Речь о тотальной войне — речь рейхсминистра народного просвещения и пропаганды Германии Пауля Йозефа Геббельса, произнесённая им перед многотысячной аудиторией в Берлинском дворце спорта 18 февраля 1943 года.

Йозеф Геббельс призывает к тотальной войне перед толпой в Берлине, 1943 год. Впервые, без купюр и изъятий, представлены тексты дневников Йозефа Геббельса периода ведения тотальной войны. Рекомендуем скачать первую песню Речь Йозефа Геббельса Тотальная война 1943 год размером 10.68 MB.

Тень Геббельса. Что такое «тотальная война»?

В Берлине он обязывает нацию к тотальной войне. Англичане говорят, что люди не хотят тотальной войны, что они хотят капитуляции ». И, конечно же, это подпитывало гнев в толпе. А когда пришли вопросы и раздались крики, контроль был потерян ».

Все это кричали. Это был мрачный опыт.

Она имеет не только военное, но и умственное и духовное значение для немецкого народа. Здесь наши очи впервые узрели подлинную суть войны. Фюрер был прав, когда сказал, что по её окончанию не будет победителей и побеждённых, а будут живые и мёртвые.

Немецкий народ борется за всё, что у него есть. Мы знаем, что немцы отстаивают всё самое святое, что у них имеется: свои семьи, своих женщин и детей, свою прекрасную и нетронутую природу, свои города и сёла, свою двухтысячелетнюю культуру - всё, ради чего действительно стоит жить. Большевизм, разумеется, нисколько не дорожит нашим народным достоянием, и он не будет заботиться о нём, если вдруг овладеет им. Наглядный тому пример - закабаление им русского народа. За последние 25 лет Советский Союз увеличил военный потенциал большевизма до невиданного уровня, и мы его неверно оценили.

В России на службе у террористического еврейства находится 200-миллионный народ. Еврейство цинично использовало свои методы для того, чтобы превратить невозмутимую прочность русского народа в смертельную опасность для цивилизованных народов Европы. Армады танков, с которыми мы столкнулись на восточном фронте, являются результатом 25 лет социального бесправия и нищеты русского народа. Я твёрдо убеждён, что нам не преодолеть большевистскую угрозу, если мы не станем использовать аналогичные но не идентичные! Немецкий народ столкнулся с самым серьёзным запросом войны, а именно с необходимостью найти в себе решимость использовать все наши ресурсы для защиты всего того, что у нас есть, и всего того, что нам понадобится в будущем.

Тотальная война - это требование данной минуты. Мы должны использовать все наши ресурсы, причём настолько быстро и тщательно, насколько это возможно с организационной и практической точек зрения. Ненужные хлопоты совершенно неуместны. Будущее Европы полностью зависит от нашего успеха на востоке. Мы готовы отстоять Европу.

В этой битве немецкий народ проливает свою самую ценную национальную кровь. Мы добровольно отказываемся от значительной части нашего уровня жизни, чтобы усилить нашу военную экономику настолько быстро и основательно, насколько это возможно. Это не самоцель, а средство к цели. Все понимают, что если мы проиграем, то всё будет уничтожено. Спросите у любого в Германии, и он вам скажет: самое радикальное - это всего лишь достаточно радикальное, и самое тотальное - это всего лишь достаточно тотальное для того, чтобы одержать победу.

Тотальная война стала делом всего немецкого народа. Поэтому я могу вас заверить, что меры, на которые идёт руководство, находятся в полном согласии с желаниями немецкого народа - как в тылу, так и на фронте. Народ готов нести любую ношу, вплоть до самой тяжёлой, идти на любые жертвы, если только это ведёт к великой цели - победе. Бурные аплодисменты. Это, естественно, означает, что ноша должна распределяться поровну.

Шумное одобрение. Те меры, которые мы приняли, и те меры, которые нам ещё только предстоит принять, будут наполнены духом национал-социалистической справедливости. Мы не обращаем внимания на класс или положение в обществе. Богатые и бедные, люди из высших и низших слоёв общества должны распределять ношу поровну. Все должны выполнять свой долг в эту трудную минуту.

Более полувека спустя Фетшер, в то время уже вышедший на пенсию профессор политологии, посвятил той речи Геббельса отдельную книгу. Она вышла в 1998 году и, хотя уже давно ее можно найти только у букинистов, но и 20 лет спустя ее все еще стоит прочитать. По результатам анализа Фетшера 1922-2014 , своей речью Геббельс преследовал четыре цели: во-первых, он хотел преодолеть смену настроения, которое охватило немецкое население после катастрофы под Сталинградом. Во-вторых, он хотел сделать популярным лозунг «тотальная война», который должен был мобилизовать народ на еще большие усилия в войне. В-третьих, длившееся 109 минут обращение было попыткой указать нейтральным государствам и противникам войны на Западе на угрозу большевизма. В-четвертых, и прежде всего, Геббельс хотел укрепить свое собственное положение среди нацистского руководства, потому что его оттеснили на второй план шеф СС Генрих Гиммлер Heinrich Himmler и особенно исполнявший в течение года обязанности рейхсминистра вооружений и боеприпасов Альберт Шпеер Albert Speer.

Среди них были такие знаменитости, как актер Генрих Георге Heinrich George , но также, очевидно, и заранее подготовленные клакеры и подстрекатели. Например, они ликовали, когда Геббельс оглашал четвертый из десяти своих риторических вопросов: «Хотите ли вы тотальную войну? Если потребуется, хотите ли вы более тотальную и радикальную войну, чем мы ее можем сегодня представить? Впервые в Германии эту идею во время Первой мировой войны озвучил Эрих Людендорф Erich Ludendorff , который с 1916 по 1918 год в должности генерал-квартирмейстера верховного командования армией был действительно весьма влиятельным человеком в империи. Под этим термином он подразумевал мобилизацию последних резервов. Его изданная в 1935 году под этим же названием книга, напротив, привлекла уже меньше внимания: Людендорф был уже давно исключен из властных кругов как отступник.

Но Геббельс осознал силу влияния термина и наполнил его дополнительным содержанием.

We see Jewry as a direct threat to every nation. We do not care what other peoples do about the danger. What we do to defend ourselves is our own business, however, and we will not tolerate objections from others.

Jewry is a contagious infection. Enemy nations may raise hypocritical protests against our measures against Jewry and cry crocodile tears, but that will not stop us from doing that which is necessary. Germany, in any event, has no intention of bowing before this threat, but rather intends to take the most radical measures, if necessary, in good time After this sentence, the chants of the audience prevent the minister from going on for several minutes. The military challenges of the Reich in the East are at the center of everything.

The war of mechanized robots against Germany and Europe has reached its high point. In resisting the grave and direct threat with its weapons, the German people and its Axis allies are fulfilling in the truest sense of the word a European mission. Our courageous and just battle against this world-wide plague will not be hindered by the worldwide outcry of International Jewry. German women, to work!

The tragic battle of Stalingrad is a symbol of heroic, manly resistance to the revolt of the steppes. It has not only a military, but also an intellectual and spiritual significance for the German people. Here for the first time our eyes have been opened to the true nature of the war. We want no more false hopes and illusions.

We want bravely to look the facts in the face, however hard and dreadful they may be. The history of our party and our state has proven that a danger recognized is a danger defeated. Our coming hard battles in the East will be under the sign of this heroic resistance. It will require previously undreamed of efforts by our soldiers and our weapons.

A merciless war is raging in the East. The German nation knows that. Its healthy instincts have led it through the daily confusion of intellectual and spiritual difficulties. We know today that the Blitzkrieg in Poland and the campaign in the West have only limited significance to the battle in the East.

The German nation is fighting for everything it has. We know that the German people are defending their holiest possessions: their families, women and children, the beautiful and untouched countryside, their cities and villages, their two thousand year old culture, everything indeed that makes life worth living. It did not do so even for its own people. Terrorist Jewry had 200 million people to serve it in Russia.

It cynically used its methods on to create out of the stolid toughness of the Russian people a grave danger for the civilized nations of Europe. A whole nation in the East was driven to battle. Men, women, and even children are employed not only in armaments factories, but in the war itself. The masses of tanks we have faced on the Eastern Front are the result of 25 years of social misfortune and misery of the Bolshevist people.

We have to respond with similar measures if we do not want to give up the game as lost. My firm conviction is that we cannot overcome the Bolshevist danger unless we use equivalent, though not identical, methods. The German people face the gravest demand of the war, namely of finding the determination to use all our resources to protect everything we have and everything we will need in the future. Total war is the demand of the hour.

Every sentence is met with growing applause and agreement. The danger facing us is enormous. The efforts we take to meet it must be just as enormous. The time has come to remove the kid gloves and use our fists.

A cry of elemental agreement rises. Chants from the galleries and seats testify to the full approval of the crowd. We can no longer make only partial and careless use of the war potential at home and in the significant parts of Europe that we control. We must use our full resources, as quickly and thoroughly as it is organizationally and practically possible.

Unnecessary concern is wholly out of place. The future of Europe hangs on our success in the East. We are ready to defend it. The German people are shedding their most valuable national blood in this battle.

The rest of Europe should at least work to support us. There are many serious voices in Europe that have already realized this. Others still resist. That cannot influence us.

If danger faced them alone, we could view their reluctance as literary nonsense of no significance. But the danger faces us all, and we must all do our share. Those who today do not understand that will thank us tomorrow on bended knees that we courageously and firmly took on the task. It bothers us not in the least that our enemies abroad claim that our total war measures resemble those of Bolshevism.

They claim hypocritically that that means there is no need to fight Bolshevism. The question here is not one of method, but of the goal, namely eliminating the danger. Applause for several minutes The question is not whether the methods are good or bad, but whether they are successful. The National Socialist government is ready to use every means.

We do not care if anyone objects. We are voluntarily giving up a significant part of our living standard to increase our war effort as quickly and completely as possible. This is not an end in itself, but rather a means to an end. Our social standard of living will be even higher after the war.

We do not need to imitate Bolshevist methods, because we have better people and leaders, which gives us a great advantage. But things have shown that we must do much more than we have done so far to turn the war in the East decisively in our favor. As countless letters from the homeland and the front have shown, by the way, the entire German people agrees. Everyone knows that if we lose, all will be destroyed.

The people and leadership are determined to take the most radical measures. The broad working masses of our people are not unhappy because the government is too ruthless. If anything, they are unhappy because it is too considerate. Ask anyone in Germany, and he will say: The most radical is just radical enough, and the most total is just total enough to gain victory.

The total war effort has become a matter of the entire German people. No one has any excuse for ignoring its demands. A storm of applause greeted my call on 30 January for total war. The people are willing to bear any burden, even the heaviest, to make any sacrifice, if it leads to the great goal of victory.

Lively applause This naturally assumes that the burdens are shared equally. Loud approval We cannot tolerate a situation in which most people carry the burden of the war, while a small, passive portion attempts to escape its burdens and responsibilities. The measures we have taken, and the ones we will yet take, will be characterized by the spirit of National Socialist justice. We pay no heed to class or standing.

Rich and poor, high and low must share the burdens equally. Everyone must do his duty in this grave hour, whether by choice or otherwise. We know this has the full support of the people. We would rather do too much rather than too little to achieve victory.

No war in history has ever been lost because of too many soldiers or weapons. Many, however, have been lost because the opposite was true. It is time to get the slackers moving. Stormy agreement They must be shaken out of their comfortable ease.

We cannot wait until they come to their senses. That might be too late. The alarm must sound throughout the nation. Millions of hands must get to work throughout the country.

The measures we have taken, and the ones we will now take, and which I shall discuss later in this speech, are critical for our whole public and private life. The individual may have to make great sacrifices, but they are tiny when compared to the sacrifices he would have to make if his refusal brought down on us the greatest national disaster. It is better to operate at the right time than to wait until the disease has taken root. One may not complain to the doctor or sue him for bodily injury.

Again let me say that the heavier the sacrifices the German people must make, the more urgent it is that they be fairly shared. The people want it that way. No one resists even the heaviest burdens of war. But it angers people when a few always try to escape the burdens.

The National Socialist government has both the moral and political duty to oppose such attempts, if necessary with draconian penalties. We are therefore compelled to adopt a series of measures that are not essential for the war effort in themselves, but seem necessary to maintain moral at home and at the front. The optics of the war, that is, how things outwardly appear, is of decisive importance in this fourth year of war. In view of the superhuman sacrifices that the front makes each day, it has a basic right to expect that no one at home claims the right to ignore the war and its demands.

And not only the front demands this, but the overwhelming part of the homeland. The industrious have a right to expect that if they work ten or twelve or fourteen hours a day, a lazy person does not stand next to them who thinks them foolish. The homeland must stay pure and intact in its entirety. Nothing may disturb the picture.

We have ordered, for example, the closing of bars and night clubs. I cannot imagine that people who are doing their duty for the war effort still have the energy to stay out late into the night in such places. I can only conclude that they are not taking their responsibilities seriously. We have closed these establishments because they began to offend us, and because they disturb the image of the war.

We have nothing against amusements as such. It may be that an occasional person thinks that, even during war, his stomach is the most important thing. We cannot pay him any heed. At the front everyone from the simple soldier to the general field marshal eats from the field kitchen.

I do not believe that it is asking too much to insist that we in the homeland pay heed to at least the basic laws of community thinking. We can become gourmets once again when the war is over. Right now, we have more important things to do than worry about our stomachs. Countless luxury stores have also been closed.

They often offended the buying public. There was generally nothing to buy, unless perhaps one paid here and there with butter or eggs instead of money. What good do shops do that no longer have anything to sell, but only use electricity, heating, and human labor that is lacking everywhere else, particularly in the armaments industry. It is no excuse to say that keeping some of these shops open gives a lovely impression to foreigners.

Foreigners will be impressed only by a German victory! Stormy applause. Everyone will want to be our friend if we win the war. But if we lose, we will be able to count our friends on the fingers of one hand.

We have put an end to such illusions. We want to put these people standing in empty shops to useful work in the war economy. This process is already in motion, and will be completed by 15 March. It is of course a major transformation in our entire economic life.

Геббельс (О тотальной войне. Часть 1)

До этого пропаганда убеждала бюргеров, будто до триумфального окончания войны осталось потерпеть всего «чуть-чуть». Служба безопасности СД доносила, что значительная часть немцев впервые осознала, что войну можно и проиграть. Теперь нужно было как-то выкручиваться. Выступление Геббельса проходило в огромном Берлинском дворце спорта перед тщательно отобранной аудиторией, которая должна была репрезентировать весь немецкий народ.

Здесь были ветераны, рабочие с военных заводов, партийные и государственные служащие, представители интеллигенции, делегаты от женщин и молодёжи. Министр начал с того, что не время выяснять, как так вышло, что ситуация сложилась настолько критической — с этим он предлагал разобраться после. Пока же гитлеровская Германия, по словам оратора, была единственной защитой Европы от большевистской угрозы с Востока.

Затем последовали три основополагающих тезиса речи. Во-первых, согласно Геббельсу, нападение на Советский Союз было превентивным, совершённым «за две минуты до полуночи» до планировавшегося сталинского наступления.

А, Громыко А. Воениздат М. И это было действительно так. Чему свидетелем как Е. Катукова, супруга «1-го танкиста» страны, так и вся 1-я гв. Ведь немцы не просто грозились физически уничтожить всех малодушных своих сограждан, но и вершили над ними многочисленные безжалостные расправы, воскресив в памяти деяния таинственной фем: «Сзади линейных войск стояли эсесовские части, и если кто-то отступал без приказа, их просто расстреливали или вешали на деревьях, чему мы были свидетелями.

И вот какого возраста пушечное мясо было брошено тогда Гитлером на верную свою смерть: «Когда фронт приблизился к границам Германии, мобилизация коснулась и детских лагерей. С марта 1944 года многие из подростков были направлены в учебные лагеря Гитлеръюгенда, СС и вермахта, где их участь в качестве пушечного мяса была предрешена» [63] Кнопп Г. Причем, уже и из них мало кто остался в живых. Что вполне естественно. Каждый второй воспитанник элитных школ погиб» [63] Там же, с. То есть даже среди тех, кто не достигнув солдатского возраста Германии, в то время уже 16 лет, и не закончив своего учебного учреждения, произвел попытку своими телами на какое-то время приостановить губительное русское наступление. Так что и в этой среде, то есть среди 12—15-летних, потери немцев, уже перед самым их концом, были просто катастрофические. Но не всем им «посчастливилось» получить в свою голову русскую пулю.

Уничтожались не только дезертиры. Спекулянты, распространители слухов, люди, запасавшиеся продовольствием, и даже те, кто, сменив адрес, не уведомил об этом гауляйтера, также находились под угрозой смертной казни» [13] Гарт Б. От «Барбароссы» до «Терминала». Взгляд с Запада.

I believe that the entire German people has a passionate interest in what I have to say tonight. I will therefore speak with holy seriousness and openness, as the hour demands. The German people, raised, educated and disciplined by National Socialism, can bear the whole truth. It knows the gravity of the situation, and its leadership can therefore demand the necessary hard measures, yes even the hardest measures. We Germans are armed against weakness and uncertainty. Now is not the time to ask how it all happened.

That can wait until later, when the German people and the whole world will learn the full truth about the misfortune of the past weeks, and its deep and fateful significance. The heroic sacrifices of heroism of our soldiers in Stalingrad has had vast historical significance for the whole Eastern Front. It was not in vain. The future will make clear why. When I jump over the past to look ahead, I do it intentionally. The time is short! There is no time for fruitless debates. We must act, immediately, thoroughly, and decisively, as has always been the National Socialist way. The movement has from its beginning acted in that way to master the many crises it faced and overcame. The National Socialist state also acted decisively when faced by a threat.

We are not like the ostrich that sticks its head in the sand so as not to see danger. We are brave enough to look danger in the face, to coolly and ruthlessly take its measure, then act decisively with our heads held high. Both as a movement and as a nation, we have always been at our best when we needed fanatic, determined wills to overcome and eliminate danger, or a strength of character sufficient to overcome every obstacle, or bitter determination to reach our goal, or an iron heart capable of withstanding every internal and external battle. So it will be today. My task is to give you an unvarnished picture of the situation, and to draw the hard conclusions that will guide the actions of the German government, but also of the German people. We face a serious military challenge in the East. The crisis is at the moment a broad one, similar but not identical in many ways to that of the previous winter. Later we will discuss the causes. Now, we must accept things as they are and discover and apply the ways and means to turn things again in our favor. There is no point in disputing the seriousness of the situation.

I do not want to give you a false impression of the situation that could lead to false conclusions, perhaps giving the German people a false sense of security that is altogether inappropriate in the present situation. The storm raging against our venerable continent from the steppes this winter overshadows all previous human and historical experience. The German army and its allies are the only possible defense. What dangers would have followed, faster than we could then have suspected, and what powers of defense would we have had to meet them? Ten years of National Socialism have been enough to make plain to the German people the seriousness of the danger posed by Bolshevism from the East. Now one can understand why we spoke so often of the fight against Bolshevism at our Nuremberg party rallies. We raised our voices in warning to our German people and the world, hoping to awaken Western humanity from the paralysis of will and spirit into which it had fallen. We tried to open their eyes to the horrible danger from Eastern Bolshevism, which had subjected a nation of nearly 200 million people to the terror of the Jews and was preparing an aggressive war against Europe. We knew the dangers and difficulties. But we also knew that dangers and difficulties always grow over time, they never diminish.

It was two minutes before midnight. Waiting any longer could easily have led to the destruction of the Reich and a total Bolshevization of the European continent. Only now do we see its true scale. That is why the battle our soldiers face in the East exceeds in its hardness, dangers and difficulties all human imagining. It demands our full national strength. This is a threat to the Reich and to the European continent that casts all previous dangers into the shadows. If we fail, we will have failed our historic mission. Everything we have built and done in the past pales in the face of this gigantic task that the German army directly and the German people less directly face. I speak first to the world, and proclaim three theses regarding our fight against the Bolshevist danger in the East. This first thesis: Were the German army not in a position to break the danger from the East, the Reich would fall to Bolshevism, and all Europe shortly afterwards.

Second: The German army, the German people and their allies alone have the strength to save Europe from this threat. Third: Danger faces us. We must act quickly and decisively, or it will be too late. I turn to the first thesis. Bolshevism has always proclaimed its goal openly: to bring revolution not only to Europe, but to the entire world, and plunge it into Bolshevist chaos. Clearly, the nearer Stalin and the other Soviet leaders believe they are to realizing their world-destroying objectives, the more they attempt to hide and conceal them. We cannot be fooled. We are not like those timid souls who wait like the hypnotized rabbit until the serpent devours them. We prefer to recognize the danger in good time and take effective action. We see through not only the ideology of Bolshevism, but also its practice, for we had great success with that in our domestic struggles.

The Kremlin cannot deceive us. We had fourteen years of our struggle for power, and ten years thereafter, to unmask its intentions and its infamous deceptions. The goal of Bolshevism is Jewish world revolution. They want to bring chaos to the Reich and Europe, using the resulting hopelessness and desperation to establish their international, Bolshevist-concealed capitalist tyranny. I do not need to say what that would mean for the German people. A Bolshevization of the Reich would mean the liquidation of our entire intelligentsia and leadership, and the descent of our workers into Bolshevist-Jewish slavery. The revolt of the steppes is readying itself at the front, and the storm from the East that breaks against our lines daily in increasing strength is nothing other than a repetition of the historical devastation that has so often in the past endangered our part of the world. That is a direct threat to the existence of every European power. No one should believe that Bolshevism would stop at the borders of the Reich, were it to be victorious. The goal of its aggressive policies and wars is the Bolshevization of every land and people in the world.

In the face of such undeniable intentions, we are not impressed by paper declarations from the Kremlin or guarantees from London or Washington. We know that we are dealing in the East with an infernal political devilishness that does not recognize the norms governing relations between people and nations. The European powers are facing the most critical question. The West is in danger. It makes no difference whether or not their governments and intellectuals realize it or not. The German people, in any event, is unwilling to bow to this danger. Behind the oncoming Soviet divisions we see the Jewish liquidation commandos, and behind them terror, the specter of mass starvation and complete anarchy. International Jewry is the devilish ferment of decomposition that finds cynical satisfaction in plunging the world into the deepest chaos and destroying ancient cultures that it played no role in building. We also know our historic responsibility. Two thousand years of Western civilization are in danger.

One cannot overestimate the danger. It is indicative that when one names it as it is, International Jewry throughout the world protests loudly. Things have gone so far in Europe that one cannot call a danger a danger when it is caused by the Jews. That does not stop us from drawing the necessary conclusions. That is what we did in our earlier domestic battles. We could see, if the danger were not overcome, the specter of hunger, misery, and forced labor by millions of Germans. We could see our venerable part of the world collapse, and bury in its ruins the ancient inheritance of the West. That is the danger we face today. My second thesis: Only the German Reich and its allies are in the position to resist this danger. The European nations, including England, believe that they are strong enough to resist effectively the Bolshevization of Europe, should it come to that.

This belief is childish and not even worth refuting. If the strongest military force in the world is not able to break the threat of Bolshevism, who else could do it? The neutral European nations have neither the potential nor the military means nor the spiritual strength to provide even the least resistance to Bolshevism. In the capitals of the mid-sized and smaller European states, they console themselves with the idea that one must be spiritually armed against Bolshevism laughter. That reminds us of the statements by bourgeois parties in 1932, who thought they could fight and win the battle against communism with spiritual weapons. That was too stupid even then to be worth refuting. Eastern Bolshevism is not only a doctrine of terrorism, it is also the practice of terrorism. It strives for its goals with an infernal thoroughness, using every resource at its disposal, regardless of the welfare, prosperity or peace of the peoples it ruthlessly oppresses. Will London perhaps persuade Bolshevism to stop at the English Channel? I have already said that Bolshevism has its foreign legions in the form of communist parties in every democratic nation.

None of these states can think it is immune to domestic Bolshevism. In a recent by-election for the House of Commons, the independent, that is communist, candidate got 10,741 of the 22,371 votes cast. This was in a district that had formerly been a conservative stronghold. Within a short time, 10,000 voters, nearly half, had been lost to the communists. That is proof that the Bolshevist danger exists in England too, and that it will not go away simply because it is ignored. We place no faith in any territorial promises that the Soviet Union may make. Bolshevism set ideological as well as military boundaries, which poses a danger to every nation. The world no longer has the choice between falling back into its old fragmentation or accepting a new order for Europe under Axis leadership. The only choice now is between living under Axis protection or in a Bolshevist Europe. I am firmly convinced that the lamenting lords and archbishops in London have not the slightest intention of resisting the Bolshevist danger that would result were the Soviet army to enter Europe.

Jewry has so deeply infected the Anglo-Saxon states both spiritually and politically that they are no longer have the ability to see the danger. It conceals itself as Bolshevism in the Soviet Union, and plutocratic-capitalism in the Anglo-Saxon states. The Jewish race is an expert at mimicry. They put their host peoples to sleep, paralyzing their defensive abilities. Our insight into the matter led us to the early realization that cooperation between international plutocracy and international Bolshevism was not a contradiction, but rather a sign of deep commonalities. The hand of the pseudo-civilized Jewry of Western Europe shakes the hand of the Jewry of the Eastern ghettos over Germany. Europe is in deadly danger. I do not flatter myself into believing that my remarks will influence public opinion in the neutral, much less the enemy, states. That is also not my goal or intention. I know that, given our problems on the Eastern Front, the English press tomorrow will furiously attack me with the accusation that I have made the first peace feelers loud laughter.

That is certainly not so. No one in Germany thinks any longer of a cowardly compromise. The entire people thinks only of a hard war. As a spokesman for the leading nation of the continent, however, I claim the right to call a danger a danger if it threatens not threatens not only our own land, but our entire continent. My third thesis is that the danger is immediate. The paralysis of the Western European democracies before their deadliest threat is frightening. International Jewry is doing all it can to encourage such paralysis. During our struggle for power in Germany, Jewish newspapers tried to conceal the danger, until National Socialism awakened the people. It is just the same today in other nations. Jewry once again reveals itself as the incarnation of evil, as the plastic demon of decay and the bearer of an international culture-destroying chaos.

This explains, by the way, our consistent Jewish policies. We see Jewry as a direct threat to every nation. We do not care what other peoples do about the danger. What we do to defend ourselves is our own business, however, and we will not tolerate objections from others. Jewry is a contagious infection.

Наконец, третий тезис был самым важным. Так как Германия оказалась перед лицом смертельной опасности, то единственный выход — тотальная война.

К этому призывал и развёрнутый над трибуной огромный транспарант: «Тотальная война — наикратчайшая война! Она подразумевала сокращение отсрочек и «броней» для мужчин и внедрение трудовой повинности для женщин. В качестве популистской меры Геббельс заявил о закрытии баров, клубов, дорогих ресторанов и салонов красоты. Были произнесены проклятия в адрес «немногих бездельников и уклонистов». Прозвучало сравнение ситуации начала 1943 г. Затем произошла кульминация. Перечислив все категории слушателей, присутствовавших во Дворце спорта, Геббельс нарёк их представителями всего немецкого народа и задал им десять вопросов.

Как Геббельс заново изобрёл искусство пропаганды и заставил немцев хотеть войны

As a spokesman for the leading nation of the continent, however, I claim the right to call a danger a danger if it threatens not threatens not only our own land, but our entire continent. My third thesis is that the danger is immediate. The paralysis of the Western European democracies before their deadliest threat is frightening. International Jewry is doing all it can to encourage such paralysis.

During our struggle for power in Germany, Jewish newspapers tried to conceal the danger, until National Socialism awakened the people. It is just the same today in other nations. Jewry once again reveals itself as the incarnation of evil, as the plastic demon of decay and the bearer of an international culture-destroying chaos.

This explains, by the way, our consistent Jewish policies. We see Jewry as a direct threat to every nation. We do not care what other peoples do about the danger.

What we do to defend ourselves is our own business, however, and we will not tolerate objections from others. Jewry is a contagious infection. Enemy nations may raise hypocritical protests against our measures against Jewry and cry crocodile tears, but that will not stop us from doing that which is necessary.

Germany, in any event, has no intention of bowing before this threat, but rather intends to take the most radical measures, if necessary, in good time After this sentence, the chants of the audience prevent the minister from going on for several minutes. The military challenges of the Reich in the East are at the center of everything. The war of mechanized robots against Germany and Europe has reached its high point.

In resisting the grave and direct threat with its weapons, the German people and its Axis allies are fulfilling in the truest sense of the word a European mission. Our courageous and just battle against this world-wide plague will not be hindered by the worldwide outcry of International Jewry. German women, to work!

We want no more false hopes and illusions. We want bravely to look the facts in the face, however hard and dreadful they may be. The history of our party and our state has proven that a danger recognized is a danger defeated.

Our coming hard battles in the East will be under the sign of this heroic resistance. It will require previously undreamed of efforts by our soldiers and our weapons. A merciless war is raging in the East.

The German nation knows that. Its healthy instincts have led it through the daily confusion of intellectual and spiritual difficulties. We know today that the Blitzkrieg in Poland and the campaign in the West have only limited significance to the battle in the East.

Terrorist Jewry had 200 million people to serve it in Russia. It cynically used its methods on to create out of the stolid toughness of the Russian people a grave danger for the civilized nations of Europe. A whole nation in the East was driven to battle.

Men, women, and even children are employed not only in armaments factories, but in the war itself. The masses of tanks we have faced on the Eastern Front are the result of 25 years of social misfortune and misery of the Bolshevist people. We have to respond with similar measures if we do not want to give up the game as lost.

My firm conviction is that we cannot overcome the Bolshevist danger unless we use equivalent, though not identical, methods. The German people face the gravest demand of the war, namely of finding the determination to use all our resources to protect everything we have and everything we will need in the future. Total war is the demand of the hour.

Every sentence is met with growing applause and agreement. The danger facing us is enormous. The efforts we take to meet it must be just as enormous.

The time has come to remove the kid gloves and use our fists. A cry of elemental agreement rises. Chants from the galleries and seats testify to the full approval of the crowd.

We can no longer make only partial and careless use of the war potential at home and in the significant parts of Europe that we control. We must use our full resources, as quickly and thoroughly as it is organizationally and practically possible. Unnecessary concern is wholly out of place.

The future of Europe hangs on our success in the East. We are ready to defend it. The German people are shedding their most valuable national blood in this battle.

The rest of Europe should at least work to support us. There are many serious voices in Europe that have already realized this. Others still resist.

That cannot influence us. If danger faced them alone, we could view their reluctance as literary nonsense of no significance. But the danger faces us all, and we must all do our share.

Those who today do not understand that will thank us tomorrow on bended knees that we courageously and firmly took on the task. It bothers us not in the least that our enemies abroad claim that our total war measures resemble those of Bolshevism. They claim hypocritically that that means there is no need to fight Bolshevism.

The question here is not one of method, but of the goal, namely eliminating the danger. Applause for several minutes The question is not whether the methods are good or bad, but whether they are successful. The National Socialist government is ready to use every means.

Our social standard of living will be even higher after the war. We do not need to imitate Bolshevist methods, because we have better people and leaders, which gives us a great advantage. But things have shown that we must do much more than we have done so far to turn the war in the East decisively in our favor.

As countless letters from the homeland and the front have shown, by the way, the entire German people agrees. Everyone knows that if we lose, all will be destroyed. The people and leadership are determined to take the most radical measures.

The broad working masses of our people are not unhappy because the government is too ruthless. If anything, they are unhappy because it is too considerate. Ask anyone in Germany, and he will say: The most radical is just radical enough, and the most total is just total enough to gain victory.

The total war effort has become a matter of the entire German people. No one has any excuse for ignoring its demands. A storm of applause greeted my call on 30 January for total war.

The people are willing to bear any burden, even the heaviest, to make any sacrifice, if it leads to the great goal of victory. Lively applause This naturally assumes that the burdens are shared equally. Loud approval We cannot tolerate a situation in which most people carry the burden of the war, while a small, passive portion attempts to escape its burdens and responsibilities.

The measures we have taken, and the ones we will yet take, will be characterized by the spirit of National Socialist justice. We pay no heed to class or standing. Rich and poor, high and low must share the burdens equally.

Everyone must do his duty in this grave hour, whether by choice or otherwise. We know this has the full support of the people. We would rather do too much rather than too little to achieve victory.

No war in history has ever been lost because of too many soldiers or weapons. Many, however, have been lost because the opposite was true. It is time to get the slackers moving.

Stormy agreement They must be shaken out of their comfortable ease. We cannot wait until they come to their senses. That might be too late.

The alarm must sound throughout the nation. Millions of hands must get to work throughout the country. The measures we have taken, and the ones we will now take, and which I shall discuss later in this speech, are critical for our whole public and private life.

The individual may have to make great sacrifices, but they are tiny when compared to the sacrifices he would have to make if his refusal brought down on us the greatest national disaster. It is better to operate at the right time than to wait until the disease has taken root. One may not complain to the doctor or sue him for bodily injury.

But it angers people when a few always try to escape the burdens. The National Socialist government has both the moral and political duty to oppose such attempts, if necessary with draconian penalties. We are therefore compelled to adopt a series of measures that are not essential for the war effort in themselves, but seem necessary to maintain moral at home and at the front.

The optics of the war, that is, how things outwardly appear, is of decisive importance in this fourth year of war. In view of the superhuman sacrifices that the front makes each day, it has a basic right to expect that no one at home claims the right to ignore the war and its demands. And not only the front demands this, but the overwhelming part of the homeland.

The industrious have a right to expect that if they work ten or twelve or fourteen hours a day, a lazy person does not stand next to them who thinks them foolish. The homeland must stay pure and intact in its entirety. Nothing may disturb the picture.

We have closed these establishments because they began to offend us, and because they disturb the image of the war. We have nothing against amusements as such. It may be that an occasional person thinks that, even during war, his stomach is the most important thing.

We cannot pay him any heed. At the front everyone from the simple soldier to the general field marshal eats from the field kitchen. I do not believe that it is asking too much to insist that we in the homeland pay heed to at least the basic laws of community thinking.

We can become gourmets once again when the war is over. Right now, we have more important things to do than worry about our stomachs. Countless luxury stores have also been closed.

It is no excuse to say that keeping some of these shops open gives a lovely impression to foreigners.

Почему Геббельс действительно объявил «тотальную войну»? После катастрофы под Сталинградом нацистский министр пропаганды Геббельс произнес печально известную речь, в которой он объявил «тотальную войну». За этим скрывался расчет, в первую очередь касавшийся его персоны. Публика отвечала неистовым ликованием. Но чего на самом деле добивался Геббельс этой речью? Свен Келлерхофф Эту картину видели бесчисленное количество раз: широкий круг берлинского дворца спорта, плотно заставленный сиденьями, ряд за рядом заполненный мужчинами и женщинами, в основном одетыми в униформу. Широкий подиум с тремя свастиками, позади могущественный орел партии, повернувший голову вправо, который в своих когтях держит еще одну свастику в лавровом венке.

Над подиумом огромная надпись: «Тотальная война — самая короткая война». Так выглядели кулисы, возможно, важнейшей речи, которую когда-либо произносил гитлеровский рейхсминистр народного просвещения и пропаганды Йозеф Геббельс; по крайней мере, эта его речь является самой известной. Эти неоднократно показанные в «Дойче Вохеншау» Deutsche Wochenschau кадры решающим образом повлияли на представление о нацистской пропаганде. Но чего же на самом деле добивался Геббельс своей речью? Зачем он приложил такие усилия для создания картины абсолютного восторга публики? В тот четверг среди слушателей сидел 21-летний солдат по имени Иринг Фетшер Iring Fetscher.

Но чего же на самом деле добивался Геббельс своей речью? Зачем он приложил такие усилия для создания картины абсолютного восторга публики? В тот четверг среди слушателей сидел 21-летний солдат по имени Иринг Фетшер Iring Fetscher. День спустя он записал в своем дневнике: «Вчерашняя речь Геббельса. Блестящая впечатляющая речь, вызвавшая народный восторг. Десять вопросов к немецкому народу в библейской торжественности, все это было похоже на большой, колоссальный спектакль, глубину, трагизм и значение которого, пожалуй, вряд ли кто-то из присутствующих мог осознать». Более полувека спустя Фетшер, в то время уже вышедший на пенсию профессор политологии, посвятил той речи Геббельса отдельную книгу. Она вышла в 1998 году и, хотя уже давно ее можно найти только у букинистов, но и 20 лет спустя ее все еще стоит прочитать. По результатам анализа Фетшера 1922-2014 , своей речью Геббельс преследовал четыре цели: во-первых, он хотел преодолеть смену настроения, которое охватило немецкое население после катастрофы под Сталинградом. Во-вторых, он хотел сделать популярным лозунг «тотальная война», который должен был мобилизовать народ на еще большие усилия в войне. В-третьих, длившееся 109 минут обращение было попыткой указать нейтральным государствам и противникам войны на Западе на угрозу большевизма. В-четвертых, и прежде всего, Геббельс хотел укрепить свое собственное положение среди нацистского руководства, потому что его оттеснили на второй план шеф СС Генрих Гиммлер Heinrich Himmler и особенно исполнявший в течение года обязанности рейхсминистра вооружений и боеприпасов Альберт Шпеер Albert Speer. Среди них были такие знаменитости, как актер Генрих Георге Heinrich George , но также, очевидно, и заранее подготовленные клакеры и подстрекатели.

Только-только случился сталинградский разгром. Немцы отступали по всему Восточному фронту. В Северной Африке для них всё тоже было плохо. Рузвельт и Черчилль на конференции в Касабланке впервые озвучили требование о безоговорочной капитуляции Германии. До этого пропаганда убеждала бюргеров, будто до триумфального окончания войны осталось потерпеть всего «чуть-чуть». Служба безопасности СД доносила, что значительная часть немцев впервые осознала, что войну можно и проиграть. Теперь нужно было как-то выкручиваться. Выступление Геббельса проходило в огромном Берлинском дворце спорта перед тщательно отобранной аудиторией, которая должна была репрезентировать весь немецкий народ. Здесь были ветераны, рабочие с военных заводов, партийные и государственные служащие, представители интеллигенции, делегаты от женщин и молодёжи.

Речь Йозефа Геббельса о тотальной войне 1943 год — Видео

На балюстраде был вывешен транспарант с лозунгом «Тотальная война — кратчайшая война». Апеллируя в речи к национальному сознанию, Геббельс, возможно, ориентировался на Сталина , который через двенадцать дней после германского нападения на СССР в своём радиообращении объявил войну СССР против Германии « Великой Отечественной войной » [1]. Хотите ли вы её, если надо, тотальней и радикальней, чем мы её себе можем сегодня представить? Когда Геббельс задал пятый вопрос: «Доверяете ли вы сегодня фюреру больше, сильнее, непоколебимее, чем когда-либо?

Геббельс уделял огромное внимание церкви. Специфика работы с церковью базировалась на том, чтобы отбить у неё паству в пользу националистических идей. Поступательно осуществлялся план, при котором слово «бог» хотели заменить на «фюрер». После Первой Мировой многие дети остались сиротами или попросту были обделены вниманием, поэтому опека нацистов им была очень симпатична. Выступая с критическими замечаниями в адрес оппонентов, Геббельс говорил, что те не способны дать немецкому обществу Великую Идею и мечту, способную увлечь народ за собой и добиться всеобщего благоденствия на родной земле. Геббельс поэтапно внедрял в коллективное бессознательное немцев идею о том, что осевой для немцев должна стать мысль о превосходстве их нации над другими. Тем не менее, на тот момент это ещё не носило империалистский характер, но всё к нему шло. На заключительном этапе порабощения умов Германии, с 1938-го, в подконтрольных Геббельсу СМИ всё чаще звучит слово «дисциплина».

Если говорить о взрослом населении Германии, то на том этапе с ними провели совсем уж хитрую манипуляцию. От демонстративных общественных дискуссий пропагандисты Геббельса не сразу перешли к открытым заявлениям о превосходстве арийской расы. Они внедрили абсолютно новые манёвры с человеческим сознанием, которые в современной рекламе и маркетинге называют бытовой дискуссией.

Геббельс упоминает о предложениях Японии об установлении сепаратного мира между Германией и Советским Союзом при ее посредничестве.

Обстоятельно рассмотрены бои на Восточном фронте с последующим крушением фронта группы армий «Центр». Тексты за 23 июля — 3 августа 1944 г.

Хотите ли вы её, если надо, тотальней и радикальней, чем мы её себе можем сегодня представить? Когда Геббельс задал пятый вопрос: «Доверяете ли вы сегодня фюреру больше, сильнее, непоколебимее, чем когда-либо? На заключительную часть речи Геббельс потратил целый час. При этом, по утверждению историка Хельмута Хейбера, Геббельс считал, что на самом деле человеком, который уже давно ведёт такую войну с Германией, был Иосиф Сталин [3].

Теоретик Людендорф

Комментарии
Читайте также
Лента новостей
Главная речь министра пропаганды
Запрещённая правда. Йозеф Геббельс. Тотальная Война!
Речь о тотальной войне - Йозеф Геббельс

"...И пусть грянет буря!" - Знаменитая речь о тотальной войне

Теоретик Людендорф. Главная» Новости» Выступление геббельса о тотальной войне. #КамрадLifeРечь Йозефа Геббельса Тотальная война 1943 годРечь о тотальной войне (Речь Геббельса во Дворце спорта, нем. Скачать бесплатно Речь Йозефа Геббельса Тотальная война 1943 год в качестве 4к (2к / 1080p).

Князь лжи. Как Геббельс из поклонника России превратился в рупор рейха

Видео Речь Йозефа Геббельса Тотальная война 1943 год загружено на YouTube 26-01-2024. Дневники Йозефа Геббельса июнь-август 1944г ИТК Дашков и К. Вид 1. Видео Речь Йозефа Геббельса Тотальная война 1943 год загружено на YouTube 26-01-2024. По мнению Людендорфа, тотальная война — это военный конфликт, в котором страна-участник использует все доступные ресурсы и методы, чтобы одолеть противника. Ложь тем отличается от правды, что непременно становится явью. Правда с нами. И светит она как свет во тьму, и тьма не победит ее.

Goebbels - Do you want Total War? | TOTALEN KRIEG | - YouTube
Речь Геббельса после Сталинграда
Речь Йозефа Геббельса о тотальной войне в Берлине, 1943 год.
Доктор Гёббельс, тотальная война и Зеленский - Лента новостей Киева
Тотальная война. Дневники Йозефа Геббельса (июнь-август 1944)
Wollt Ihr den totalen Krieg?

«Вы хотите тотальной войны?»

С самого начала Второй мировой войны подлинные замыслы Гитлера скрывала завеса лжи, сконструированной «министерством правды» под руководством Геббельса. Видео Речь Йозефа Геббельса Тотальная война 1943 год загружено на YouTube 26-01-2024. речь Йозефа Геббельса в 1943 году. Скачать песню Йозеф Геббельс – Тотальная война на телефон (рингтон на звонок), либо слушать mp3 в хорошем качестве (320 kbps) вы можете на.

Новости тотальная война геббельс