I would like to find all Hitler speeches in original German, but the more I look, the less I find. Sure there are a few here and there, but his complete speeches in German are nowhere to find. I did find a full text on , (linked to also in this answer) but sadly that is only in English. Also the search. европейский мир. #речи. Цитаты Гитлера Представляю вам цитаты Гитлера. Adolf Hitler beeinflusste die Geschichte des 20. Jahrhunderts auf schreckliche Weise. Doch wie wurde er zum Diktator, der die Welt mit einem verheerenden Krieg und dem Holocaust in eine Katastrophe stürzte? Нацисты требовали от жителей Германии произносить нацистское приветствие[6][7]. Но, по мнению свидетелей Иеговы, произносить выражение «Heil Hitler!» означало бы выражать упование на то, что спасение придёт от Гитлера.
Der Fuerer ist gefallen-Сообщение немецкого радио о смерти Адольфа Гитлера 1 мая 1945 года.
| Цитата Гитлера из статьи Путина, по всей видимости, фейковая | Опозорили Германию перед всем миром. |
| Цитаты Гитлера на немецком | In seiner Ansprache vor dem deutschen Reichstag am 1. September 1939 rechtfertigte Reichskanzler Adolf Hitler den deutschen Angriff auf Polen. Die Rede war nicht nur an die anwesenden Reichstagsabgeordneten gerichtet: Durch Radioübertragung und Übersetzungen wurde Sorge. |
| Цитаты гитлера на немецком с переводом. Немецкие крылатые выражения в русском языке | Я должен заявить определённо: Германия соблюдает свои обязательства; нацменьшинства, которые проживают в Германии, не преследуются. |
| List of speeches given by Adolf Hitler - Wikipedia | This list is incomplete; you can help by adding missing items. (February 2011). |
Цитаты гитлера на немецком с переводом. Немецкие крылатые выражения в русском языке
Афоризмы, цитаты, высказывания знаменитых людей в переводе с немецкого на русский язык. Цитаты, фразы и афоризмы на немецком с переводом.”. Причем слова, фразы и цитаты использовались немецкой пропагандой не лишь для укрепления воинского духа солдат или «рекламы» известной идеологии.
Адольф Гитлер знаменитые цитаты
- Inhaltsverzeichnis
- Содержание
- Речь Гитлера после воссоединения Австрии с Германией
- You are here
- Search the Holocaust Encyclopedia
- Известные фразы гитлера. Цитаты на немецком языке с переводом
Звуки с голосами немецкой речи скачать и слушать онлайн
Within a few weeks the political debris and the social prejudices which had been accumulating through a thousand years of German history were removed and cleared away. May we not speak of a revolution when the chaotic conditions brought about by parliamentary-democracy disappear in less than three months and a regime of order and discipline takes their place, and a new energy springs forth from a firmly welded unity and a comprehensive authoritative power such as Germany never before had? So great was the Revolution that its intellectual foundations are not even yet understood but are superficially criticized by our contemporaries. They talk of democracies and dictatorships; but they fail to grasp the fact that in this country a radical transformation has taken place and has produced results which are democratic in the highest sense of the word, if democracy has any meaning at all. With infallible certainty we are steering towards an order of things in which a process of selection will become active in the political leadership of the nation, as it exists throughout the whole of life in general.
By this process of selection, which will follow the laws of Nature and the dictates of human reason, those among our people who show the greatest natural ability will be appointed to positions in the political leadership of the nation. In making this selection no consideration will be given to birth or ancestry, name or wealth, but only to the question of whether or not the candidate has a natural vocation for those higher positions of leadership. In this country that principle will have its political counterpart. Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid.
And that is no theory. In the present National Socialist Germany it is a reality that is considered by us all as a matter of course. I myself, to whom the people have given their trust and who have been called to be their leader, come from the people. All the millions of German workers know that it is not a foreign dilettante or an international revolutionary apostle who is at the head of the Reich, but a German who has come from their own ranks.
And numerous people whose families belong to the peasantry and working classes are now filling prominent positions in this National Socialist State. Some of them actually hold the highest offices in the leadership of the nation, as Cabinet Ministers, Reichsstatthalter and Gauleiter. But National Socialism always bears in mind the interests of the people as a whole and not the interests of one class or another. The National Socialist Revolution has not aimed at turning a privileged class into a class which will have no rights in the future.
Its aim has been to grant equal rights to those social strata that hitherto were denied such rights. We have not ruined millions of citizens by degrading them to the level of enslaved workers. Our aim has been to educate slaves to be German citizens. One thing will certainly be quite clear to every German; and this is that revolutions as acts of terror can only be of short duration.
If revolutions are not able to produce something new they will end up by devouring the whole of the national patrimony which existed before them. From the assumption of power as an act of force the beneficial work of peace must be promptly developed. But those who abolish classes for the purpose of putting new classes in their place sow the seeds of new revolutions. The bourgeois citizen who has the ruling power in his hands today will become a proletarian if he is banished to Siberia tomorrow and condemned to enforced lab our there.
He will then yearn for hisday of deliverance, just as did the proletarian of former times, who now thinks that his turn has come to play the despot. Therefore the National Socialist Revolution never aimed at bringing in one class of the German people and turning out another. One the contrary, our objective has been to make it possible for the whole German people to work, not only in the economic but also in the political field, and to guarantee this possibility by organizing the various classes into one national unit. The National Socialist Movement, however, limits its sphere of internal activity to those individuals who belong to one people and it refuses to allow the members of a foreign race to wield an influence over our political, intellectual, or cultural life.
And we refuse to accord to the members of a foreign race any predominant position in our national economic system. In this folk-community, which is based on the bond of blood, and in the results which National Socialism has obtained by making the idea of this community understood among the public, lies the most profound reason for the marvelous success of our Revolution. Confronted with this new and vigorous ideal, all idols and relics of the past which had been upheld by dynastic interests, tribal affiliations and even party interests, now began to lose their glamour. That is why the whole party system of former times completely collapsed in a few weeks, without giving rise to the feeling that something had been lost.
They were superseded by a better ideal. A new movement took their place. A reorganization of our people into a national unit that includes all those whose lab our is productive simply pushed aside the old organizations of employers and employees. The symbolic emblems of the recent past, which was a period of disintegration and disability, were banished, not—as in 1918 or 1919—through a resolution voted by a committee appointed to invent a new symbol for the Reich, as if the choice were to depend on the results of a prize competition.
Since that day it has become the consecrated symbol of his national resurgence on land and sea and in the air. There could be no more eloquent proof of how profoundly the German people have understood the significance of this change and new development than the manner in which the nation sanctioned our regime at the polls on so many occasions during the years that followed. So, of all those who like to point again and again to the democratic form of government as the institution which is based on the universal will of the people, in contrast to dictatorships, nobody has a better right to speak in the name of the people than I have. Among the results of this phase of the German Revolution I may enumerate the following: — 1 Since that time there is only one trustee of supreme power among the German people and that trustee is the whole people itself.
Anyone who compares this state of affairs with the condition of Germany before January 1933 will realize what a tremendous transformation is indicated by these few short statements. But this transformation is only a result that has followed from carrying a fundamental axiom of the National Socialist doctrine into practical effect. This axiom is that the only reasonable meaning and purpose of all human thought and conduct cannot be to create or to maintain structures, organizations or functions made by men, but only to preserve and develop the innate character of the people itself; for Providence has given us this character as the groundwork of all our constructive efforts. Through the successful issue of the National Socialist Movement the people as such was placed above any organization, construction or function, as the sole element that is always there and will permanently abide.
The meaning and purpose which Providence had in mind when it created the different races cannot be investigated by us, human beings, and no theory about it can be laid down. But the meaning and purpose of human organizations and of all human activities can be measured by asking what value they are for the maintenance of the race or people, which is the one existing element that must abide. The people—the race—is the primary thing. Party, State, Army, the national economic structure, Justice etc, all these are only secondary and accidental.
They are only the means to the end and the end is the preservation of this nation. These public institutions are right and useful according to the measure in which their energies are directed towards this task. If they are incapable of fulfilling it, then their existence is harmful and they must either be reformed or removed and replaced by something better. It is absolutely necessary that this principle should be practically recognized; for that is the only way in which men can be saved from becoming the victims of a devitalized set of dogmas in a matter where dogmas are entirely out of place, and from drawing dogmatic conclusions from the consideration of ways and means, when the final purpose itself is the only valid dogma.
All of you, gentlemen and members of the German Reichstag, understand the meaning of what I have just said. But on this occasion I am speaking to the whole German people and therefore I should like to bring forward a few examples which show how important these principles were proved to be when they were put into practice. There are many people for whom this is the only way of explaining why we talk of a Nationalist Socialist Revolution, though no blood was shed and no property wrecked. For a long time our ideas of law and justice had been developing in a way that led to a state of general confusion.
This was partly due to the fact that we adopted ideas which were foreign to our national character and also partly because the German mind itself did not have any clear notion of what public justice meant. This confusion was evidenced more strikingly by the lack of inner clarity as to the function of law and justice. There are two extreme poles which are characteristic of this mental lack: —- 1 The opinion that the law as such is its own justification and hence cannot be made the subject of any critical analysis as to its utility, either in regard to its general principles or its relation to particular problems. According to this notion, the law would remain even though the world should disappear.
Between these two extreme poles the idea of defending the larger interests of the community was introduced very timidly and under the cloak of an appeal to reasons of state. In contradistinction to all this, the National Socialist Revolution has laid down a definite and unambiguous principle on which the whole system of legislation, jurisprudence and administration of justice must be founded. It is the task of justice to collaborate in supporting and protecting the people as a whole against those individuals who, because they lack a social conscience, try to shirk the obligations to which all the members of the community are subject, or directly act against the interests of the community itself. In the new German legal system which will be in force from now onwards the nation is placed above persons and property.
The principle expressed in that brief statement and everything it implies has led to the greatest reform ever introduced in our German legal structure. The first decisive action taken in accordance with the fundamental principle I have spoken of was the setting up not only of one legislator but also of one executive. The second measure is not yet ready but will be announced to the nation within a few weeks. In the German penal code, which has been drawn up with this wide general perspective in view, German justice will be placed for the first time on a basis which ensures that for all time to come its duty will be to serve in maintaining the German race.
Although the chaos which we found before us in the various branches of public life was very great indeed, the state of dissolution into which German economic life had fallen was still greater. And this was the feature of the German collapse that impressed itself most strikingly on the minds of the broad masses of the people. The conditions that then actually existed have still remained in their memories and in the memory of the German people as a whole. As outstanding examples of this catastrophe we found these two phenomena: — 1 More than six millions of unemployed.
The area covered by the German agricultural farms that were on the point of being sold up by forced auction was as large as the whole of Thuringia more than 8. In the natural course of events the falling off in production on the one side and the decrease in purchasing power, on the other, must necessarily bring about the disruption and annihilation of the great mass of the middle class also. How seriously this side of the German distress was then felt might subsequently be measured by the fact that I had to ask for full owners for the period of four years especially for the purpose of reducing unemployment and putting a stop to the dissolution of the German agricultural population. I may further state that in 1933 the National Socialists did not interfere with any activities which were being carried out by others and which at the same time promised success.
The Party was called to take over the government of the country at a moment when the possibilities of redeeming the situation in any other way had been exhausted and particularly when repeated attempts to overcome the economic crisis had failed. After four years from that date I now face the German people and you, gentlemen and members of the Reichstag, to give an account of what has been accomplished. On this occasion I do not think you will withhold your sanction from what the National Socialist Government has done and you will agree that I have fulfilled the promises I made four years ago. It was not an easy undertaking.
I am not giving away any secrets when I tell you that at that time the so-called economic experts were convinced that the economic crisis could not be overcome. In the face of this staggering situation which, as I have said, appeared hopeless to the minds of the experts, I still believed in the possibility of a German revival and particularly in the possibility of an economic recovery. My belief was grounded on two considerations: — 1 I have always had sympathy for those excited people who invariably talk of the collapse of the nation whenever they find themselves confronted with a difficult situation. What do they mean by a collapse?
The German people were already in existence before they made any definite appearance in history as it is known to us. Now, leaving out entirely what their pre-historic experiences may have been, it is certain that during the past two thousand years of history, through which that portion of mankind which we call the German People has passed, unspeakable miseries and catastrophes must have befallen them more than once. Famines, wars and pestilences have overwhelmed our people and wreaked terrible havoc among them. It must give rise to unlimited faith in the vital resources of a nation when we recall the fact that only a few centuries ago our German people, with a population of more than eighteen millions, were reduced by the Thirty Years War to less than four millions.
Let us also remember that this once flourishing land was pillaged, dismembered and devastated, that its cities were burned down, its hamlets and villages laid waste, that its fields were left uncultivated and barren. Some ten years afterwards our people began again to increase in number. The cities were rebuilt and began to be filled with a new life. The fields were ploughed once more.
Songs were heard along the countryside, in concord with the rhythm of that work which brought new life and livelihood to the people. Let us look back over the development, or at least that part of it known to us, through which our people have passed since those dim historic ages down to the present time. We shall then recognize how puny is all the fuss that these weakling fools make who immediately begin to talk about the collapse of the economic structure—and hence of human existence—the first moment a piece of printed paper loses its face value somewhere in the world. Germany and the German people have mastered many a grave catastrophe.
Of course, we must admit that the right men were always needed to formulate the necessary measures and enforce them without paying any attention to those negative persons who always think that they know more than others. A bevy of parliamentarian weaklings are certainly not the kind of men to lead a nation out of the slough of distress and despair. I firmly believed and was solemnly convinced that the economic catastrophe would be mastered in Germany as soon as the people could be got to believe in their own immortality as a people and as soon as they realized that the aim and purpose of all economic effort is to save and maintain the life of the nation. But unfortunately I have observed that the worst theorists are always busy in those quarters where theory has no place at all and where practical life counts for everything.
It goes without saying that in the economic sphere and with the passing of time experience has given rise to the employment of certain definite principles and also definite methods of work which have been proved to be productive of good results. But all methods and principles are subject to the time element. To make hard-and-fast dogmas out of practical methods would deprive the human faculties and working power of that elasticity which alone enables them to face changing demands by changing the means of meeting them accordingly and thus mastering them. There were many persons among us who busied themselves, with that perseverance which is characteristic of the Germans, in an effort to formulate dogmas from economic methods and then raise that dogmatic system to a branch of our university curriculum, under the title of national economy.
According to the pronouncements issued by these national economists, Germany was irrevocably lost. It is a characteristic of all dogmatists that they vigorously reject any new dogma. In other words, they criticize any new piece of knowledge that may be put forward and reject it as mere theory. For the last eigtheen [sic] years we have been witnessing a rare spectacle.
Our economic dogmatists have been proved wrong in almost every branch of practical life and yet they repudiate those who have actually overcome the economic crisis, as propagators of false theories and damn them accordingly. You all know the story of the doctor who told a patient that he could live only for another six months. Ten years afterwards the patient met the physician; but the only surprise which the latter expressed at the recovery of the patient was to state that the treatment which the second doctor gave the patient was entirely wrong. The German economic policy which National Socialism introduced in 1933 is based on some fundamental considerations.
In the relations between economics and the people, the people alone is the only unchangeable element. Economic activity in itself is no dogma and never can be such. There is no economic theory or opinion which can claim to be considered as sacrosanct. The will to place the economic system at the service of the people, and capital at the service of economics, is the only thing that is of decisive importance here.
We know that National Socialism vigorously combats the opinion which holds that the economic structure exists for the benefit of capital and that the people are to be looked upon as subject to the economic system. We were therefore determined from the very beginning to exterminate the false notion that the economic system could exist and operate entirely freely and entirely outside of any control or supervision on the part of the State. Today there can no longer be such a thing as an independent economic system. That is to say, the economic system can no longer be left to itself exclusively.
And this is so, not only because it is unallowable from the political point of view but also because, in the purely economic sphere itself, the consequences would be disastrous. It is out of the question that millions of individuals should be allowed to work just as they like and merely to meet their own needs; but it is just as impossible to allow the entire system of economics to function according to the notions held exclusively in economic circles and thus made to serve egotistic interests. Then there is the further consideration that these economic circles are not in a position to bear the responsibility for their own failures. In its modern phase of the development, the economic system concentrates enormous masses of workers in certain special branches and in definite local areas.
New inventions or a slump in the market may destroy whole branches of industry at one blow. The industrialist may close his factory gates. He may even try to find a new field for his personal activities. In most cases he will not be ruined so easily.
Moreover, the industrialists who have to suffer in such contingencies are only a small number if individuals. But on the other side there are hundreds of thousands of workers, with their wives and children. Who is to defend their interests and care for them? The whole community of the people?
Indeed, it is its duty to do so. Therefore the whole community cannot be made to bear the burden of economic disasters without according it the right of influencing and controlling economic life and thus avoiding catastrophes. It was exclusively a problem of how industrial lab our could best be employed on the one side and, on the other, how our agricultural resources could be utilized.
April 1945, s. Gedichte Band 5, Suhrkamp 1964 S. Bechtle 1968.
Ich denke, die Journalisten zeigten schlechten Geschmack, als sie den Mann der Stunde in Deutschland kritisierten. April 1931, S. Er spricht scharf gegen Rosenberg. Weil er alles und nichts macht. Juli 1933. Schmidt, Der Standard, 20.
Wer es zuerst tut, ist verloren. Alles was du im Leben brauchst ist Ignoranz und Uberzeugung, und der Erfolg wird dir sicher sein. У каждого, как у луны, есть темная сторона , которую он никому не показывает.
Man vergisst vielleicht, wo man die Friedenspfeife vergraben hat. Aber man vergisst niemals, wo das Beil liegt. Вероятно, можно забыть, где закопана трубка мира.
Но никогда не забывают, где лежит топор. Тот, кто много знает, стремиться к ясности; тот, кто хочет показать, что много знает, стремиться во тьму. То, что делается из , всегда находится по ту сторону и.
Надежда — это радуга над падающим вниз ручейком. Wer nie reist, sieht nur eine Seite davon. Мир - это книга.
Кто никогда не путешествует, видит только одну её страницу. Billy Graham Самый опасный из всех наркотиков - это успех. Ничего в мире так не заразительно, как смех и хорошее настроение.
Тяжелее разрушить предвзятое мнение, чем расщепить атом. Sitzt man jedoch eine Minute auf einem heissen Ofen, meint man, es waren zwei Stunden. Das ist Relativitat.
Если сидеть два часа рядом с , кажется, это прошла минута. Если же посидеть минуту на горячей плите, покажется, что прошло два часа. Это и есть относительность.
Родившись в Австрии, Гитлер в молодости стремился стать художником, но в конечном итоге влился в политику, присоединившись к Немецкой Рабочей Партии в 1919 году. К 1921 году Гитлер стал лидером партии, переименовав ее в Национал-социалистическую немецкую рабочую партию, или НСДАП часто сокращенно называемую нацистской партией. В 1933 году Гитлер был назначен канцлером Германии, и в течение нескольких лет установил авторитарное правление, известное как Третий Райх.
Адольф Гитлер цитаты и высказывания.
Да и фанатично настроенное окружение Гитлера на допросах могло просто врать, что фюрер был в бункере до 30 апреля, а затем покончил с собой. Разумеется, ни тогда, ни сегодня никто не стал опровергать, являющуюся официальной версию самоубийства Гитлера, но проверить возможные места его бегства было необходимо. Тем более, что в здании Главного штаба ВМФ Германии сотрудниками советской разведки были найдены карты с указанием лоций прохождения специальным конвоем фюрера, состоящим из подводных лодок, подводных пещер под Землей Королевы Мод у побережья Антарктиды. Конечной целью путешествия значилась обратная сторона Земли. На картах были даже отмечены континенты этой загадочной страны.
Подписывайтесь на канал, и не забудьте поставить колокольчик. Впереди вас ждет много чего интересного и полезного. Начните свою жизнь - по новому и с чистого листа. Желаю всем удачи и только добра.
Кристин Кинг и другие историки отмечают, что свидетелей Иеговы арестовывали за отказ произносить нацистское приветствие, а их детей исключали из школ и разлучали с семьями [9] [13] [14] [15].
После Второй мировой войны править После Второй мировой войны в некоторых странах нацистское приветствие и восклицания Heil Hitler! В Австрии действует аналогичный закон. В России в 2012 году рассматривался законопроект о введении штрафов за нацистское приветствие или за приветствие, схожее с ним [16] [17] , который так и не был принят. Слова типа «Хайль, такой-то! В 1996 году в антикоммунистической агитгазете « Не дай Бог!
Im Jahr darauf bekam er als ihr neuer Vorsitzender umfassende Machtbefugnisse — sein politischer Weg zur Machtergreifung begann. Hitler sah den richtigen Zeitpunkt gekommen, um die Macht zu ergreifen. Am Abend des 8. Schon Ende 1924 wurde er vorzeitig aus der Haft entlassen. Am 13. April erhielt er 36,8 Prozent. Am 30. Januar 1933 ernannte Hindenburg Hitler zum Reichskanzler.
Цитаты Гитлера
| Adolf Hitler Issues Comment on the "Jewish Question" | Holocaust Encyclopedia | 1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:04,900 Ob du meine Arbeit für richtig hältst, 2 00:00:05,000 --> 00:00:08,990 ob du glaubst, dass ich fleißig gewesen bin, dass ich gearbeitet habe. 3 00:00:09,000 --> 00:00:11,900 dass ich mich in diesen Jahren für dich eingesetzt habe, 4 00:00:12,000 --> 00:00:16,990 dass ich. |
| Цитаты гитлера на немецком с переводом. Немецкие крылатые выражения в русском языке | Сравнение речи Гитлера и Путина найдены поразительные 3. |
| Адольф Гитлер Фразы На Немецком Скачать mp3 | In seiner Ansprache vor dem deutschen Reichstag am 1. September 1939 rechtfertigte Reichskanzler Adolf Hitler den deutschen Angriff auf Polen. Die Rede war nicht nur an die anwesenden Reichstagsabgeordneten gerichtet: Durch Radioübertragung und Übersetzungen wurde Sorge. |
| Цитаты Гитлера на немецком | Журналистка немецкого телеканала опозорилась на весь мир, использовав термин, который был в ходу во времена Гитлера. |
Обращение Адольфа Гитлера к германскому народу 22 июня 1941
Hitler im Reichstag am 1. September 1939 Quelle: Bundesarchiv Koblenz. Звук с фразой "Гитлер капут" на немецком языке (мужской голос). Meine Ehre heißt Treue! — (нем. Моя честь называется верность, другой возможный перевод Верность — моя честь) девиз на клинках Кинжалов СС (нем. В первую очередь из-за знаменитой фразы Гитлера в 1936 году, когда он наперекор всем приказал войти в демилитаризованную Рейнскую о6ласть. исторические очерки, документы, материалы» (М., Изд.
Фразы на немецком Гитлера — история и значения
This list is incomplete; you can help by adding missing items. (February 2011). Hofbrauhaus interior where Hitler spoke National Socialist German Workers Party Public meeting in the Great Hall of the Hofbräuhaus Friday 15 August 1920 Adolf Hitler ~~Why We Are Antisemites~~ Translation from German by Hasso Castrup (Copenhagen, Denmark), January, 2013, exclusively for. Пользователь Микола Довгенький задал вопрос в категории Лингвистика и получил на него 2 ответа. Цитаты гитлера на немецком | Анекдоты, цитаты, статусы, загадки, стихи, фразы. Пользователь Микола Довгенький задал вопрос в категории Лингвистика и получил на него 2 ответа. Adolf Hitler said in a speech: Wenn es dem internationalen Finanzjudentum in und außerhalb Europas gelingen sollte, die Völker noch einmal in einen Weltkrieg zu stürzen, dann wird das Ergebnis nicht der Sieg des Judentums sein, sondern die Vernichtung der jüdischen Rasse in Europa! If international.
Цитаты адольфа гитлера на немецком с переводом
Albert Schweitzer Вдохновение - хорошее топливо, но, к сожалению, оно слишком быстро сгорает. Albert Schweitzer Единственно важное в жизни - это следы , которые мы оставляем, когда идём. Ambrose Bierce Циник - это человек, который видит вещи такими, какие они есть, и не видит, какими они должны быть. Liebe ist vor allem geistigseelisch. Для многих людей именуется. Не может быть без духовного влечения, но это еще не значит, что она превращается в бледное, бестелесное, платоническое влечение. Телесная близость должна быть воплощением духовной близости и духовного влечения.
Wer es zuerst tut, ist verloren. Alles was du im Leben brauchst ist Ignoranz und Uberzeugung, und der Erfolg wird dir sicher sein. У каждого, как у луны, есть темная сторона , которую он никому не показывает. Man vergisst vielleicht, wo man die Friedenspfeife vergraben hat. Aber man vergisst niemals, wo das Beil liegt. Вероятно, можно забыть, где закопана трубка мира.
Но никогда не забывают, где лежит топор. Тот, кто много знает, стремиться к ясности; тот, кто хочет показать, что много знает, стремиться во тьму. То, что делается из , всегда находится по ту сторону и. Надежда — это радуга над падающим вниз ручейком. Wer nie reist, sieht nur eine Seite davon. Мир - это книга.
Кто никогда не путешествует, видит только одну её страницу. Billy Graham Самый опасный из всех наркотиков - это успех.
I made one more final effort to accept a proposal for mediation on the part of the Italian Government. Mussolini proposed a conference of the major powers in Munich. Mussolini agreed on the cession to Germany of the Sudeten German territory and the measures consequent thereon, and by this agreement the Czechoslovak government was to be hold responsible for the steps necessary to secure its fulfilment. For a whole day I sat in my Government and waited to see whether the Czech government would abide to the agreement the major powers of Europe had concluded in order to prevent a major war in Europe. Deputies, if the German Government and its Leader patiently endured such treatment Germany would deserve only to disappear from the political stage. But I am wrongly judged if my love of peace and my patience are mistaken for weakness or even cowardice. I, therefore, decided last night and informed the British Government that in these circumstances I can no longer find any willingness on the part of the Czechoslovak Government to conduct serious negotiations with us.
These proposals for mediation have failed because in the meanwhile there, first of all, came as an answer the sudden Czechoslovak general mobilization, followed by more Czech atrocities. These were again repeated last night. Recently there have been as many as twenty-one incidents in which Czech military formations have killed innocent Sudeten Germans without provocations. Last night there were fourteen, of which one was quite serious. I have, therefore, resolved to speak to Czechoslovakia in the same language that Czechoslovakia for months past has used toward us and the Sudeten German minority. This attitude on the part of the Reich will not change. The other European States understand in part our attitude. I should like here above all to thank Italy as well as Hungary, which throughout have supported us, but you will understand that for the carrying on of this struggle we do not intend to appeal to foreign help. We will carry out this task ourselves.
The neutral States have assured us of their neutrality, just as we had already guaranteed it to them. When statesmen in the West declare that this affects their interests, I can only regret such a declaration. It cannot for a moment make me hesitate to fulfil my duty. What more is wanted? I have solemnly assured them, and I repeat it, that we ask nothing of those Western States and never will ask anything. I have declared that the frontier between France and Germany is a final one. I have repeatedly offered friendship and, if necessary, the closest co-operation to Britain, but this cannot be offered from one side only. It must find response on the other side. Germany has no interests in the West, and our western wall is for all time the frontier of the Reich on the west.
Moreover, we have no aims of any kind there for the future. With this assurance we are in solemn earnest, and as long as others do not violate their neutrality we will likewise take every care to respect it. I am determined to solve 1 the Sudeten question and 2 to see to it that a change is made in the relationship between Germany and Czechoslovakia that shall ensure a peaceful co-existence. In this I am resolved to continue to fight until either the present Czechoslovak government is willing to continue to bring about this change or until another Czechoslovak Government is ready to do so. I am resolved to remove from the German frontiers the element of uncertainty, the everlasting atmosphere of conditions resembling civil war. I will see to it that in the East there is, on the frontier, a peace precisely similar to that on our other frontiers.
Но никогда не забывают, где лежит топор. Тот, кто много знает, стремиться к ясности; тот, кто хочет показать, что много знает, стремиться во тьму.
То, что делается из , всегда находится по ту сторону и. Надежда — это радуга над падающим вниз ручейком. Wer nie reist, sieht nur eine Seite davon. Мир - это книга. Кто никогда не путешествует, видит только одну её страницу. Billy Graham Самый опасный из всех наркотиков - это успех. Ничего в мире так не заразительно, как смех и хорошее настроение. Тяжелее разрушить предвзятое мнение, чем расщепить атом.
Sitzt man jedoch eine Minute auf einem heissen Ofen, meint man, es waren zwei Stunden. Das ist Relativitat. Если сидеть два часа рядом с , кажется, это прошла минута. Если же посидеть минуту на горячей плите, покажется, что прошло два часа. Это и есть относительность. Лучшие вещи в - это не те, которые можно получить за. Paul Thomas Mann Религия — это благоговение — в первую очередь перед тайной, которую представляет собой человек. В тот момент, когда человек сомневается в и ценности , он болен.
Sie konnen schwimmen. Heinz Ruhmann Проблемы не тонут в алкоголе. Они умеют плавать.
Она состояла в непреклонной фанатической защите только одного своегособственного учения. Каждый художник, который изображает небо зелёным, а траву голубой, должен быть подвергнут стерилизации. Чтобы излечить какую-либо болезнь, надо сначала понять, каковы её возбудители. То же самое относится и к лечению политических болезней. Никогда нельзя встретить лисы, которая обнаруживала бы какие-нибудь гуманные намерения по отношению к гусю, как никогда мы не встретим кошки, склонной к дружбе с мышами. Пока я руковожу партией, она не будет дискуссионным клубом для безродных литераторов и салонных большевиков. В последнем счете всегда побеждает только инстинкт самосохранения.
Поддавлением этого инстинкта вся так называемая человечность, являющаясятолько выражением чего-то среднего между глупостью, трусостью исамомнением, тает как снег на весеннем солнце. Высшей целью человечества является ни в коем случае не сохранениеданной государственной формы или тем более данного правительства, асохранение народного начала. Грехи против крови и расы являються самыми страшными грехами на этом свете. Нация, которая предаётся этим грехам, обречена. Будь то Ветхий Завет или Новый, нет никакой разницы: всё то же старое еврейское надувательство. Нельзя быть одновременно немцем и христианином. Надо выбрать одно. Нам нужны свободные люди, которые чувствуют и знают, что Бог находиться в них самих. Я не измеряю её по нашим новым фабрикам и новым мостам, которые мы строим, а также по новым дивизиям, которые мы можем мобилизовать. Напротив, в центре суждения об успешности этой работы стоит немецкий ребёнок, стоит немецкая молодёж.
Только тогда, когда созданы условия для их роста и развития, я могу быть твёрдо уверен в том, что иой народ не исчезнет, а, значит, и наша работа не окажется напрасной. Мы не желаем удобной жизни, мы стремимся постичь тайну жизни с её сотнями тысяч и миллионами проявлений. Мы вопрошаем звёзды, чья воля заставляет их чередовать свои восходы и закаты. И мы вопрошаем воды, в какую даль и глубину устремляют они свой бег. Мы достаточно сильны сердцем, чтобы не убегать от вечных вопросов «откуда» и «куда» и мы не можем согласится с тем, что научное познание законов природы может дать законченное объяснение этих причин. Наше благоговение перед глубиной мира не исчезает перед лицом необходимости вести борьбу за существование. Но но мы не желаем превратиться в бездеятельных фантазёров или людей, которые, снедаемые постоянными сомнениями, не способны вести активную жизнь. Скорее мы стремимся принять жизнь такой как она есть в повседневности, со всеми ее горестями, которые так же, как и радость, ведут нас к постижению смысла бытия. Бог, в которого мы верим соответствует нашим сердцам. Он пребывает в наших сердцах тогда, когда они открыты и находятся в гармонии с миром.
Бог живёт в нас, потому что мы постоянно ищем свидетельства Его Силы в мире и стремимся приобщиться к ним. Разве это не требует гордости и благородного мужества, чтобы обрести Бога в себе? Разве это не требует благородной стойкости и способности — утвердить себя как человека перед Всемогущим Богом? Мы возносим мольбу к Богу и Его мировому творениию с тем большей верой, чем более гордыми и уверенными мы ощущаем себя. Смеющийся глаз, легкий шаг, дух, который воистину способен радоваться и возвышаться, искренняя юность, неподдельная стойкость, любовь, дружба — вот заповеди, данные нам Богом. И вновь мы соглашаемся с мыслями автора, которого мы упоминали в начале и который завершает утверждение своего поэтического кредо словами, представляющими символ Веры для всех нас: «Сила Божия творится руками человеческими». Всемогущий есть наш Судья. Наша задача — исполнить наш долг так, чтобы мы смогли предстать перед Ним как Творцом всего мироздания в соответствии с данным Им законом, законом борьбы за существование. Ванюшкиной Из сборника «SS Ideology, translated from original SS publication» Когда людские сердца разбиваются от горя, а души разрываются от отчаяния, тогда из мглы прошедших времен на нас смотрят наши великие предки, не раз преодолевавшие нужду и заботу, позор и муку, духовную несвободу и физическое принуждение. Они смотрят на нас и протягивают нам, отчаявшимся смертным, свою вечную руку помощи!
Горе народу, стыдящемуся опереться на нее! Речь 18. Смысл и цель существования государства заключается в том, чтобы гарантировать народу нормальное питание и достойное место во власти.
Адольф Гитлер цитаты
Economically these people were deliberately ruined and afterward handed over to a slow process of extermination. These truths cannot be abolished by phrases. They are testified to by deeds. The misery of the Sudeten Germans is without end. They want to annihilate them. They are being oppressed in an inhuman and intolerable manner and treated in an undignified way. When 3,500,000 who belong to a people of almost 80,000,000 are not allowed to sing any song that the Czechs do not like because it does not please the Czechs or are brutally struck for wearing white stockings because the Czechs do not like it, and do not want to see them, and are terrorized or maltreated because they greet with a form of salutation that is not agreeable to them, although they are greeting not Czechs but one another, and when they are pursued like wild beasts for every expression of their national life. This may be a matter of indifference to several representatives of our democracies or they may possibly even be sympathetic because it concerns only 3,500,000 Germans. I can only say to representatives of the democracies that this is not a matter of indifference to us. And I say that if these tortured creatures cannot obtain rights and assistance by themselves, they can obtain both from us.
An end must be made of depriving these people of their rights. I have already said this quite clearly in my speech of February 22. It was a short-sighted piece of work when the statesmen at Versailles brought the abnormal structure of Czechoslovakia into being. It was possible to violate the demands of millions of another nationality only so long as the brother nation itself was suffering from the consequences of general maltreatment by the world. To believe that such a regime could go on sinning without hindrance forever was possible only through a scarcely credible degree of blindness. I declared in my speech of February 22 before the Reichstag that the Reich would not tolerate any further continued oppression of 3,500,000 Germans, and I hope that the foreign statesmen will be convinced that these were no mere words. The National Socialist State has consented to very great sacrifices indeed, very great national sacrifices for the sake of European peace; not only has it not cherished so-called thoughts of revenge, but on the contrary it has banished them from all its public and private life. As always, I attempted to bring about, by the peaceful method of making proposals for revision, an alteration of this intolerable position. It is a lie when the outside world says that we only tried to carry through our revisions by pressure.
For twenty years there was the opportunity for the Czechoslovak government of carrying out these revisions by peaceful settlements and understanding. All these proposals, as you know, have been rejected by the Czechs - proposals of giving the Sudeten German minority a humane treatment and the respect they deserve. You know the proposals that I have made to fulfill the necessity of restoring German sovereignty over German territories. You know the endless attempts I made for a peaceful clarification and understanding of the problem of Austria. It was all in vain. I must here state something definitely; German has kept these obligations; the minorities who live in Germany are not persecuted. No Frenchman can stand up and say that any Frenchman living in the Saar territory is oppressed, tortured, or deprived of his rights. Nobody can say this. For six months I have calmly watched developments, although I never ceased to give warnings.
In the last few days I have increased these warnings. I left no doubt that people who wanted to compare the Germany of to-day with the former Germany would be deceiving themselves. An attempt was made to justify the oppression of the Germans by claiming that they had committed acts of provocation.
The art of Greece reached its highest level when the young state had triumphed over invading Persian armies. Construction of the Acropolis began at that time. Rome became the city of art after the end of the Punic Wars, and Germany built her cathedrals, as in Worms, Speyer and Limburg, when the German Empire under Salians had achieved its greatest triumphs. We can follow this connection to our time.
We know that art, for example the beauty of German towns, always depended on political development of these towns; that it was political considerations which moved Napoleon III to regulating of the Boulevards and Friedrich the Great to establishing Unter den Linden. Similarly in Munich where it was obvious that the city could not become an industrial center and so art was chosen to elevate the rank of the city, which now everyone who wants to get to know Germany must visit. The case was similar with other arts. The moment the small, powerless statelets began to unite into one state, then also one German art, proud of itself, began to grow. The works of Richard Wagner appeared in the period when shame and powerlessness were replaced by a unified, great German Reich. And so, not just art is dependent on the state, on the politics of the state; the same is the case with work itself because only a sound state is in the position to give the opportunity of working to its citizens and let them use their talents. The opposite is the case with the race in relation to everything else.
A state with a rotten, sick and unsound race will never produce great works of art or make great politics, or at least bask in abundance. Each of these factors depends on the others. And only when all of them complement each other, can we say: There is harmony in the state, the way we Germanics understand it. Can the Jew build a state? Now we have to ask ourselves the question: How about the Jew as a state builder? Does the Jew possess the power to create a state? First we must examine his attitude to work, find out how he perceives the principle of work, and excuse me if I now take a book called The Bible.
I am not claiming that all its contents are necessarily true, as we know that Jewry was very liberal in writing it. One thing, however, is certain: it has not been written by an antisemite. Laughter It is very important because no antisemite would have been able to write a more terrible indictment against the Jewish race than the Bible, the Old Testament. Ladies and Gentlemen! Already here we see that the whole world lies between us; we could never conceive of work as a punishment — otherwise we would all have been convicts. We do not want to conceive of work as punishment. I must confess: I would not have been able to exist without work, and hundreds of thousands and millions would have been able to withstand perhaps 3 or 5 days, maybe even 10, but not 90 or 100 days without any activity.
If Paradise really existed, the Land of Plenty, then our people would have been unhappy in it. Calls: Hear, hear We Germans seek constantly a possibility to do something and if we cannot find anything, at least from time to time we hit one another in the face. Laughter We are unable to bear absolute rest. Thus we see, already here, a big difference. Because a Jew has written this, true or not is unimportant because it still reflects the opinion which Jewry has about work. For them work is not an obvious ethical duty but at most a means to sustenance. In our eyes, this is not work because in this case any activity serving self-preservation, without regard to fellow men, might be called work.
And we know that this work, in the past, consisted of plundering of caravans, and today in planned plundering of indebted farmers, industrialists and workers. The form has changed but the principle is the same. We do not call it work, but robbery. Calls: Hear, hear When already such a basic notion separates us, here comes another. I have already explained that in the long period in the North the races became purified. This means that all the inferior and weak gradually died out and only the soundest remained. Also, here the Jew differs from us because he has not become purified but instead practiced inbreeding; he multiplied greatly but only in narrow circles, and without selection.
And therefore we see a generation which is plagued by defects caused by inbreeding. Finally, the Jew does not possess the third factor: The inner spiritual life. I do not need to explain here what a Jew generally looks like. You all know him. Laughter You know his constant restlessness that never gives him a possibility to concentrate and have a spiritual experience. In the most solemn moments he flickers his eyes and one can see that even during the most beautiful opera he is calculating dividends. Laughter The Jew has never had his own art.
Hear, hear His own temple has been built by foreign builders: The first was the Assyrians, and for the building of the second — the Roman artists. He has not left anything which might be called art, no buildings, nothing. We shall not conceal that today he has many famous conductors whose fame he can thank the well-organized Jewish Press for. Laughter When a nation does not possess these three traits, it is not able to create states. And that is true because throughout centuries the Jew was always a nomad. He has never had what we might call a state. On the one side, there was always a great chasm between the tribes of Judah and Caleb and the northern Israeli tribes, and only David, for the first time, succeeded in gradually bridging the chasm through the unitary cult of Yahweh.
We know precisely that this cult has at a very late time chosen for itself Jerusalem as its sole seat. Only from that moment have the Jewish people gotten a center, like Berlin or New York or Warsaw today. Because a people which does not want to work — the often hard work of building and maintaining a state — to work in mines, factories, in construction etc. Such a people will never establish a state but prefers to live in some other state where others work and he acts as an intermediary in business, a dealer in the best case, or in good German — a robber, a nomad who undertakes robbing raids just like in ancient times. Lively bravo! Efforts are made to explain that so and so many Jews have been found that want to go there as farmers, workers, even soldiers. Laughter If these people really have this urge in themselves, Germany today needs these ideal men as turf cutters and coal miners; they could take part in building our water power plants, our lakes etc.
The whole Zionist state will be nothing else than the perfect high school for their international criminals, and from there they will be directed. And every Jew will, of course, have immunity as a citizen of the Palestinian state Laughter and he will of course keep our citizenship. But when caught red-handed, he will not be a German Jew any longer but a citizen of Palestine. Laughter One can almost say that the Jew cannot help it because everything stems from his race. A Jew is everywhere a Jew; consciously or unconsciously, he resolutely represents the interests of his race. Thus we can see the two great differences between races: Aryanism means ethical perception of work and that which we today so often hear — socialism, community spirit, common good before own good. Jewry means egoistic attitude to work and thereby mammonism and materialism, the opposite of socialism.
He cannot do otherwise, whether he wants to or not. And thereby he is unable to create his own state because it requires a lot of social sense. He is only able to live as a parasite in the states of others. He lives as a race amongst other races, in a state within others states. And we can see very precisely that when a race does not possess certain traits which must be hereditary, it not only cannot create a state but must act as a destroyer, no matter if a given individual is good or evil. The Jewish path of destruction We can follow this fate of Jewry from the earliest prehistory. It is not important if there is truth in every word of the Bible.
In general, it gives us at least an extract of the history of Jewry. We see how the Jews present themselves because the Jew wrote these words quite innocuously. It did not appear to him as outrageous when a race, through cunning and deceit, invaded and despoiled other races, was always finally expelled and, unoffended, sought to repeat the same elsewhere. They pimped and haggled even when it came to their ideals, always ready to offer even their own families. We know that not long ago a gentleman was staying here, Sigmund Fraenkel, who has just written that it is quite unjust to accuse Jews of a materialistic spirit. One should only look at their sunny family life. However, this intimate family life did not prevent Grandfather Abraham from pimping off his own wife to the Pharaoh of Egypt in order to be able to do business.
Laughter As was the grandfather, so was the father and so were the sons who never neglected their business. And you can be sure that they are not neglecting the business even as we speak. Who among you was a soldier, he will remember Galicia or Poland: There, at the train stations, these Abrahams were everywhere. Laughter and hand clapping They penetrated into other races for millennia. And we know very well that wherever they stayed long enough symptoms of decay appeared and the peoples could do nothing else than to liberate themselves from the uninvited guest or to disappear themselves. Heavy plagues came over the nations, no less then ten in Egypt — the same plague we experience today firsthand — and finally the Egyptians lost their patience. When the chronicler describes that the Jews were suffering when they finally left, we know differently, for as soon as they were out, they began to long after coming back.
Laughter It seems that they did not have it so badly. And just as you are not going to see this race voluntarily do it, so there was nothing left to the Egyptians but to force them. What hundreds of thousands of others do as a matter of course, means for the Jew another chapter of suffering and persecution. Still later, the Jew was able to infiltrate the then soaring Roman Empire. We can still see his traces in southern Italy.
К 1921 году Гитлер стал лидером партии, переименовав ее в Национал-социалистическую немецкую рабочую партию, или НСДАП часто сокращенно называемую нацистской партией.
В 1933 году Гитлер был назначен канцлером Германии, и в течение нескольких лет установил авторитарное правление, известное как Третий Райх. Гитлер был известен своей агрессивной внешней политикой и убеждением в расовой превосходственности арийцев.
And that danger comes from those who are themselves active in that sphere. For our fellow-countrymen who are engaged in artistic and cultural productivity today, or are acting as custodians and trustees of cultural works, have not the necessary intuitive faculties to value and appreciate the ideal products of human genius in this sphere.
The National Socialist Movement has laid down the directive lines along which the State must conduct the education of the people. This education does not begin at a certain year and end at another. The development of the human being makes it necessary to take the child from the control of that small cell of social life which is the family and entrust his further training to the community itself. The National Socialist Revolution has clearly outlined the duties which this social education must fulfil and, above all, it has made this education independent of the question of age.
In other words, the education of the individual can never end. Therefore it is the duty of the folk-community to see that this education and higher training must always be along lines that help the community to fulfil its own task, which is the maintenance of the race and nation. For that reason we must insist that all organs of education which may be useful for the instruction and training of the people have to fulfil their duty towards the community. Such organs or organizations are: Education of the Youth, Young Peoples Organization, Hitler Youth, Lab our Front, Party and Army—all these are institutions for the education and higher training of our people.
The book press and the newspaper press, lectures and art, the theatre and the cinema, they are all organs of popular education. What the National Socialist Revolution has accomplished in this sphere is astounding. Think only of the following: — The whole body of our German education, including the press, the theatre, the cinema and literature, is being controlled and shaped today by men and women of our own race. Some time ago one often heard it said that if Jewry were expelled from these institutions they would collapse or become deserted.
And now what has happened? In all those branches cultural and artistic activities are flourishing. Our films are better than ever before and our theatrical productions today in our leading theatres stand supreme and alone in comparison with the rest of the world. Our press has become a powerful instrument to help our people in bringing their innate faculties to self-expression and assertion, and by so doing it strengthens the nation.
German science is active and is producing results which will one day bear testimony to the creative and constructive will of this epoch. It is very remarkable how the German people have become immune from those destructive tendencies under which another world is suffering. Many of our organizations which were not understood at all a few years ago are now accepted as a matter of course: the Young people, the Hitler Youth, BDM. This consolidation of the internal life of our German nation also establishes a united front towards the outside world.
I believe that it is here that the National Socialist Revival has produced the most marvelous results. Four years ago, when I was entrusted with the Chancellorship and therewith the leadership of the nation, I took upon myself the bitter duty of restoring the honour of a nation which for fifteen years had been forced to live as a pariah among the other nations of the world. The internal order which we created among the German people offered the conditions necessary to reorganize the army and also made it possible for me to throw off those shackles which we felt to be the deepest disgrace ever branded on a people. It was not the occasion of taking anything from anybody or causing any suffering to anybody.
Second: I now state here that, in accordance with the restoration of equality of rights, I shall divest the German Railways and the Reichsbank of the forms under which they have hitherto functioned and shall place them absolutely under the sovereign control of the Government of the German Reich. Third: I hereby declare that the section of the Versailles Treaty which deprived our nation of the rights that it shared on an equal footing with other nations and degraded it to the level of an inferior people found its natural liquidation in virtue of the restoration of equality of status. Fourth: Above all, I solemnly withdraw the German signature from that declaration which was extracted under duress from a weak government, acting against its better judgment. Members of the German Reichstag: The revindication of the honour of the German people, which was expressed outwardly in the restoration of universal military service, the creation of a new air force, the reconstruction of a German navy and the reoccupation of the Rhineland by our troops, was the boldest task that I ever had to face and the most difficult to accomplish.
Today I must humbly thank Providence, whose grace has enabled me, who was once an unknown soldier in the War, to bring to a successful issue the struggle for the restoration of our honor and rights as a nation. I regret to say that it was not possible to carry through all the necessary measures by way of negotiation. But at the same time it must be remembered that the honor of a people cannot be bartered away; it can only be taken away. And if it cannot be bartered away it cannot be restored through barter; it must simply be taken back.
That I carried out the measures which were necessary for this purpose without consulting our former enemies in each case, and even without informing them, was due to my conviction that the way in which I chose to act would make it easier for the other side to accept our decisions, for they would have had to accept them in any case. I should like to add here that, at all this has now been accomplished, the so-called period of surprises has come to an end. As a State which is now on an equal juridical footing with all the other States, Germany is more conscious than ever that she has a European task before here, which is to collaborate loyally in getting rid of those problems that are the cause of anxiety to ourselves and also to the other nations. If I may state my views on those general questions that are of actual importance today, the most effective way of doing so will be to refer to the statements that were recently made by Mr.
Eden in the British House of Commons. At this point I should like to express my sincere thanks for the opportunity which has been given me by the outspoken and noteworthy declarations made by the British Foreign Secretary. I think I have read those statements carefully and have understood them correctly. Of course, I do not want to get lost among the details, and so I should like to single out the leading points in Mr.
In doing this, I shall first try to correct what seems to me to be a most regrettable error. This error lay in assuming that somehow or other Germany wishes to isolate herself and to allow the events which happen in the rest of the world to pass by without participating in them, or that she does not wish to take any account whatsoever of the general necessities of the time. What are the grounds for the assumption that Germany wants to pursue a policy of isolation? If this a such an attitude, then the most than [sic] can be said is that it has been forced to do so under the coercion of a foreign will imposed upon it.
Now, in the first place, I should like to assure Mr. Eden that we Germans do not in the least want to be isolated and that we do not at all feel ourselves isolated. During recent years Germany has entered into quite a number of political agreements with other States. She has resumed former agreements and improved them.
And I may say that she has established close friendly relations with a number of States. Our relations with most of the European States are normal from our standpoint and we are on terms of close friendship with quite a number. Among all those diplomatic connections I would give a special place in the foreground to those excellent relations which we have with those States that were liberated from sufferings similar to those we had to endure and have consequently arrived at similar decisions. Through a number of treaties which we have made, we have relieved many strained relations and thereby made a substantial contribution towards an improvement in European conditions.
I need remind you only of our agreement with Poland, which has turned out advantageous for both countries, our agreement with Austria and the excellent and close relations which we have established with Italy. Finally, I may mention our cordial relations with a whole series of nations outside of Europe. The agreement which Germany has made with Japan for combating the movement directed by the Comintern is a vital proof of how little the German Government thinks of isolating itself and how little we feel ourselves actually isolated. Furthermore, I have on several ocassions [sic] declared that it is our wish and hope to arrive at good cordial relations with all our neighbors.
Germany has steadily given its assurance, and I solemnly repeat this assurance here, that between ourselves and France, for example, there are no grounds for quarrel that are humanly thinkable. Furthermore, the German Government has assured Belgium and Holland that it is ready to recognize and guarantee these States as neutral regions in perpetuity. In view of the declarations which we have made in the past and in view of the existing state of affairs, I cannot quite clearly see why Germany should consider herself isolated or why we should pursue a policy of isolation. From the economic standpoint there are no grounds for asserting that Germany is withdrawing from international cooperation.
The contrary is the truth. On looking over the speeches which several statesmen have made within the last few months, I find that they might easily give rise to the impression that the whole world is waiting to shower economic favors on Germany but that we, who are represented as obstinately clinging to a policy of isolation, do not wish to partake of those favors To place this whole matter in its true light, I should like to call attention to the following bare facts: — 1 For many years the German people have been trying to make better commercial treaties with their neighbors. And these efforts have not been in vain; for, as a matter of fact, German foreign trade has increased since 1932, both in volume and in value. This is the clearest refutation of the assertion that Germany is pursuing a policy of economic isolation.
Credit manipulation may perhaps have a temporary effect, but in the long run economic international relations will be decisively influenced by the volume of mutual exchange of goods. And here the state of affairs at the present moment is not such that the outside world would be able to place huge orders with us or offer prospects of an increase in the exchange of goods even if we were to fulfil the most extraordinary conditions that they might lay down. Matters should not be made more complicated than they already are. But Germany cannot be blamed for these two things, and especially not National Socialist Germany.
When we assumed power the world economic crisis was worse than it is today. I fear however that I must interpret Mr. Therefore I wish it to be clearly understood that our decision to carry out this plan is unalterable. The reasons which led to that decision were inexorable.
And since then I have not been able to discover anything whatsoever that might induce us to discontinue the four years plan. I shall take only one practical example: In carrying out the four years plan our synthetic production of rubber and petrol will necessitate an annual increase in our consumption of coal by a margin of something between 20 and 30 million tons. This means that an extra quota of thousands of coal miners are assured of employment for the rest of their active lives. I must really take the liberty of asking this question: Supposing we abondon [sic] the German four years plan, then what statesman can guarantee me some economic equivalent or other, outside of the Reich, for these thirty million tons of coal?
I want bread and work for my people. And certainly I do not wish to have it through the operation of credit guarantees, but through solid and permanent lab our, the products of which I can either exchange for foreign goods or for domestic goods in our internal commercial circulation. If by some manipulation or other Germany were to throw these 20 or 30 million tons of coal annually on the international market for the future, the result would be that the coal exports of other countries would have to decrease. I do not know if a British statesman, for example, could face such a contingency without realizing how serious it would be for his own nation.
And yet that is the state of affairs. Germany has an enormous number of men who not only want to work but also to eat. And the standard of living among our people is high. I cannot build the future of the German nation on the assurances of a foreign statesman or on any international help, but only on the real basis of a steady production, for which I must find a market at home or abroad.
Perhaps my skepticism in these matters leads me to differ from the British Foreign Secretary in regard to the optimistic tone of his statements. I mean here that if Europe does not awaken to the danger of the Bolshevic infection, then I fear that international commerce will not increase but decrease, despite all the good intentions of individual statesmen. For this commerce is based not only on the undisturbed and guaranteed stability of production in one individual nation but also on the production of all the nations together. One of the first things which is clear in this matter is that every Bolshevic disturbance must necessarily lead to a more or less permanent destruction of orderly production.
Therefore my opinion about the future of Europe is, I am sorry to say, not so optimistic as Mr. I am the responsible leader of the German people and must safeguard its interests in this world as well as I can. And therefore I am bound to judge things objectively as I see them. I should not be acquitted before the bar of our history if I neglected something—no matter on what grounds—which is necessary to maintain the existence of this people.
I am pleased, and we are all pleased, at every increase that takes place in our foreign trade. But in view of the obscure political situation I shall not neglect anything that is necessary to guarantee the existence of the German people, although other nations may become the victims of the Bolshevic infection. And I must also repudiate the suggestion that this view is the outcome of mere fancy. For the following is certainly true: The British Foreign Secretary opens out theoretical prospects of existence to us, whereas in reality what is happening is totally different.
The revolutionizing of Spain, for instance, has driven out 15. Should this revolutionizing of Spain spread to other European countries then these damages would not be lessened but increased. I also am a responsible statesman and I must take such possibilities into account. Therefore it is my unalterable determination so to organize German lab our that it will guarantee the maintenance of my people.
Eden may rest assured that we shall utilize every possibility offered us of strengthening our economic relations with other nations, but also that we shall avail ourselves of every possibility to improve and enrich the circulation of our own internal trade. I must ask also whether the grounds for assuming that Germany is pursuing a policy of isolation are to be found in the fact that we have left he League of Nations. If such be the grounds, then I would point out that the Geneva League has never been a real League of peoples. A number of great nations do not belong to it or have left it.
And nobody has on this account asserted that they were following a policy of isolation. I think therefore that on this point Mr. Eden misunderstands our intentions and views. For nothing is farther from our wishes than to break off or weaken our political or economic relations with other nations.
I have already tried to contribute towards bringing about a good understanding in Europe and I have often given, especially to the British people and their Government, assurance of how ardently we wish for a sincere and cordial cooperation with them. I admit that on one point there is a wide difference between the views of the British Foreign Secretary and our views; and here it seems to me that this is a gap which cannot be filled up. Eden declares that under no circumstances does the British Government wish to see Europe torn into two halves. Unfortunately, this desire for unity has not hitherto been declared or listened to.
And now the desire is an illusion. For the fact is that the division into two halves, not only of Europe but also of the whole world, is an accomplished fact. It is to be regretted that the British Government did not adopt its present attitude at an earlier date, that under all circumstances a division of Europe must be avoided; for then the Treaty of Versailles would not have been entered into. This Treaty brought in the first division of Europe, namely a division of the nations into victors on the one side and vanquished on the other, the latter nations being outlawed.
Through this division of Europe nobody suffered more than the German people. That this division was wiped out, so far as concerns Germany, is essentially due to the National Socialist Revolution and this brings some credit to myself. The second division has been brought about by the proclamation of the Bolshevic doctrine, an integral feature of which is that they do not confine it to one nation but try to impose it on all the nations. Here it is not a question of a special form of national life in Russia but of the Bolshevic demand for a world revolution.
If Mr. Eden does not look at Bolshevism as we look at it, that may have something to do with the position of Great Britain and also with some happenings that are unknown to us. But I believe that nobody will question the sincerity of our opinions on this matter, for they are not based merely on abstract theory. For Mr.
Eden Bolshevism is perhaps a thing which has its seat in Moscow, but for us in Germany this Bolshevism is a pestilence against which we have had to struggle at the cost of much bloodshed. It is a pestilence which tried to turn our country into the same kind of desert as is now the case in Spain; for the habit of murdering hostages began here, in the form in which we now see it in Spain. National Socialism did not try to come to grips with Bolshevism in Russia, but the Jewish international Bolshevics in Moscow have tried to introduce their system into Germany and are still trying to do so. Against this attempt we have waged a bitter struggle, not only in defence of our own civilization but in defence of European civilization as a whole.
In January and February of the year 1933, when the last decisive struggle against this barbarism was being fought out in Germany, had Germany been defeated in that struggle and had the Bolshevic field of destruction and death extended over Central Europe, then perhaps a different opinion would have arisen on the banks of the Thames as to the nature of this terrible menace to humanity. For since it is said that England must be defended on the frontier of the Rhine she would then have found herself in close contact with that harmless democratic world of Moscow, whose innocence they are always trying to impress upon us. Here I should like to state the following once again: — The teaching of Bolshevism is that there must be a world revolution, which would mean world-destruction. If such a doctrine were accepted and given equal rights with other teachings in Europe, this would mean that Europe would be delivered over to it.
As far as Germany itself is concerned, let there be no doubts on the following points: — 1 We look on Bolshevism as a world peril for which there must be no toleration. It is in accordance with this attitude of ours that we should avoid close contact with the carriers of these poisonous bacilli.
Речь Адольфа Гитлера 26 сентября 1938 г. в Берлинском Дворце спорта.
| Звуки с голосами немецкой речи скачать и слушать онлайн | причем в оригинале, русский перевод с купюрами я уже. |
| Полный текст заявления Гитлера от 22 июня 1941 года | В национал-социалистическом контексте фраза Meine Ehre heißt Treue относится к заявлению Адольфа Гитлера после восстания Стеннеса, инцидента между берлинским штурмовым отрядом (SA) и Шуцштаффелем (SS). |
| Adolf Hitler: Speech at Krupp Factory in Germany (1935) | British Pathé | Цитаты гитлера на немецком | Анекдоты, цитаты, статусы, загадки, стихи, фразы. |
Navigation menu
- List of speeches given by Adolf Hitler - Wikipedia
- Выдержки из стенографической записи высказываний Гитлера // Документы
- Смотрим вместе, и я даю свой лексический и грамматический комментарий
- Цитаты Гитлера - Буридо
- Знаменитый фрагмент из фильма “Der Untergang” (рус. “Бункер”) — Речь Гитлера в бункере
Хайль Гитлер
Die ersten 30 Lebensjahre nennt Fest deshalb "ein zielloses Leben". Wie wurde Adolf Hitler zum Diktator? Dieses begann am 20. Er wuchs zusammen mit seiner Schwester Paula und den beiden Halbgeschwistern Alois und Angela zusammen auf.
Da dieser als uneheliches Kind geboren wurde, trug er fast 40 Jahre lang den Nachnamen Schicklgruber. Alois Hitler war Zollbeamter und mit Klara in dritter Ehe verheiratet. Als er dann die Realschule in Linz besuchte, verschlechterten sich seine Noten drastisch, er blieb mehrmals sitzen und wechselte die Schule.
Stattdessen wohnte er zusammen mit der Mutter in Linz.
Зиг… хайль! Лозунг был придуман Рудольфом Гессом : на одном из съездов НСДАП в Нюрнберге после речи Гитлера, когда тот долго стоял в задумчивости, находившийся рядом Гесс, впечатлившийся речью Гитлера, начал выкрикивать словосочетание «Зиг хайль! Август Ландмессер среди рабочих верфи не поднял руку в нацистском приветствии Преследования за отказ произносить нацистское приветствие править Нацисты требовали от жителей Германии произносить нацистское приветствие [6] [7]. Но, по мнению свидетелей Иеговы , произносить выражение «Heil Hitler! Поэтому свидетели Иеговы отказывались произносить нацистское приветствие [10] [11] [12]. Кристин Кинг и другие историки отмечают, что свидетелей Иеговы арестовывали за отказ произносить нацистское приветствие, а их детей исключали из школ и разлучали с семьями [9] [13] [14] [15].
Какими бы ни были до сих пор засекреченные подробности переговоров западных государств с Германией, это не были договоренности о разделе Европы, какими были германо-советские секретные протоколы. Иными словами, в советскую сферу влияния попадали не только территории, на которых проживало преимущественно украинское и белорусское население, но и исторические польские земли междуречья Буга и Вислы. Об этом факте далеко не все сейчас знают.
Как известно, сослагательное наклонение трудно применимо к уже произошедшим событиям. Скажу лишь, что в сентябре 1939 года советское руководство имело возможность отодвинуть западные рубежи СССР еще дальше на запад, вплоть до Варшавы, но приняло решение не делать этого. Риббентроп и В. Путин умалчивает о том, что по тому же самому секретному протоколу Литва отходила к сфере интересов Германии. Отказ Сталина от продвижения на запад в Польше вовсе не был свидетельством каких-то миролюбивых намерений, это всего лишь результат закулисной договоренности. Как жителей Латвии, Литвы и Эстонии депортировали после советской оккупации. Новое в блогах Сила народа есть ни что иное, как единодушие и внутренние связи этого народа. Речь 26. В первую очередь мы думаем о благе нашего народа. Речь 02.
Речь 13. Речь 18. Нашему народу нужны руководители, обладающие решимостью делать все, что они сочтут правильным перед Богом, миром и собственной совестью. Речь 27. Речь 20. Эта организация будет построена на идее авторитета, идее руководства снизу доверху. Только такая организация может служить интересам всего народа. Речь 06. Прокламация 01. Речь 16.
Второе: Решение тяжелейшей социальной проблемы путем возвращения миллионной армии наших, достойных всяческого сочувствия, безработных обратно на производство. Третье: Восстановление стабильного и авторитетного государственного руководства, опирающегося на доверие и волю нации; руководства, которое снова вернет нашему великому народу способность выполнять свои обязательства перед миром. Речь 17. Наша национальная гордость заключается не в том, чтобы презирать других, а в том, чтобы уважать и любить свой народ! Речь 01. Речь 24. Он неуклонно и в первую очередь будет думать о соблюдении интересов народа в вопросах мира, работы и культуры. Я был солдатом и видел все собственными глазами, в отличие от очень многих других государственных деятелей, которые сами этого никогда не переживали. И я, разумеется, отвергаю войну. Но отвергаю я ее не как изменник, предатель и трус, а как порядочный немец, честно выполнивший свой воинский долг на фронте, и желающий оставаться порядочным до конца.
Man kann diese Gefahr gar nicht ernst genug schildern, aber es ist auch bezeichinend, dass wenn man sie nur beim Namen nennt, das internationale Judentum in allen Lдndern dagegen mit lдrmenden Ausfьhrungen Protest erhebt. So weit also ist es in Europa schon gekommen, dass man eine Gefahr nicht mehr eine Gefahr nennen darf, wenn sie eben vom Judentum ausgeht. Das aber hindert uns nicht daran, die dazu notwendigen Feststellungen zu treffen.
Wir haben das auch frьher in unserem innerpolitischen Kampfe getan, als das kommunistische Judentum sich des demokratischen Judentums im «Berliner Tageblatt» und in der «Vossischen Zeitung» bediente, um eine Gefahr, die von Tag zu Tag drohender wurde, zu verniedlichen und zu bagatellisieren, um damit die von ihr bedrohten Teile unseres Volkes in Sicherheit einzuwiegen und ihre Abwehrkrдfte einzuschlдfern. Wir sдhen, wenn wir dieser Gefahr nicht Herr wьrden, im Geiste schon das Gespenst des Hungers, des Elends und einer Millionenzwangsarbeit fьr das deutsche Volk heraufziehen, sдhen den ehrwьrdigsten Erdteil in seinen Grundfesten wanken und unter seinen Trьmmern das geschichtliche Erbe der abendlдndischen Menschheit begraben. Das ist das Problem, vor dem wir stehen.
Die europдischen Staaten einschlieЯlich Englands behaupten, stark genug zu sein, einer Bolschewisierung des europдischen Kontinents, sollte sie einmal praktisch gegeben sein, rechtzeitig und wirksam entgegenzutreten. Diese Erklдrung ist kindisch und verdient ьberhaupt keine Widerlegung. Sollte die stдrkste Militдrmacht der Welt nicht in der Lage sein, die Drohung des Bolschewismus zu brechen, wer brдchte dann noch die Kraft dazu auf?
Hier antworten stьrmische Rufe aus der im Sportpalast versammelten Menge: «Niemand! Sie wьrden im Bedarfsfall von seinen motorisierten Roboterdivisionen in wenigen Tagen ьberfahren werden. In den Hauptstдdten der mittleren und kleinen europдischen Staaten trцstet man sich mit der Absicht, man mьsse sich gegen die bolschewistische Gefahr seelisch rьsten.
Das erinnert verzweifelt an die Erklдrungen der bьrgerlichen Mittelparteien aus dem Jahre 1932, dass der Kampf gegen den Kommunismus nur mit geistigen Waffen ausgefochten und gewonnen werden kцnne. Diese Behauptung war uns auch damals zu albern, als dass wir uns damit auseinandergesetzt hдtten. Der цstliche Bolschewismus ist nicht nur eine terroristische Lehre, sondern auch eine terroristische Praxis.
Er verfolgt seine Ziele und Zwecke mit einer infernalischen Grьndlichkeit, unter restloser Ausschцpfung seines inneren Potentials und ohne jede Rьcksichtnahme auf Glьck, Wohlstand und Frieden der von ihm unterjochten Vцlkerschaften. Was wollten England und Amerika tun, wenn der europдische Kontinent im grцbsten Unglьcksfall dem Bolschewismus in die Arme fiele? Will man Europa von London aus vielleicht einreden, dass eine solche Entwicklung an der Kanalgrenze Halt machen wьrde?
Ich habe schon einmal darauf hingewiesen, dass der Bolschewismus seine Fremdenlegionen auf dem Boden aller demokratischen Staaten bereits in den kommunistischen Parteien stehen hat. Keiner dieser Staaten kann von sich behaupten, gegen eine innere Bolschewisierung immun zu sein. Eine jьngst vorgenommene Nachwahl zum englischen Unterhaus ergab, dass der unabhдngige, d.
Alle territorialen Verpflichtungen, die die Sowjetunion auf sich nimmt, besitzen in unseren Augen keinen effektiven Wert. Der Bolschewismus pflegt seine Grenzen auch ideologisch und nicht nur militдrisch zu ziehen, und darin ist eben seine ьber die Grenzen der Vцlker hinwegspringende Gefahr gegeben. Die Welt hat also nicht die Wahl zwischen einem in seine alte Zersplitterung zurьckfallenden und einem unter der Achsenfьhrung sich neu ordnenden Europa, sondern nur die zwischen einem unter dem militдrischen Schutz der Achse stehenden und einem bolschewistischen Europa.
Darьber hinaus bin ich der festen Ьberzeugung, dass die lamentierenden Lords und Erzbischцfe in London ьberhaupt nicht einmal die Absicht haben, der bolschewistischen Gefahr, die bei einem weiteren Vordringen der Sowjetarmeen fьr die europдischen Staaten gegeben wдre, praktisch entgegenzutreten. Das Judentum hat die angelsдchsischen Staaten geistig und politisch schon so tief durchdrungen, dass sie diese Gefahr ьberhaupt nicht mehr sehen und wahr haben wollen. Wie es sich in der Sowjetunion bolschewistisch tarnt, so tarnt es sicii in den angelsдchsischen Staaten plutokratisch-kapitalistisch.
Die Methoden der Mimikry sind bei der jьdischen Rasse bekannt. Sie geht seit jeher darauf aus, ihre Gastvцlker einzuschlдfern und damit ihre Abwehrkrдfte gegen von ihr stammende akute und lebensgefдhrdende Bedrohungen zu lдhmen. Zurufe aus der Menge: «Wir haben sie erlebt!
Ьber unser Land hinweg reichen sich bereits das westeuropдische scheinzivilisierte Judentum und das Judentum des цstlichen Ghettos die Hдnde. Damit ist Europa in Todesgefahr. Ich schmeichle mir nicht, mit diesen Ausfьhrungen die цffentliche Meinung in den neutralen oder gar in den feindlichen Staaten alarmieren zu kцnnen.
Das ist auch nicht ihr Zweck und ihre Absicht. Ich weiЯ, dass die englische Presse morgen mit einem wьtenden Geklдff ьber mich herfallen wird, ich hдtte angesichts unserer Belastung an der Ostfront die ersten Friedensfьhler ausgestreckt. Stьrmisches Gelдchter.
Davon kann ьberhaupt keine Rede sein. In Deutschland denkt heute kein Mensch an einen faulen Kompromiss, das ganze Volk denkt nur an einen harten Krieg. Ich beanspruche aber als ein verantwortlicher Sprecher des fьhrenden Landes dieses Kontinents fьr mich das souverдne Recht, eine Gefahr eine Gefahr zu nennen, wenn sie nicht nur unser eigenes Land, sondern unseren ganzen Erdteil bedroht.
Als Nationalsozialisten haben wir die Pflicht, Alarm zu schlagen gegen die versuchte Chaotisierung des europдischen Kontinents durch das internationale Judentum, das sich im Bolschewismus eine terroristische Militдrmacht aufgebaut hat, deren Bedrohlichkeit ьberhaupt nicht ьberschдtzt werden kann. Die dritte These, die ich hier nдher erlдutern will, ist die, dass Gefahr unmittelbar im Verzuge ist. Die Lдhmungserscheinungen der westeuropдischen Demokratien gegen ihre tцdlichste Bedrohung sind herzbeklemmend.
Das internationale Judentum fцrdert sie mit allen Krдften. Genau so, wie der Widerstand gegen den Kommunismus in unserem Kampf um die Macht in unserem eigenen Lande von den jьdischen Zeitungen kьnstlich eingeschlдfert und nur durch den Nationalsozialismus wieder erweckt wurde, genau so ist das heute bei den anderen Vцlkern der Fall. Das Judentum erweist sich hier wieder einmal als die Inkarnation des Bцsen, als plastischer Dдmon des Verfalls und als Trдger eines internationalen kulturzerstцrerischen Chaos.
Man wird, um das hier nur zu erwдhnen, in diesem Zusammenhang auch unsere konsequente Judenpolitik verstehen kцnnen. Wir sehen im Judentum fьr jedes Land eine unmittelbare Gefahr gegeben. Wie andere Vцlker sich gegen diese Gefahr zur Wehr setzen, ist uns gleichgьltig.
Wie wir uns aber dagegen zur Wehr setzen, das ist unsere eigene Sache, in die wir keinerlei Einsprьche dulden. Das Judentum stellt eine infektiцse Erscheinung dar, die ansteckend wirkt. Wenn das feindliche Ausland gegen unsere antijьdische Politik scheinheilig Protest einlegt und ьber unsere MaЯnahmen gegen das Judentum heuchlerische Krokodilstrдnen vergieЯt, so kann uns das nicht daran hindern, das Notwendige zu tun.
Deutschland jedenfalls hat nicht die Absicht, sich dieser Bedrohung zu beugen, sondern vielmehr die, ihr rechtzeitig und wenn nцtig mit den radikalsten GegenmaЯnahmen entgegenzutreten. Minutenlang hindern nach diesen Sдtzen zustimmende Sprechchцre den Ministeram Weiterreden. Der Krieg der mechanisierten Roboter gegen Deutschland und gegen Europa ist auf seinen Hцhepunkt gestiegen.
Das deutsche Volk erfьllt mit seinen Achsenpartnern im wahrsten Sinne des Wortes eine europдische Mission, wenn es dieser unmittelbaren und ernsten Lebensbedrohung mit den Waffen entgegentritt. Wir lassen uns nicht durch das Geschrei des internationalen Judentums in aller Welt in der mutigen und aufrechten Fortfьhrung des gigantischen Kampfes gegen diese Weltpest beirren. Er kann und darf nur mit Sieg enden.
Hier ertцnen laute Zwischenrufe: «Deutsche Mдnner, ans Gewehr! Deutsche Frauen, an die Arbeit! Es hatte deshalb nicht nur eine militдrische, sondern auch eine geistige und seelische Bedeutung fьr das deutsche Volk von tiefstgreifender Wirkung.
Erst hier sind uns unsere Augen fьr die aus diesem Kriege erwachsende Problematik vollkommen geцffnet worden. Wir wollen jetzt gar nichts mehr von falschen Hoffnungen und Illusionen hцren. Wir wollen den Tatsachen, und wenn sie noch so hart und grausam sind, mutig in die Augen schauen.
Denn jedes Mal noch hat es sich in der Geschichte unserer Partei und unseres Staates erwiesen, dass eine erkannte Gefahr bald schon auch eine gebannte Gefahr ist. Im Zeichen dieses heroischen Widerstandes stehen unsere weiteren schwersten Abwehrkдmpfe im Osten. Sie beanspruchen unsere Soldaten und ihre Waffen in einem Umfange, der uns bei allen bisherigen Feldzьgen vollkommen unbekannt gewesen ist.
Im Osten tobt ein Krieg ohne Gnade. Der Fьhrer hat ihn richtig charakterisiert, als er erklдrte, es werden aus ihm nicht Sieger und Besiegte, sondern nur noch Ьberlebende und Vernichtete hervorgehen. Das deutsche Volk hat das ganz klar erkannt.
Mit seinem gesunden Instinkt hat es sich auf eigene Weise einen Weg durch das Gestrьpp der tagesaktuell bedingten geistigen und seelischen Schwierigkeiten dieses Krieges gebahnt. Wir wissen heute genau, dass der Blitzkrieg des Polen- und Wesfeldzuges fьr den Osten nur noch eine bedingte Gьltigkeit hat. Hier kдmpft die deutsche Nation um ihr alles.
Wir sind in diesem Kampf zu der Erkenntnis gekommen, dass das deutsche Volk hier seine heiligsten Gьter, seine Familien, seine Frauen und seine Kinder, die Schцnheit und Unberьhrtheit seiner Landschaft, seine Stдdte und Dцrfer, das zweitausendjдhrige Erbe seiner Kultur und alles, was uns das Leben lebenswert macht, zu verteidigen hat. Fьr diese Schдtze unseres reichen Volkstums hat der Bolschewismus natьrlich nicht das geringste Verstдndnis, und er wьrde auch im Bedarfsfalle darauf nicht die geringste Rьcksicht nehmen. Er tut das ja nicht einmal seinem eigenen Volke gegenьber.
Die Sowjetunion hat das bolschewistische Kriegspotential seit 25 Jahren in einem Umfange ausgeschцpft, der fьr uns gдnzlich unvorstellbar war und deshalb von uns auch falsch eingeschдtzt wurde. Das terroristische Judentum hat sich in Russland 200 Millionen Menschen dienstbar gemacht, dabei seine zynischen Methoden und Praktiken mit der stumpfen Zдhigkeit der russischen Rasse vermдhlt, die deshalb eine um so grцЯere Gefahr fьr die europдischen Kulturvцlker darstellt. Im Osten wird ein ganzes Volk zum Kampf gezwungen.
Hier werden Mдnner, Frauen, ja Kinder nicht nur in die Rьstungsfabriken, sondern auch in den Krieg getrieben. Die Massen von Panzern, die in diesem Winter unsere цstliche Front berennen, sind das Ergebnis eines 25jдhrigen sozialen Unglьcks und Elends des bolschewistischen Volkes. Dagegen mьssen wir mit entsprechenden GegenmaЯnahmen antreten, wenn wir nicht das Spiel als verloren aufgeben wollen.
Ich gebe meiner festen Ьberzeugung Ausdruck, dass wir die bolschewistische Gefahr auf die Dauer nur niederringen kцnnen, wenn wir ihr, wenn auch nicht mit gleichen, so doch mit gleichwertigen Methoden entgegentreten. Die deutsche Nation steht damit vor der ernstesten Frage dieses Krieges, nдmlich der, die Entschlossenheit aufzubringen, alles einzusetzen, um alles, was sie besitzt, zu erhalten, und alles, was sie zum spдteren Leben nцtig hat, dazu zu gewinnen. Der totale Krieg also ist das Gebot der Stunde.
Es muss jetzt zu Ende sein mit den bьrgerlichen Zimperlichkeiten, die auch in diesem Schicksalskampf nach dem Grundsatz verfahren wollen: Wasch mir den Pelz, aber mach mich nicht nass! Jeder Satz des Ministers wird von wachsendem Beifall und stдrkster Zustimmung begleitet. Die Gefahr, vor der wir stehen, ist riesengroЯ.
RiesengroЯ mьssen deshalb auch die Anstrengungen sein, mit denen wir ihr entgegentreten. Es ist also jetzt die Stunde gekommen, die Glacehandschuhe auszuziehen und die Faust zu bandagieren. Wie ein einziger Schrei erbebt sich ein orkanartiger Beifall.
Sprechchцre von den Galerien und Rдngen bestдtigen die volle Zustimmung der Menge. Es geht nicht mehr an, das reiche Kriegspotential nicht nur unseres eigenen Landes, sondern der uns zur Verfьgung stehenden bedeutenden Teile Europas nur flьchtig und an der Oberflдche auszuschцpfen. Es muss ganz zur Ausschцpfung gelangen, und zwar so schnell und so grьndlich, als das organisatorisch und sachlich ьberhaupt nur denkbar ist.
Hier wдre eine falsche Rьcksichtnahme vollkommen fehl am Orte. Europas Zukunft hдngt von unserem Kampf im Osten ab. Wir stehen zu seinem Schutze bereit.
Das deutsche Volk stellt sein kostbarstes nationales Blut fьr diesen Kampf zur Verfьgung. Der ьbrige Teil Europas sollte hierfьr wenigstens seine Arbeit zur Verfьgung stellen. Es gibt viele ernsthafte Kritiker auch in anderen Lдndern, die diese zwingende Pflicht bereits einsehen.
Andere wieder bestreiten sie noch. Das aber kann fьr uns nicht ausschlaggebend sein. Wenn die Gefahr fьr sie allein gegeben wдre, so kцnnte man ihre Auslassungen als literarischen Unsinn bewerten, der keinerlei Bedeutung besitzt.
Aber die Gefahr ist fьr uns alle gegeben, und deshalb mьssen wir uns auch alle dagegen zur Wehr setzen. Wer diesen Kampf im ьbrigen Europa heute noch nicht versteht, wird uns morgen auf den Knien danken, dass wir ihn mutig und unbeirrt auf uns genommen haben. Es дrgert uns nicht einmal, wenn unsere Feinde im Ausland behaupten, die MaЯnahmen, die wir jetzt zur Totalisierung des Krieges durchfьhrten, kдmen denen des Bolschewismus ziemlich nahe.
Scheinheilig erklдren sie, daraus mьsse man also folgern, dass sich unter diesen Umstдnden der Kampf gegen den Bolschewismus ьberhaupt erьbrige. Es geht hier nicht um die Methode, mit der man den Bolschewismus zu Boden schlдgt sondern um das Ziel, nдmlich um die Beseitigung der Gefahr. Minutenlanger Beifall.
Die Frage ist also nicht die, ob die Methoden, die wir anwenden, gut oder schlecht sind, sondern ob sie zum Erfolge fьhren. Jedenfalls sind wir als nationalsozialistische Volksfьhrung jetzt zu allem entschlossen. Wir packen zu, ohne Rьcksicht auf die Einsprьche des einen oder des anderen.
Wir wollen nicht mehr im Interesse der Aufrechterhaltung eines hohen, manchmal fast friedensmдЯigen inneren Lebensstandards fьr eine bestimmte Volksschicht das deutsche Kriegspotential schwдchen und damit unsere Kriegfьhrung gefдhrden. Im Gegenteil, wir verzichten freiwillig auf einen bedeutenden Teil dieses Lebensstandards, um das Kriegspotential so schnell und so grьndlich wie mцglich zu erhцhen. Diese Aktion stellt keinen Selbstzweck, sondern nur ein Mittel zum Zweck dar.
Umso hцher wird nach dem Siege wieder der soziale Lebensstandard unseres Volkes steigen. Wir brauchen die bolschewistischen Methoden schon deshalb nicht nachzuahmen, weil wir ьber das bessere Menschen- und Fьhrungsmaterial verfьgen und damit einen groЯen Vorsprung besitzen. Aber wir mьssen, wie die Entwicklung zeigt, viel mehr tun, als wir bisher getan haben, um dem Krieg im Osten eine entscheidende Wendung zum Besseren zu geben.
Im Ьbrigen herrscht darьber, wie mir aus ungezдhlten Briefen aus der Heimat und Zustimmungskundgebungen von der Front mitgeteilt wird, im ganzen deutschen Volke ьberhaupt nur eine Meinung. Jedermann weiЯ, dass dieser Krieg, wenn wir ihr verlцren, uns aber vernichten wьrde. Und darum ist das Volk mit seiner Fьhrung entschlossen, nunmehr zur radikalsten Selbsthilfe zu greifen.
Die breiten arbeitenden Massen unseres Volkes machen der Regierung nicht zum Vorwurf, dass sie zu rьcksichtslos, sondern hцchstens, dass sie zu rьcksichtsvoll vorgeht. Man frage landauf, landab das deutsche Volk; nun wird ьberall nur die eine Antwort erhalten: Das Radikalste ist heute eben radikal, und das Totalste ist heute eben total genug, um den Sieg zu erringen. Darum ist die totale Kriegfьhrung eine Sache des ganzen deutschen Volkes.
Niemand kann sich auch nur mit einem Schein von Berechtigung an ihren Forderungen vorbeidrьcken. Als ich in meiner Rede vom 30. Januar von dieser Stelle aus den totalen Krieg proklamierte, schwollen mir aus den um reich versammelten Menschenmassen Orkane der Zustimmung zu.
Ich kann also feststellen, dass die Fьhrung sich in ihren MaЯnahmen in vollkommener Ьbereinstimmung mit dem ganzen deutschen Volk in der Heimat und an der Front befindet. Das Volk will alle, auch die schwersten Belastungen auf sich nehmen und ist bereit, jedes Opfer zu bringen, wenn damit dem groЯen Ziel des Sieges gedient wird. Lebhafte Zurufe.
Die Voraussetzung dazu aber ist selbstverstдndlich die, dass die Lasten gerecht verteilt werden. Lauteste Zustimmung.