgeschцpft, der fьr uns gдnzlich unvorstellbar war und deshalb von uns auch falsch eingeschдtzt wurde. Das terroristische Judentum hat sich in Russland 200 Millionen Menschen dienstbar gemacht, dabei seine zynischen Methoden und Praktiken mit der stumpfen Zдhigkeit der russischen Rasse vermдhlt, die deshalb eine um so grцЯere Gefahr fьr die europдischen Kulturvцlker darstellt.

Im Osten wird ein ganzes Volk zum Kampf gezwungen. Hier werden Mдnner, Frauen, ja Kinder nicht nur in die Rьstungsfabriken, sondern auch in den Krieg getrieben. Die Massen von Panzern, die in diesem Winter unsere цstliche Front berennen, sind das Ergebnis eines 25jдhrigen sozialen Unglьcks und Elends des bolschewistischen Volkes. Dagegen mьssen wir mit entsprechenden GegenmaЯnahmen antreten, wenn wir nicht das Spiel als verloren aufgeben wollen. Ich gebe meiner festen Ьberzeugung Ausdruck, dass wir die bolschewistische Gefahr auf die Dauer nur niederringen kцnnen, wenn wir ihr, wenn auch nicht mit gleichen, so doch mit gleichwertigen Methoden entgegentreten.

Die deutsche Nation steht damit vor der ernstesten Frage dieses Krieges, nдmlich der, die Entschlossenheit aufzubringen, alles einzusetzen, um alles, was sie besitzt, zu erhalten, und alles, was sie zum spдteren Leben nцtig hat, dazu zu gewinnen. Der totale Krieg also ist das Gebot der Stunde. Es muss jetzt zu Ende sein mit den bьrgerlichen Zimperlichkeiten, die auch in diesem Schicksalskampf nach dem Grundsatz verfahren wollen: Wasch mir den Pelz, aber mach mich nicht nass! Jeder Satz des Ministers wird von wachsendem Beifall und stдrkster Zustimmung begleitet. Die Gefahr, vor der wir stehen, ist riesengroЯ.

RiesengroЯ mьssen deshalb auch die Anstrengungen sein, mit denen wir ihr entgegentreten. Es ist also jetzt die Stunde gekommen, die Glacehandschuhe auszuziehen und die Faust zu bandagieren. Wie ein einziger Schrei erbebt sich ein orkanartiger Beifall. Sprechchцre von den Galerien und Rдngen bestдtigen die volle Zustimmung der Menge. Es geht nicht mehr an, das reiche Kriegspotential nicht nur unseres eigenen Landes, sondern der uns zur Verfьgung stehenden bedeutenden Teile Europas nur flьchtig und an der Oberflдche auszuschцpfen.

Es muss ganz zur Ausschцpfung gelangen, und zwar so schnell und so grьndlich, als das organisatorisch und sachlich ьberhaupt nur denkbar ist. Hier wдre eine falsche Rьcksichtnahme vollkommen fehl am Orte. Europas Zukunft hдngt von unserem Kampf im Osten ab. Wir stehen zu seinem Schutze bereit. Das deutsche Volk stellt sein kostbarstes nationales Blut fьr diesen Kampf zur Verfьgung.

Der ьbrige Teil Europas sollte hierfьr wenigstens seine Arbeit zur Verfьgung stellen. Es gibt viele ernsthafte Kritiker auch in anderen Lдndern, die diese zwingende Pflicht bereits einsehen. Andere wieder bestreiten sie noch. Das aber kann fьr uns nicht ausschlaggebend sein. Wenn die Gefahr fьr sie allein gegeben wдre, so kцnnte man ihre Auslassungen als literarischen Unsinn bewerten, der keinerlei Bedeutung besitzt.

Aber die Gefahr ist fьr uns alle gegeben, und deshalb mьssen wir uns auch alle dagegen zur Wehr setzen. Wer diesen Kampf im ьbrigen Europa heute noch nicht versteht, wird uns morgen auf den Knien danken, dass wir ihn mutig und unbeirrt auf uns genommen haben. Es дrgert uns nicht einmal, wenn unsere Feinde im Ausland behaupten, die MaЯnahmen, die wir jetzt zur Totalisierung des Krieges durchfьhrten, kдmen denen des Bolschewismus ziemlich nahe. Scheinheilig erklдren sie, daraus mьsse man also folgern, dass sich unter diesen Umstдnden der Kampf gegen den Bolschewismus ьberhaupt erьbrige. Es geht hier nicht um die Methode, mit der man den Bolschewismus zu Boden schlдgt sondern um das Ziel, nдmlich um die Beseitigung der Gefahr.

Minutenlanger Beifall. Die Frage ist also nicht die, ob die Methoden, die wir anwenden, gut oder schlecht sind, sondern ob sie zum Erfolge fьhren. Jedenfalls sind wir als nationalsozialistische Volksfьhrung jetzt zu allem entschlossen. Wir packen zu, ohne Rьcksicht auf die Einsprьche des einen oder des anderen. Wir wollen nicht mehr im Interesse der Aufrechterhaltung eines hohen, manchmal fast friedensmдЯigen inneren Lebensstandards fьr eine bestimmte Volksschicht das deutsche Kriegspotential schwдchen und damit unsere Kriegfьhrung gefдhrden.

Im Gegenteil, wir verzichten freiwillig auf einen bedeutenden Teil dieses Lebensstandards, um das Kriegspotential so schnell und so grьndlich wie mцglich zu erhцhen. Diese Aktion stellt keinen Selbstzweck, sondern nur ein Mittel zum Zweck dar. Umso hцher wird nach dem Siege wieder der soziale Lebensstandard unseres Volkes steigen. Wir brauchen die bolschewistischen Methoden schon deshalb nicht nachzuahmen, weil wir ьber das bessere Menschen- und Fьhrungsmaterial verfьgen und damit einen groЯen Vorsprung besitzen. Aber wir mьssen, wie die Entwicklung zeigt, viel mehr tun, als wir bisher getan haben, um dem Krieg im Osten eine entscheidende Wendung zum Besseren zu geben.

Im Ьbrigen herrscht darьber, wie mir aus ungezдhlten Briefen aus der Heimat und Zustimmungskundgebungen von der Front mitgeteilt wird, im ganzen deutschen Volke ьberhaupt nur eine Meinung. Jedermann weiЯ, dass dieser Krieg, wenn wir ihr verlцren, uns aber vernichten wьrde. Und darum ist das Volk mit seiner Fьhrung entschlossen, nunmehr zur radikalsten Selbsthilfe zu greifen.

Billy Graham Самый опасный из всех наркотиков - это успех. Ничего в мире так не заразительно, как смех и хорошее настроение. Тяжелее разрушить предвзятое мнение, чем расщепить атом. Sitzt man jedoch eine Minute auf einem heissen Ofen, meint man, es waren zwei Stunden. Das ist Relativitat.

Если сидеть два часа рядом с , кажется, это прошла минута. Если же посидеть минуту на горячей плите, покажется, что прошло два часа. Это и есть относительность. Лучшие вещи в - это не те, которые можно получить за. Paul Thomas Mann Религия — это благоговение — в первую очередь перед тайной, которую представляет собой человек. В тот момент, когда человек сомневается в и ценности , он болен. Sie konnen schwimmen. Heinz Ruhmann Проблемы не тонут в алкоголе.

Они умеют плавать. Хайнц Рюман Wer immer tut, was er schon kann, bleibt immer das, was er schon ist. Henry Ford Кто всегда делает то, что он уже умеет, остаётся всегда тем, кем он уже является. Генри Форд Habe Mut, dich deines eigenen Verstandes zu bedienen. Автомобили и транспорт. Дом и дача. Хобби и развлечение.

Известные фразы гитлера. Цитаты на немецком языке с переводом

Цитаты гитлера на немецком с переводом. Немецкие крылатые выражения в русском языке	Выражение “Гитлер капут” имеет хорошие шансы навсегда выветриться из коллективной памяти немцев.
Фразы гитлера на немецком языке	Известные цитаты Гитлера (100 цитат).

Знаменитый фрагмент из фильма “Der Untergang” (рус. “Бункер”) — Речь Гитлера в бункере

Но но мы не желаем превратиться в бездеятельных фантазёров или людей, которые, снедаемые постоянными сомнениями, не способны вести активную жизнь. Скорее мы стремимся принять жизнь такой как она есть в повседневности, со всеми ее горестями, которые так же, как и радость, ведут нас к постижению смысла бытия. Бог, в которого мы верим соответствует нашим сердцам. Он пребывает в наших сердцах тогда, когда они открыты и находятся в гармонии с миром. Бог живёт в нас, потому что мы постоянно ищем свидетельства Его Силы в мире и стремимся приобщиться к ним. Разве это не требует гордости и благородного мужества, чтобы обрести Бога в себе? Разве это не требует благородной стойкости и способности — утвердить себя как человека перед Всемогущим Богом? Мы возносим мольбу к Богу и Его мировому творениию с тем большей верой, чем более гордыми и уверенными мы ощущаем себя. Смеющийся глаз, легкий шаг, дух, который воистину способен радоваться и возвышаться, искренняя юность, неподдельная стойкость, любовь, дружба — вот заповеди, данные нам Богом. И вновь мы соглашаемся с мыслями автора, которого мы упоминали в начале и который завершает утверждение своего поэтического кредо словами, представляющими символ Веры для всех нас: «Сила Божия творится руками человеческими».

Всемогущий есть наш Судья. Наша задача — исполнить наш долг так, чтобы мы смогли предстать перед Ним как Творцом всего мироздания в соответствии с данным Им законом, законом борьбы за существование. Ванюшкиной Из сборника «SS Ideology, translated from original SS publication» Когда людские сердца разбиваются от горя, а души разрываются от отчаяния, тогда из мглы прошедших времен на нас смотрят наши великие предки, не раз преодолевавшие нужду и заботу, позор и муку, духовную несвободу и физическое принуждение. Они смотрят на нас и протягивают нам, отчаявшимся смертным, свою вечную руку помощи! Горе народу, стыдящемуся опереться на нее! Речь 18. Смысл и цель существования государства заключается в том, чтобы гарантировать народу нормальное питание и достойное место во власти. Заключительная речь 27. Доклад 27.

Речь 20. Прокламация 01. Вырвавшийся на свободу революционный поток должен быть направлен в надежное русло эволюции. Речь 06. Но кардинально изменить само положение вещей может только эволюция! Прокламация 05. Речь 07. Мы верим в то, что своей борьбой мы лишь исполняем волю Создателя, наделившего каждое живое существо инстинктом самосохранения. Да будет жить наш народ!

Важно только одно — чтобы был наш народ! Речь 28. Но, если мы спасем Германию, мы сделаем самое благое дело в мире. Пусть говорят, что мы не всегда справедливы! Но, если мы спасем Германию, мы устраним величайшую несправедливость в мире. Пусть говорят, что мы не достаточно нравственны! Но, если наш народ будет спасен, мы возродим истинную нравственность! Речь 19. Речь 01.

Я всегда добросовестно старался преобразовать авторитет власти в силу доверия. И теперь я с гордостью могу признать, что подобно тому, как наша национальная социалистическая партия всегда была укоренена в нашем народе, так и теперь мы, уже в качестве правительства, всегда думаем как народ, вместе с народом и о народе! Речь 30.

Wir Deutschen sind gewappnet gegen Schwдche und Anfдlligkeit, und Schlдge und Unglьcksfдlle des Krieges verleihen uns nur zusдtzliche Kraft, feste Entschlossenheit und eine seelische und kдmpferische Aktivitдt, die bereit ist, alle Schwierigkeiten und Hindernisse mit revolutionдrem Elan zu ьberwinden. Es ist jetzt nicht der Дugenblick, danach zu fragen, wie alles gekommen ist. Das wird einer spдteren Rechenschaftslegung ьberlassen bleiben, die in voller Offenheit erfolgen soll und dem deutschen Volke und der Weltцffentlichkeit zeigen wird, dass das Unglьck, das uns in den letzten Wochen betroffen hat, seine tiefe, schicksalhafte Bedeutung besitzt. Das groЯe Heldenopfer, das unsere Soldaten in Stalingrad brachten, ist fьr die ganze Ostfront von einer ausschlaggebenden geschichtlichen Bedeutung gewesen. Es war nicht umsonst. Warum, das wird die Zukunft beweisen.

Wenn ich nunmehr ьber die jьngste Vergangenheit hinaus den Blick wieder nach vorne lenke, so tue ich das mit voller Absicht. Die Stunde drдngt! Sie lдЯt keine Zeit mehr offen fьr fruchtlose Debatten. Wir mьssen handeln, und zwar unverzьglich, schnell und grьndlich, so wie es seit jeher nationalsozialistische Art gewesen ist. Von ihrem Anfang an ist die Bewegung in den vielen Krisen, die sie durchzustehen und durchzukдmpfen hatte, so verfahren. Und auch der nationalsozialistische Staat hat sich, wenn eine Bedrohung vor ihm auftauchte, ihr mit entschlossener Willenskraft entgegen geworfen. Wir sind mutig genug, sie unmittelbar ins Дuge zu nehmen, sie kьhl und rьcksichtslos abzumessen und ihr dann erhobenen Hauptes und mit fester Entschlusskraft entgegenzutreten. Erst dann entwickelten wir als Bewegung und als Volk immer auch unsere hцchsten Tugenden, nдmlich einen wilden und entschlossenen Willen, die Gefahr zu brechen und zu bannen, eine Stдrke des Charakters, die alle Hindernisse ьberwindet, zдhe Verbissenheit in der Verfolgung des einmal erkannten Zieles und ein ehernes Herz, das gegen alle inneren und дuЯeren Anfechtungen gewappnet ist. So soll es auch heute sein.

Ich habe die Aufgabe, Ihnen ein ungeschminktes Bild der Lage zu entwerfen und daraus die harten Konsequenzen fьr das Handeln der deutschen Fьhrung, aber auch fьr das Handeln des deutschen Volkes zu ziehen. Wir durchleben im Osten augenblicklich eine schwere militдrische Belastung. Diese Belastung hat zeitweilig grцЯere AusmaЯe angenommen und gleicht, wenn nicht in der Art der Anlage, so doch in ihrem Umfang der des vergangenen Winters. Ьber ihre Ursachen wird spдter einmal zu sprechen sein. Heute bleibt uns nichts anderes ьbrig, als ihr Vorhandensein festzustellen und die Mittel und Wege zu ьberprьfen und anzuwenden bzw. Es hat deshalb auch gar keinen Zweck, diese Belastung selbst zu bestreiten. Ich bin mir zu gut dazu, Ihnen ein tдuschendes Bild der Lage zu geben, das nur zu falschen Folgerungen fьhren kцnnte und geeignet wдre, das deutsche Volk in eine Sicherheit seiner Lebensfьhrung und seines Handelns einzuwiegen, die der gegenwдrtigen Situation durchaus unangepasst wдre. Der Ansturm der Steppe gegen unseren ehrwьrdigen Kontinent ist in diesem Winter mit einer Wucht losgebrochen, die alle menschlichen und geschichtlichen Vorstellungen in den Schatten stellt. Die deutsche Wehrmacht bildet dagegen mit ihren Verbьndeten den einzigen ьberhaupt in Frage kommenden Schutzwall.

Der Fьhrer hat schon in seiner Proklamation zum 30. Januar mit ernsten und eindringlichen Worten die Frage aufgeworfen, was aus Deutschland und aus Europa geworden wдre, wenn am 30. Januar 1933 statt der nationalsozialistischen Bewegung ein bьrgerliches oder ein demokratisches Regime die Macht ьbernommen hдtte! Welche Gefahren wдren dann, schneller als wir es damals ahnen konnten, ьber das Reich hereingebrochen, und welche Abwehrkrдfte hдtten uns noch zur Verfьgung gestanden, um ihnen zu begegnen? Zehn Jahre Nationalsozialismus haben genьgt, das deutsche Volk ьber den Ernst der schicksalhaften Problematik, die aus dem цstlichen Bolschewismus entspringt, vollkommen aufzuklдren. Man wird jetzt auch verstehen, warum wir unsere Nьrnberger Parteitage so oft unter das Signum des Kampfes gegen den Bolschewismus gestellt haben. Wir erhoben damals unsere warnende Stimme vor dem deutschen Volk und vor der Weltцffentlichkeit, um die von einer Willens- und Geisteslдhmung ohnegleichen befallene abendlдndische Menschheit zum Erwachen zu bringen und ihr die Augen zu цffnen fьr die grauenerregenden geschichtlichen Gefahren, die aus dem Vorhandensein des цstlichen Bolschewismus erwachsen, der ein Volk von fast 200 Millionen dem jьdischen Terror dienstbar gemacht hatte und es zum Angriffskrieg gegen Europa vorbereitete. Als der Fьhrer die deutsche Wehrmacht am 22. Juni 1941 im Osten zum Angriff antreten lieЯ, waren wir uns alle im Klaren darьber, dass damit ьberhaupt der entscheidende Kampf dieses gigantischen Weltringens anbrach.

Wir wussten, welche Gefahren und Schwierigkeiten er fьr uns mit sich bringen wьrde. Wir waren uns aber auch klar darьber, dass die Gefahren und Schwierigkeiten bei lдngerem Zuwarten nur wachsen, niemals aber abnehmen kцnnten. Es war zwei Minuten vor zwцlf. Ein weiteres Zцgern hдtte leicht zur Vernichtung des Reiches und zur vollkommenen Bolschewisierung des europдischen Kontinents gefьhrt. Es ist verstдndlich, dass wir bei den groЯ angelegten Tarnungs- und Bluffmanцvern des bolschewistischen Regimes das Kriegspotential der Sowjetunion nicht richtig eingeschдtzt haben. Erst jetzt offenbart es sich uns in seiner ganzen wilden GrцЯe. Dementsprechend ist auch der Kampf, den unsere Soldaten im Osten zu bestehen haben, ьber alle menschlichen Vorstellungen hinaus hart, schwer und gefдhrlich. Er erfordert die Aufbietung unserer ganzen nationalen Kraft. Hier ist eine Bedrohung des Reiches und des europдischen Kontinents gegeben, die alle bisherigen Gefahren des Abendlandes weit in den Schatten stellt.

Wьrden wir in diesem Kampf versagen, so verspielten wir damit ьberhaupt unsere geschichtliche Mission. Alles, was wir bisher aufgebaut und geleistet haben, verblasst angesichts der gigantischen Aufgabe, die hier der deutschen Wehrmacht unmittelbar und dem deutschen Volke mittelbar gestellt ist. Ich wende mich in meinen Ausfьhrungen zuerst an die Weltцffentlichkeit und proklamiere ihr gegenьber drei Thesen unseres Kampfes gegen die bolschewistische Gefahr im Osten. Die erste dieser drei Thesen lautet: Wдre die deutsche Wehrmacht nicht in der Lage, die Gefahr aus dem Osten zu brechen, so wдre damit das Reich und in kurzer Folge ganz Europa dem Bolschewismus verfallen Die zweite dieser Thesen lautet: Die deutsche Wehrmacht und das deutsche Volk allein besitzen mit ihren Verbьndeten die Kraft, eine grundlegende Rettung Europas aus dieser Bedrohung durchzufьhren. Die dritte dieser Thesen lautet: Gefahr ist im Verzuge. Es muss schnell und grьndlich gehandelt werden, sonst ist es zu spдt. Zur ersten These habe ich im Einzelnen zu bemerken: Der Bolschewismus hat seit jeher ganz offen das Ziel proklamiert, nicht nur Europa, sondern die ganze Welt zu revolutionieren und sie in ein bolschewistisches Chaos zu stьrzen. Dieses Ziel ist seit Beginn der bolschewistischen Sowjetunion seitens des Kremls ideologisch vertreten und praktisch verfochten worden. Es ist klar, dass Stalin und die anderen SowjetgrцЯen, je mehr sie glauben, sich der Verwirklichung ihrer weltzerstцrerischen Absichten zu nдhern, umso mehr auch bestrebt sind, diese zu tarnen und zu verschleiern.

Das kann uns nicht beirren. Wir gehцren nicht zu jenen furchtsamen Gemьtern, die wie das hypnotisierte Kaninchen auf die Schlange schauen, bis sie es verschlingt. Wir wollen die Gefahr rechtzeitig erkennen und ihr auch rechtzeitig mit wirksamen Mitteln entgegentreten. Wir durchschauen nicht nur die Ideologie, sondern auch die Praktiken des Bolschewismus, denn wir haben uns schon einmal mit ihnen, und zwar mit denkbar grцЯtem Erfolg, auf innerpolitischem Felde auseinandergesetzt. Uns kann der Kreml nichts vormachen. Wir haben in einem vierzehnjдhrigen Kampf vor der Machtьbernahme und in einem zehnjдhrigen Kampf nach der Machtьbernahme seine Absichten und infamen Weltbetrugsmanцver demaskiert. Das Ziel des Bolschewismus ist die Weltrevolution der Juden. Sie wollen das Chaos ьber das Reich und ьber Europa hereinfьhren, um in der daraus entstehenden Hoffnungslosigkeit und Verzweiflung der Vцlker ihre internationale, bolschewistisch verschleierte kapitalistische Tyrannei aufzurichten. Was das fьr das deutsche Volk bedeuten wьrde, braucht nicht nдher erlдutert zu werden.

Es wьrde mit der Bolschewisierung des Reiches eine Liquidierung unserer gesamten Intelligenz- und Fьhrungsschicht und als Folge davon die Ьberfьhrung der arbeitenden Massen in die bolschewistisch-jьdische Sklaverei nach sich ziehen. Man sucht in Moskau Zwangsarbeitsbataillone, wie der Fьhrer in seiner Proklamation zum 30. Januar schon sagte, fьr die sibirischen Tundren. Der Aufstand der Steppe macht sich vor unseren Fronten bereit, und der Ansturm des Ostens, der in tдglich sich steigender Stдrke gegen unsere Linien anbrandet, ist nichts anderes als die versuchte Wiederholung der geschichtlichen Verheerungen, die frьher schon so oft unseren Erdteil gefдhrdet haben. Damit aber ist auch eine unmittelbare akute Lebensbedrohung fьr alle europдischen Mдchte gegeben. Man soll nicht glauben, dass der Bolschewismus, hдtte er die Gelegenheit, seinen Siegeszug ьber das Reich anzutreten, irgendwo an unseren Grenzen Halt machen wьrde. Er treibt eine Aggressionspolitik und Aggressionskriegfьhrung, die ausgesprochen auf die Bolschewisierung aller Lдnder und Vцlker ausgeht. Papierene Erklдrungen, die von Seiten des Kremls oder als Garantieverpflichtungen von Seiten Londons oder Washingtons gegen diese nicht zu bestreitenden Absichten abgegeben werden, imponieren uns nicht. Wir wissen, dass wir es im Osten mit einer infernalischen politischen Teufelei zu tun haben, die die sonst unter Menschen und Staaten ьblichen Beziehungen nicht anerkennt.

Wenn beispielsweise der englische Lord Beaverbrook erklдrt, dass Europa dem Sowjetismus zur Fьhrung ьberantwortet werden mьsse, wenn ein maЯgeblicher amerikanisch-jьdischer Journalist Brown diese These durch die zynische Verlautbarung ergдnzt, dass eine Bolschewisierung Europas vielleicht ьberhaupt die Lцsung unseres kontinentalen Problems darstellte, so wissen wir genau, was damit gemeint ist. Die europдischen Mдchte stehen hier vor ihrer entscheidenden Lebensfrage. Das Abendland ist in Gefahr. Ob ihre Regierungen und ihre Intelligenzschichten das einsehen wollen oder nicht, ist dabei gдnzlich unerheblich. Das deutsche Volk jedenfalls ist nicht gewillt, sich dieser Gefahr auch nur versuchsweise preiszugeben. Hinter den anstьrmenden Sowjetdivisionen sehen wir schon die jьdischen Liquidationskommandos, hinter diesen aber erhebt sich der Terror, das Gespenst des Millionenhungers und einer vollkommenen Anarchie. Hier erweist sich wiederum das internationale Judentum als das teuflische Ferment der Dekomposition, das eine geradezu zynische Genugtuung dabei empfindet, die Welt in ihre tiefste Unordnung zu stьrzen und damit den Untergang jahrtausendealter Kulturen, an denen es niemals einen inneren Anteil hatte, herbeizufьhren. Wir wissen damit also, vor welcher geschichtlichen Aufgabe wir stehen. Eine zweitausendjдhrige Aufbauarbeit der abendlдndischen Menschheit ist in Gefahr.

Man kann diese Gefahr gar nicht ernst genug schildern, aber es ist auch bezeichinend, dass wenn man sie nur beim Namen nennt, das internationale Judentum in allen Lдndern dagegen mit lдrmenden Ausfьhrungen Protest erhebt. So weit also ist es in Europa schon gekommen, dass man eine Gefahr nicht mehr eine Gefahr nennen darf, wenn sie eben vom Judentum ausgeht. Das aber hindert uns nicht daran, die dazu notwendigen Feststellungen zu treffen. Wir haben das auch frьher in unserem innerpolitischen Kampfe getan, als das kommunistische Judentum sich des demokratischen Judentums im «Berliner Tageblatt» und in der «Vossischen Zeitung» bediente, um eine Gefahr, die von Tag zu Tag drohender wurde, zu verniedlichen und zu bagatellisieren, um damit die von ihr bedrohten Teile unseres Volkes in Sicherheit einzuwiegen und ihre Abwehrkrдfte einzuschlдfern. Wir sдhen, wenn wir dieser Gefahr nicht Herr wьrden, im Geiste schon das Gespenst des Hungers, des Elends und einer Millionenzwangsarbeit fьr das deutsche Volk heraufziehen, sдhen den ehrwьrdigsten Erdteil in seinen Grundfesten wanken und unter seinen Trьmmern das geschichtliche Erbe der abendlдndischen Menschheit begraben. Das ist das Problem, vor dem wir stehen. Die europдischen Staaten einschlieЯlich Englands behaupten, stark genug zu sein, einer Bolschewisierung des europдischen Kontinents, sollte sie einmal praktisch gegeben sein, rechtzeitig und wirksam entgegenzutreten. Diese Erklдrung ist kindisch und verdient ьberhaupt keine Widerlegung. Sollte die stдrkste Militдrmacht der Welt nicht in der Lage sein, die Drohung des Bolschewismus zu brechen, wer brдchte dann noch die Kraft dazu auf?

Hier antworten stьrmische Rufe aus der im Sportpalast versammelten Menge: «Niemand! Sie wьrden im Bedarfsfall von seinen motorisierten Roboterdivisionen in wenigen Tagen ьberfahren werden. In den Hauptstдdten der mittleren und kleinen europдischen Staaten trцstet man sich mit der Absicht, man mьsse sich gegen die bolschewistische Gefahr seelisch rьsten. Das erinnert verzweifelt an die Erklдrungen der bьrgerlichen Mittelparteien aus dem Jahre 1932, dass der Kampf gegen den Kommunismus nur mit geistigen Waffen ausgefochten und gewonnen werden kцnne. Diese Behauptung war uns auch damals zu albern, als dass wir uns damit auseinandergesetzt hдtten. Der цstliche Bolschewismus ist nicht nur eine terroristische Lehre, sondern auch eine terroristische Praxis. Er verfolgt seine Ziele und Zwecke mit einer infernalischen Grьndlichkeit, unter restloser Ausschцpfung seines inneren Potentials und ohne jede Rьcksichtnahme auf Glьck, Wohlstand und Frieden der von ihm unterjochten Vцlkerschaften. Was wollten England und Amerika tun, wenn der europдische Kontinent im grцbsten Unglьcksfall dem Bolschewismus in die Arme fiele? Will man Europa von London aus vielleicht einreden, dass eine solche Entwicklung an der Kanalgrenze Halt machen wьrde?

Ich habe schon einmal darauf hingewiesen, dass der Bolschewismus seine Fremdenlegionen auf dem Boden aller demokratischen Staaten bereits in den kommunistischen Parteien stehen hat. Keiner dieser Staaten kann von sich behaupten, gegen eine innere Bolschewisierung immun zu sein. Eine jьngst vorgenommene Nachwahl zum englischen Unterhaus ergab, dass der unabhдngige, d. Alle territorialen Verpflichtungen, die die Sowjetunion auf sich nimmt, besitzen in unseren Augen keinen effektiven Wert. Der Bolschewismus pflegt seine Grenzen auch ideologisch und nicht nur militдrisch zu ziehen, und darin ist eben seine ьber die Grenzen der Vцlker hinwegspringende Gefahr gegeben. Die Welt hat also nicht die Wahl zwischen einem in seine alte Zersplitterung zurьckfallenden und einem unter der Achsenfьhrung sich neu ordnenden Europa, sondern nur die zwischen einem unter dem militдrischen Schutz der Achse stehenden und einem bolschewistischen Europa. Darьber hinaus bin ich der festen Ьberzeugung, dass die lamentierenden Lords und Erzbischцfe in London ьberhaupt nicht einmal die Absicht haben, der bolschewistischen Gefahr, die bei einem weiteren Vordringen der Sowjetarmeen fьr die europдischen Staaten gegeben wдre, praktisch entgegenzutreten. Das Judentum hat die angelsдchsischen Staaten geistig und politisch schon so tief durchdrungen, dass sie diese Gefahr ьberhaupt nicht mehr sehen und wahr haben wollen. Wie es sich in der Sowjetunion bolschewistisch tarnt, so tarnt es sicii in den angelsдchsischen Staaten plutokratisch-kapitalistisch.

Die Methoden der Mimikry sind bei der jьdischen Rasse bekannt. Sie geht seit jeher darauf aus, ihre Gastvцlker einzuschlдfern und damit ihre Abwehrkrдfte gegen von ihr stammende akute und lebensgefдhrdende Bedrohungen zu lдhmen. Zurufe aus der Menge: «Wir haben sie erlebt! Ьber unser Land hinweg reichen sich bereits das westeuropдische scheinzivilisierte Judentum und das Judentum des цstlichen Ghettos die Hдnde. Damit ist Europa in Todesgefahr. Ich schmeichle mir nicht, mit diesen Ausfьhrungen die цffentliche Meinung in den neutralen oder gar in den feindlichen Staaten alarmieren zu kцnnen. Das ist auch nicht ihr Zweck und ihre Absicht. Ich weiЯ, dass die englische Presse morgen mit einem wьtenden Geklдff ьber mich herfallen wird, ich hдtte angesichts unserer Belastung an der Ostfront die ersten Friedensfьhler ausgestreckt. Stьrmisches Gelдchter.

Davon kann ьberhaupt keine Rede sein. In Deutschland denkt heute kein Mensch an einen faulen Kompromiss, das ganze Volk denkt nur an einen harten Krieg. Ich beanspruche aber als ein verantwortlicher Sprecher des fьhrenden Landes dieses Kontinents fьr mich das souverдne Recht, eine Gefahr eine Gefahr zu nennen, wenn sie nicht nur unser eigenes Land, sondern unseren ganzen Erdteil bedroht. Als Nationalsozialisten haben wir die Pflicht, Alarm zu schlagen gegen die versuchte Chaotisierung des europдischen Kontinents durch das internationale Judentum, das sich im Bolschewismus eine terroristische Militдrmacht aufgebaut hat, deren Bedrohlichkeit ьberhaupt nicht ьberschдtzt werden kann. Die dritte These, die ich hier nдher erlдutern will, ist die, dass Gefahr unmittelbar im Verzuge ist. Die Lдhmungserscheinungen der westeuropдischen Demokratien gegen ihre tцdlichste Bedrohung sind herzbeklemmend. Das internationale Judentum fцrdert sie mit allen Krдften. Genau so, wie der Widerstand gegen den Kommunismus in unserem Kampf um die Macht in unserem eigenen Lande von den jьdischen Zeitungen kьnstlich eingeschlдfert und nur durch den Nationalsozialismus wieder erweckt wurde, genau so ist das heute bei den anderen Vцlkern der Fall. Das Judentum erweist sich hier wieder einmal als die Inkarnation des Bцsen, als plastischer Dдmon des Verfalls und als Trдger eines internationalen kulturzerstцrerischen Chaos.

Man wird, um das hier nur zu erwдhnen, in diesem Zusammenhang auch unsere konsequente Judenpolitik verstehen kцnnen. Wir sehen im Judentum fьr jedes Land eine unmittelbare Gefahr gegeben. Wie andere Vцlker sich gegen diese Gefahr zur Wehr setzen, ist uns gleichgьltig. Wie wir uns aber dagegen zur Wehr setzen, das ist unsere eigene Sache, in die wir keinerlei Einsprьche dulden. Das Judentum stellt eine infektiцse Erscheinung dar, die ansteckend wirkt. Wenn das feindliche Ausland gegen unsere antijьdische Politik scheinheilig Protest einlegt und ьber unsere MaЯnahmen gegen das Judentum heuchlerische Krokodilstrдnen vergieЯt, so kann uns das nicht daran hindern, das Notwendige zu tun. Deutschland jedenfalls hat nicht die Absicht, sich dieser Bedrohung zu beugen, sondern vielmehr die, ihr rechtzeitig und wenn nцtig mit den radikalsten GegenmaЯnahmen entgegenzutreten. Minutenlang hindern nach diesen Sдtzen zustimmende Sprechchцre den Ministeram Weiterreden.

В нашей подборке можно прочитать осмысленные и известные цитаты Гитлера на немецком языке. Некоторые из выражений очень трудны к пониманию и заставляют задуматься каждого человека.

Jede Generation muss sich am Krieg beteiligen. Niemand wird den Gewinner fragen, ob er die Wahrheit gesagt hat oder nicht. Nur ein fanatischer Mob ist leicht zu kontrollieren. Ein Blut ist ein Staat! Ein Wort war mir nie bekannt — aufgeben.

The Bolshevist monster, to which they want to deliver the European nations, will someday tear them and their people to pieces. The Jew will not however exterminate the European peoples, rather he will be the victim of his own plot.

I have also left no doubt that, if the nations of Europe are again to be regarded as mere shares to be bought and sold by those international money and finance conspirators, then that race, Jewry, which is the real guilty party in this murderous struggle, will be saddled with the responsibility. I also made it clear that this time, not only would millions of children of European Aryan races starve, not only would millions of grown men meet their death, and not only would millions of women and children be burned or bombed to death in the cities, but that the real culprit would atone for his guilt, even if by more humane means. The most fearsome example of this kind is Russia where he Jewry allowed 39 million humans in truly fanatical wildness to die or starve in inhuman agony, in order to secure the mastery of a great people for a gang of Jewish literati and stock exchange bandits. The result is not only the end of freedom for the people oppressed by the Jews, but rather also the end of these parasites of the peoples themselves. After the death of the victim, the vampire dies sooner or later. Mein Kampf, 1925, Volume 1, p.

Похожие новости: