Новости цитаты гитлера на немецком

Я хотел бы найти все речи Гитлера в оригинале на немецком языке, но чем больше я смотрю, тем меньше нахожу. Конечно, кое-где есть несколько его выступлений, но полного текста его речей на немецком нигде не найти. My German Fellow Countrymen and Women, My Comrades! At present everybody speaks before the forum which seems to them the most fitting. Some speak before a parliament whose existence, composition and origin (are well known). I believe that I should return again today whence I came. Подождите немного. Если воспроизведение так и не начнется, перезагрузите устройство. Welcome to Uncensor History Here at Uncensor History, we believe that all history should be free and accessible to all, regardless of how dark or evil it is. We believe that history should be preserved and. Ja, das deutsche Volk war ja damals eine Demokratie, vor uns, Und es ist ausgeplündert und ausgepresst worden. Nein, was heißt für diese internationalen Hyänen Demokratie oder autoritärer Staat? Das interessiert die gar nicht. Es interessiert sie nur eines: Ist jemand bereit, sich ausplündern. Hitler on the Jews, taken from the transcript of a speech given in July 1922.

Фразы гитлера на немецком с переводом. Цитаты на немецком языке с переводом

Ein Kampf Besonders aber auch gegen das Volk, das... Und wir haben gearbeitet. Was haben wir geschaffen in den Jahren bis 1939! Die Herren Churchill begannen sofort wieder zu hetzen. Статистика страницы на pesni.

Апеллируя в речи к национальному сознанию, Геббельс, возможно, ориентировался на Сталина , который через двенадцать дней после германского нападения на СССР в своём радиообращении объявил войну СССР против Германии « Великой Отечественной войной » [1]. Хотите ли вы её, если надо, тотальней и радикальней, чем мы её себе можем сегодня представить? Когда Геббельс задал пятый вопрос: «Доверяете ли вы сегодня фюреру больше, сильнее, непоколебимее, чем когда-либо? На заключительную часть речи Геббельс потратил целый час.

Впереди вас ждет много чего интересного и полезного. Начните свою жизнь - по новому и с чистого листа. Желаю всем удачи и только добра. Показать больше.

Weil er alles und nichts macht. Juli 1933. Schmidt, Der Standard, 20. Er hatte das gewisse Etwas, woraus Legenden geschaffen werden…" - John F. Kennedy , Tagebucheintrag vom 1. September 1936 "Man wird der historischen Erscheinung Adolf Hitlers nicht gerecht, solange man ihn als Einzelwesen schildert. Ich bekenne, dass mir Hitler selbst sympathisch ist. Luzern: Vita Nova, 1935, S. Grundlagen kollektiven Verhaltens.

Адольф Гитлер знаменитые цитаты

• Цитаты гитлера на немецком
• Смотрите также
• Нацист и ближайший соратник Гитлера Рудольф Гесс родился 130 лет назад
• Inhaltsverzeichnis
• Цитаты Гитлера на немецком

Выдержки из стенографической записи высказываний Гитлера

And with this prophecy as well I will be proved right. He concludes that "all indicated that he had ordered and was then implementing the destruction of the Jews". About 125,000 copies of the newspaper were printed and posted in public places to be viewed by millions of people. Herf acknowledges that there is no reliable evidence as to "how many people had the intellectual curiosity, political acumen, and moral courage to conclude that this wall newspaper was an announcement of mass murder". He argued that Germany lost World War I because it did not understand the great danger posed by internal enemies and the Jews; Nazi Germany would win its war against the " half-Jew Roosevelt" because it had been enlightened. On 18 February 1943, Goebbels delivered the total war speech at the Sportpalast. This process is of vast importance, and will have unforeseeable consequences that will take time. But it cannot be halted. Goebbels wrote that he was satisfied with the reception of the article and planned to increase the use of antisemitism as a propaganda tactic, as he found it second only to Bolshevism in effectiveness.

Anyone not dying through a shot in the neck would be deported. The children of the upper classes would be taken away and eliminated. This entire bestiality has been organized by the Jews. Hitler declared that the Jews would be destroyed, just as he had predicted, [158] [162] and this was received well by the audience. According to historian Nicholas Stargardt , the speech did not comfort its listeners but stoked their fear that there would not be a negotiated peace. I gave them a last warning at the outbreak of war. I never left them in uncertainty that if they were to plunge the world into war again they would this time not be spared—that the vermin in Europe would be finally eradicated. She argues that his assessment was correct.

In the 1960s, the school of functionalism emerged, which characterized Hitler as a weak dictator and argued that anti-Jewish policy emerged from Nazi functionaries as the war continued. Confino contends that although not even Hitler knew what he meant by "annihilation", the speech demonstrated that Hitler and his listeners already envisioned "a world in which extreme violence was applied to get rid of Jews and eliminate Judaism".

Но это - единственная область, в которой они должны получать «образование» с нашей помощью. Что касается гигиены покоренных народов, то не в наших интересах, подчеркнул шеф, насаждать у них немецкие обычаи. Это дало бы им абсолютно нежелательные условия для колоссального прироста населения. Поэтому шеф запретил проводить на восточных территориях гигиенические мероприятия по немецкому образцу.

Также и принудительная прививка должна в этих областях практиковаться только для немцев. Немецкие врачи будут лечить только немцев, в немецких поселениях. Было бы совершенно нелепо, продолжал шеф, пытаться осчастливить покоренные народы нашими знаниями в области зубной терапии. Но действовать следует осторожно, чтобы наши стремления не бросались в глаза. И если уж какой-то больной с абсолютной решимостью желает лечиться у дантиста, что ж, придется сделать для него исключение. Самая большая глупость, которую можно допустить в оккупированных восточных областях, добавил шеф,- это дать в руки покоренным народам оружие.

История учит, что все господствующие народы погибли, разрешив покоренным народам доступ к оружию. Можно даже сказать, заключил шеф, что передача оружия покоренным народам есть необходимое и достаточное условие для гибели господствующих народов. Поэтому мы должны обеспечивать безопасность и порядок на всем оккупированном русском пространстве собственными силами. Следовательно, оккупированные восточные области должны быть пронизаны сетью военных баз. Все немцы, живущие на этих территориях, должны будут иметь личный контакт с базами, то есть ощущать свою персональную связь с ними. Кроме того, базы нужно строить с таким расчетом, чтобы, опираясь на них, немецкая колонизационная политика могла в соответствии с перспективными планами обеспечить образование все более мощного национального немецкого клина в покоренном нами пространстве.

Но каким образом англичане смогли бы господствовать в своей мировой империи, обладая всего 50 миллионами человек собственного населения, если бы не стали мастерами лжи? Если бы они действительно хотели, как постоянно утверждают, принести индусам свободу и развитие индийской культуры, то им следовало бы, конечно, из Индии уйти. Но они лгали, словно гетевский Рейнеке Лис, до самой последней минуты. А мужество для лжи они черпали не в последнюю очередь из того непомерного самосознания, которое позволяет им смотреть на английский народ, как на кормчего, управляющего кораблем всего мира. Поскольку немецкий народ хочет и должен обрести мировое значение, необходимо и его прежде всего воспитать в таком духе, что честность нужна лишь по отношению к самому себе, а перед чужими народами, например чехами, следует столь же чистосердечно лгать, как это делают англичане, вместо того, чтобы повсюду вызывать антипатию своею честностью. Молодежь, сказал он, следует воспитывать в духе гордости за то, что на Востоке ее ждет не мягкая постель, а возможность вершить великие дела собственными силами.

Само собой разумеется, продолжал он, что те кадры, которые проявят на Востоке свои способности, должны продвигаться по служебной лестнице значительно быстрее, чем их сверстники, отсиживающиеся в границах старой империи, где им только и дела, что продолжать давно налаженную работу. Лишь обеспечив направляемым на Восток преимущества, можно добиться отношения к переселяемым на Восток, как к настоящему поощрению. Цель своей восточной политики, если рассматривать ее в перспективе, шеф характеризовал как создание на восточном пространстве территории для расселения приблизительно ста миллионов представителей германской расы. Он считает необходимым приложить все силы к тому, чтобы с железным упорством заселять Восток немцами миллион за миллионом. Он заявил, что не позднее чем через десять лет ожидает рапорта о колонизации уже включенных к тому времени в состав Германии или оккупированных нашими войсками восточных областей по меньшей мере двадцатью миллионами немцев. О том, каких успехов можно там достичь в деле создания необходимых культурных условий для переселенцев, сказал он далее, дает представление тот факт, что даже поляки сумели преобразить облик центра Готенхафена[ 1 ] проложив здесь красивые широкие улицы.

Во время ужина шеф заметил, что начало всякой культуры выражается в строительстве дорог. Как римляне во времена Цезаря и в первые два столетия нашей эры осваивали германские земли, проложив грунтовые дороги и пути с деревянным настилом через болота, топи и леса, так и мы в наше время должны в первую очередь строить в России дороги. Кто представляет себе начало освоения России по-иному, скажем, на базе строительства железнодорожной сети, тот запрягает лошадь с хвоста. Шеф сказал, что считает необходимым соорудить в России не менее 750-1000 км шоссейных дорог уже по чисто военным соображениям. Ведь без первоклассных дорог огромное русское пространство не может быть ни очищено в военном смысле, ни закреплено за нами на длительное время. Все имеющиеся в русских городах и деревнях резервы рабочей силы, без которых можно обойтись в сельском хозяйстве и военной промышленности, должны поэтому в самую первую очередь использоваться для строительства дорог.

Переходя к проблеме сооружения новых деревень, шеф указал, что эта работа должна на русском пространстве осуществляться не только на основе военных соображений; она должна также способствовать преодолению монотонности гигантских по протяженности дорог. Нам совершенно безразлично, моют ли они ежедневно шваброй свои дома или не моют. Наша миссия ведь не в том, чтобы осуществлять надзор за их каждодневной жизнью, а в том, чтобы гарантировать удовлетворение только наших собственных интересов. С этой целью необходимо в самой большой мере, в какой это только возможно, отделить жизнь немцев в подлежащих колонизации районах от жизни местного населения. В местные гостиницы, где жители плюют прямо на пол, мы немцам входить не позволим. Для немцев будут сооружены отдельные гостиницы, недоступные для местных жителей.

Пусть тогда плюют, куда хотят, нам это безразлично. Предоставив жителей самим себе, мы сможем избежать ненужных столкновений с ними по поводу образа их жизни и создать себе наилучшие предпосылки для строительства наших собственных замкнутых немецких центров. Глядя на украинских детей, подчеркнул он, трудно предположить, что впоследствии их лица примут плоские, славянские черты. Дети, как и большинство людей восточнобалтийского типа, светловолосы и голубоглазы; кроме того, они толстощекие и круглотелые, так что выглядят поистине мило. В противоположность им, наши дети - преимущественно нордического типа, в раннем возрасте они похожи на молодых жеребят: неуклюжие, со слишком тонкими и длинными ногами, угловатыми телами и лицами! А по внешности украинских детей нельзя предположить, сколь сильно впоследствии опошляются и огрубляются их лица.

Кроме того, подчеркнул рейхслейтер Борман, когда ездишь по тем местам, встречаешь мало мужчин, но неимоверно много детей. Это обилие детей, продолжал он, может нам в будущем дорого обойтись. Ведь этим обилием отличается раса, которая воспитана в гораздо более суровых привычках, чем наш собственный народ. Здесь нигде не видно людей в очках, у большинства отличные зубы, питание у них хорошее, и похоже, что все они, от мала до велика, обладают отличным здоровьем. Значит, нам было бы выгодно добиться такого положения, при котором эти русские или так называемые украинцы не размножались бы столь быстро. Мы ведь собираемся через какое-то время заселить всю эту бывшую русскую землю немцами.

Шеф заметил по этому поводу, что в какой-то статье было недавно высказано предложение запретить в оккупированных восточных областях продажу и употребление средств против беременности. Если и вправду, продолжал шеф, какой-нибудь идиот вздумает осуществить на практике подобную меру в оккупированных восточных областях, то он, шеф, расстреляет его собственной рукой. При обилии детей у местного населения мы можем лишь желать, сказал шеф, чтобы незамужние и замужние женщины возможно чаще прибегали к аборту. Необходимо поэтому не только допустить бойкую торговлю противозачаточными средствами в восточных областях, но и всячески ее поощрять, поскольку мы ни в малейшей мере не заинтересованы в увеличении ненемецкого населения. А в первую очередь необходимо в этом деле форсировать помощь евреям. Опасность дальнейшей интенсификации размножения местного населения при нашем господстве несомненна, сказал далее шеф.

Ведь при немецком руководстве совершенно неизбежно, что все условия жизни местных жителей значительно улучшатся, а гарантия от заболеваний повысится. Поэтому крайне необходимо принять меры против увеличения ненемецкого населения. В этих условиях было бы, по мнению шефа, просто сумасбродством устраивать для ненемецкого населения оккупированных восточных областей систему здравоохранения, подобную немецкой. Не может быть и речи, сказал он, о прививках или каких-либо других профилактических медицинских мерах в отношении ненемецкого населения. Более того, у местных жителей следует пресекать даже стремление к подобным мерам охраны здоровья. Необходимо поэтому способствовать распространению среди них суеверий и слухов, согласно которым прививки и т.

Далее чрезвычайно важно избегать всяких шагов, которые могли бы способствовать развитию у ненемецкого населения сознания, присущего повелителям.

Гитлер был известен своей агрессивной внешней политикой и убеждением в расовой превосходственности арийцев. Его антисемитские взгляды привели к Холокосту, геноциду евреев, во время которого было убито около шести миллионов евреев. В 1945 году, когда союзники наступали на Берлин, Гитлер покончил жизнь самоубийством.

Речь 13. Речь 18.

Нашему народу нужны руководители, обладающие решимостью делать все, что они сочтут правильным перед Богом, миром и собственной совестью. Речь 27. Речь 20. Эта организация будет построена на идее авторитета, идее руководства снизу доверху. Только такая организация может служить интересам всего народа. Речь 06.

Прокламация 01. Речь 16. Второе: Решение тяжелейшей социальной проблемы путем возвращения миллионной армии наших, достойных всяческого сочувствия, безработных обратно на производство. Третье: Восстановление стабильного и авторитетного государственного руководства, опирающегося на доверие и волю нации; руководства, которое снова вернет нашему великому народу способность выполнять свои обязательства перед миром. Речь 17. Наша национальная гордость заключается не в том, чтобы презирать других, а в том, чтобы уважать и любить свой народ!

Речь 01. Речь 24. Он неуклонно и в первую очередь будет думать о соблюдении интересов народа в вопросах мира, работы и культуры.

Adolf Hitler Quotes

April 1945, s. Gedichte Band 5, Suhrkamp 1964 S. Bechtle 1968. Ich denke, die Journalisten zeigten schlechten Geschmack, als sie den Mann der Stunde in Deutschland kritisierten. April 1931, S. Er spricht scharf gegen Rosenberg. Weil er alles und nichts macht.

Juli 1933. Schmidt, Der Standard, 20.

First, it was simple caves, later huts and houses. In short, he created a principle, the principle of work. Life would not have been possible without it. Although work was still simple, it had already to be planned beforehand and each individual knew that if he has not done his part, he will die of hunger in the coming winter. At the same time another development followed — the terrible hardship became a means for breeding of a race. Whoever was weak or sickly could not survive the terrible winter period and died prematurely. What remained was a race of strong and healthy giants. Yet another trait of this race was born.

Where man is externally muzzled, where his radius of action is limited, he begins to develop internally. Externally limited, internally he becomes unlimited. The more man, due to external forces, must depend on himself, the deeper internal life he develops and the more he turns inward. These three achievements: The recognized principle of work as a duty, the necessity, not only out of egoism but for preservation of the whole group of people — a small clan; second — the necessity of bodily health and thereby also of normal mental health; and third — the deep spiritual life. All these gave the northern races the ability to go to the world and build states. If this power could not find its full expression in the high North, it became apparent when the ice shackles fell and man turned south to the happier, freer nature. We know that all these northern peoples had one symbol in common — the symbol of the Sun. You will find this cross as a Hakenkreuz as far as India and Japan, carved in the temple pillars. It is the Swastika, which was once a sign of established communities of Aryan Culture. Those races, today called Aryans, created all the great cultures of the ancient world.

We know that Egypt was brought upon its high cultural level by Aryan immigrants. Similarly, Persia and Greece; the immigrants were blond, blue eyed Aryans. And we know that outside of these Aryan states no civilized states have been founded. There emerged mixed races between the black, dark eyed and dark colored, southern races and the immigrants, but they failed to create any large, creative culture states. Why is it that only Aryans possessed the ability to create states? It was due, almost exclusively, to their attitude toward work. Those races which, as the first, stopped seeing work as the result of coercion and saw it rather as a necessity born out of hundreds of thousands of years of hardship, had to become superior to other people. And, besides, it was work that made people come together and divide the work among them. We know that the moment the individual work to sustain oneself turned into work within communities, the community tended to assign a particular work to those particularly talented, and with increasing division of work it became necessary for still greater joining together into still bigger groups. So, it is work which created kinships at first, later tribes, and still later, led to the creation of states.

If we see, as the first prerequisite for creating states, the conception of work as social duty, so the second necessary ingredient is racial health and purity. And nothing helped the northern conquerors more against the lazy and rotten southern races than the refined strength of their race. States would remain an empty vessel if not decorated with that which we normally call culture. If we removed everything and kept just railways, ships, etc. The moment their great, inborn imagination could act in great, free areas, it created everywhere immortal works. We see this process repeated continuously even in the smallest scale. Similarly, we know that great minds are often born at the bottom of society, unable to develop there but, given an opportunity, they begin to grow and become leaders in arts, sciences, and also in politics. We know today that there are extensive interrelations between the state, nation, culture, art and work and it would be madness to think that any of them could exist independently of the others. Let us take art — considered as an international domain — and we shall see that it is unconditionally dependent on the state. Art blossomed in those areas where the political development made it possible.

The art of Greece reached its highest level when the young state had triumphed over invading Persian armies. Construction of the Acropolis began at that time. Rome became the city of art after the end of the Punic Wars, and Germany built her cathedrals, as in Worms, Speyer and Limburg, when the German Empire under Salians had achieved its greatest triumphs. We can follow this connection to our time. We know that art, for example the beauty of German towns, always depended on political development of these towns; that it was political considerations which moved Napoleon III to regulating of the Boulevards and Friedrich the Great to establishing Unter den Linden. Similarly in Munich where it was obvious that the city could not become an industrial center and so art was chosen to elevate the rank of the city, which now everyone who wants to get to know Germany must visit. The case was similar with other arts. The moment the small, powerless statelets began to unite into one state, then also one German art, proud of itself, began to grow. The works of Richard Wagner appeared in the period when shame and powerlessness were replaced by a unified, great German Reich. And so, not just art is dependent on the state, on the politics of the state; the same is the case with work itself because only a sound state is in the position to give the opportunity of working to its citizens and let them use their talents.

The opposite is the case with the race in relation to everything else. A state with a rotten, sick and unsound race will never produce great works of art or make great politics, or at least bask in abundance. Each of these factors depends on the others. And only when all of them complement each other, can we say: There is harmony in the state, the way we Germanics understand it. Can the Jew build a state? Now we have to ask ourselves the question: How about the Jew as a state builder? Does the Jew possess the power to create a state? First we must examine his attitude to work, find out how he perceives the principle of work, and excuse me if I now take a book called The Bible. I am not claiming that all its contents are necessarily true, as we know that Jewry was very liberal in writing it. One thing, however, is certain: it has not been written by an antisemite.

Laughter It is very important because no antisemite would have been able to write a more terrible indictment against the Jewish race than the Bible, the Old Testament. Ladies and Gentlemen! Already here we see that the whole world lies between us; we could never conceive of work as a punishment — otherwise we would all have been convicts. We do not want to conceive of work as punishment. I must confess: I would not have been able to exist without work, and hundreds of thousands and millions would have been able to withstand perhaps 3 or 5 days, maybe even 10, but not 90 or 100 days without any activity. If Paradise really existed, the Land of Plenty, then our people would have been unhappy in it. Calls: Hear, hear We Germans seek constantly a possibility to do something and if we cannot find anything, at least from time to time we hit one another in the face. Laughter We are unable to bear absolute rest. Thus we see, already here, a big difference. Because a Jew has written this, true or not is unimportant because it still reflects the opinion which Jewry has about work.

For them work is not an obvious ethical duty but at most a means to sustenance. In our eyes, this is not work because in this case any activity serving self-preservation, without regard to fellow men, might be called work. And we know that this work, in the past, consisted of plundering of caravans, and today in planned plundering of indebted farmers, industrialists and workers. The form has changed but the principle is the same. We do not call it work, but robbery. Calls: Hear, hear When already such a basic notion separates us, here comes another. I have already explained that in the long period in the North the races became purified. This means that all the inferior and weak gradually died out and only the soundest remained. Also, here the Jew differs from us because he has not become purified but instead practiced inbreeding; he multiplied greatly but only in narrow circles, and without selection. And therefore we see a generation which is plagued by defects caused by inbreeding.

Finally, the Jew does not possess the third factor: The inner spiritual life. I do not need to explain here what a Jew generally looks like. You all know him. Laughter You know his constant restlessness that never gives him a possibility to concentrate and have a spiritual experience. In the most solemn moments he flickers his eyes and one can see that even during the most beautiful opera he is calculating dividends. Laughter The Jew has never had his own art. Hear, hear His own temple has been built by foreign builders: The first was the Assyrians, and for the building of the second — the Roman artists. He has not left anything which might be called art, no buildings, nothing. We shall not conceal that today he has many famous conductors whose fame he can thank the well-organized Jewish Press for. Laughter When a nation does not possess these three traits, it is not able to create states.

And that is true because throughout centuries the Jew was always a nomad. He has never had what we might call a state. On the one side, there was always a great chasm between the tribes of Judah and Caleb and the northern Israeli tribes, and only David, for the first time, succeeded in gradually bridging the chasm through the unitary cult of Yahweh. We know precisely that this cult has at a very late time chosen for itself Jerusalem as its sole seat. Only from that moment have the Jewish people gotten a center, like Berlin or New York or Warsaw today.

Счастливая по жизни.

Спасибо маме и папе за жизнь. Интуиция - это жизнь! Intuition ist das Leben! Моя мама - мой ангел. Мечтай так, словно ты будешь жить вечно. Живи так, словно умрешь сегодня.

Lebe so, als ob du heute stirbst. Моей любви достойна только мать. Nur Meine Mutter ist meiner Liebe wert. Любовь доступна всем, только не мне. Никто, кроме тебя. Niemand als du.

Все к лучшему! Alles, was passiert, ist zu Gutem! Иду к своей мечте. Ich gehe zu meinem Traum. Я не как все, я лучший. Ich bin nicht, wie alle, ich bin der Beste.

Не будь горд с теми, с кем душа хочет сходить с ума. Жить и любить. Leben und lieben. Удача со мной. Учитесь наслаждаться жизнью… Страдать, она научит сама. Да поможет мне Бог!

Hilf mir Gott! Сильная, но нежная. Stark, aber zart. Любовь победит всё. Liebe besiegt alles. Хочу надолго и по-настоящему.

Доверяй только себе. Vertraue nur an sich selbst. Прощать не сложно, сложно заново поверить. Verzeihen ist nicht schwierig, schwierig ist es aufs Neue zu glauben. Надейся на лучшее. Hoffe dich auf das Beste.

Будь готова к худшему. Sei auf das Schlimmste fertig. Жизнь - игра. Das Leben ist ein Spiel. Делаем вид, что все хорошо, а внутри страшная боль. Wir tun, es sei alles gut, drinnen ist aber ein schrecklicher Schmerz.

Мы ничего не можем предугадать. Дай мне силы. Удача всегда со мной. Поступки сильнее слов. Мама и Папа, я люблю вас. Mutter und Vater, ich liebe euch.

Боже сохрани меня! Bewahre mich Got! Только потеряв - мы начинаем ценить. Одна любовь, одна судьба! Eine Liebe, ein Schicksal! Как жаль, что некоторые моменты никогда больше не повторятся.

Wie schade, dass einige Momente des Lebens sich nie mehr wiederholen. Чем сильнее что-то любишь, тем сложнее это терять. Иногда не хватает лишь капельки смелости, которая может изменить всю жизнь. Каждый человек имеет право на ошибку. Но не всякая ошибка имеет право на прощение. Jeder Mensch hat sein Recht auf einen Fehler.

Nicht jeder Fehler hat ein Recht auf Verzeihung. Цените своих близких, пока они рядом. Идеальных людей не бывает, цените тех, кто смог полюбить ваши недостатки. Не судите чужого прошлого — вы не знаете своего будущего. Gott mit uns. С нами Бог.

В будущем Нева должна стать границей между Финляндией и нами. Разрушению будут подвергнуты также ленинградские порты и верфи. Ибо стать хозяином в Балтийском море можно лишь в том случае, если оно превратится во внутреннее море Германии.

И потому нужно раз и навсегда позаботиться о том, чтобы не осталось ни одного крупного порта на периферии нашей империи. Нечего говорить, что нам будет совершенно достаточно собственных портов и портов в Прибалтике для удовлетворения наших потребностей, так что нам вовсе не понадобятся ленинградские порты, замерзающие на целых полгода. Рейхсфюрер СС Гиммлер доложил в связи с этим, что принимает меры к пресечению всякой активности полячества, как наиболее стойкого в историческом аспекте народа; что с этой целью он зажимает полячество в железные клещи германцев.

Он, рейхсфюрер СС, уже договорился с генерал-губернатором оккупированной Польши Франком заселить немцами Краковщину, включая и чисто немецкий главный город этой области, а также область Люблина. Именно с этих двух исходных позиций будет постепенно зажиматься в клещи полячество. Шеф заметил, что проявлять снисходительность к полячеству нет никаких оснований.

Иначе придется испытать то же, что уже неоднократно имело место в истории прежних веков в связи с разделами Польши. Полячество существует до сих пор лишь потому, что ему не приходилось серьезно считаться с русскими, как с господствующей нацией, а также и потому, что ему удалось хитрыми маневрами занять такую политическую позицию по отношению к немцам, которая сделала полячество решающим фактором немецкой внутренней политики. А это играло на руку прежде всего политическому католицизму.

В первую очередь, продолжал он, необходимо следить, чтобы немцы ни в коем случае не смешивались с поляками, не насыщали ведущие слои польского населения германской кровью. Рейхсфюрер СС совершенно прав, констатируя, что в 1939 г. Ведь давно известно, что именно наиболее способные выходцы из немцев всегда проникали в руководящий слой принимавшей их страны и тем самым оказывались потерянными для германства, между тем как в остававшихся на немецкой земле народных слоях сосредоточивались лишь ущербные индивиды, проявлявшие, однако, верность своему немецкому происхождению.

Такую же осторожность, как с поляками, надо проявлять и в отношении чехов, которые уже более полутысячи лет набираются умения отлично играть в верноподданных, не вызывая недоверия. Ведь сколько чехов, с которыми шеф сталкивался в молодости, крутились в Вене, очень скоро овладевали венским диалектом, а затем умело проползали на важнейшие посты в государстве, экономике и т. Никогда не следует упускать из виду, заключил шеф, что подобную невидимую войну в условиях мира можно выиграть только в том случае, если мы будем поддерживать в империи высокий уровень расовой чистоты.

Ведь наше преимущество по отношению, например, к США, которые лишь незначительно превосходят нас по числу населения, состоит в том, что наш германский расовый корень значительно выше, чем у них, составляя четыре пятых чистых германцев. Необходимо исходить из того, сказал шеф, что главная миссия этих народов - обслуживать нас экономически: поэтому мы должны стремиться всеми средствами выкачать из оккупированных русских областей все, что возможно в экономическом отношении. Нужно создать у русских определенный стимул для поставки сельскохозяйственных продуктов и предоставления нам рабочей силы для горнодобывающей промышленности и военного производства.

Этого можно в достаточной мере добиться завозом на расположенные в России торговые базы промышленных товаров и т. Но если мы, заметил шеф, захотим сверх этого обеспечить благополучие каждого отдельного индивида, то нам не удастся обойтись без введения какой-то административной организации по образцу нашего государственного управления, а это вызовет лишь ненависть по отношению к нам. Ибо чем люди примитивнее, тем скорее воспринимают всякое ограничение их личной свободы как насилие.

К тому же, создать у них государственную административную организацию означало бы обеспечить им возможность сплочения в крупные коллективы, а при случае и использовать эту организацию даже против нас. Поэтому самая высокая ступень административных учреждений, которую им можно позволить, это — общинное управление, да и то лишь в той мере, в какой оно необходимо для содержания рабочей силы, то есть для удовлетворения насущных потребностей отдельных индивидов. Также и сельские коллективы нужно, как указал шеф, организовать с таким расчетом, чтобы не могли возникнуть связи между соседними сельскими общинами.

Во всех случаях необходимо запрещать устройство единых церквей для сколько-нибудь значительных русских территорий. Нашим интересам соответствовало бы такое положение, при котором каждая деревня имела бы собственную секту, где развивались бы свои особые представления о боге. Даже если в этом случае в отдельных деревнях возникнут шаманские культы, подобно негритянским или американо-индейским, то мы могли бы это только приветствовать, ибо это лишь увеличило бы количество факторов, дробящих русское пространство на мелкие единицы.

Напомнив о своем мнении, что следует препятствовать всякой организации крупного государственного управления и что наши комиссары должны будут на Востоке лишь контролировать управление экономикой, шеф заметил далее, что уже тем самым отрицается всякая другая форма организации покоренных народов. Поэтому пусть не вздумает туда явиться какой-нибудь школьный деятель, чтобы вдруг провозгласить обязательное обучение покоренных народов. Если русские, украинцы, киргизы и т.

Ибо подобные навыки дали бы возможность самым способным из них получить определенные знания в области истории и, следовательно, прийти к размышлениям политического свойства, острие которых было бы неизбежно направлено против нас. С точки зрения шефа, было бы разумнее установить в каждой деревне громкоговоритель, чтобы таким путем информировать людей о новостях и дать им пищу для разговоров; это лучше, чем допустить их к самостоятельному изучению политических, научных и т. И пусть никому не приходит в голову передавать покоренным народам по радио сведения из их прежней истории.

Передавать следует музыку и еще раз музыку! Ибо веселая музыка способствует прилежной работе. А если люди смогут побольше плясать, то и это, по мнению шефа, должно, как правило, приветствоваться.

Единственное, что следует централизованно организовать в оккупированных русских областях-это движение транспорта. Ибо освоение страны в транспортном отношении - одна из важнейших предпосылок к господству над нею и ее экономического использования. Поэтому систему транспортных узлов должны изучать и покоренные.

Но это - единственная область, в которой они должны получать «образование» с нашей помощью. Что касается гигиены покоренных народов, то не в наших интересах, подчеркнул шеф, насаждать у них немецкие обычаи. Это дало бы им абсолютно нежелательные условия для колоссального прироста населения.

Поэтому шеф запретил проводить на восточных территориях гигиенические мероприятия по немецкому образцу. Также и принудительная прививка должна в этих областях практиковаться только для немцев. Немецкие врачи будут лечить только немцев, в немецких поселениях.

Было бы совершенно нелепо, продолжал шеф, пытаться осчастливить покоренные народы нашими знаниями в области зубной терапии. Но действовать следует осторожно, чтобы наши стремления не бросались в глаза. И если уж какой-то больной с абсолютной решимостью желает лечиться у дантиста, что ж, придется сделать для него исключение.

Самая большая глупость, которую можно допустить в оккупированных восточных областях, добавил шеф,- это дать в руки покоренным народам оружие. История учит, что все господствующие народы погибли, разрешив покоренным народам доступ к оружию. Можно даже сказать, заключил шеф, что передача оружия покоренным народам есть необходимое и достаточное условие для гибели господствующих народов.

Поэтому мы должны обеспечивать безопасность и порядок на всем оккупированном русском пространстве собственными силами. Следовательно, оккупированные восточные области должны быть пронизаны сетью военных баз. Все немцы, живущие на этих территориях, должны будут иметь личный контакт с базами, то есть ощущать свою персональную связь с ними.

Кроме того, базы нужно строить с таким расчетом, чтобы, опираясь на них, немецкая колонизационная политика могла в соответствии с перспективными планами обеспечить образование все более мощного национального немецкого клина в покоренном нами пространстве. Но каким образом англичане смогли бы господствовать в своей мировой империи, обладая всего 50 миллионами человек собственного населения, если бы не стали мастерами лжи? Если бы они действительно хотели, как постоянно утверждают, принести индусам свободу и развитие индийской культуры, то им следовало бы, конечно, из Индии уйти.

Но они лгали, словно гетевский Рейнеке Лис, до самой последней минуты. А мужество для лжи они черпали не в последнюю очередь из того непомерного самосознания, которое позволяет им смотреть на английский народ, как на кормчего, управляющего кораблем всего мира. Поскольку немецкий народ хочет и должен обрести мировое значение, необходимо и его прежде всего воспитать в таком духе, что честность нужна лишь по отношению к самому себе, а перед чужими народами, например чехами, следует столь же чистосердечно лгать, как это делают англичане, вместо того, чтобы повсюду вызывать антипатию своею честностью.

Молодежь, сказал он, следует воспитывать в духе гордости за то, что на Востоке ее ждет не мягкая постель, а возможность вершить великие дела собственными силами. Само собой разумеется, продолжал он, что те кадры, которые проявят на Востоке свои способности, должны продвигаться по служебной лестнице значительно быстрее, чем их сверстники, отсиживающиеся в границах старой империи, где им только и дела, что продолжать давно налаженную работу.

Цитаты гитлера

It was played up by the Jews and became very popular. So we should not be surprised when he also attacks what many people even today are not indifferent to, and what to many at least can give inner peace — religion. Also here we see the same Jew who himself has enough religious customs which others could easily mock, but no one does, as we, in principle, never ridicule religion because it is sacred to us. But he tries to destroy everything without offering a substitute. Who today, in this age of the vilest deceit and swindle, is detached from it; for him there are just two more possibilities, either he hangs himself in despair or becomes a crook. Instead of the authority of reason, there enters the authority of the great spongy majority led by the Jew, because the Jew is always going through three periods. First, autocratically-minded, ready to serve any prince, he then descends to the people, fighting for democracy, of which he knows that it will be in his hand, and steered by him; he owns it, he becomes a dictator. Hear, hear And we see this today in Russia, where a Lenin has just assured that the councils are already outlived, and that now it is not absolutely necessary that a proletarian state be led through one council or parliament, that it is sufficient that 2 or 3 proletarian-minded people govern this country.

These proletarian-minded persons are some Jewish billionaires, and we know very well that behind 2 or 3 proletarians ultimately stands another organization which is outside of the state: the Alliance Israelite and their grandiose propaganda organization and the organization of Freemasonry. Loud applause and clapping of hands And in all these things we must understand that there are no good or evil Jews. Here everyone works exactly according to the instincts of his race, because the race, or should we say, the nation and its character, as the Jew himself explains, lies in blood, and this blood is forcing everyone to act according to these principles, whether he is the leading mind in a party that calls itself democratic, or calls itself socialist, or a man of science, literature, or just an ordinary exploiter. The political organization And when we see, for example, in these Jewish magazines, that it is specified that every Jew everywhere is obligated to fight against any antisemite, wherever and whoever he is, then it follows by deduction that every German, wherever and whoever he is, will become an antisemite. Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal social justice, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge and when we finally united, there was only one big question: How should we actually baptize ourselves? A party? A bad name!

When I hear that word I go mad. Economic organizing only — here lies the salvation and the future. Stormy applause Since it is clear that scientific knowledge is worthless as long as this knowledge is not a basis for an organization of the masses for the implementation of what we consider necessary, and it is further clear that for this organization only the broad masses of our people can be considered. Loud applaus. The salvation can never come from above, it can and will only come from the masses, from the bottom up. Applause And as we came to this realization and decided to form a party, a political party that wants to enter into the ruthless political struggle for the future, then we heard a voice: Do you believe that you few can do it, do you really believe that a couple of guys can do it? Because we understood that we had an immense battle ahead of us but also that anything created by men can be destroyed by other men.

And another conviction has arisen within us, that this can not be a matter of whether we think we can do it, but only a question of whether we believe that it is right and that it is necessary, and if it is right and necessary, then it is no longer a question of whether we want to, but rather it is our duty to do what we feel is necessary. We did not ask after money and supporters, but we decided to go forth. And while others are working a whole generation, perhaps in order to get a small house or to have a carefree retirement, we put our lives at stake and have begun this difficult struggle. If we win, and we are convinced we will, though we may die penniless we will have helped create the biggest movement which will now extend over all Europe and the whole world. Loud applause The first three principles were clear, and they are inseparable from each other. And we were aware that in this fight we can rely on no one but our own people. We are convinced that socialism in the right sense will only be possible in nations and races that are Aryan, and there in the first place we hope for our own people and are convinced that socialism is inseparable from nationalism.

Loud applause To be nationalist does not mean for us to belong to one party or another, but to show with every action that one benefits the people; it means love for all the people without exception. From this point of view we will realize that it is necessary to preserve the most precious thing a people has, the sum of all active creative powers of its workers, to keep it healthy in body and soul. Cheers And this view of nationalism compels us to immediately form a front against its opposite, the Semitic conception of the idea of people Volk , and especially against the Semitic concept of work. Since we are socialists, we must necessarily also be antisemites because we want to fight against the very opposite: materialism and mammonism. And when today the Jew still runs into our factories and says: How can you be a socialist antisemite? Are not you ashamed? Hear, hear There comes a time when it will be obvious that socialism can only be carried out accompanied by nationalism and antisemitism.

The three concepts are inseparably connected. They are the foundations of our program and therefore we call ourselves National Socialists. Cheers How to proceed Finally, we know how great the social reforms must be so that Germany may recover. We know that one will have to cut deep. We will not be able to come around the national problem and the issue of land reform, and the problem of care for all those who, day after day, are working for the community and in their old age this care must not be a pittance, but they have a right to have their old days be still worth living. If we wish to make these social reforms, this must go hand in hand with the fight against the enemy of every social institution: Jewry. Here too we know that scientific knowledge can only be the groundwork, but that behind this knowledge must stand an organization which one day will be able to go over into action.

And in this action we will remain adamant, which means: removal of Jews from amongst our people Loud and long sustained applause and clapping , not because we begrudge them their existence — we congratulate the rest of the world on account of their visits great hilarity — but because we value the existence of our own people a thousand times higher than that of an alien race. And since we are convinced that this scientific antisemitism that clearly recognizes the terrible danger of this race for any people can only be a guide, and the masses will always perceive them emotionally — for they know the Jew first and foremost as the man in daily life who always and everywhere sticks out — our concern must be to arouse in our people the instinct against Jewry and whip it up and stir, until they come to the decision to join the movement which is willing to take the consequences. Bravo and applause. Some people tell us: Whether you succeed depends eventually on whether you have the sufficient money and so on. To this, I think I can say the following: Even the power of money is somehow limited; there is a certain limit beyond which, eventually, not the money rules but the truth. And we do not despair if we maybe still stand alone, if we today, wherever we go, do see potential supporters but nowhere the courage to join the organization. That should not lead us astray; we have accepted the fight and we must win it.

I could predict it back then because I knew that the courage and the will to act were absent everywhere. We have proclaimed as our election platform only one thing: Let the others go to the polls today, to the Reichstag, to the parliaments and loll in their club chairs; we want to climb up the beer tables and pull the masses with us. Tirelessly and constantly, as long as we have a spark of strength and a breath in the lungs, we will come out and call all our people; and always tell the truth until we can begin to hope that this truth will prevail. Till the day finally comes when our words fall silent and action begins. Pause and discussion Closing remarks of the speaker Hitler: Ladies and gentlemen! We are not as dreadful as our primary enemy and we cannot shatter Jewry by ourselves; we do not imagine it is so easy. However, we have decided not to come with any buts and ifs.

But once the matter comes to the solution, it will be done, and done thoroughly. Then a gentleman said that our movement would mean a battle into which the working class would be drawn. Yes, and we the social democrats and communists? That mistake we will not make. We do not promise any Heaven but the one thing, that if you are determined to carry out this program in Germany, maybe once again the time will come in which you will be able to have a life. If you carry out the glorious reform which these gentlemen here wish, you will in an even shorter time face the need to embellish this life with the very same decrees which their leaders Trotsky and Lenin issue now: Those who are not willing to fight for the blessings of that State, die. Finally, he said that they opposed any capitalism.

My esteemed audience! The communists have so far merely been fighting industrial capital and have only hung industrial capitalists. But name me one Jewish capitalist whom they have hung. The Soviet Government itself admits this now. Among those 300,000 is not a single Jew! Is that persecution of Jews or rather, in the truest sense of the word, persecution of Christians? Hear, hear Then you said you fought against both the loan capital and industrial capital.

But you have so far combated neither the one nor the other. You cannot fight the industrial capital, at most destroy it, and then you must again start with a 12-hour working day to rebuild it. This one is paying you. Thunderous applause and clapping of hands Then the second speaker stated the cause of the revolution should be looked for in poverty. We prefer to put it this way: Poverty has made Germany ripe for those who wanted the revolution. You can read the piece written by their Lord and Master who was then ruling Germany, Rathenau, where he explained precisely that the revolution had a real and deliberate purpose: Displacement of the feudal system and its replacement by plutocracy. These men have been the financiersof this glorious movement.

Loud applause Then you said further: Before the war one has not heard anything of Jews. That is a sad fact that we have heard so little. This does not mean, however, that he was not there. But above all, it is not true, because this movement did not begin after the war but has been there just as long as there are Jews. If you go back and read in Jewish history, the Jews gradually exterminated the original tribes in Palestine by the sword, so you can imagine that there has been antisemitism as a logical reaction. And it existed the whole time till this day, and the pharaohs in Egypt were probably just as antisemitic as we are today. If you had, before the war, not only read their famous writers Moritz, Salomon, and others — I do not even mention newspapers which, a priori, carry the stamp of approval of the Alliance Israelite- you would have heard that in Austria there was a huge anti-Semitic movement, but also the Russia people constantly attempted to rise up against the Jewish bloodsuckers.

That in Galicia, the Poles groaned and no longer worked, and sometimes rose in despair against those crazy idealists who were hell-bound to send the people to their early graves. Unfortunately, too late we have begun to understand this there, but you say: Before the war, one has not heard of it. But really deplorable are only those who hear it now and still cannot get the courage to answer our call. We are grateful that at least you admit that your pope has made mistakes. Laughter But then you declare you would not make these mistakes. For one thing, when 300,000 people are hanged in Germany and when our whole economy is shattered after their pattern, then your statement that you would not make the same mistakes is not enough. You seem to have a poor idea of what the Bolshevik system really means.

It will not improve the situation, but it is put there in order to destroy the races with these errors.

Но уже даже цифры первых заказов говорят много. А количество проектов, причём некоторые судя по описаниям были весьма перспективны, внушало уважение. Самое же интересное, это технический, качественный уровень германской армии к концу Первой Мировой войны. Всё это было уничтожено Версальским договором, по которому вооружение либо отдавалась странам-победителям, либо просто уничтожалось.

The ethical duty to work Gradually, he also had to lead an existential struggle against the growing awakening and anger of the people. This forced him to lay his hands on the inner structure of the states if he wanted to remain the master of the peoples. We see the resulting destruction in three areas, namely those same three areas which were preserving and developing the states. The first area was the fight against the principle of the ethical duty to work. The Jew had found another kind of work for himself where he could earn gold without practically moving a finger. He developed a principle which, throughout millennia, made it possible for him to amass fortunes without sweat and toil, unlike all other mortals, and above all — without taking risk. What is industrial capital? It is a constantly changing factor, a relative concept. Once it was a needle and thread, a workshop and a couple of cents in ready money which a tailor in Nurnberg possessed in the 13th century. It was a sum that made work possible, that is: tools, workshops and a certain amount of money in order to survive for a period of time. Gradually, this small workshop became a big factory. But workshops and tools, machines and factories have, per se, no value able to produce value but are a means to an end. What produces value is work, and the few cents which made it possible to survive difficult times and buy some fabrics, multiplied through time, stand before us today — we call it Capital for continued operation in bad times, that is Working Capital. Here I want to emphasize one thing: Tools, workshop, machine, factory — or working capital, that is, industrial capital — against this you cannot fight at all. You can perhaps make sure that it is not abused but you cannot fight against it. This is the first major scam that one makes to our people, and they make it to distract us from the real fight, to pull it off from the capital which should and must be fought — from the loan and financial capital. Stormy bravo! This capital arises in a very different way. The smallest master craftsman was dependent on the fate that might affect him every day, on the general situation in the middle Ages, perhaps on the size of his city and its prosperity, the security in this city. Also today is this capital, that is, the industrial capital tied to the state and to the people, depending on the will of the people to work, but depending also on the possibility to procure raw materials in order to be able to offer work and find buyers who will really buy the product. And we know that a collapse of the state, under certain circumstances, renders the greatest values worthless, devalues them, as distinguished from the other capital, the finance and loan capital, which accrues interest very evenly without any regard to whether the owner, for example, of these 10,000 Mark himself passes away or not. The debt remains on the estate. We know that this railway fortunately has now a 20 billion deficit but their bonds must bear interest, and even though they were sold, in part, more than 60 years ago and have already been repaid four times, the debt, the interest, runs further, and while a great nation gains nothing on this company, it still must bleed; the loan capital continues to grow completely irrespective of any outside disturbance. Here we already see the first possibility, namely that this kind of money-making, which is independent of all the events and incidents of daily life, must necessarily, because it is never hindered and always runs evenly, gradually lead to huge capitals which are so enormous that they ultimately have only one fault, namely the difficulty of their further accommodation. To accommodate this capital, you have to proceed to destroying whole states, to destroy entire cultures, to abolish national industries — not to socialize, but to throw all into the jaws of this international capital — because this capital is international, as the only thing on this Earth that is truly international. It is international because its carrier, the Jews, are international through their distribution across the world. Consent And already here one should knock oneself on the head and say: if this capital is international because its carrier is distributed internationally, it must be madness to think that this capital can be fought internationally with the help of the members of the same race which possesses it. Hear, hear Fire is not extinguished by fire but by water and the international capital belonging to the international Jew can only be broken by a national force. Bravo and applause! So, this capital has grown to incredibly large proportions and today virtually rules the Earth, still eerily growing and — the worst! For it is appalling that the common man who has to bear the burden in order to return the capital sees that, despite his hard work, diligence, thrift and in spite of the real work, he is hardly able to nourish himself and still less to dress, while this international capital devours billions just in interest, which he also must supply, and at the same time a whole racial stratum which does no other work than collect interest and cut coupons, spreads in the state. This is a degradation of any honest work, for every honestly working man must ask today: Does it have a purpose at all that I work? Yes, one of the foundations of our strength is being destroyed, namely the ethical concept of work, and that was the brilliant idea of Karl Marx to falsify the ethical concept of work, and the whole mass of the people who groan under the Capital are to be organized for the destruction of the national economy and for the protection of international finance-and-loan capital. Stormy applause We know that today 15 billion of industry capital is facing 500 billion of loan capital. These 15 billion of industry capital is invested in creative values, while this 500 billion loan capital, which we always get in spoonful rates of 6 and 7 billion and which we use in periods of 1 to 2 months to supplement our rations a little, these 6 to 7 billion today which are decreed almost worthless scraps of paper, at a later date, should we ever recover, will have to be repaid in high quality money i. This is not only the destruction of a state, but already the application of a chain, of a neck collar for later times. National purity as a source of strength The second pillar against which the Jew as a parasite turns, and must turn, is the national purity as a source of the strength of a nation. The Jew, who is himself a nationalist more than any other nation, who through millennia did not mix with any other race, uses intermingling just for others to degenerate them in the best case; this same Jew preaches every day with thousands of tongues, from 19,000 papers in Germany alone, that all nations on Earth are equal, that international solidarity should bind all the peoples, that no people can lay a claim to a special status etc. What a nation means, he, who himself never dreams of climbing down to those to whom he preaches internationalism, knows well. First a race must be denationalized. First it must unlearn that its power is in its blood, and when it has reached the level where it has no more pride, the result is a product, a second race, which is lower than the previous one and the Jew needs the lower one in order to organize his final world domination. In order to build it and keep it, he lowers the racial level of the other peoples, so that only he is racially pure and able to eventually rule over all the others. We know that the Hindus in India are a mixed people, stemming from the high Aryan immigrants and from the dark aborigines. And this nation bears the consequences, for it is a slave nation of a race that may seem in many ways almost as a second Jewry. Another problem is the problem of physical decomposition of races. The Jew is trying to eliminate all of which he knows that is somehow strengthening, muscle-steeling, and eliminate above all everything of that which he knows may keep a race so healthy that it will remain determined not to tolerate among themselves national criminals, pests to the national community, but under some circumstances, punish them with death. And that is his great fear and worry; for even the heaviest latches of the safest prison are not so tough, and the prison is not so safe that a few million could not open it eventually. Only one lock is permanent, and that is death, and in front of it he has the most awe. And therefore he seeks to abolish this barbaric punishment everywhere where he lives as a parasite. But wherever he already is, Lord, it is used ruthlessly. Loud applause And, for the breaking of physical strength, he has excellent means at hand. First of all, he has the trade that should be nothing more than distribution of foodstuffs and other necessary items for daily use. He uses it to withdraw these articles of daily life, when necessary, in order to raise the price on the one hand, but also to withdraw in order to create the conditions for physical weakening which have always worked best: hunger. Everywhere, what we see behind these organizations is not the desire to make a shining organization for food supply, but through them gradually to create hunger. We know that as a politician he never had reason and cause to shun the hunger, on the contrary, wherever the Jew appeared in political parties, hunger and misery was the only soil in which he could grow. He desires it, and therefore he does not even think of easing social misery. He was a leading proponent of a policy of assimilation for German Jews ] Hand in hand with this goes a battle against the health of the people. He knows how to turn all the healthy normal manners, the obvious hygienic rules of a race on its head, from night he makes day; he creates the notorious nightlife and knows exactly that it works slowly but surely, gradually destroying the healthy strength of a race, making it soft; the one is destroyed physically, the other spiritually, and into the heart of the third it puts the hatred as he has to see the others feast. And finally, as a last resort, he destroys the productive capacity, and if necessary, in connection with it, the productive resources of a nation. That is the great mystery of Russia. They have destroyed factories, not because they knew they would no longer be needed, but because they knew that the people would be forced, with enormous hardships, to replace what had been destroyed. So the Jew succeeds in harnessing the people, instead of the former 9 and 10 hours, for 12 hours. For at the moment when the Jew becomes Lord, he knows no 8-hour day, he recognizes his Sabbath for his cattle, but not for the Goyim, for the Akum [words for non-Jews]. The destruction of culture Finally, he reaches for the last method: The destruction of all culture, of all that we consider as belonging in a state which we consider civilized. Here is his work perhaps most difficult to recognize, but here the actual effect is the most terrible. This is true inner experience, unlike the other ones, which are only superficial swindle Applause , set in the world with an intent to gradually destroy in the people any healthy idea and to whip the people into a state in which no one can understand whether the times are crazy, or whether he himself is mad. Big laughter and applause. Just as he works in painting, sculpture and music, so he does in poetry and especially in literature. Here he has a great advantage. What has become of it? A place which today you are ashamed to enter unless someone might notice you the moment you go in. And if theater has become a hotbed of vice and shamelessness, then a thousand times more so that new invention which perhaps comes from genial inspiration, but which the Jew understood right away to remodel into the filthiest business that you can imagine: the cinema. Thunderous applause and clapping. At first people attached greatest hopes to this brilliant invention. It could become an easy mediator of profound knowledge for the entire people of the world. And what has become of it? It became the mediator of the greatest and the most shameless filth. The Jew works on. For him there is no spiritual sensitivity, and just as his forefather Abraham was selling his wife, he finds nothing special about the fact that today he sells girls, and through the centuries we find him everywhere, in North America as in Germany, Austria-Hungary and all over the East, as the merchant of the human commodity and it can not be denied away; even the greatest Jew defender cannot deny that all of these girl-dealers are Hebrews. This subject is atrocious. According to Germanic sentiment there would be only one punishment for this: death. For people that play fast and loose, regarding as a business, as a commodity, what for millions of others means greatest happiness or greatest misfortune. For them love is nothing more than business in which they make money. They are always ready to tear apart the happiness of any marriage, if only 30 pieces of silver can be made. It was played up by the Jews and became very popular. So we should not be surprised when he also attacks what many people even today are not indifferent to, and what to many at least can give inner peace — religion. Also here we see the same Jew who himself has enough religious customs which others could easily mock, but no one does, as we, in principle, never ridicule religion because it is sacred to us. But he tries to destroy everything without offering a substitute. Who today, in this age of the vilest deceit and swindle, is detached from it; for him there are just two more possibilities, either he hangs himself in despair or becomes a crook. Instead of the authority of reason, there enters the authority of the great spongy majority led by the Jew, because the Jew is always going through three periods. First, autocratically-minded, ready to serve any prince, he then descends to the people, fighting for democracy, of which he knows that it will be in his hand, and steered by him; he owns it, he becomes a dictator. Hear, hear And we see this today in Russia, where a Lenin has just assured that the councils are already outlived, and that now it is not absolutely necessary that a proletarian state be led through one council or parliament, that it is sufficient that 2 or 3 proletarian-minded people govern this country. These proletarian-minded persons are some Jewish billionaires, and we know very well that behind 2 or 3 proletarians ultimately stands another organization which is outside of the state: the Alliance Israelite and their grandiose propaganda organization and the organization of Freemasonry.

This means in reality that it endeavors to make sure that no European state is able to win over a certain measure... What they wanted was a disunited, disintegrated Europe, a Europe all of whose forces completely offset one another. To reach this goal, England conducted one war after another in Europe. She has seen first its powerful position menaced by Spain. When they had finally conquered Spain, they turned their attentions to the Netherlanders. When Holland seemed to represent no further danger, British hate concentrated itself against France. And when finally France was crushed with the help of all Europe, to be sure, they then imagined that Germany must be, of necessity, the one factor which might possibly be suited to the unification of Europe. Then it was that the struggle against Germany began, not out of love for the nations, but only in their own most sober interests. It is well-known that they have always been the instigators of unrest among the nations, because they were able to profit only in time of unrest, and because a period of peace might lead to reflection and hence, also, to an insight into the ways of these evil-doers of all nations. When, in 1914,a world coalition against the German Reich of that time was first brewing,... They then said, "Germany must first of all be freed from its Kaiser. But the English always feel concerned for other nations, and for that reason they wanted to free Germany of its Kaiser, then as now. Finally, they said, "There shall be no more war. Therefore let us wage war upon war. If only one wanted to apply it in retrospect. That means, if one wanted to say, "We agree that war is an injustice because only brutal force decides war. We will eliminate all coercion. Hence we will abolish everything arisen through coercion up to now. But still it would have been wonderful if England had led the way to the rest of the world in its abhorrence of war in this manner, that it would have liberated the fruits of its own wars, that is, that it would have placed them again at the disposition of the rest of the world. If England had done that, if it had therefore declared: "We abhor war. Therefore, we will immediately return South Africa; because we won it through war. We hate war. Therefore, we will return the East Indies; we also won those in a war. For instance, we hate war. Therefore, we will also leave Egypt; because this also we have subjugated through force. We shall also retire from the entire Near East; because this also became ours through force. However, the struggle against war meant something entirely different in England; namely, this war against war was interpreted to mean every possibility of making good the injustices already existing in this world;... It is about the same as the attitude we recognize also in domestic policy, when people say: "We want no change in the social order. He who is rich is to stay rich; he who is poor must stay poor. As things are, so are they willed; and as they are willed, so they are to remain; for man should not rise against that which is once willed, because it is so. We see in each state and at each moment of this world the evidence of a never interrupted process of life; and it is impossible to say at a certain moment, "Here ceases this evolutionary process. It lies, on the contrary, in the essence of Nature, that ever and again... That means therefore that from the domestic life of peoples the... And so the talk of war on war has been proved quite false. The best proof for that is that the moment the war was over, the conditions for a new war could by no means be avoided, nor the instruments for waging the new war, either. It would have been a wonderful gesture if after the disarmament of Germany, as it... We suggested it to them often, begged them to at the time of the Weimar Republic, and still later demanded that they do it. They considered it not at all. On the contrary, the wars went on. Only the defeated people, the German people, lost every prospect ever in this world to change its condition once more for the better. The methods which they used in the first World War were like those with which they are fighting today. At first the war from outside, and war in the form of creating coalitions. Then he himself admits that they were never in a position to fight alone. But they guaranteed the Baltic states; they guaranteed the Balkans. They went on around: Every state in the world, they declared, needs a guarantee. Great Britain will put her whole strength behind them and will protect them. Today this same arch-liar says: "But we were really never in a position to carry on the war alone. Therefore they cooked up a coalition against us of world-wide extent. The methods have likewise remained the same. Promises to all those of little faith, the credulous, or stupid, who wanted to trust these promises, moreover, the attempt to allow their own interests to be represented with as much other blood as possible. This truth is connected with the second British method, that is, with the method of division. In that time that the British Empire had its origin, Germany tore herself apart. There were at that time modes of thought that we no longer understand, modes of thought of a religious kind, that unfortunately were fought out only with the sword, modes of thought that became horrible among the people, that seem insufficient to us in their inner being. Only these grievous internal struggles, that cost the German people endless blood, gave England the opportunity in this same period, to raise up a world claim, that never belonged to her either in number or in significance. Then I must always point out that it is not true that we Germans are like upstarts, but if one wants to talk about upstarts, then it is unconditionally the English and not ourselves! We have an older history, and in a time when Europe had a powerful German Empire, England was a quite insignificant, small, green island. In the last World War the possibilities of this splitting up lay in another sphere. Afterwards the religious problems did not provoke any more bloodshed, especially since the priests themselves would not have been ready any more to sacrifice their lives for these causes. We lived through it then. The parties of the right and the parties of the left, which further broke up in a dozen bourgeois aspects, in a half dozen proletarian aspects, and ever split up some more, and having begun with these parties, from the bourgeoisie of the bourgeois center up to the KPD Communist Party of Germany , succeeded this refers back to the parties of the right and left in undermining and breaking down the German people slowly from within. In spite of that, the course of the war was a glorious one. The years 1914-1918-they proved it: in which not even the opponents triumphed. A low, common revolt was plotted by Marxian-demoralizing-Liberal-Capitalistic subjects-behind all of it as a driving force was the eternal Jew. They brought Germany to its collapse at that time. Only the cowardice of the then rulers, their indecision, their halfway measures, their own uncertainty brought it on. And so the First World War could not alone be lost by the merit of our opponents, but exclusively by our own fault. The consequences of this collapse in November were not that world democracy stretched out open arms to Germany, were not the concern of others to free the German people from its burdens and to lift the German people to a higher standard of culture. For that they could have no concern at all, for they themselves had a much lower one. But the consequence was just their collapse, the most frightful one, politically and economically, that a people has ever experienced. At that time there came to us a man who has done the German people immeasurable harm, Woodrow Wilson, the man who lied with a straight face. If Germany would lay down her arms, then she would get a compassionate, an understanding peace! Then she would not lose her colonies! But the colonial problems were fixed up, all right! The man lyingly promised us that there would be a general disarmament, that we would then be accepted on equal terms among nations, peoples, etc. He lyingly promised us that then secret diplomacy would be done away with, and that we too would then enter into a new age of peace, of equality, of reason, etc.! Screams the last sentence. He was his right hand. Our German folk believed this man then. They had no idea that they were dealing here with an American President, that is, with a man who has no regard for truths; who, for example, can calmly say before an election: "I shall vote against war," and after the election can say: "I vote for war. So there came the hour then the German people got its disappointment at the moment when the German subordinate emissaries entered the car in the Compiegne forest, now known to us for the second time. And there right away came the rude question: "What are you gentlemen doing here? They said: "He who says that the intention is to take from Germany her... They said beforehand: "He who says that we want to take away part of the German people is inciting the people! They had broken all their promises! In a few months the German people sank into a state of unimaginably deep despair and despondency-starving people without hope any longer. A people that did not get its war-prisoners back, even after the armistice and peace-treaty had been signed! A people that was not given food, even after it was defenseless! A people that was now repeatedly coerced,-if one carefully studies those times-from whom re-subjection was again and again demanded, extorted by some new repression. When one reflects upon this even today, one falls even now into a state of burning hatred and rancor against a world in which anything like this is possible. Well, it was at that time, my racial comrades, when everything was broken up, when the upper leadership had faithlessly fled abroad, when others were surrendering, when the Wehrmacht had to give up its weapons, when the people disarmed themselves voluntarily,-it was at that time, when the agitation? It was such a mad determination in the eyes of those others, that my closest friends did not understand me. I found the strength for this determination only from my knowledge of the people. If, at that time, I had only known the upper ten thousand, believe me, my German people-I would not stand before you today, I would never have found courage for this thought which is capable of revolutionizing a people. I knew at that time first and all the people itself; I knew... I could not abandon that, for it would have been to betray my own comrades, who were just as badly... I have come to know the great mass of the German people, ladies and gentlemen, from living with them. And these masses have not only upheld my belief in the people, but have restored it, and constantly strengthened it through all the years since then, in the face of contrary circumstances, or when any misfortune seemed to threaten the realization of my plans. It was clear to me that this whole development, just as in the last 20 years or 30 years before the war, could lead only to collapse. But I had already formed the resolve to declare war on this whole development. That is not merely to declare: "I will get a German Wehrmacht, I will get an army or an air-force"; it was clear to me that the inner structure of the social order must be altered, so that in the dead body of our people the blood would flow again, and that society should hold firmly... I have always looked upon this undertaking as possible, as within the power of the country. But I was of the conviction that strength could only be given to a body in which the sight and the essence of the new condition was already incorporated. Therefore, I was resolved to build up a small movement, beginning with those people who should already have within themselves that which appeared later as really essential to the whole of society. And this was perhaps not so hard as I thought, inasmuch as I was already on guard against the danger of unworthy place-seekers or selfish persons joining my ranks. For whoever joined this movement in those years from 1919-23 had to be a boundless idealist. Any other kind of man would only say: "He is an utter fool. The man is mad. And I can say that of all my followers, all of them who at that time and later supported me: they had nothing to win, and everything to lose. And how much have they all lost for my sake. I have now begun this battle, first against stupidity, stupidity and inertia, under the so-called higher strata; I have begun it against the cowardice which spreads caste far and wide, the cowardice which always pretended to be cleverness and came around and said: "We must submit; we must be patient"; or, as Herr Erzberger said, "We must sign everything, we must sign everything they put before us; then they will forgive us; then it will be all right again. Often we have experienced... And we were not quiet. I then formed the program: "The German language belongs to the German. And I had at that time to fight on further against selfish? The man of the Left said to me: "You are going against my interests" or "You are going against my interests. My interests are class interests. And these class interests oblige me to slay the other fellow. We have the interests of station, we too have our interests,... Do not come in here! And above the interests which seemed to be found in station or in class, stood sic the interests which lie in the folk, in that community which cannot be torn apart, all this appears today to be so obvious a thing to get all these... One group did not want to accept this idea,... We want our old filth... Eventually you will even demand of me that I should add one... To me also it is obvious, we want...

Полный текст обращения Гитлера к немецкому народу 22 июня 1941 года

I should like to add here that, at all this has now been accomplished, the so-called period of surprises has come to an end. As a State which is now on an equal juridical footing with all the other States, Germany is more conscious than ever that she has a European task before here, which is to collaborate loyally in getting rid of those problems that are the cause of anxiety to ourselves and also to the other nations. If I may state my views on those general questions that are of actual importance today, the most effective way of doing so will be to refer to the statements that were recently made by Mr. Eden in the British House of Commons. At this point I should like to express my sincere thanks for the opportunity which has been given me by the outspoken and noteworthy declarations made by the British Foreign Secretary. I think I have read those statements carefully and have understood them correctly. Of course, I do not want to get lost among the details, and so I should like to single out the leading points in Mr. In doing this, I shall first try to correct what seems to me to be a most regrettable error. This error lay in assuming that somehow or other Germany wishes to isolate herself and to allow the events which happen in the rest of the world to pass by without participating in them, or that she does not wish to take any account whatsoever of the general necessities of the time. What are the grounds for the assumption that Germany wants to pursue a policy of isolation?

If this a such an attitude, then the most than [sic] can be said is that it has been forced to do so under the coercion of a foreign will imposed upon it. Now, in the first place, I should like to assure Mr. Eden that we Germans do not in the least want to be isolated and that we do not at all feel ourselves isolated. During recent years Germany has entered into quite a number of political agreements with other States. She has resumed former agreements and improved them. And I may say that she has established close friendly relations with a number of States. Our relations with most of the European States are normal from our standpoint and we are on terms of close friendship with quite a number. Among all those diplomatic connections I would give a special place in the foreground to those excellent relations which we have with those States that were liberated from sufferings similar to those we had to endure and have consequently arrived at similar decisions. Through a number of treaties which we have made, we have relieved many strained relations and thereby made a substantial contribution towards an improvement in European conditions.

I need remind you only of our agreement with Poland, which has turned out advantageous for both countries, our agreement with Austria and the excellent and close relations which we have established with Italy. Finally, I may mention our cordial relations with a whole series of nations outside of Europe. The agreement which Germany has made with Japan for combating the movement directed by the Comintern is a vital proof of how little the German Government thinks of isolating itself and how little we feel ourselves actually isolated. Furthermore, I have on several ocassions [sic] declared that it is our wish and hope to arrive at good cordial relations with all our neighbors. Germany has steadily given its assurance, and I solemnly repeat this assurance here, that between ourselves and France, for example, there are no grounds for quarrel that are humanly thinkable. Furthermore, the German Government has assured Belgium and Holland that it is ready to recognize and guarantee these States as neutral regions in perpetuity. In view of the declarations which we have made in the past and in view of the existing state of affairs, I cannot quite clearly see why Germany should consider herself isolated or why we should pursue a policy of isolation. From the economic standpoint there are no grounds for asserting that Germany is withdrawing from international cooperation. The contrary is the truth.

On looking over the speeches which several statesmen have made within the last few months, I find that they might easily give rise to the impression that the whole world is waiting to shower economic favors on Germany but that we, who are represented as obstinately clinging to a policy of isolation, do not wish to partake of those favors To place this whole matter in its true light, I should like to call attention to the following bare facts: — 1 For many years the German people have been trying to make better commercial treaties with their neighbors. And these efforts have not been in vain; for, as a matter of fact, German foreign trade has increased since 1932, both in volume and in value. This is the clearest refutation of the assertion that Germany is pursuing a policy of economic isolation. Credit manipulation may perhaps have a temporary effect, but in the long run economic international relations will be decisively influenced by the volume of mutual exchange of goods. And here the state of affairs at the present moment is not such that the outside world would be able to place huge orders with us or offer prospects of an increase in the exchange of goods even if we were to fulfil the most extraordinary conditions that they might lay down. Matters should not be made more complicated than they already are. But Germany cannot be blamed for these two things, and especially not National Socialist Germany. When we assumed power the world economic crisis was worse than it is today. I fear however that I must interpret Mr.

Therefore I wish it to be clearly understood that our decision to carry out this plan is unalterable. The reasons which led to that decision were inexorable. And since then I have not been able to discover anything whatsoever that might induce us to discontinue the four years plan. I shall take only one practical example: In carrying out the four years plan our synthetic production of rubber and petrol will necessitate an annual increase in our consumption of coal by a margin of something between 20 and 30 million tons. This means that an extra quota of thousands of coal miners are assured of employment for the rest of their active lives. I must really take the liberty of asking this question: Supposing we abondon [sic] the German four years plan, then what statesman can guarantee me some economic equivalent or other, outside of the Reich, for these thirty million tons of coal? I want bread and work for my people. And certainly I do not wish to have it through the operation of credit guarantees, but through solid and permanent lab our, the products of which I can either exchange for foreign goods or for domestic goods in our internal commercial circulation. If by some manipulation or other Germany were to throw these 20 or 30 million tons of coal annually on the international market for the future, the result would be that the coal exports of other countries would have to decrease.

I do not know if a British statesman, for example, could face such a contingency without realizing how serious it would be for his own nation. And yet that is the state of affairs. Germany has an enormous number of men who not only want to work but also to eat. And the standard of living among our people is high. I cannot build the future of the German nation on the assurances of a foreign statesman or on any international help, but only on the real basis of a steady production, for which I must find a market at home or abroad. Perhaps my skepticism in these matters leads me to differ from the British Foreign Secretary in regard to the optimistic tone of his statements. I mean here that if Europe does not awaken to the danger of the Bolshevic infection, then I fear that international commerce will not increase but decrease, despite all the good intentions of individual statesmen. For this commerce is based not only on the undisturbed and guaranteed stability of production in one individual nation but also on the production of all the nations together. One of the first things which is clear in this matter is that every Bolshevic disturbance must necessarily lead to a more or less permanent destruction of orderly production.

Therefore my opinion about the future of Europe is, I am sorry to say, not so optimistic as Mr. I am the responsible leader of the German people and must safeguard its interests in this world as well as I can. And therefore I am bound to judge things objectively as I see them. I should not be acquitted before the bar of our history if I neglected something—no matter on what grounds—which is necessary to maintain the existence of this people. I am pleased, and we are all pleased, at every increase that takes place in our foreign trade. But in view of the obscure political situation I shall not neglect anything that is necessary to guarantee the existence of the German people, although other nations may become the victims of the Bolshevic infection. And I must also repudiate the suggestion that this view is the outcome of mere fancy. For the following is certainly true: The British Foreign Secretary opens out theoretical prospects of existence to us, whereas in reality what is happening is totally different. The revolutionizing of Spain, for instance, has driven out 15.

Should this revolutionizing of Spain spread to other European countries then these damages would not be lessened but increased. I also am a responsible statesman and I must take such possibilities into account. Therefore it is my unalterable determination so to organize German lab our that it will guarantee the maintenance of my people. Eden may rest assured that we shall utilize every possibility offered us of strengthening our economic relations with other nations, but also that we shall avail ourselves of every possibility to improve and enrich the circulation of our own internal trade. I must ask also whether the grounds for assuming that Germany is pursuing a policy of isolation are to be found in the fact that we have left he League of Nations. If such be the grounds, then I would point out that the Geneva League has never been a real League of peoples. A number of great nations do not belong to it or have left it. And nobody has on this account asserted that they were following a policy of isolation. I think therefore that on this point Mr.

Eden misunderstands our intentions and views. For nothing is farther from our wishes than to break off or weaken our political or economic relations with other nations. I have already tried to contribute towards bringing about a good understanding in Europe and I have often given, especially to the British people and their Government, assurance of how ardently we wish for a sincere and cordial cooperation with them. I admit that on one point there is a wide difference between the views of the British Foreign Secretary and our views; and here it seems to me that this is a gap which cannot be filled up. Eden declares that under no circumstances does the British Government wish to see Europe torn into two halves. Unfortunately, this desire for unity has not hitherto been declared or listened to. And now the desire is an illusion. For the fact is that the division into two halves, not only of Europe but also of the whole world, is an accomplished fact. It is to be regretted that the British Government did not adopt its present attitude at an earlier date, that under all circumstances a division of Europe must be avoided; for then the Treaty of Versailles would not have been entered into.

This Treaty brought in the first division of Europe, namely a division of the nations into victors on the one side and vanquished on the other, the latter nations being outlawed. Through this division of Europe nobody suffered more than the German people. That this division was wiped out, so far as concerns Germany, is essentially due to the National Socialist Revolution and this brings some credit to myself. The second division has been brought about by the proclamation of the Bolshevic doctrine, an integral feature of which is that they do not confine it to one nation but try to impose it on all the nations. Here it is not a question of a special form of national life in Russia but of the Bolshevic demand for a world revolution. If Mr. Eden does not look at Bolshevism as we look at it, that may have something to do with the position of Great Britain and also with some happenings that are unknown to us. But I believe that nobody will question the sincerity of our opinions on this matter, for they are not based merely on abstract theory. For Mr.

Eden Bolshevism is perhaps a thing which has its seat in Moscow, but for us in Germany this Bolshevism is a pestilence against which we have had to struggle at the cost of much bloodshed. It is a pestilence which tried to turn our country into the same kind of desert as is now the case in Spain; for the habit of murdering hostages began here, in the form in which we now see it in Spain. National Socialism did not try to come to grips with Bolshevism in Russia, but the Jewish international Bolshevics in Moscow have tried to introduce their system into Germany and are still trying to do so. Against this attempt we have waged a bitter struggle, not only in defence of our own civilization but in defence of European civilization as a whole. In January and February of the year 1933, when the last decisive struggle against this barbarism was being fought out in Germany, had Germany been defeated in that struggle and had the Bolshevic field of destruction and death extended over Central Europe, then perhaps a different opinion would have arisen on the banks of the Thames as to the nature of this terrible menace to humanity. For since it is said that England must be defended on the frontier of the Rhine she would then have found herself in close contact with that harmless democratic world of Moscow, whose innocence they are always trying to impress upon us. Here I should like to state the following once again: — The teaching of Bolshevism is that there must be a world revolution, which would mean world-destruction. If such a doctrine were accepted and given equal rights with other teachings in Europe, this would mean that Europe would be delivered over to it. As far as Germany itself is concerned, let there be no doubts on the following points: — 1 We look on Bolshevism as a world peril for which there must be no toleration.

It is in accordance with this attitude of ours that we should avoid close contact with the carriers of these poisonous bacilli. And that is also the reason why we do not want to have any closer relations with them beyond the necessary political and commercial relations; for if we went beyond these we might thereby run the risk of closing the eyes of our people to the danger itself. I consider Bolshevism the most malignant poison that can be given to a people. And therefore I do not want my own people to come into contact with this teaching. As a citizen of this nation I myself shall not do what I should have to condemn my fellow-citizens for doing. I demand from every German workman that he shall not have any relations with these international mischief-makers and he shall never see me clinking glasses or rubbing shoulders with them. Moreover, any further treaty connections with the present Bolshevic Russia would be completely worthless for us. It is out of the question to think that National Socialist Germany should ever be bound to protect Bolshevism or that we, on our side, should ever agree to accept the assistance of a Bolshevic State. For I fear that the moment any nation should agree to accept such assistance, it would thereby seal its own doom.

I must also say here that I do not accept the opinion which holds that in the moment of peril the League of nations could come to the rescue of the member States and hold them up by the arms, as it were. Eden stated in his last address that deeds and not speeches are what matters. On that point I should like to call attention to the fact that up to now the outstanding feature of the League of Nations has been talk rather than action. There was one exception and in that case it would probably have been better to have been content with talk. In this one case, as might have been foreseen, action was fruitless. Hence, just as I have been forced by economic circumstances to depend on our own resources principally for the maintenance of my people, so also I have been forced in the political sphere. And we ourselves are not to blame for that. Three times I have made concrete offers for armament restriction or at least armament limitation. These offers were rejected.

In this connection I may recall the fact that the greatest offer which I then made was that Germany and France together should reduce their standing armies to 300,000 men; that Germany, Great Britain and France, should bring down their air force to parity and that Germany and Great Britain should conclude a naval agreement. Only the last offer was accepted and it was the only contribution in the world to a real limitation of armaments. The other German proposals were either flatly refused or were answered by the conclusion of those alliances which gave Central Europe to Soviet Russia as the field of play for its gigantic forces. Eden speaks of German armaments and expects a limitation of these armaments. We ourselves proposed this limitation long ago. But it had no effect because, instead of accepting our proposal, treaties were made whereby the greatest military power in the world was, according to the terms of the treaties and in fact, introduced into Central Europe. In speaking of armaments it would be well to mention in the first instance the armaments possessed by that Power which sets the standard for the armaments of all others. Eden believes that in the future all States should possess only the armament which is necessary for their de fence. I do not know whether and how far Mr.

Eden has sounded Moscow on the question of carrying that excellent idea into effect, and I do not know what assurances they have given from that quarter. I think however that I ought to put forward one point in this connection. Each nation has the right to judge this for itself, and it alone has the right. If therefore Great Britain today decides for herself on the extent of her armaments everybody in Germany will understand her action; for we can only think of London alone as being competent to decide on what is necessary for the protection of the British Empire. On the other hand I should like to insist that the estimate of our protective needs, and thus of the armament that is necessary for the de fence of our people, is within our own competency and can be decided only in Berlin. I believe that the general recognition of these principles will not render conditions more difficult but will help to release tension. Anyhow Germany is pleased at having found friends in Italy and Japan who hold the same views as ourselves and we should be still more pleased if these convictions were widespread in Europe. Therefore nobody welcomed more cordially than we did the manifest lessening of tension in the Mediterranean, brought about by the Anglo-Italian agreement. We believe that this will first of all lead to an understanding which may put a stop to, or at least limit, the catastrophe from which poor Spain is suffering.

Тем не менее, количество самолётов было таким, что Герингу в 1939 году и не снилось. Была наимощнейшая артиллерии, до которой Вермахту расти и расти. Были проблемы с танками, которые немцы только начали разрабатывать. Но уже даже цифры первых заказов говорят много.

Тот, у кого есть «Зачем» жить, вынесет любое «Как». То, что делается из любви, всегда находится по ту сторону добра и зла. Фридрих Ницше Dem wird befohlen, der sich nicht selber gehorchen kann. Приказывают тому, кто сам себе не умеет повиноваться. Надежда — это радуга над падающим вниз ручейком жизни. Фридрих Ницше Weltkind немец. Без музыки жизнь была бы глупостью. Иметь фантазию — не значит что-то выдумывать; это значит, делать что-то новое из вещей. Религия — это благоговение — в первую очередь перед тайной, которую представляет собой человек. Пауль Томас Манн Wenn man jemandem alles verziehen hat, ist man mit ihm fertig. Если ты простил человеку все, значит с ним покончено. В тот момент, когда человек сомневается в смысле и ценности жизни, он болен. Зигмунд Фрейд Wir streben mehr danach, Schmerz zu vermeiden als Freude zu gewinnen. Мы больше стремимся к тому, чтобы избегать боли, нежели к тому, чтобы ощущать радость. Мужчину легко узнать, женщина же не выдает своей тайны. Прекрасно то, что нравится, даже не вызывая интереса. Иммануил Кант Habe Mut, dich deines eigenen Verstandes zu bedienen. Имей мужество использовать свой собственный разум. Нужно думать, как единицы, и говорить, как большинство. Постоянны только изменения. Die Freunde nennen sich aufrichtig.

Выступление Гитлера на немецком. Речь Гитлера текст. Выступление Гитлера с переводом. Красивые немецкие слова. Самые красивые немецкие слова. Смешные слрв ана немецком. Звучные немецкие слова. Вводные слова в немецком языке. Вводные слова на немецком. Немецкий язык слова. Фразы на немецком языке. Гитлеровские речи на немецком. Адольф Гитлер 1941. Адольф Гитлер на трибуне 1941. Германия Адольф Гитлер. Адольф Гитлер 1 сентября 1939 года. Газета речь 1917. Газета речь. Немецкие оккупационные газеты. Оккупационная газета. Йозеф Геббельс тотальная война. Геббельс 1943. Геббельс 1943 тотальная война. Goebbels Speech 1943. Фразы Гитлера на немецком. Немецкие слова в русском языке. Неменцкие слова га руском. Слова пришедшие в русский с немецкого. Слова пришедшие из немецкого языка. Выступление перед нацистами. Выступление перед немцами. Аншлюс фокус. Памятка немецкого солдата. Памятка немецкого солдата 1941. Памятка советскому солдату в Германии. Памятка солдата вермахта. Немецкие газеты 1941 года. Нацистские газеты на русском. Немецкие фразы второй мировой. Немецкие фразы во время войны. Памятка советского солдата ВОВ. Фразы немцев во вторую мировую. Адольф Гитлер оратор. Адольф Гитлер на трибуне. Адольф Гитлер выступление перед народом. Адольф Гитлер выступает на трибуне. Рейхстаг 1941 Гитлер. Адольф Гитлер Speech. Берлин в 1941 Гитлер. Трибуны Рейхстага Гитлер. Адольф Гитлер югенд. Альфред Чех Гитлерюгенд. Гитлер юнген СС. Гитлер награждает Гитлерюгенд 1945. Адольф Гитлер в Рейхстаге. Адольф Гитлер зигует в Рейхстаге. Йозеф Геббельс толпа.

служба утерянных цитат - 9

Hofbrauhaus interior where Hitler spoke National Socialist German Workers Party Public meeting in the Great Hall of the Hofbräuhaus Friday 15 August 1920 Adolf Hitler ~~Why We Are Antisemites~~ Translation from German by Hasso Castrup (Copenhagen, Denmark), January, 2013, exclusively for. исторические очерки, документы, материалы» (М., Изд. Главная» Новости» Выступление гитлера на немецком кричит. Известные цитаты Гитлера (100 цитат).

Знаменитый фрагмент из фильма “Der Untergang” (рус. “Бункер”) — Речь Гитлера в бункере

Вот, что говорил Адольф Гитлер. Цитаты и афоризмы Гитлера были представлены выше. Цитаты, приведенные ниже, собрал Вернер Мазер, автор самой полной и авторитетной биографии Гитлера. September 1, 1939, justifying the German invasion of Poland. Short video clip excerpt. Миллион Цитат. Гитлера нужно слушать, а не читать, на Гитлера надо смотреть, а не искать логику в его речах. Главная» Новости» Выступление гитлера на немецком кричит.

Login with your account

• Знаменитый фрагмент из фильма “Der Untergang” (рус. “Бункер”) — Речь Гитлера в бункере
• Полный текст обращения Гитлера к немецкому народу 22 июня 1941 года: d_34 — LiveJournal
• Adolf Hitler Speech Compilation w/ English Subtitles | Uncensor History - YouTube
• Выдержки из стенографической записи высказываний Гитлера
• Полный текст заявления Гитлера от 22 июня 1941 года
• Politisches Testament 1945

Adolf Hitler - Речи | Текст песни

Личный архитектор Гитлера Альберт Шпеер вспоминал, как Гитлеру донесли новость о побеге. Речь Гитлера в бункере перед генералами. Оригинальные немецкие субтитры без изменений, как говорят в фильме, и дословный перевод субтитров на русский язык. The quote in a viral meme with the Nazi leader's picture read: "We tolerate no one in our ranks who attacks the ideas of Christianity. Our movement is Christian.". Hofbrauhaus interior where Hitler spoke National Socialist German Workers Party Public meeting in the Great Hall of the Hofbräuhaus Friday 15 August 1920 Adolf Hitler ~~Why We Are Antisemites~~ Translation from German by Hasso Castrup (Copenhagen, Denmark), January, 2013, exclusively for. (русский текст внизу) Russland hat eine Rede Adolf Hitlers freigegeben, nota bene mit russischen Untertiteln versehen. Die Botschaft an die Machthaber weltweit und an die "Elite" in Amerika kann deutlicher nicht sein: Was AH damals sagte, es trifft exakt auf heute zu. Es mag traurig sein, es ist wahr. Речь Гитлера на немецком текст.

Похожие новости: