Et l'activité mentale, Filosofia, Kant (Emmanuel). Etudes.
Advance: концепция Макрона о воинственной и сильной Европе ошибочна
Retrouvez toute l’actualité de Emmanuel Kant. Suivez nos dernières informations, reportages, décryptages et analyses sur Le Point. Источник: РИА "Новости". В Калининграде мероприятия в честь юбилея Иммануила Канта. Один из самых известных горожан родился 300 лет назад 22 апреля.
Лауреат Каннского кинофестиваля, французский режиссёр Лоран Канте умер в 63 года
President Emmanuel Macron, during a speech on Europe, in the amphitheater of the Sorbonne University, Paris, April 25, 2024. Kant jettisoned traditional theistic proofs for God as utilized by natural theology, but sought to ground ethics, in part, in his concepts of categorical imperatives or universal maxims to guide morality. Though Kant is as undeniably German as the Nord Stream pipeline, Putin (and anyone else anywhere) has a right to quote him morning, noon and. Иммануил Кант – немецкий философ, основал немецкую классическую философию, жил в эпоху Просвещения и романтизма. О сервисе Прессе Авторские права Связаться с нами Авторам Рекламодателям Разработчикам. Последние дни Иммануила Канта: Directed by Philippe Collin.
Кант Иммануил
The False Subtlety of the Four Syllogistic Figures 1762 rehearses criticisms of Aristotelian logic that were developed by other German philosophers. The book attracted several positive and some negative reviews. In Negative Magnitudes Kant also argues that the morality of an action is a function of the internal forces that motivate one to act, rather than of the external physical actions or their consequences. Finally, Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and the Sublime 1764 deals mainly with alleged differences in the tastes of men and women and of people from different cultures.
After it was published, Kant filled his own interleaved copy of this book with often unrelated handwritten remarks, many of which reflect the deep influence of Rousseau on his thinking about moral philosophy in the mid-1760s. These works helped to secure Kant a broader reputation in Germany, but for the most part they were not strikingly original. While some of his early works tend to emphasize rationalist ideas, others have a more empiricist emphasis.
During this time Kant was striving to work out an independent position, but before the 1770s his views remained fluid. In 1766 Kant published his first work concerned with the possibility of metaphysics, which later became a central topic of his mature philosophy. In 1770, at the age of forty-six, Kant was appointed to the chair in logic and metaphysics at the Albertina, after teaching for fifteen years as an unsalaried lecturer and working since 1766 as a sublibrarian to supplement his income.
Kant was turned down for the same position in 1758. In order to inaugurate his new position, Kant also wrote one more Latin dissertation: Concerning the Form and Principles of the Sensible and Intelligible World 1770 , which is known as the Inaugural Dissertation. Inspired by Crusius and the Swiss natural philosopher Johann Heinrich Lambert 1728—1777 , Kant distinguishes between two fundamental powers of cognition, sensibility and understanding intelligence , where the Leibniz-Wolffians regarded understanding intellect as the only fundamental power.
Moreover, as the title of the Inaugural Dissertation indicates, Kant argues that sensibility and understanding are directed at two different worlds: sensibility gives us access to the sensible world, while understanding enables us to grasp a distinct intelligible world. The Inaugural Dissertation thus develops a form of Platonism; and it rejects the view of British sentimentalists that moral judgments are based on feelings of pleasure or pain, since Kant now holds that moral judgments are based on pure understanding alone. After 1770 Kant never surrendered the views that sensibility and understanding are distinct powers of cognition, that space and time are subjective forms of human sensibility, and that moral judgments are based on pure understanding or reason alone.
But his embrace of Platonism in the Inaugural Dissertation was short-lived. He soon denied that our understanding is capable of insight into an intelligible world, which cleared the path toward his mature position in the Critique of Pure Reason 1781 , according to which the understanding like sensibility supplies forms that structure our experience of the sensible world, to which human knowledge is limited, while the intelligible or noumenal world is strictly unknowable to us. Kant spent a decade working on the Critique of Pure Reason and published nothing else of significance between 1770 and 1781.
Kant also published a number of important essays in this period, including Idea for a Universal History With a Cosmopolitan Aim 1784 and Conjectural Beginning of Human History 1786 , his main contributions to the philosophy of history; An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment? Jacobi 1743—1819 accused the recently deceased G. Lessing 1729—1781 of Spinozism.
With these works Kant secured international fame and came to dominate German philosophy in the late 1780s. But in 1790 he announced that the Critique of the Power of Judgment brought his critical enterprise to an end 5:170. By then K.
In 1794 his chair at Jena passed to J. Kant retired from teaching in 1796. For nearly two decades he had lived a highly disciplined life focused primarily on completing his philosophical system, which began to take definite shape in his mind only in middle age.
After retiring he came to believe that there was a gap in this system separating the metaphysical foundations of natural science from physics itself, and he set out to close this gap in a series of notes that postulate the existence of an ether or caloric matter. Kant died February 12, 1804, just short of his eightieth birthday. See also Bxiv; and 4:255—257.
Thus metaphysics for Kant concerns a priori knowledge, or knowledge whose justification does not depend on experience; and he associates a priori knowledge with reason. The project of the Critique is to examine whether, how, and to what extent human reason is capable of a priori knowledge. The Enlightenment was a reaction to the rise and successes of modern science in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.
The spectacular achievements of Newton in particular engendered widespread confidence and optimism about the power of human reason to control nature and to improve human life. One effect of this new confidence in reason was that traditional authorities were increasingly questioned. Why should we need political or religious authorities to tell us how to live or what to believe, if each of us has the capacity to figure these things out for ourselves?
Kant expresses this Enlightenment commitment to the sovereignty of reason in the Critique: Our age is the age of criticism, to which everything must submit. Religion through its holiness and legislation through its majesty commonly seek to exempt themselves from it. But in this way they excite a just suspicion against themselves, and cannot lay claim to that unfeigned respect that reason grants only to that which has been able to withstand its free and public examination.
Axi Enlightenment is about thinking for oneself rather than letting others think for you, according to What is Enlightenment? In this essay, Kant also expresses the Enlightenment faith in the inevitability of progress. A few independent thinkers will gradually inspire a broader cultural movement, which ultimately will lead to greater freedom of action and governmental reform.
The problem is that to some it seemed unclear whether progress would in fact ensue if reason enjoyed full sovereignty over traditional authorities; or whether unaided reasoning would instead lead straight to materialism, fatalism, atheism, skepticism Bxxxiv , or even libertinism and authoritarianism 8:146. The Enlightenment commitment to the sovereignty of reason was tied to the expectation that it would not lead to any of these consequences but instead would support certain key beliefs that tradition had always sanctioned. Crucially, these included belief in God, the soul, freedom, and the compatibility of science with morality and religion.
Although a few intellectuals rejected some or all of these beliefs, the general spirit of the Enlightenment was not so radical. The Enlightenment was about replacing traditional authorities with the authority of individual human reason, but it was not about overturning traditional moral and religious beliefs. Yet the original inspiration for the Enlightenment was the new physics, which was mechanistic.
If nature is entirely governed by mechanistic, causal laws, then it may seem that there is no room for freedom, a soul, or anything but matter in motion. This threatened the traditional view that morality requires freedom. We must be free in order to choose what is right over what is wrong, because otherwise we cannot be held responsible.
It also threatened the traditional religious belief in a soul that can survive death or be resurrected in an afterlife. So modern science, the pride of the Enlightenment, the source of its optimism about the powers of human reason, threatened to undermine traditional moral and religious beliefs that free rational thought was expected to support. This was the main intellectual crisis of the Enlightenment.
In other words, free rational inquiry adequately supports all of these essential human interests and shows them to be mutually consistent. So reason deserves the sovereignty attributed to it by the Enlightenment. The Inaugural Dissertation also tries to reconcile Newtonian science with traditional morality and religion in a way, but its strategy is different from that of the Critique.
According to the Inaugural Dissertation, Newtonian science is true of the sensible world, to which sensibility gives us access; and the understanding grasps principles of divine and moral perfection in a distinct intelligible world, which are paradigms for measuring everything in the sensible world. So on this view our knowledge of the intelligible world is a priori because it does not depend on sensibility, and this a priori knowledge furnishes principles for judging the sensible world because in some way the sensible world itself conforms to or imitates the intelligible world. Soon after writing the Inaugural Dissertation, however, Kant expressed doubts about this view.
As he explained in a February 21, 1772 letter to his friend and former student, Marcus Herz: In my dissertation I was content to explain the nature of intellectual representations in a merely negative way, namely, to state that they were not modifications of the soul brought about by the object. However, I silently passed over the further question of how a representation that refers to an object without being in any way affected by it can be possible…. And if such intellectual representations depend on our inner activity, whence comes the agreement that they are supposed to have with objects — objects that are nevertheless not possibly produced thereby?
The position of the Inaugural Dissertation is that the intelligible world is independent of the human understanding and of the sensible world, both of which in different ways conform to the intelligible world. But, leaving aside questions about what it means for the sensible world to conform to an intelligible world, how is it possible for the human understanding to conform to or grasp an intelligible world? If the intelligible world is independent of our understanding, then it seems that we could grasp it only if we are passively affected by it in some way.
So the only way we could grasp an intelligible world that is independent of us is through sensibility, which means that our knowledge of it could not be a priori. The pure understanding alone could at best enable us to form representations of an intelligible world. Such a priori intellectual representations could well be figments of the brain that do not correspond to anything independent of the human mind.
In any case, it is completely mysterious how there might come to be a correspondence between purely intellectual representations and an independent intelligible world. But the Critique gives a far more modest and yet revolutionary account of a priori knowledge. This turned out to be a dead end, and Kant never again maintained that we can have a priori knowledge about an intelligible world precisely because such a world would be entirely independent of us.
The sensible world, or the world of appearances, is constructed by the human mind from a combination of sensory matter that we receive passively and a priori forms that are supplied by our cognitive faculties. We can have a priori knowledge only about aspects of the sensible world that reflect the a priori forms supplied by our cognitive faculties. So according to the Critique, a priori knowledge is possible only if and to the extent that the sensible world itself depends on the way the human mind structures its experience.
Kant characterizes this new constructivist view of experience in the Critique through an analogy with the revolution wrought by Copernicus in astronomy: Up to now it has been assumed that all our cognition must conform to the objects; but all attempts to find out something about them a priori through concepts that would extend our cognition have, on this presupposition, come to nothing. Hence let us once try whether we do not get farther with the problems of metaphysics by assuming that the objects must conform to our cognition, which would agree better with the requested possibility of an a priori cognition of them, which is to establish something about objects before they are given to us. This would be just like the first thoughts of Copernicus, who, when he did not make good progress in the explanation of the celestial motions if he assumed that the entire celestial host revolves around the observer, tried to see if he might not have greater success if he made the observer revolve and left the stars at rest.
Now in metaphysics we can try in a similar way regarding the intuition of objects. If intuition has to conform to the constitution of the objects, then I do not see how we can know anything of them a priori; but if the object as an object of the senses conforms to the constitution of our faculty of intuition, then I can very well represent this possibility to myself. Yet because I cannot stop with these intuitions, if they are to become cognitions, but must refer them as representations to something as their object and determine this object through them, I can assume either that the concepts through which I bring about this determination also conform to the objects, and then I am once again in the same difficulty about how I could know anything about them a priori, or else I assume that the objects, or what is the same thing, the experience in which alone they can be cognized as given objects conforms to those concepts, in which case I immediately see an easier way out of the difficulty, since experience itself is a kind of cognition requiring the understanding, whose rule I have to presuppose in myself before any object is given to me, hence a priori, which rule is expressed in concepts a priori, to which all objects of experience must therefore necessarily conform, and with which they must agree.
Bxvi—xviii As this passage suggests, what Kant has changed in the Critique is primarily his view about the role and powers of the understanding, since he already held in the Inaugural Dissertation that sensibility contributes the forms of space and time — which he calls pure or a priori intuitions 2:397 — to our cognition of the sensible world. But the Critique claims that pure understanding too, rather than giving us insight into an intelligible world, is limited to providing forms — which he calls pure or a priori concepts — that structure our cognition of the sensible world. So now both sensibility and understanding work together to construct cognition of the sensible world, which therefore conforms to the a priori forms that are supplied by our cognitive faculties: the a priori intuitions of sensibility and the a priori concepts of the understanding.
This account is analogous to the heliocentric revolution of Copernicus in astronomy because both require contributions from the observer to be factored into explanations of phenomena, although neither reduces phenomena to the contributions of observers alone. For Kant, analogously, the phenomena of human experience depend on both the sensory data that we receive passively through sensibility and the way our mind actively processes this data according to its own a priori rules. These rules supply the general framework in which the sensible world and all the objects or phenomena in it appear to us.
So the sensible world and its phenomena are not entirely independent of the human mind, which contributes its basic structure. First, it gives Kant a new and ingenious way of placing modern science on an a priori foundation. In other words, the sensible world necessarily conforms to certain fundamental laws — such as that every event has a cause — because the human mind constructs it according to those laws.
Moreover, we can identify those laws by reflecting on the conditions of possible experience, which reveals that it would be impossible for us to experience a world in which, for example, any given event fails to have a cause. From this Kant concludes that metaphysics is indeed possible in the sense that we can have a priori knowledge that the entire sensible world — not just our actual experience, but any possible human experience — necessarily conforms to certain laws. Kant calls this immanent metaphysics or the metaphysics of experience, because it deals with the essential principles that are immanent to human experience.
In the Critique Kant thus rejects the insight into an intelligible world that he defended in the Inaugural Dissertation, and he now claims that rejecting knowledge about things in themselves is necessary for reconciling science with traditional morality and religion. This is because he claims that belief in God, freedom, and immortality have a strictly moral basis, and yet adopting these beliefs on moral grounds would be unjustified if we could know that they were false.
Europe needs less fragmented markets for energy, telecoms and financial services, and must also cut red tape, he added. The French leader hopes his speech will have the same impact as a similar address at the Sorbonne he made seven years ago that prefigured some significant EU policy shifts.
These questions are transcending because their point is not to get an understanding of one definite being from other being; rather, it is an understanding of existence itself that each question seeks at the boundary of existence, from principles that do not belong to existence as objects of cognition. He stops at the boundary. What his transcending in thoughts of possibility clarifies, together with the mode of our existence, is its phenomenality as an expression of our assurance of intrinsic Being.
Случалось так, что ему нечего было обуть, тогда он одалживал ботинки у друзей, и шел на лекции. Спасение молодой человек находил в философии, он считал, что вещи должны подчиняться человеку, а не наоборот. В 16 Кант стал студентом Кенигсбергского университета. Именно там он знакомится с преподавателем Мартином Кнутценом, пиетистом и вольфианцем, который открыл Канту учения Исаака Ньютона , оказавшие на молодого человека колоссальное влияние. Кант учился очень хорошо, несмотря на материальные трудности. Он отдавал предпочтение физике, математике, философии. Теология не стала его любимым предметом, поэтому он посетил всего одно занятие, и то из благодарности к пастору Шульцу. Философия По мнению ученых, биография Канта состоит из двух периодов — докритического и критического. В докритическом периоде начала формироваться философская мысль Канта, он медленно избавлялся от влияния учения Христиана Вольфа, которое в те годы занимало господствующие позиции в Германии. В критическом периоде философ возносит метафизику к наукам, создает новое учение, основанное на активности сознания. Свое первое сочинение под названием «Мысли об истинной оценке живых сил» Кант написал еще в годы учебы в университете. Большое влияние на него оказал преподаватель Кнутцен. Работа попала в печать только в 1749-м, благодаря стараниям и материальной поддержке дядюшки Рихтера. Иммануил не получил университетский диплом. В 1746 году умер отец, забота о материальном благополучии семьи легла на его плечи. Кант находит работу домашнего учителя и на протяжении долгих десяти лет учит детишек из богатых семей. Все свободное время молодой человек посвящал написанию философских трудов, которые впоследствии стали основой его учения. В 1755-м философ возвращается в родной вуз. Его цель — защита диссертации «Об огне» и получение степени магистра. Осенью того же года он представил свою новую работу «Новое освещение первых принципов метафизического познания» и стал доктором наук. Теперь он имеет право преподавать в университете и незамедлительно воспользовался этой возможностью. Он учил студентов логике и метафизике. Самой интересной работой первого периода философской деятельности Канта ученые назвали «Всеобщую естественную историю и теорию неба». В ней изложена история происхождения Вселенной, причем с точки зрения физики, а не теологии. В том же периоде Кант занялся изучением теории пространства с точки зрения физики. Он верил в то, что Высший Разум существует, и именно он положил начало жизни на Земле. Иммануил говорил, что существование материи доказывает существование Бога. Он считал, что за материальными вещами обязательно стоит их Создатель. Именно эта мысль отражена в его труде под названием «Единственно возможное основание для доказательства бытия Бога». Начало критического периода философского творчества Канта пришлось на годы преподавания логики и метафизики в вузе.
Кант Иммануил
Reform of institutions: Emmanuel Macron receives François Hollande at the Élysée. Иммануил Кант с младенчества, просто по праву рождения, был зачислен в гильдию шорников. О сервисе Прессе Авторские права Связаться с нами Авторам Рекламодателям Разработчикам. Иммануил Кант – самый русский из европейских и самый европейский из русских философов. Он родился и всю жизнь работал в Кенигсберге – сегодня это Калининград, несколько лет даже. Cited Names – Emmanuel Kant. Article. Theorizing American Studies: German Interventions into an Ongoing Debate [Full text]. Что любопытно, Эммануэль Макрон говорит об этом сейчас, когда реальна перспектива возвращения к власти в США Дональда Трампа.
«Мы в центре мощнейшей когнитивной войны»: Алиханов объяснил, почему нужна ревизия учения Канта
Macron said Europe also risks falling behind economically in a context where global free-trade rules are being challenged by major competitors, and he said it should aim to become a global leader in artificial intelligence, quantum computing, space, biotechnologies and renewable energy. Europe needs less fragmented markets for energy, telecoms and financial services, and must also cut red tape, he added. The French leader hopes his speech will have the same impact as a similar address at the Sorbonne he made seven years ago that prefigured some significant EU policy shifts.
The second book continues this line of argument in four chapters, each associated with one of the category groupings. In some cases, it adds a connection to the spatial dimension of intuition to the categories it analyzes. Some commentators consider this the most significant section of the Critique. He argues that the unity of time implies that "all change must consist in the alteration of states in an underlying substance, whose existence and quantity must be unchangeable or conserved. That was the end of the chapter in the A edition of the Critique.
The B edition includes one more short section, "The Refutation of Idealism". In this section, by analysis of the concept of self-consciousness, Kant argues that his transcendental idealism is a "critical" or "formal" idealism that does not deny the existence of reality apart from our subjective representations. Against this, Kant reasserts his own insistence upon the necessity of a sensible component in all genuine knowledge. In particular, it is concerned to demonstrate as spurious the efforts of reason to arrive at knowledge independent of sensibility. This endeavor, Kant argues, is doomed to failure, which he claims to demonstrate by showing that reason, unbounded by sense, is always capable of generating opposing or otherwise incompatible conclusions. Like "the light dove, in free flight cutting through the air, the resistance of which it feels", reason "could get the idea that it could do even better in airless space". He presents the speculative excesses of traditional metaphysics as inherent in our very capacity of reason.
Moreover, he argues that its products are not without some carefully qualified regulative value. They are different from the concepts of understanding in that they are not limited by the critical stricture limiting knowledge to the conditions of possible experience and its objects. Kant replaces the first with the positive results of the first part of the Critique. He proposes to replace the following three with his later doctrines of anthropology, the metaphysical foundations of natural science, and the critical postulation of human freedom and morality. He does this by developing contradictions in each of the three metaphysical disciplines that he contends are in fact pseudosciences. In this context, it not possible to do much more than enumerate the topics of discussion. The first chapter addresses what Kant terms the paralogisms—i.
He argues that one cannot take the mere thought of "I" in the proposition "I think" as the proper cognition of "I" as an object. In this way, he claims to debunk various metaphysical theses about the substantiality, unity, and self-identity of the soul. Originally, Kant had thought that all transcendental illusion could be analyzed in antinomic terms. Whereas an idea is a pure concept generated by reason, an ideal is the concept of an idea as an individual thing. In an Appendix to this section, Kant rejects such a conclusion. The ideas of pure reason, he argues, have an important regulatory function in directing and organizing our theoretical and practical inquiry. With regard to morality , Kant argued that the source of the good lies not in anything outside the human subject, either in nature or given by God , but rather is only the good will itself.
A good will is one that acts from duty in accordance with the universal moral law that the autonomous human being freely gives itself. This law obliges one to treat humanity—understood as rational agency, and represented through oneself as well as others—as an end in itself rather than merely as means to other ends the individual might hold. Kant is known for his theory that all moral obligation is grounded in what he calls the " categorical imperative ", which is derived from the concept of duty. He argues that the moral law is a principle of reason itself, not based on contingent facts about the world, such as what would make us happy; to act on the moral law has no other motive than "worthiness to be happy". Kant finds it a source of difficulty that the practical idea of freedom is founded on the transcendental idea of freedom, [132] but for the sake of practical interests uses the practical meaning, taking "no account of... Reason can give us only the "pragmatic laws of free action through the senses", but pure practical laws given by reason a priori dictate "what is to be done".
В беседе с вируальным Кантом надо соблюдать определенный этикет, точнее правила работы с системой. Во-первых , он не терпит фамильярности. В отличие от заполонивших современные гаджеты голосовых ассистенток, никакие «Ок», «Привет» или «Слушай» не привлекут внимание профессора. Активировать образ мыслителя следует, назвав ученое звание и прибавив «Здравствуйте» или «Добрый день». Во-вторых , не стоит задавать ему вопросы, пока внизу горит красная полоса-бегунок — кант в это время размышляет, копаясь в своем выдающемся искусственном интеллекте. Алексей Быков, руководитель цифрового экспоната «Беседа с Кантом»: «Встречаемся с разными сложностями из-за того, что искусственный интеллект работает с библиотеками распознавания речи с открытым кодом.
Положении для Пруссии было настолько серьёзным, что Фридрих Великий в отчаянии даже хотел отречься от престола. По взятии Кёнигсберга, как тогда и полагалось, население города привели к присяге русской императрице. Кант, как житель города, тоже тогда дал присягу и стал на несколько лет подданным Елизаветы Петровны. Русские офицеры и другие образованные люди, с удовольствием ходили в те года на лекции Канта, и брали у него частные уроки. А в 1762 году Иммануил Кант был избран членом Петербургской Академии наук. После его смерти, в 1804 году, философ был захоронен внутри Кафедрального собора, но потом тело эксгумировали и перенесли в специально построенный мавзолей на углу того же самого собора. При эксгумации был измерен его череп и обнаружено, что он был больше, чем у среднестатистического немецкого мужчины того времени, с "высоким и широким" лбом. При жизни многие его современники описывали его лицо, как лицо с большим лбом и "явно выступающим". Вот вкратце такой он был необыкновенный человек, Иммануил Кант. В день его трёхсотлетия, в городе для всех желающих свои двери открыл музей его имени в Кафедральном соборе, расположенном на острове, который тоже носит его имя. Мы, конечно, воспользовались возможностью, и пошли в эти открытые двери... Вот перед вами Кафедральный собор на острове Канта... И вот, собственно, "сам" Кант, ведущий увлечённо научную дискуссию с помощью современного средства связи... Как говорится, глазам не верю!
Emmanuel Kant Duarte
Он был одним из самых значимых мыслителей эпохи Просвещения. Его труды « Критика чистого разума » и « Критика практического разума » затрагивали фундаментальные вопросы бытия, освещали вопросы пространства и времени. Работы Канта вдохновили следующие поколения философов и даже Альберта Эйнштейна. Сам Иммануил Кант был увлеченным своим делом ученым, талантливым преподавателем и эксцентричным, но при этом общительным человеком. О занимательных фактах из его биографии рассказываем в нашем материале. Не любил учебу в гимназии Родители отдали маленького Иммануила в обычную школу на окраине города. Однако друг семьи, немецкий богослов Франц Шульц, отметил способности мальчика и порекомендовал перевести его в престижную гимназию «Фридрихс-Коллегиум». А отучившись здесь, можно было рассчитывать на высокие должности в церкви и государственных учреждениях. Иммануил Кант изучал в гимназии древние языки, Библию, философию, древнегреческую литературу, теологию, логику. Школа отнимала почти все его время, а на протяжении учебного года у него был всего один выходной в неделю — воскресенье. Практически по всем предметам будущий философ имел высокие баллы.
При этом воспоминания о годах в гимназии были не самыми приятными. Уже будучи взрослым, Кант сравнивал свое обучение с рабством, а также критиковал жестокость учителей, от которых доставалось его одноклассникам. Начал писать свою первую работу в 20 лет Один из главных трудов Канта — «Критика чистого разума» — вышел в 1781 году, когда автору было уже 57 лет.
Это стремление — источник всех метафизических систем, их претензий на сверхопытное знание.
Несостоятельность этих стремлений, однако, не означает, что основные идеи метафизики мир как целое; свобода, предшествующая необходимости; субстанциальность души; Бог должны быть отброшены. Эти идеи имманентны разуму, они являются регулятивными принципами познания, осуществляют высший синтез знаний, приобретаемых рассудком. Метафизика — высшая культура разума, без которой немыслимо его существование. Необходимо, однако, создание метафизики как науки, как системы априорных синтетических суждений, которые не претендуют на познание трансцендентного.
Это значит, что идеи метафизики никоим образом не указывают на существование того, что в них мыслится, т. Отсюда его убеждение: «Мне пришлось ограничить [aufheben] знание, чтобы освободить место вере... Речь идёт не об ограничении познания природы или общества, а об ограничении претензий разума на познание метафизической реальности, которая принципиально недоступна познанию. Одним из важнейших разделов трансцендентальной диалектики является учение об антиномиях , т.
Каждая антиномия состоит из тезиса и антитезиса, причём оба эти положения в равной мере доказуемы. Так, тезис одной из антиномий утверждает, что существует «свободная причинность», т. Антитезис, напротив, утверждает, что нет никакой свободы, и всё совершается по законам природы. Антиномии кажутся неразрешимыми противоречиями, однако Кант полагает, что они вполне разрешимы, если учесть, что, кроме чувственно воспринимаемой реальности, существует трансцендентный мир «вещей в себе» и человек представляет собой не только явление природы, но и «вещь в себе».
В таком случае антиномия свободы и необходимости вполне разрешима: человек как «вещь в себе» свободен, но он же подчинён необходимости как явление, природное существо. Все главные проблемы критической философии Канта сводятся к вопросу: «Что такое человек? В центре «Критики практического разума» — понятие чистого нравственного сознания, не признающего никаких иных побудительных мотивов поступков человека, кроме свободного от всяких предпочтений сознания долга. Это означает, что нравственное сознание, в силу своей автономии, свободы, независимо также от религии.
Такое воздаяние, как правило, неосуществимо в земной человеческой жизни. Но поскольку справедливость не знает границ во времени и пространстве, необходимо верить в загробную жизнь людей. Это доказательство, обосновывая разумность и необходимость религиозной веры, не утверждает, однако, что Бог и бессмертие души действительно существуют, ибо трансцендентное абсолютно непознаваемо. Всеобъемлющим нравственным законом является, по Канту, категорический императив безусловное повеление , который гласит: поступай так, чтобы максима т.
Теория практического разума включает в себя и учение о праве, правовом государстве. Право является реализацией свободы члена общества, ограниченной лишь свободой других его членов. Республика, принцип которой составляет разделение властей, — постулат чистого практического разума. Поэтому человек лишь постольку морален, поскольку он признаёт равенство всех других индивидов перед законом, отрицая тем самым любые сословные привилегии.
Философско-исторические воззрения Канта непосредственно связаны с его философией права , т.
Comment ne plus voir ce message? Nous vous conseillons de modifier votre mot de passe. Subscribe to continue reading.
По итогам завершившегося сезона клуб вылетел в третий бельгийский дивизион. По информации источника, Канте лично ездил на базу команды, чтобы оценить инфраструктуру клуба. Бельгийская федерация уже проинформирована о процессе продажи, на данный момент сделка находится в процессе оформления документов.
Клуб представляет бельгийскую провинцию Люксембург и проводит матчи на четырехтысячном стадионе «Иван Жорж».
Я живу в Калининграде. Как мы отпраздновали День рождения Иммануила Канта? С вдохновением...
Иммануил Кант – немецкий философ, основал немецкую классическую философию, жил в эпоху Просвещения и романтизма. [–] Emmanuel__Kant 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago (0 children). I have allways the high cost champion. Hi there, my name is Emmanuel Kant Duarte and welcome to my profile. Connect with me: Image of linkedin logo Image of Earth Planet Image of twitter bird Image of YouTube logo Image of codepen. Впервые президент Франции Эммануэль Макрон принял участие в заседании комитета по поиску решений для легальной досрочной смерти. "Я глубоко убежден – и это отвечает.