Адольф Гитлер — немецкий политик и оратор, основоположник и центральная фигура национал-социализма, основатель тоталитарной диктатуры Третьего рейха, глава Национал-социалистической немецкой рабочей п Смотрите видео онлайн «Адольф Гитлер цитаты и. Adolf Hitler beeinflusste die Geschichte des 20. Jahrhunderts auf schreckliche Weise. Doch wie wurde er zum Diktator, der die Welt mit einem verheerenden Krieg und dem Holocaust in eine Katastrophe stürzte? Крылатые фразы Гитлера. Высказывание Гитлера на немецком.
Высказывания адольфа гитлера. Цитаты на немецком языке с переводом
Цитаты, фразы и афоризмы на немецком с переводом.”. причем в оригинале, русский перевод с купюрами я уже. Речь рейхсканцлера А. Гитлера в Рейхстаге 1 сентября 1939 Heil Hitler! — «да здравствует Гитлер, слава Гитлеру» (обычно передаётся по-русски как Хайль Гитлер) или просто нем. Адольф Гитлер — немецкий политик и оратор, основоположник и центральная фигура национал-социализма, основатель тоталитарной диктатуры Третьего рейха, глава Национал-социалистической немецкой рабочей п Смотрите видео онлайн «Адольф Гитлер цитаты и. речь гитлера на немецком скачать mp3 или слушать онлайн бесплатно на
Полный текст заявления Гитлера от 22 июня 1941 года
Цитаты Гитлера все скажут сами за себя. Главная» Новости» Выступление гитлера на немецком текст. Фразы Гитлера на немецком языке имеют большое значение, потому что они отражают его идеологию и политические убеждения. В первую очередь из-за знаменитой фразы Гитлера в 1936 году, когда он наперекор всем приказал войти в демилитаризованную Рейнскую о6ласть. В заключение, несмотря на то что фразы Гитлера на немецком являются частью истории, их использование должно быть осознанным и ответственным.
Adolf Hitler
Смотреть онлайн или скачать видео Adolf Hitler: Speech at Krupp Factory in Germany (1935) | British Pathé в MP3, 3GP, WebM, MP4 в HD 720, Full HD 1080, Ultra HD 4K и даже Ultra HD 8К качестве со звуком с YouTube бесплатно по прямой ссылке на компьютер, телефон или планшет без. речь гитлера на немецком скачать mp3 или слушать онлайн бесплатно на Опозорили Германию перед всем миром. 1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:04,900 Ob du meine Arbeit für richtig hältst, 2 00:00:05,000 --> 00:00:08,990 ob du glaubst, dass ich fleißig gewesen bin, dass ich gearbeitet habe. 3 00:00:09,000 --> 00:00:11,900 dass ich mich in diesen Jahren für dich eingesetzt habe, 4 00:00:12,000 --> 00:00:16,990 dass ich. Причем слова, фразы и цитаты использовались немецкой пропагандой не лишь для укрепления воинского духа солдат или «рекламы» известной идеологии. Смотреть онлайн или скачать видео Adolf Hitler: Speech at Krupp Factory in Germany (1935) | British Pathé в MP3, 3GP, WebM, MP4 в HD 720, Full HD 1080, Ultra HD 4K и даже Ultra HD 8К качестве со звуком с YouTube бесплатно по прямой ссылке на компьютер, телефон или планшет без.
Хайль Гитлер
Немецкий является языком оригинала многих из нижеприведенных цитат, потому что среди немцев было много великих людей. Выражение “Гитлер капут” имеет хорошие шансы навсегда выветриться из коллективной памяти немцев. Например: фразы для похода к врачу — собраны вот, а фразы для того, чтобы объясниться с парикмахером — А сегодня на очереди фразы на немецком языке, которые могут пригодится вам в самых разных жизненных ситуациях. (русский текст внизу) Russland hat eine Rede Adolf Hitlers freigegeben, nota bene mit russischen Untertiteln versehen. Die Botschaft an die Machthaber weltweit und an die "Elite" in Amerika kann deutlicher nicht sein: Was AH damals sagte, es trifft exakt auf heute zu. Es mag traurig sein, es ist wahr. On September 12, 1938, Adolf Hitler, Chancellor of the Reich, addressed the German Reichstag. That morning, The German Reich had crossed the German-Czech frontier, thus initiating the Invasion of Czechoslovakia. Delegates, Men of the German Reichstag! For months we have been suffering under. Главная» Новости» Выступление гитлера на немецком кричит.
Adolf Hitler: Speech at Krupp Factory in Germany (1935) | British Pathé
речь гитлера на немецком скачать mp3 или слушать онлайн бесплатно на Причем слова, фразы и цитаты использовались немецкой пропагандой не лишь для укрепления воинского духа солдат или «рекламы» известной идеологии. September 16, 1919. On this date, Adolf Hitler issued his first written comment on the so-called Jewish Question. Звук с фразой "Гитлер капут" на немецком языке (мужской голос). Главная» Новости» Выступление гитлера на немецком текст. In seiner Ansprache vor dem deutschen Reichstag am 1. September 1939 rechtfertigte Reichskanzler Adolf Hitler den deutschen Angriff auf Polen. Die Rede war nicht nur an die anwesenden Reichstagsabgeordneten gerichtet: Durch Radioübertragung und Übersetzungen wurde Sorge.
Известные фразы гитлера. Цитаты на немецком языке с переводом
Я сделал это исключительно в сознании своей ответственности по отношению к германскому народу, но, прежде всего, в надежде на возможность все же в конце достигнуть длительного примирения и уменьшения жертв, которые иначе могли быть от нас потребованы. Наряду с торжественными заверениями Германии в Москве относительно упомянутых областей и стран — за исключением Литвы — как лежащих за пределами германских политических интересов, было достигнуто особое соглашение на случай, если Англии действительно удастся втравить Польшу в войну против Германии. Но также и здесь имело место ограничение германских требований, которое было не пропорционально достижениям германского оружия. В немецком оригинале: «безо всякого нарушения нашего производства» — «ohne jene Zerstoerung unserer Produktion» S. Результаты этого договора, желаемого мной и заключенного в интересах германского народа, были особенно тяжелы для немцев, живущих в затронутых им странах. Более полумиллиона германских соотечественников -мелкие крестьяне, ремесленники и рабочие — были принуждены почти в течение одной ночи покинуть свою прежнюю родину, чтобы избежать нового режима, угрожающего им непосредственно беспредельными бедствиями, а раньше или позже полным уничтожением. Несмотря на это, тысячи немцев исчезли! Было невозможно даже установить постигшую их судьбу или же хотя бы их местопребывание.
В их числе находятся свыше 160 человек германских подданных. Я молчал в ответ на все это, так как я должен был молчать! Моим желанием было достигнуть окончательного примирения и, если возможно, длительного согласия с этим государством. Однако, уже во время нашего похода в Польшу, советские власть имущие вдруг потребовали — противно договору — также и Литву. Германия никогда не имела намерения занимать Литву и не только не ставила таких ультиматумов литовскому правительству, но, напротив, отклонила просьбу тогдашнего литовского правительства — прислать с этой целью германские войска как образ действия, не соответствующий целям германской политики. Несмотря на это, я покорился и этому новому русскому требованию. Однако это было лишь началом новых шантажирований1, которые постоянно повторялись с тех пор.
В немецком оригинале «новых случаев давления» — «neuer Erpressungen» S. Победа в Польше, достигнутая исключительно благодаря германским войскам, побудила меня вновь обратиться к западным державам с предложением мира. Оно было отклонено благодаря интернациональным и еврейским подстрекателям к войне. Однако причина этого отказа уже тогда заключалась в том, что Англия все еще надеялась быть в состоянии создать европейскую коалицию против Германии, включая в нее Балканы и Советскую Россию. Так, в Лондоне было решено послать г. Криппса1 послом в Москву. Ему было поручено определенное задание вновь заняться англо-советскими отношениями и развивать их в английском духе.
Английская пресса сообщала об успехах этого задания, поскольку ее не заставляли молчать тактические причины. Осенью 1939 г. Приступая к военному порабощению не только Финляндии, но также и балтийских государств, Россия вдруг мотивировала эти действия в такой же мере ложным, как и смешным заявлением, что она принуждена защищать эти страны от чужой угрозы, которую она должна предупредить. Под этим могла подразумеваться только Германия. Ибо никакая другая держава не могла ни вторгнуться, ни вести войну в прибалтийских областях. И все же я должен был молчать. Однако власть имущие в Кремле сейчас же пошли дальше.
В то время, как Германия весной 1940 г. Согласно личному заявлению, данному тогда Молотовым, уже весной 1940 г. Так как русское правительство всегда утверждало, что его пригласило само население, цель его присутствия там могла быть истолкована только как демонстрация против Германии. В то время, как наши солдаты, начиная с 10 мая 1940 г. Начиная с августа 1940 г. Однако было достигнуто то, к чему стремилось англосоветское сотрудничество, а именно: ввиду концентрации такого количества германских сил на Востоке, германские власть имущие не сочли возможным предпринять радикальное завершение войны на западе, особенно в отношении воздушной борьбы. Это соответствовало, однако, целям не только английской, но также и советской политики.
Потому что Англия, равно как и Советская Россия, намерены продлить эту войну как можно дольше, с целью ослабить Европу и повергнуть ее в еще большее бессилие. Угрожающее выступление России против Румынии должно было также в конечном итоге послужить лишь тому, чтобы захватить в свои руки или же, по крайней мере, уничтожить важную опору не только германской экономической жизни, но и экономической жизни всей Европы. Однако, именно Германия, начиная с 1933 г. Мы были поэтому в высшей степени заинтересованы в их государственной консолидации и порядке.
Современное положение Использование данного девиза в некоторых странах является противозаконным. Закон Запрета от 1947 года. Новое в блогах Сила народа есть ни что иное, как единодушие и внутренние связи этого народа. Речь 26. В первую очередь мы думаем о благе нашего народа. Речь 02.
Речь 13. Речь 18. Нашему народу нужны руководители, обладающие решимостью делать все, что они сочтут правильным перед Богом, миром и собственной совестью. Речь 27. Речь 20. Эта организация будет построена на идее авторитета, идее руководства снизу доверху. Только такая организация может служить интересам всего народа. Речь 06. Прокламация 01. Речь 16.
Второе: Решение тяжелейшей социальной проблемы путем возвращения миллионной армии наших, достойных всяческого сочувствия, безработных обратно на производство.
В тот момент, когда человек сомневается в и ценности , он болен. Мы больше стремимся к тому, чтобы избегать боли, нежели к тому, чтобы ощущать радость. Sie konnen schwimmen. Heinz Ruhmann Проблемы не тонут в алкоголе.
Они умеют плавать. Хайнц Рюман Wer immer tut, was er schon kann, bleibt immer das, was er schon ist. Henry Ford Кто всегда делает то, что он уже умеет, остаётся всегда тем, кем он уже является. Генри Форд Habe Mut, dich deines eigenen Verstandes zu bedienen. Имей мужество использовать свой собственный разум.
Постоянны только изменения. Die Freunde nennen sich aufrichtig. Die Feinde sind es.
Август Ландмессер среди рабочих верфи не поднял руку в нацистском приветствии Преследования за отказ произносить нацистское приветствие править Нацисты требовали от жителей Германии произносить нацистское приветствие [6] [7]. Но, по мнению свидетелей Иеговы , произносить выражение «Heil Hitler! Поэтому свидетели Иеговы отказывались произносить нацистское приветствие [10] [11] [12]. Кристин Кинг и другие историки отмечают, что свидетелей Иеговы арестовывали за отказ произносить нацистское приветствие, а их детей исключали из школ и разлучали с семьями [9] [13] [14] [15]. После Второй мировой войны править После Второй мировой войны в некоторых странах нацистское приветствие и восклицания Heil Hitler! В Австрии действует аналогичный закон.
Цитаты адольфа гитлера на немецком с переводом
Here is his work perhaps most difficult to recognize, but here the actual effect is the most terrible. This is true inner experience, unlike the other ones, which are only superficial swindle Applause , set in the world with an intent to gradually destroy in the people any healthy idea and to whip the people into a state in which no one can understand whether the times are crazy, or whether he himself is mad. Big laughter and applause. Just as he works in painting, sculpture and music, so he does in poetry and especially in literature. Here he has a great advantage. What has become of it? A place which today you are ashamed to enter unless someone might notice you the moment you go in.
And if theater has become a hotbed of vice and shamelessness, then a thousand times more so that new invention which perhaps comes from genial inspiration, but which the Jew understood right away to remodel into the filthiest business that you can imagine: the cinema. Thunderous applause and clapping. At first people attached greatest hopes to this brilliant invention. It could become an easy mediator of profound knowledge for the entire people of the world. And what has become of it? It became the mediator of the greatest and the most shameless filth.
The Jew works on. For him there is no spiritual sensitivity, and just as his forefather Abraham was selling his wife, he finds nothing special about the fact that today he sells girls, and through the centuries we find him everywhere, in North America as in Germany, Austria-Hungary and all over the East, as the merchant of the human commodity and it can not be denied away; even the greatest Jew defender cannot deny that all of these girl-dealers are Hebrews. This subject is atrocious. According to Germanic sentiment there would be only one punishment for this: death. For people that play fast and loose, regarding as a business, as a commodity, what for millions of others means greatest happiness or greatest misfortune. For them love is nothing more than business in which they make money.
They are always ready to tear apart the happiness of any marriage, if only 30 pieces of silver can be made. It was played up by the Jews and became very popular. So we should not be surprised when he also attacks what many people even today are not indifferent to, and what to many at least can give inner peace — religion. Also here we see the same Jew who himself has enough religious customs which others could easily mock, but no one does, as we, in principle, never ridicule religion because it is sacred to us. But he tries to destroy everything without offering a substitute. Who today, in this age of the vilest deceit and swindle, is detached from it; for him there are just two more possibilities, either he hangs himself in despair or becomes a crook.
Instead of the authority of reason, there enters the authority of the great spongy majority led by the Jew, because the Jew is always going through three periods. First, autocratically-minded, ready to serve any prince, he then descends to the people, fighting for democracy, of which he knows that it will be in his hand, and steered by him; he owns it, he becomes a dictator. Hear, hear And we see this today in Russia, where a Lenin has just assured that the councils are already outlived, and that now it is not absolutely necessary that a proletarian state be led through one council or parliament, that it is sufficient that 2 or 3 proletarian-minded people govern this country. These proletarian-minded persons are some Jewish billionaires, and we know very well that behind 2 or 3 proletarians ultimately stands another organization which is outside of the state: the Alliance Israelite and their grandiose propaganda organization and the organization of Freemasonry. Loud applause and clapping of hands And in all these things we must understand that there are no good or evil Jews. Here everyone works exactly according to the instincts of his race, because the race, or should we say, the nation and its character, as the Jew himself explains, lies in blood, and this blood is forcing everyone to act according to these principles, whether he is the leading mind in a party that calls itself democratic, or calls itself socialist, or a man of science, literature, or just an ordinary exploiter.
The political organization And when we see, for example, in these Jewish magazines, that it is specified that every Jew everywhere is obligated to fight against any antisemite, wherever and whoever he is, then it follows by deduction that every German, wherever and whoever he is, will become an antisemite. Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal social justice, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge and when we finally united, there was only one big question: How should we actually baptize ourselves? A party? A bad name! When I hear that word I go mad. Economic organizing only — here lies the salvation and the future.
Stormy applause Since it is clear that scientific knowledge is worthless as long as this knowledge is not a basis for an organization of the masses for the implementation of what we consider necessary, and it is further clear that for this organization only the broad masses of our people can be considered. Loud applaus. The salvation can never come from above, it can and will only come from the masses, from the bottom up. Applause And as we came to this realization and decided to form a party, a political party that wants to enter into the ruthless political struggle for the future, then we heard a voice: Do you believe that you few can do it, do you really believe that a couple of guys can do it? Because we understood that we had an immense battle ahead of us but also that anything created by men can be destroyed by other men. And another conviction has arisen within us, that this can not be a matter of whether we think we can do it, but only a question of whether we believe that it is right and that it is necessary, and if it is right and necessary, then it is no longer a question of whether we want to, but rather it is our duty to do what we feel is necessary.
We did not ask after money and supporters, but we decided to go forth. And while others are working a whole generation, perhaps in order to get a small house or to have a carefree retirement, we put our lives at stake and have begun this difficult struggle. If we win, and we are convinced we will, though we may die penniless we will have helped create the biggest movement which will now extend over all Europe and the whole world. Loud applause The first three principles were clear, and they are inseparable from each other. And we were aware that in this fight we can rely on no one but our own people. We are convinced that socialism in the right sense will only be possible in nations and races that are Aryan, and there in the first place we hope for our own people and are convinced that socialism is inseparable from nationalism.
Loud applause To be nationalist does not mean for us to belong to one party or another, but to show with every action that one benefits the people; it means love for all the people without exception. From this point of view we will realize that it is necessary to preserve the most precious thing a people has, the sum of all active creative powers of its workers, to keep it healthy in body and soul. Cheers And this view of nationalism compels us to immediately form a front against its opposite, the Semitic conception of the idea of people Volk , and especially against the Semitic concept of work. Since we are socialists, we must necessarily also be antisemites because we want to fight against the very opposite: materialism and mammonism. And when today the Jew still runs into our factories and says: How can you be a socialist antisemite? Are not you ashamed?
Hear, hear There comes a time when it will be obvious that socialism can only be carried out accompanied by nationalism and antisemitism. The three concepts are inseparably connected. They are the foundations of our program and therefore we call ourselves National Socialists. Cheers How to proceed Finally, we know how great the social reforms must be so that Germany may recover. We know that one will have to cut deep. We will not be able to come around the national problem and the issue of land reform, and the problem of care for all those who, day after day, are working for the community and in their old age this care must not be a pittance, but they have a right to have their old days be still worth living.
If we wish to make these social reforms, this must go hand in hand with the fight against the enemy of every social institution: Jewry. Here too we know that scientific knowledge can only be the groundwork, but that behind this knowledge must stand an organization which one day will be able to go over into action. And in this action we will remain adamant, which means: removal of Jews from amongst our people Loud and long sustained applause and clapping , not because we begrudge them their existence — we congratulate the rest of the world on account of their visits great hilarity — but because we value the existence of our own people a thousand times higher than that of an alien race. And since we are convinced that this scientific antisemitism that clearly recognizes the terrible danger of this race for any people can only be a guide, and the masses will always perceive them emotionally — for they know the Jew first and foremost as the man in daily life who always and everywhere sticks out — our concern must be to arouse in our people the instinct against Jewry and whip it up and stir, until they come to the decision to join the movement which is willing to take the consequences. Bravo and applause. Some people tell us: Whether you succeed depends eventually on whether you have the sufficient money and so on.
To this, I think I can say the following: Even the power of money is somehow limited; there is a certain limit beyond which, eventually, not the money rules but the truth. And we do not despair if we maybe still stand alone, if we today, wherever we go, do see potential supporters but nowhere the courage to join the organization. That should not lead us astray; we have accepted the fight and we must win it. I could predict it back then because I knew that the courage and the will to act were absent everywhere. We have proclaimed as our election platform only one thing: Let the others go to the polls today, to the Reichstag, to the parliaments and loll in their club chairs; we want to climb up the beer tables and pull the masses with us. Tirelessly and constantly, as long as we have a spark of strength and a breath in the lungs, we will come out and call all our people; and always tell the truth until we can begin to hope that this truth will prevail.
Till the day finally comes when our words fall silent and action begins. Pause and discussion Closing remarks of the speaker Hitler: Ladies and gentlemen! We are not as dreadful as our primary enemy and we cannot shatter Jewry by ourselves; we do not imagine it is so easy. However, we have decided not to come with any buts and ifs. But once the matter comes to the solution, it will be done, and done thoroughly. Then a gentleman said that our movement would mean a battle into which the working class would be drawn.
Yes, and we the social democrats and communists? That mistake we will not make. We do not promise any Heaven but the one thing, that if you are determined to carry out this program in Germany, maybe once again the time will come in which you will be able to have a life. If you carry out the glorious reform which these gentlemen here wish, you will in an even shorter time face the need to embellish this life with the very same decrees which their leaders Trotsky and Lenin issue now: Those who are not willing to fight for the blessings of that State, die. Finally, he said that they opposed any capitalism. My esteemed audience!
The communists have so far merely been fighting industrial capital and have only hung industrial capitalists. But name me one Jewish capitalist whom they have hung. The Soviet Government itself admits this now. Among those 300,000 is not a single Jew! Is that persecution of Jews or rather, in the truest sense of the word, persecution of Christians? Hear, hear Then you said you fought against both the loan capital and industrial capital.
But you have so far combated neither the one nor the other. You cannot fight the industrial capital, at most destroy it, and then you must again start with a 12-hour working day to rebuild it.
В фашистском приветствии соединялись исторический древнеримский салют и торжественный жест христиан , восходящий к ветхозаветным временам Быт. Согласно нацистским идеологам, поднятие руки и восклицание Heil! Как официальное название часто использовался термин «Немецкое приветствие». В Древнем Риме аналогичный жест изначально использовался клиентами в качестве приветствия и пожелания здоровья своему патрону существует версия, что исходно этим жестом указывали на холм, на котором располагался храм бога здоровья , позже, когда император сделался «патроном всех римлян» — для приветствия императора. До этого оно было факультативным, и большинство военных использовали стандарное отдание чести, употребляя гитлеровское приветствие только в ответ на такое же обращение со стороны чинов партии или СС.
At the time when I used to go here and there throughout the country, simply as a public speaker, people from the bourgeois classes used to ask me why we believed that a revolution would be necessary, instead of working within the framework of the established political order and with the collaboration of the parties already in existence, for the purpose of improving those conditions which we considered unsound and injurious. Why must be have a new party, and especially why a new revolution? The answer which I then gave may be stated under the following headings: — 1 The elements of confusion and dissolution which are making themselves felt in German life, in the concept of life itself and the will to national self-preservation, cannot be eradicated by a mere change of government. More than enough of those changes have already taken place without bringing about any essential betterment of the distress that exists in Germany. All these Cabinet reconstructions brought some positive advantage only to the actors who took part in the play; but the results were almost always quite negative as far as the interests of the people were concerned. As time has gone on the thought and practical life of our people have been led astray into ways that are unnatural to them and injurious. One of the causes which brought about this condition of affairs must be attributed to the fact that the structure of our State and our methods of government were foreign to our own national character, our historical development and our national needs. The parliamentary-democratic system is inseparable from the other symptoms of the time. A critical situation cannot be remedied by collaborating with the causes of it but by a radical extermination of these causes. Hence under such conditions the political struggle must necessarily take the form of a revolution. Nor would it be possible to bring this about by collaborating with these institutions, but only by establishing a new movement which will fight against them for the purpose of carrying through a radical reformation in political, cultural and economic life. And this fight will have to be undertaken even at the sacrifice of life and blood, if that should be necessary. In this connection it is worthy of remark that when the average political party wins a parliamentary victory no essential change takes place in the historical course which the people are following or in the outer aspect of public life; whereas a genuine revolution that arises from a profound ideological insight will always lead to a transformation which is strikingly impressive and is manifest to the outside world. Surely nobody will doubt the fact that during the last four years a revolution of the most momentous character has passed like a storm over Germany. Who could compare this new Germany with that which existed on the 30th. I am speaking of a National Socialist Revolution; but this revolutionary process in Germany had a particular character of its own, which may have been the reason why the outside world and so many of our fellow-countrymen failed to understand the profound nature of the transformation that took place. I do not deny that this peculiar feature, which has been for us the most outstanding characteristic of the lines along which the National Socialist Revolution took place—a feature which we can be specially proud of—has hindered rather than helped to make this unique historic event understood abroad and among some of our own people. For the National Socialist Revolution was in itself a revolution in the revolutionary tradition. What I mean is this: Throughout thousands of years the conviction grew up and prevailed, not so much in the German mind as in the minds of the contemporary world, that bloodshed and the extermination of those hitherto in power—together with the destruction of public and private institutions and property—were essential characteristics of every true revolution. Mankind in general has grown accustomed to accept revolutions with all these consequences somehow or other as if they were legal happenings. I do not mean that people endorse all this tumultuous destruction of life and property; but they certainly accept it as the necessary accompaniment of events which, because of this very reason, are called revolutions. Herein lies the difference between the National Socialist Revolution and other revolutions, with the exception of the Fascist Revolution in Italy. The National Socialist Revolution was almost entirely a bloodless proceeding. When the party took over power in Germany, after overthrowing the very formidable obstacles that had stood in its way, it did so without causing any damage whatsoever to property. I can say with a certain amount of pride that this was the first revolution in which not even a window-pane was broken. If this revolution was bloodless that was not because we were not manly enough to look at blood. I was a soldier for more than four years in a war where more blood was shed than ever before throughout human history. I never lost my nerve, no matter what the situation was and no matter what sights I had to face. The same holds good for my party colleagues. But we did not consider it as part of the program of the National Socialist Revolution to destroy human life or material goods, but rather to build up a new and better life. And it is the greatest source of pride to us that we have been able to carry through this revolution, which is certainly the greatest revolution ever experienced in the history of our people, with a minimum of loss and sacrifice. Only in those cases where the murderous lust of the Bolsheviks, even after the 30th of January, 1933, led them to think that by the use of brute force they could prevent the success and realization of the National Socialist ideal—only then did we answer violence with violence, and naturally we did it promptly. Certain other individuals of a naturally undisciplined temperament, and who had no political consciousness whatsoever, had to be taken into protective custody; but, generally speaking, these individuals were given their freedom after a short period. Beyond this there was a small number who took part in politics only for the purpose of establishing an alibi for their criminal activities, which were proved by the numerous sentences to prison and penal servitude that had been passed upon them previously. We prevented such individuals from pursuing their destructive careers, inasmuch as we set them to do some useful work, probably for the first time in their lives. I do not know if there ever has been a resolution which was of such a profound character as the National Socialist Revolution and which at the same time allowed innumerable persons who had been prominent in political circles under the former regime to follow their respective callings in private life peacefully and without causing them any worry. Not only that, but even many among our bitterest enemies, some of whom had occupied the highest positions in the government, were allowed to enjoy their regular emoluments and pensions. That is what we did. But this policy did not always help our reputation abroad. If the revolution in Germany had taken place according to the democratic model in Spain these strange apostles of non-intervention abroad would probably find that there was nothing which they need to worry about. People closely acquainted with the state of affairs in Spain have assured us that if we place the number of persons who have been slaughtered in this bestial way at 170. Measured by the achievements of the noble democratic revolutionaries in Spain, the quota of human beings allotted for slaughter to the National Socialist Revolution would have been about 400. That we did not carry out this mass-slaughter is apparently looked on as a piece of negligence on our part. We see that the democratic world-citizens are by no means gracious in their criticism of this leniency. We certainly had the power in our hands to do what has been done in Spain. And probably we had better nerves than the murderer who steals upon his victim unawares, shunning the open fight, and who is capable only of murdering defenseless [sic] hostages. We have been soldiers and we never flinched in the face of battle throughout that most gruesome war of all times. Our hearts and, I may also add, our sound common sense saved us from committing any acts like those which have been done in Spain. Taking it all in all, fewer lives were sacrificed in the National Socialist Revolution than the number of National Socialist followers who were murdered in Germany by our Bolshevik opponents in the year 1932 alone, when there was no revolution. This absence of bloodshed and destruction was made possible solely because we had adopted a principle which not only guided our conduct in the past but which we shall also never forget in the future. This principle was that the purpose of a revolution, or of any general change in the condition of public affairs, cannot be to produce chaos but only to replace what is bad by substituting something better. In such cases, however, something better must be ready at hand. On the 30th. All the means employed in carrying on that struggle were strictly within the law as it then stood and the protagonists in the fight were the National Socialists. Before the new State could be actually established and promulgated, the idea of it and the model for its organization had already existed within the framework of our party. All the fundamental principles on which the new Reich was to be constructed were the principles and ideas already embodied in the National Socialist Party. As a result of the constitutional struggle to win over our German fellow-countrymen to our side the party had established its predominance in the Reichstag and for a whole year before it actually assumed power it already had the right to demand this power for itself, even according to the principles of the parliamentary-democratic system. But it was essential for the National Socialist Revolution that this party should put forward demands which of themselves would involve a real revolutionary change in the principles and institutions of government hitherto in force. When certain individuals who were blind to the actual state of affairs thought that they could refuse to submit to the practical application of the principles of the movement which had been entrusted with the government of the Reich, then, but not until then, the party used an iron hand to make these illegal disturbers of the peace bend their stubborn necks before the laws of the new National Socialist Reich and Government. With this act the National Socialist Revolution came to an end. For as soon as the party had taken over power, and this new condition of affairs was consolidated, I looked upon it as a matter of course that the Revolution should be transformed into an evolution. The new development which now set in, however, meant that there had to be a new orientation not merely of our ideas but also in regard to the practical policy which we had to carry out. Even today certain individuals who have fallen in the march of events refuse to adapt themselves to this change. They cannot understand it because it is beyond their mental horizon or outside the sphere of their egotistic interests. Our National Socialist teaching has undoubtedly a revolutionizing effect in many spheres of life and has interfered and acted under the revolutionary impulse. The main plank in the National Socialist program is to abolish the liberalistic concept of the individual and the Marxist concept of humanity and to substitute therefore the folk community, rooted in the soil and bound together by the bond of its common blood. A very simple statement; but it involves a principle that has tremendous consequences. This is probably the first time and this is the first country in which people are being taught to realize that, of all the tasks which we have to face, the noblest and most sacred for mankind is that each racial species must preserve the purity of the blood which God has given it. And thus it happens that for the first time it is now possible for men to use their God-given faculties of perception and insight in the understanding of those problems which are of more momentous importance for the preservation of human existence than all the victories that may be won on the battlefield or the successes that may be obtained through economic efforts. It is not for men to discuss the question of why Providence created different races, but rather to recognize the fact that it punishes those who disregard its work of creation. Unspeakable suffering and misery have come upon mankind because they lost this instinct which was grounded in a profound intuition; and this loss was caused by a wrong and lopsided education of the intellect. Among our people there are millions and millions of persons living today for whom this law has become clear and intelligible. What individual seers and the still unspoiled natures of our forefathers saw by direct perception has now become a subject of scientific research in Germany. And I can prophesy here that, just as the knowledge that the earth moves around the sun led to a revolutionary alternation in the general world-picture, so the blood-and-race doctrine of the National Socialist Movement will bring about a revolutionary change in our knowledge and therewith a radical reconstruction of the picture which human history gives us of the past and will also change the course of that history in the future. And this will not lead to an estrangement between the nations; but, on the contrary, it will bring about for the first time a real understanding of one another. At the same time, however, it will prevent the Jewish people from intruding themselves among all the other nations as elements of internal disruption, under the mask of honest world-citizens, and thus gaining power over these nations. We feel convinced that the consequences of this really revolutionizing vision of truth will bring about a radical transformation in German life. For the first time in our history, The German people have found the way to a higher unity than they ever had before; and that is due to the compelling attraction of this inner feeling. Innumerable prejudices have been broken down, many barriers have been overthrown as unreasonable, evil traditions have been wiped out and antiquated symbols shown to be meaningless. From that chaos of disunion which had been caused by tribal, dynastic, philosophical, religious and political strife, the German nation has arisen and has unfurled the banner of a reunion which symbolically announces, not a political triumph, but the triumph of the racial principle. For the past four-and-a-half years German legislation has upheld and enforced this idea. Just as on January 30th, 1933, a state of affairs already in existence was legalized by the fact that I was entrusted with the chancellorship, whereby the party whose supremacy in Germany had then become unquestionable was not authorized to take over the government of the Reich and mould the future destiny of Germany; so this German legislation that has been in force for the past four years was only the legal sanction which gave jurisdiction and binding force to an idea that had already been clearly formulated and promulgated by the party. When the German community, based on the racial blood-bond, became realized in the German State we all felt that this would remain one of the finest moments to be remembered during our lives. Like a blast of springtime it passed over Germany four years ago. The fighting forces of our movement who for many years had defended the banner of the Hooked Cross against the superior forces of the enemy, and had carried it steadily forward for a long fourteen years, now planted it firmly in the soil of the new Reich. Within a few weeks the political debris and the social prejudices which had been accumulating through a thousand years of German history were removed and cleared away. May we not speak of a revolution when the chaotic conditions brought about by parliamentary-democracy disappear in less than three months and a regime of order and discipline takes their place, and a new energy springs forth from a firmly welded unity and a comprehensive authoritative power such as Germany never before had? So great was the Revolution that its intellectual foundations are not even yet understood but are superficially criticized by our contemporaries. They talk of democracies and dictatorships; but they fail to grasp the fact that in this country a radical transformation has taken place and has produced results which are democratic in the highest sense of the word, if democracy has any meaning at all. With infallible certainty we are steering towards an order of things in which a process of selection will become active in the political leadership of the nation, as it exists throughout the whole of life in general. By this process of selection, which will follow the laws of Nature and the dictates of human reason, those among our people who show the greatest natural ability will be appointed to positions in the political leadership of the nation. In making this selection no consideration will be given to birth or ancestry, name or wealth, but only to the question of whether or not the candidate has a natural vocation for those higher positions of leadership. In this country that principle will have its political counterpart. Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid. And that is no theory. In the present National Socialist Germany it is a reality that is considered by us all as a matter of course. I myself, to whom the people have given their trust and who have been called to be their leader, come from the people. All the millions of German workers know that it is not a foreign dilettante or an international revolutionary apostle who is at the head of the Reich, but a German who has come from their own ranks. And numerous people whose families belong to the peasantry and working classes are now filling prominent positions in this National Socialist State. Some of them actually hold the highest offices in the leadership of the nation, as Cabinet Ministers, Reichsstatthalter and Gauleiter. But National Socialism always bears in mind the interests of the people as a whole and not the interests of one class or another. The National Socialist Revolution has not aimed at turning a privileged class into a class which will have no rights in the future. Its aim has been to grant equal rights to those social strata that hitherto were denied such rights. We have not ruined millions of citizens by degrading them to the level of enslaved workers. Our aim has been to educate slaves to be German citizens. One thing will certainly be quite clear to every German; and this is that revolutions as acts of terror can only be of short duration. If revolutions are not able to produce something new they will end up by devouring the whole of the national patrimony which existed before them. From the assumption of power as an act of force the beneficial work of peace must be promptly developed. But those who abolish classes for the purpose of putting new classes in their place sow the seeds of new revolutions. The bourgeois citizen who has the ruling power in his hands today will become a proletarian if he is banished to Siberia tomorrow and condemned to enforced lab our there. He will then yearn for hisday of deliverance, just as did the proletarian of former times, who now thinks that his turn has come to play the despot. Therefore the National Socialist Revolution never aimed at bringing in one class of the German people and turning out another. One the contrary, our objective has been to make it possible for the whole German people to work, not only in the economic but also in the political field, and to guarantee this possibility by organizing the various classes into one national unit. The National Socialist Movement, however, limits its sphere of internal activity to those individuals who belong to one people and it refuses to allow the members of a foreign race to wield an influence over our political, intellectual, or cultural life. And we refuse to accord to the members of a foreign race any predominant position in our national economic system. In this folk-community, which is based on the bond of blood, and in the results which National Socialism has obtained by making the idea of this community understood among the public, lies the most profound reason for the marvelous success of our Revolution. Confronted with this new and vigorous ideal, all idols and relics of the past which had been upheld by dynastic interests, tribal affiliations and even party interests, now began to lose their glamour. That is why the whole party system of former times completely collapsed in a few weeks, without giving rise to the feeling that something had been lost. They were superseded by a better ideal. A new movement took their place. A reorganization of our people into a national unit that includes all those whose lab our is productive simply pushed aside the old organizations of employers and employees. The symbolic emblems of the recent past, which was a period of disintegration and disability, were banished, not—as in 1918 or 1919—through a resolution voted by a committee appointed to invent a new symbol for the Reich, as if the choice were to depend on the results of a prize competition. Since that day it has become the consecrated symbol of his national resurgence on land and sea and in the air. There could be no more eloquent proof of how profoundly the German people have understood the significance of this change and new development than the manner in which the nation sanctioned our regime at the polls on so many occasions during the years that followed. So, of all those who like to point again and again to the democratic form of government as the institution which is based on the universal will of the people, in contrast to dictatorships, nobody has a better right to speak in the name of the people than I have. Among the results of this phase of the German Revolution I may enumerate the following: — 1 Since that time there is only one trustee of supreme power among the German people and that trustee is the whole people itself. Anyone who compares this state of affairs with the condition of Germany before January 1933 will realize what a tremendous transformation is indicated by these few short statements. But this transformation is only a result that has followed from carrying a fundamental axiom of the National Socialist doctrine into practical effect. This axiom is that the only reasonable meaning and purpose of all human thought and conduct cannot be to create or to maintain structures, organizations or functions made by men, but only to preserve and develop the innate character of the people itself; for Providence has given us this character as the groundwork of all our constructive efforts. Through the successful issue of the National Socialist Movement the people as such was placed above any organization, construction or function, as the sole element that is always there and will permanently abide. The meaning and purpose which Providence had in mind when it created the different races cannot be investigated by us, human beings, and no theory about it can be laid down. But the meaning and purpose of human organizations and of all human activities can be measured by asking what value they are for the maintenance of the race or people, which is the one existing element that must abide. The people—the race—is the primary thing. Party, State, Army, the national economic structure, Justice etc, all these are only secondary and accidental. They are only the means to the end and the end is the preservation of this nation. These public institutions are right and useful according to the measure in which their energies are directed towards this task.
Das Ziel des Bolschewismus ist die Weltrevolution der Juden. Sie wollen das Chaos ьber das Reich und ьber Europa hereinfьhren, um in der daraus entstehenden Hoffnungslosigkeit und Verzweiflung der Vцlker ihre internationale, bolschewistisch verschleierte kapitalistische Tyrannei aufzurichten. Was das fьr das deutsche Volk bedeuten wьrde, braucht nicht nдher erlдutert zu werden. Es wьrde mit der Bolschewisierung des Reiches eine Liquidierung unserer gesamten Intelligenz- und Fьhrungsschicht und als Folge davon die Ьberfьhrung der arbeitenden Massen in die bolschewistisch-jьdische Sklaverei nach sich ziehen. Man sucht in Moskau Zwangsarbeitsbataillone, wie der Fьhrer in seiner Proklamation zum 30. Januar schon sagte, fьr die sibirischen Tundren. Der Aufstand der Steppe macht sich vor unseren Fronten bereit, und der Ansturm des Ostens, der in tдglich sich steigender Stдrke gegen unsere Linien anbrandet, ist nichts anderes als die versuchte Wiederholung der geschichtlichen Verheerungen, die frьher schon so oft unseren Erdteil gefдhrdet haben. Damit aber ist auch eine unmittelbare akute Lebensbedrohung fьr alle europдischen Mдchte gegeben. Man soll nicht glauben, dass der Bolschewismus, hдtte er die Gelegenheit, seinen Siegeszug ьber das Reich anzutreten, irgendwo an unseren Grenzen Halt machen wьrde. Er treibt eine Aggressionspolitik und Aggressionskriegfьhrung, die ausgesprochen auf die Bolschewisierung aller Lдnder und Vцlker ausgeht. Papierene Erklдrungen, die von Seiten des Kremls oder als Garantieverpflichtungen von Seiten Londons oder Washingtons gegen diese nicht zu bestreitenden Absichten abgegeben werden, imponieren uns nicht. Wir wissen, dass wir es im Osten mit einer infernalischen politischen Teufelei zu tun haben, die die sonst unter Menschen und Staaten ьblichen Beziehungen nicht anerkennt. Wenn beispielsweise der englische Lord Beaverbrook erklдrt, dass Europa dem Sowjetismus zur Fьhrung ьberantwortet werden mьsse, wenn ein maЯgeblicher amerikanisch-jьdischer Journalist Brown diese These durch die zynische Verlautbarung ergдnzt, dass eine Bolschewisierung Europas vielleicht ьberhaupt die Lцsung unseres kontinentalen Problems darstellte, so wissen wir genau, was damit gemeint ist. Die europдischen Mдchte stehen hier vor ihrer entscheidenden Lebensfrage. Das Abendland ist in Gefahr. Ob ihre Regierungen und ihre Intelligenzschichten das einsehen wollen oder nicht, ist dabei gдnzlich unerheblich. Das deutsche Volk jedenfalls ist nicht gewillt, sich dieser Gefahr auch nur versuchsweise preiszugeben. Hinter den anstьrmenden Sowjetdivisionen sehen wir schon die jьdischen Liquidationskommandos, hinter diesen aber erhebt sich der Terror, das Gespenst des Millionenhungers und einer vollkommenen Anarchie. Hier erweist sich wiederum das internationale Judentum als das teuflische Ferment der Dekomposition, das eine geradezu zynische Genugtuung dabei empfindet, die Welt in ihre tiefste Unordnung zu stьrzen und damit den Untergang jahrtausendealter Kulturen, an denen es niemals einen inneren Anteil hatte, herbeizufьhren. Wir wissen damit also, vor welcher geschichtlichen Aufgabe wir stehen. Eine zweitausendjдhrige Aufbauarbeit der abendlдndischen Menschheit ist in Gefahr. Man kann diese Gefahr gar nicht ernst genug schildern, aber es ist auch bezeichinend, dass wenn man sie nur beim Namen nennt, das internationale Judentum in allen Lдndern dagegen mit lдrmenden Ausfьhrungen Protest erhebt. So weit also ist es in Europa schon gekommen, dass man eine Gefahr nicht mehr eine Gefahr nennen darf, wenn sie eben vom Judentum ausgeht. Das aber hindert uns nicht daran, die dazu notwendigen Feststellungen zu treffen. Wir haben das auch frьher in unserem innerpolitischen Kampfe getan, als das kommunistische Judentum sich des demokratischen Judentums im «Berliner Tageblatt» und in der «Vossischen Zeitung» bediente, um eine Gefahr, die von Tag zu Tag drohender wurde, zu verniedlichen und zu bagatellisieren, um damit die von ihr bedrohten Teile unseres Volkes in Sicherheit einzuwiegen und ihre Abwehrkrдfte einzuschlдfern. Wir sдhen, wenn wir dieser Gefahr nicht Herr wьrden, im Geiste schon das Gespenst des Hungers, des Elends und einer Millionenzwangsarbeit fьr das deutsche Volk heraufziehen, sдhen den ehrwьrdigsten Erdteil in seinen Grundfesten wanken und unter seinen Trьmmern das geschichtliche Erbe der abendlдndischen Menschheit begraben. Das ist das Problem, vor dem wir stehen. Die europдischen Staaten einschlieЯlich Englands behaupten, stark genug zu sein, einer Bolschewisierung des europдischen Kontinents, sollte sie einmal praktisch gegeben sein, rechtzeitig und wirksam entgegenzutreten. Diese Erklдrung ist kindisch und verdient ьberhaupt keine Widerlegung. Sollte die stдrkste Militдrmacht der Welt nicht in der Lage sein, die Drohung des Bolschewismus zu brechen, wer brдchte dann noch die Kraft dazu auf? Hier antworten stьrmische Rufe aus der im Sportpalast versammelten Menge: «Niemand! Sie wьrden im Bedarfsfall von seinen motorisierten Roboterdivisionen in wenigen Tagen ьberfahren werden. In den Hauptstдdten der mittleren und kleinen europдischen Staaten trцstet man sich mit der Absicht, man mьsse sich gegen die bolschewistische Gefahr seelisch rьsten. Das erinnert verzweifelt an die Erklдrungen der bьrgerlichen Mittelparteien aus dem Jahre 1932, dass der Kampf gegen den Kommunismus nur mit geistigen Waffen ausgefochten und gewonnen werden kцnne. Diese Behauptung war uns auch damals zu albern, als dass wir uns damit auseinandergesetzt hдtten. Der цstliche Bolschewismus ist nicht nur eine terroristische Lehre, sondern auch eine terroristische Praxis. Er verfolgt seine Ziele und Zwecke mit einer infernalischen Grьndlichkeit, unter restloser Ausschцpfung seines inneren Potentials und ohne jede Rьcksichtnahme auf Glьck, Wohlstand und Frieden der von ihm unterjochten Vцlkerschaften. Was wollten England und Amerika tun, wenn der europдische Kontinent im grцbsten Unglьcksfall dem Bolschewismus in die Arme fiele? Will man Europa von London aus vielleicht einreden, dass eine solche Entwicklung an der Kanalgrenze Halt machen wьrde? Ich habe schon einmal darauf hingewiesen, dass der Bolschewismus seine Fremdenlegionen auf dem Boden aller demokratischen Staaten bereits in den kommunistischen Parteien stehen hat. Keiner dieser Staaten kann von sich behaupten, gegen eine innere Bolschewisierung immun zu sein. Eine jьngst vorgenommene Nachwahl zum englischen Unterhaus ergab, dass der unabhдngige, d. Alle territorialen Verpflichtungen, die die Sowjetunion auf sich nimmt, besitzen in unseren Augen keinen effektiven Wert. Der Bolschewismus pflegt seine Grenzen auch ideologisch und nicht nur militдrisch zu ziehen, und darin ist eben seine ьber die Grenzen der Vцlker hinwegspringende Gefahr gegeben. Die Welt hat also nicht die Wahl zwischen einem in seine alte Zersplitterung zurьckfallenden und einem unter der Achsenfьhrung sich neu ordnenden Europa, sondern nur die zwischen einem unter dem militдrischen Schutz der Achse stehenden und einem bolschewistischen Europa. Darьber hinaus bin ich der festen Ьberzeugung, dass die lamentierenden Lords und Erzbischцfe in London ьberhaupt nicht einmal die Absicht haben, der bolschewistischen Gefahr, die bei einem weiteren Vordringen der Sowjetarmeen fьr die europдischen Staaten gegeben wдre, praktisch entgegenzutreten. Das Judentum hat die angelsдchsischen Staaten geistig und politisch schon so tief durchdrungen, dass sie diese Gefahr ьberhaupt nicht mehr sehen und wahr haben wollen. Wie es sich in der Sowjetunion bolschewistisch tarnt, so tarnt es sicii in den angelsдchsischen Staaten plutokratisch-kapitalistisch. Die Methoden der Mimikry sind bei der jьdischen Rasse bekannt. Sie geht seit jeher darauf aus, ihre Gastvцlker einzuschlдfern und damit ihre Abwehrkrдfte gegen von ihr stammende akute und lebensgefдhrdende Bedrohungen zu lдhmen. Zurufe aus der Menge: «Wir haben sie erlebt! Ьber unser Land hinweg reichen sich bereits das westeuropдische scheinzivilisierte Judentum und das Judentum des цstlichen Ghettos die Hдnde. Damit ist Europa in Todesgefahr. Ich schmeichle mir nicht, mit diesen Ausfьhrungen die цffentliche Meinung in den neutralen oder gar in den feindlichen Staaten alarmieren zu kцnnen. Das ist auch nicht ihr Zweck und ihre Absicht. Ich weiЯ, dass die englische Presse morgen mit einem wьtenden Geklдff ьber mich herfallen wird, ich hдtte angesichts unserer Belastung an der Ostfront die ersten Friedensfьhler ausgestreckt. Stьrmisches Gelдchter. Davon kann ьberhaupt keine Rede sein. In Deutschland denkt heute kein Mensch an einen faulen Kompromiss, das ganze Volk denkt nur an einen harten Krieg. Ich beanspruche aber als ein verantwortlicher Sprecher des fьhrenden Landes dieses Kontinents fьr mich das souverдne Recht, eine Gefahr eine Gefahr zu nennen, wenn sie nicht nur unser eigenes Land, sondern unseren ganzen Erdteil bedroht. Als Nationalsozialisten haben wir die Pflicht, Alarm zu schlagen gegen die versuchte Chaotisierung des europдischen Kontinents durch das internationale Judentum, das sich im Bolschewismus eine terroristische Militдrmacht aufgebaut hat, deren Bedrohlichkeit ьberhaupt nicht ьberschдtzt werden kann. Die dritte These, die ich hier nдher erlдutern will, ist die, dass Gefahr unmittelbar im Verzuge ist. Die Lдhmungserscheinungen der westeuropдischen Demokratien gegen ihre tцdlichste Bedrohung sind herzbeklemmend. Das internationale Judentum fцrdert sie mit allen Krдften. Genau so, wie der Widerstand gegen den Kommunismus in unserem Kampf um die Macht in unserem eigenen Lande von den jьdischen Zeitungen kьnstlich eingeschlдfert und nur durch den Nationalsozialismus wieder erweckt wurde, genau so ist das heute bei den anderen Vцlkern der Fall. Das Judentum erweist sich hier wieder einmal als die Inkarnation des Bцsen, als plastischer Dдmon des Verfalls und als Trдger eines internationalen kulturzerstцrerischen Chaos. Man wird, um das hier nur zu erwдhnen, in diesem Zusammenhang auch unsere konsequente Judenpolitik verstehen kцnnen. Wir sehen im Judentum fьr jedes Land eine unmittelbare Gefahr gegeben. Wie andere Vцlker sich gegen diese Gefahr zur Wehr setzen, ist uns gleichgьltig. Wie wir uns aber dagegen zur Wehr setzen, das ist unsere eigene Sache, in die wir keinerlei Einsprьche dulden. Das Judentum stellt eine infektiцse Erscheinung dar, die ansteckend wirkt. Wenn das feindliche Ausland gegen unsere antijьdische Politik scheinheilig Protest einlegt und ьber unsere MaЯnahmen gegen das Judentum heuchlerische Krokodilstrдnen vergieЯt, so kann uns das nicht daran hindern, das Notwendige zu tun. Deutschland jedenfalls hat nicht die Absicht, sich dieser Bedrohung zu beugen, sondern vielmehr die, ihr rechtzeitig und wenn nцtig mit den radikalsten GegenmaЯnahmen entgegenzutreten. Minutenlang hindern nach diesen Sдtzen zustimmende Sprechchцre den Ministeram Weiterreden. Der Krieg der mechanisierten Roboter gegen Deutschland und gegen Europa ist auf seinen Hцhepunkt gestiegen. Das deutsche Volk erfьllt mit seinen Achsenpartnern im wahrsten Sinne des Wortes eine europдische Mission, wenn es dieser unmittelbaren und ernsten Lebensbedrohung mit den Waffen entgegentritt. Wir lassen uns nicht durch das Geschrei des internationalen Judentums in aller Welt in der mutigen und aufrechten Fortfьhrung des gigantischen Kampfes gegen diese Weltpest beirren. Er kann und darf nur mit Sieg enden. Hier ertцnen laute Zwischenrufe: «Deutsche Mдnner, ans Gewehr! Deutsche Frauen, an die Arbeit! Es hatte deshalb nicht nur eine militдrische, sondern auch eine geistige und seelische Bedeutung fьr das deutsche Volk von tiefstgreifender Wirkung. Erst hier sind uns unsere Augen fьr die aus diesem Kriege erwachsende Problematik vollkommen geцffnet worden. Wir wollen jetzt gar nichts mehr von falschen Hoffnungen und Illusionen hцren. Wir wollen den Tatsachen, und wenn sie noch so hart und grausam sind, mutig in die Augen schauen. Denn jedes Mal noch hat es sich in der Geschichte unserer Partei und unseres Staates erwiesen, dass eine erkannte Gefahr bald schon auch eine gebannte Gefahr ist. Im Zeichen dieses heroischen Widerstandes stehen unsere weiteren schwersten Abwehrkдmpfe im Osten. Sie beanspruchen unsere Soldaten und ihre Waffen in einem Umfange, der uns bei allen bisherigen Feldzьgen vollkommen unbekannt gewesen ist. Im Osten tobt ein Krieg ohne Gnade. Der Fьhrer hat ihn richtig charakterisiert, als er erklдrte, es werden aus ihm nicht Sieger und Besiegte, sondern nur noch Ьberlebende und Vernichtete hervorgehen. Das deutsche Volk hat das ganz klar erkannt. Mit seinem gesunden Instinkt hat es sich auf eigene Weise einen Weg durch das Gestrьpp der tagesaktuell bedingten geistigen und seelischen Schwierigkeiten dieses Krieges gebahnt. Wir wissen heute genau, dass der Blitzkrieg des Polen- und Wesfeldzuges fьr den Osten nur noch eine bedingte Gьltigkeit hat. Hier kдmpft die deutsche Nation um ihr alles. Wir sind in diesem Kampf zu der Erkenntnis gekommen, dass das deutsche Volk hier seine heiligsten Gьter, seine Familien, seine Frauen und seine Kinder, die Schцnheit und Unberьhrtheit seiner Landschaft, seine Stдdte und Dцrfer, das zweitausendjдhrige Erbe seiner Kultur und alles, was uns das Leben lebenswert macht, zu verteidigen hat. Fьr diese Schдtze unseres reichen Volkstums hat der Bolschewismus natьrlich nicht das geringste Verstдndnis, und er wьrde auch im Bedarfsfalle darauf nicht die geringste Rьcksicht nehmen. Er tut das ja nicht einmal seinem eigenen Volke gegenьber. Die Sowjetunion hat das bolschewistische Kriegspotential seit 25 Jahren in einem Umfange ausgeschцpft, der fьr uns gдnzlich unvorstellbar war und deshalb von uns auch falsch eingeschдtzt wurde. Das terroristische Judentum hat sich in Russland 200 Millionen Menschen dienstbar gemacht, dabei seine zynischen Methoden und Praktiken mit der stumpfen Zдhigkeit der russischen Rasse vermдhlt, die deshalb eine um so grцЯere Gefahr fьr die europдischen Kulturvцlker darstellt. Im Osten wird ein ganzes Volk zum Kampf gezwungen. Hier werden Mдnner, Frauen, ja Kinder nicht nur in die Rьstungsfabriken, sondern auch in den Krieg getrieben. Die Massen von Panzern, die in diesem Winter unsere цstliche Front berennen, sind das Ergebnis eines 25jдhrigen sozialen Unglьcks und Elends des bolschewistischen Volkes. Dagegen mьssen wir mit entsprechenden GegenmaЯnahmen antreten, wenn wir nicht das Spiel als verloren aufgeben wollen. Ich gebe meiner festen Ьberzeugung Ausdruck, dass wir die bolschewistische Gefahr auf die Dauer nur niederringen kцnnen, wenn wir ihr, wenn auch nicht mit gleichen, so doch mit gleichwertigen Methoden entgegentreten. Die deutsche Nation steht damit vor der ernstesten Frage dieses Krieges, nдmlich der, die Entschlossenheit aufzubringen, alles einzusetzen, um alles, was sie besitzt, zu erhalten, und alles, was sie zum spдteren Leben nцtig hat, dazu zu gewinnen. Der totale Krieg also ist das Gebot der Stunde. Es muss jetzt zu Ende sein mit den bьrgerlichen Zimperlichkeiten, die auch in diesem Schicksalskampf nach dem Grundsatz verfahren wollen: Wasch mir den Pelz, aber mach mich nicht nass! Jeder Satz des Ministers wird von wachsendem Beifall und stдrkster Zustimmung begleitet. Die Gefahr, vor der wir stehen, ist riesengroЯ. RiesengroЯ mьssen deshalb auch die Anstrengungen sein, mit denen wir ihr entgegentreten. Es ist also jetzt die Stunde gekommen, die Glacehandschuhe auszuziehen und die Faust zu bandagieren. Wie ein einziger Schrei erbebt sich ein orkanartiger Beifall. Sprechchцre von den Galerien und Rдngen bestдtigen die volle Zustimmung der Menge. Es geht nicht mehr an, das reiche Kriegspotential nicht nur unseres eigenen Landes, sondern der uns zur Verfьgung stehenden bedeutenden Teile Europas nur flьchtig und an der Oberflдche auszuschцpfen. Es muss ganz zur Ausschцpfung gelangen, und zwar so schnell und so grьndlich, als das organisatorisch und sachlich ьberhaupt nur denkbar ist. Hier wдre eine falsche Rьcksichtnahme vollkommen fehl am Orte. Europas Zukunft hдngt von unserem Kampf im Osten ab. Wir stehen zu seinem Schutze bereit. Das deutsche Volk stellt sein kostbarstes nationales Blut fьr diesen Kampf zur Verfьgung. Der ьbrige Teil Europas sollte hierfьr wenigstens seine Arbeit zur Verfьgung stellen. Es gibt viele ernsthafte Kritiker auch in anderen Lдndern, die diese zwingende Pflicht bereits einsehen. Andere wieder bestreiten sie noch. Das aber kann fьr uns nicht ausschlaggebend sein. Wenn die Gefahr fьr sie allein gegeben wдre, so kцnnte man ihre Auslassungen als literarischen Unsinn bewerten, der keinerlei Bedeutung besitzt. Aber die Gefahr ist fьr uns alle gegeben, und deshalb mьssen wir uns auch alle dagegen zur Wehr setzen. Wer diesen Kampf im ьbrigen Europa heute noch nicht versteht, wird uns morgen auf den Knien danken, dass wir ihn mutig und unbeirrt auf uns genommen haben. Es дrgert uns nicht einmal, wenn unsere Feinde im Ausland behaupten, die MaЯnahmen, die wir jetzt zur Totalisierung des Krieges durchfьhrten, kдmen denen des Bolschewismus ziemlich nahe. Scheinheilig erklдren sie, daraus mьsse man also folgern, dass sich unter diesen Umstдnden der Kampf gegen den Bolschewismus ьberhaupt erьbrige. Es geht hier nicht um die Methode, mit der man den Bolschewismus zu Boden schlдgt sondern um das Ziel, nдmlich um die Beseitigung der Gefahr. Minutenlanger Beifall. Die Frage ist also nicht die, ob die Methoden, die wir anwenden, gut oder schlecht sind, sondern ob sie zum Erfolge fьhren. Jedenfalls sind wir als nationalsozialistische Volksfьhrung jetzt zu allem entschlossen.
Знаменитый фрагмент из фильма “Der Untergang” (рус. “Бункер”) — Речь Гитлера в бункере
| речь адольфа гитлера на немецком слушать | Дзен | Пользователь Микола Довгенький задал вопрос в категории Лингвистика и получил на него 2 ответа. |
| Адольф Гитлер цитаты | This list is incomplete; you can help by adding missing items. (February 2011). |
| "Why We Are Antisemites" - Text of Adolf Hitler's 1920 speech at the Hofbräuhaus | Carolyn Yeager | Я объявляю немецкому народу и всему миру, что Адольф Гитлер вступил как фюрер и рейхсканцлер теперь в замок старой столицы империи, хранительницы короны империи. |
| Adolf Hitler Speeches : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive | По одной из них, данная фраза была в письме Гитлера главе берлинского отделения СС Курту Далюге. |
Известные цитаты Гитлера (100 цитат)
Только такая организация может служить интересам всего народа. Речь 06. Прокламация 01. Речь 16. Второе: Решение тяжелейшей социальной проблемы путем возвращения миллионной армии наших, достойных всяческого сочувствия, безработных обратно на производство.
Третье: Восстановление стабильного и авторитетного государственного руководства, опирающегося на доверие и волю нации; руководства, которое снова вернет нашему великому народу способность выполнять свои обязательства перед миром. Речь 17. Наша национальная гордость заключается не в том, чтобы презирать других, а в том, чтобы уважать и любить свой народ! Речь 01.
Речь 24. Он неуклонно и в первую очередь будет думать о соблюдении интересов народа в вопросах мира, работы и культуры. Я был солдатом и видел все собственными глазами, в отличие от очень многих других государственных деятелей, которые сами этого никогда не переживали. И я, разумеется, отвергаю войну.
Но отвергаю я ее не как изменник, предатель и трус, а как порядочный немец, честно выполнивший свой воинский долг на фронте, и желающий оставаться порядочным до конца. Поэтому я в равной мере не оставлю на произвол судьбы ни права немецкого народа на жизнь, ни его права на честь. Эти люди — повсюду, но нигде они не дома. Речь 10.
Также и народом являются только те, кто способен, если потребуется, выступить как единый народ навстречу любым испытаниям. Я создал … совершенно новое движение. Движение, которое с самого своего зарождения и вопреки всем явлениям распада в окружавшей его действительности вновь созидало народную общность. Лишь в этом случае государство способно полноценно выполнять свои социальные обязательства.
Истинную ценность любому движению придают только люди. Люди, которые, руководствуясь смыслом этого движения, воплощают его идеи в жизнь. Речь 07. Речь 05.
В структурах, которым принадлежит реальная власть, под «свободой» подразумевается их возможность грабить широкие массы населения, без каких-либо ограничений, и не встречая хоть сколько-нибудь серьезного сопротивления. Речь 28. Инструменты финансового еврейства. Речь 21.
Герой стал презираем, трус — почитаем; добросовестность оказалась наказуема, нерадивость — вознаграждаема. Приличного человека уже не ждало ничего, кроме насмешек; опустившийся же, наоборот, стал образцом для подражания. Сила стала вызывать осуждение, слабость — восхищение. Полноценность человеческой личности перестала что-либо значить.
Это — ложь, когда либеральный мир говорит, что мы хотим добиться перемен силой. По свой собственной инициативе я неоднократно предлагал пересмотреть эти невыносимые условия. Все эти предложения, как вы знаете, были отклонены — предложения об ограничении вооружений и, если необходимо, разоружении, предложения об ограничении военного производства, предложения о запрещении некоторых видов современного вооружения. Вы знаете о предложениях, которые я делал для восстановления германского суверенитета над немецкими территориями. Вы знаете о моих бесконечных попытках, которые я предпринимал для мирного урегулирования вопросов с Австрией, потом с Судетской областью, Богемией и Моравией. Все они оказались напрасны. Польша обрушила нападки на свободный город Данциг. Более того, Польша не была готова уладить проблему Коридора разумным способом, с равноправным отношениям к обеим сторонам, и она не думала о соблюдении её обязательств по отношению к нацменьшинствам.
Гитлер был известен своей агрессивной внешней политикой и убеждением в расовой превосходственности арийцев. Его антисемитские взгляды привели к Холокосту, геноциду евреев, во время которого было убито около шести миллионов евреев. В 1945 году, когда союзники наступали на Берлин, Гитлер покончил жизнь самоубийством.
These proposals for mediation have failed because in the meanwhile there, first of all, came as an answer the sudden Czechoslovak general mobilization, followed by more Czech atrocities. These were again repeated last night. Recently there have been as many as twenty-one incidents in which Czech military formations have killed innocent Sudeten Germans without provocations. Last night there were fourteen, of which one was quite serious. I have, therefore, resolved to speak to Czechoslovakia in the same language that Czechoslovakia for months past has used toward us and the Sudeten German minority.
This attitude on the part of the Reich will not change. The other European States understand in part our attitude. I should like here above all to thank Italy as well as Hungary, which throughout have supported us, but you will understand that for the carrying on of this struggle we do not intend to appeal to foreign help. We will carry out this task ourselves. The neutral States have assured us of their neutrality, just as we had already guaranteed it to them. When statesmen in the West declare that this affects their interests, I can only regret such a declaration. It cannot for a moment make me hesitate to fulfil my duty. What more is wanted?
I have solemnly assured them, and I repeat it, that we ask nothing of those Western States and never will ask anything. I have declared that the frontier between France and Germany is a final one. I have repeatedly offered friendship and, if necessary, the closest co-operation to Britain, but this cannot be offered from one side only. It must find response on the other side. Germany has no interests in the West, and our western wall is for all time the frontier of the Reich on the west. Moreover, we have no aims of any kind there for the future. With this assurance we are in solemn earnest, and as long as others do not violate their neutrality we will likewise take every care to respect it. I am determined to solve 1 the Sudeten question and 2 to see to it that a change is made in the relationship between Germany and Czechoslovakia that shall ensure a peaceful co-existence.
In this I am resolved to continue to fight until either the present Czechoslovak government is willing to continue to bring about this change or until another Czechoslovak Government is ready to do so. I am resolved to remove from the German frontiers the element of uncertainty, the everlasting atmosphere of conditions resembling civil war. I will see to it that in the East there is, on the frontier, a peace precisely similar to that on our other frontiers. In this I will take the necessary measures to se that they do not contradict the proposals I have already made known in the Reichstag itself to the rest of the world, that is to say, I will not war against women and children. I have ordered my air force to restrict itself to attacks on military objectives. If, however, the enemy thinks he can form that draw carte blanche on his side to fight by the other methods he will receive an answer that will deprive him of hearing and sight. This night for the first time Czech regular soldiers fired on our territory. Three German soldiers and five Sudeten Germans were killed by Czech soldiers at Egerteich without provocation.
Since 6. Whoever fight with poison gas will be fought with poison gas.